Le Sat, Nov 04, 2000 at 09:01:58PM +0100, Andries Brouwer a écrit:
> > after reaching process count something around 30568, processes start
> > getting pid from start, which ever is the first free entry slot in process
> > table. that means we can't have simultaneously more than roughly 2^15
> > p
I've seen the same arguments over and over again here. It seems that there
are two feasible ways to accomplish persistence: totally kernel and
totally user-space
The totally kernel-space people want to make a way for modules to store
persistent data, either in memory, or across boots on disk
> hi,
> why does this program works. when executed, it doesnt
> give a segmentation fault. when the program requests
> memory, is a standard chunk is allocated irrespective
> of the what the user specifies. please explain.
>
> main()
> {
>char *s;
>s = (char*)malloc(0);
>strcpy(s,"
> From: "Dan Kegel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] asked:
> > > [Why does this program not crash?]
> > >
> > > main()
> > > {
> > >char *s;
> > >s = (char*)malloc(0);
> > >strcpy(s,"f");
> > >printf("%s\n",s);
> > > }
> >
> > It doesn't crash because the standard mal
Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2000 23:32:42 -0800
From: Jordan Mendelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Ok, but why doesn't 2.2.16 exhibit this behavior?
We've had reports from quite a number of people complaining about
this and I'm fairly certain not all of them are from Earthlink.
The only thing diff
"David S. Miller" wrote:
>
>Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2000 23:16:21 -0800
>From: Jordan Mendelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>"David S. Miller" wrote:
>> It is clear though, that something is messing with or corrupting the
>> packets. One thing you might try is turning off TCP header
>
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2000 08:16:04 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hmm. One of these weird bandwidth limiters again?
In a more recent mail, TCP header compression in Win98 or Earthlink's
terminal servers have become the current prime suspect. :-)
The RTT is lower than 2.2's i
Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2000 23:16:21 -0800
From: Jordan Mendelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"David S. Miller" wrote:
> It is clear though, that something is messing with or corrupting the
> packets. One thing you might try is turning off TCP header
> compression for the PPP link, does thi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Andrew,
> I got 5250 Req/s with your locks-sem.patch on normal Apache.
> It is good performance on normal Apache.
Great. Thanks again. Trond has this patch now for ongoing
NFS locking stuff. Hopefully 2.4 will now work OK with "legacy"
Apache configurations.
As l
David Feuer writes:
> People keep saying it's OK to start muted on boot, but I must say that I
> don't think this is really acceptable I may very well want to set my
> mixer and just leave it that way forever would there be any way to give
> the sound driver a scribble pad on disk
"David S. Miller" wrote:
>
>Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2000 22:44:00 -0800
>From: Jordan Mendelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>Attached to this message are dumps from the windows 98 machine using
>windump and the linux 2.4.0-test10. Sorry the time stamps don't match
>up.
>
> (ie. Linux se
From: "Dan Kegel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] asked:
> > [Why does this program not crash?]
> >
> > main()
> > {
> >char *s;
> >s = (char*)malloc(0);
> >strcpy(s,"f");
> >printf("%s\n",s);
> > }
>
> It doesn't crash because the standard malloc is
> optimized
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 10:59:04PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
>Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2000 08:03:42 +0100
>From: Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>It looks very like to me like a poster child for the non timestamp
>RTT update problem I just described on netdev. Linux always
>retr
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2000 08:03:42 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
It looks very like to me like a poster child for the non timestamp
RTT update problem I just described on netdev. Linux always
retransmits too early and there is never a better RTT estimate
which could fix
Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2000 22:44:00 -0800
From: Jordan Mendelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Attached to this message are dumps from the windows 98 machine using
windump and the linux 2.4.0-test10. Sorry the time stamps don't match
up.
Ok, something is "odd" at the win98 side, I quote the win
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 10:03:05PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
> The only thing I can do now is beg for a tcpdump from the windows95
> machine side. Do you have the facilities necessary to obtain this?
> This would prove that it is packet drop between the two systems, for
> whatever reason, tha
"David S. Miller" wrote:
>
>Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2000 22:13:23 -0800
>From: Jordan Mendelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>There is a possibility that we are hitting an upper level bandwidth
>limit between us an our upstream provider due to a misconfiguration
>on the other end, but thi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] asked:
> [Why does this program not crash?]
>
> main()
> {
>char *s;
>s = (char*)malloc(0);
>strcpy(s,"f");
>printf("%s\n",s);
> }
It doesn't crash because the standard malloc is
optimized for speed, not for finding bugs.
Try linking it with a debuggi
Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2000 22:13:23 -0800
From: Jordan Mendelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
There is a possibility that we are hitting an upper level bandwidth
limit between us an our upstream provider due to a misconfiguration
on the other end, but this should only happen during peak time
"David S. Miller" wrote:
>
>Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2000 21:20:39 -0800
>From: Jordan Mendelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>It looks to me like there is an artificial delay in 2.4.0 which is
>slowing down the traffic to unbearable levels.
>
> No, I think I see whats wrong, it's nothing mor
Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
By author:Antony Suter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> This issue, and all related issues, need to be taken care of for all
> speed changing CPUs from Intel, AMD and Transmeta. Is the answer of
> "howto write userland programs correctly
Andries Brouwer wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 12:43:43AM -0800, Miles Lane wrote:
>
>
>> I have an ORB drive I am accessing using the usb-storage driver.
>> I formatted the drive media last night using Windoze 98. The media
>> was formatted as though it had one large partition, which is wei
Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2000 21:20:39 -0800
From: Jordan Mendelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
It looks to me like there is an artificial delay in 2.4.0 which is
slowing down the traffic to unbearable levels.
No, I think I see whats wrong, it's nothing more than packet drop.
The large gaps in ti
Date:Mon, 6 Nov 2000 21:23:57 -0800 (PST)
From: dean gaudet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
apache is about correctness first, and performance second.
Which is why we say it is "incorrect" for apache to try
and work around kernel performance problems. :-)))
Later,
David S. Miller
[EMAIL
On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> This is why I'd love to _not_ see silly work-arounds in apache
hey, maybe it's time for me to repeat something that i'm often quoted as
saying:
apache is about correctness first, and performance second.
i don't think that's silly personally. remem
"David S. Miller" wrote:
>
>Date:Mon, 06 Nov 2000 18:17:19 -0800
>From: Jordan Mendelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>18:54:57.394894 eth0 > 64.124.41.177. > 209.179.248.69.1238: .
>2429:2429(0) ack 506 win 6432 (DF)
>
> And this is it? The connection dies right here and
Anton Blanchard wrote:
>
> > > fast_gettimeoffset_quotient, see do_fast_gettimeoffset().
> >
> > Also remember that the TSC may not be available due to the chip era, chip
> > bugs or running SMP with non matched CPU clocks.
>
> When I boot my thinkpad 600e off battery and then change to AC power
On Tue, 07 Nov 2000 15:00:11 +1100,
Keith Owens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>insmod takes parameters from modules.conf, from the saved persistent
>data (see below) and from the command line, in that order. The last
>value for a parameter takes precedence.
Correction: modprobe takes parameters fr
On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, George Talbot wrote:
> I respectfully disagree that programs which don't surround some of the
> most common system calls with
>
> do
> {
> rv = __some_system_call__(...);
> } while (rv == -1 && errno == EINTR);
welcome to Unix. this is how it
On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 12:43:43AM -0800, Miles Lane wrote:
> I have an ORB drive I am accessing using the usb-storage driver.
> I formatted the drive media last night using Windoze 98. The media
> was formatted as though it had one large partition, which is weird
> because I had previously part
So far I have hit 25 minutes of uptime, another few hours to go.
I noticed a few errors in dmesg, though:
VFS: Disk change detected on device ide0(3,64)
And while the system is running I thought I might as well run iozone (an
IO benchmarking tool good for hard drives).
Additionally, I have gott
Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2000 19:44:57 -0800
From: Jordan Mendelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Just some updates. This problem does not appear to happen under
2.2.16. The dump for 2.2.16 is almost the same except we send an
mss back of 536 and not 1460 (remote mtu vs local mtu).
MSS advertiz
Date:Mon, 06 Nov 2000 18:17:19 -0800
From: Jordan Mendelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
18:54:57.394894 eth0 > 64.124.41.177. > 209.179.248.69.1238: .
2429:2429(0) ack 506 win 6432 (DF)
And this is it? The connection dies right here and says no
more? Surely, there was more sai
Joe Harrington wrote:
>
> Sorry about the question to do with visuall gcc. Alot of people seemed to
> get a intolerable response to my question. The reason I posted it here was
> a) I am lazy, b) On all the sites to do with Kdevelop the download links are
> down, and c) I wanted to use the progra
People keep saying it's OK to start muted on boot, but I must say that I
don't think this is really acceptable I may very well want to set my
mixer and just leave it that way forever would there be any way to give
the sound driver a scribble pad on disk to let it sa
--
This message has
On Sat, 4 Nov 2000, Frank Davis hissed:
> I noticed that Pentium 4 isn't an config option in 2.4.0-test10. Is
> someone working on a patch for the the kernel (if needed) to support the
> Pentium 4 after 2.4.0 is released?
from what i have read of the Pentium IV, the linux kernel will not need
a
Enough people have asked for persistent module storage to at least
justify me writing the code. The design is simple.
MODULE_PARM(var,type) currently defines type as [min[-max]]{b,h,i,l,s}.
For persistent data support, type is now [min[-max]]{b,h,i,l,s}{p}, the
trailing 'p' for persistent is opt
hi,
why does this program works. when executed, it doesnt
give a segmentation fault. when the program requests
memory, is a standard chunk is allocated irrespective
of the what the user specifies. please explain.
main()
{
char *s;
s = (char*)malloc(0);
strcpy(s,"f");
printf("%s\n
Sorry about the question to do with visuall gcc. Alot of people seemed to
get a intolerable response to my question. The reason I posted it here was
a) I am lazy, b) On all the sites to do with Kdevelop the download links are
down, and c) I wanted to use the program to compile such files as schedu
From: Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date:Tue, 07 Nov 2000 03:38:35 +0100
Because this will add a Fallback (non ECN) packet to every denied
target. I think this is bad policy at least. It might violate the
RFCs, too. Keep in mind, we cannot recognice a rejection due to
Jordan Mendelson wrote:
>
> We are seeing a performance slowdown between Windows PPP users and
> servers running 2.4.0-test10. Attached is a tcpdump log of the
> connection. The machines is without TCP ECN support. The Windows machine
> is running Windows 98 SE 4.10. A dialed up over PPP w/ T
Not to worry, some of us are working with the 'I' guys to do proper P4
detection.
Cheers,
On Sat, 4 Nov 2000, Frank Davis wrote:
> Hello,
> I noticed that Pentium 4 isn't an config option in 2.4.0-test10. Is
> someone working on a patch for the the kernel (if needed) to support the
> Pentium
On Tue, 7 Nov 2000 01:20:36 +0100 (CET),
Tomasz Motylewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>2.2.18pre19:
>And , whose idea was that "make modules_install" should create
>/lib/modules//build symlink to the kernel sources?
>It really breakes depmod -a (modutils 2.3.11)(*)
>
>(*) I could find a worka
UPDATE:
Now I have upgraded to 2.2.18pre19 + ide-2.2.18pre18 + raid-2.2.18-A2 +
patched eepro100.
Unfortunately, I still get:
hde: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error }
hde: dma_intr: error=0x10 { SectorIdNotFound }, LBAsect=15347359,
sector=15347328
hde: dma_intr: status=0x51
On Mon, 6 Nov 2000 23:03:44 +0100,
Frank van Maarseveen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>First a firewall is installed (ppp0). Starting the network (eth0/lo only. ppp0 is
>nonexistent at this point) gives the following Oops:
>Nov 6 22:20:25 iapetus kernel: EIP:
>0010:[ipt_REJECT:__insmod_ipt_REJE
Hello,
I noticed that Pentium 4 isn't an config option in 2.4.0-test10. Is
someone working on a patch for the the kernel (if needed) to support the
Pentium 4 after 2.4.0 is released?
Regards,
Frank
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a messag
Andrew,
I got 5250 Req/s with your locks-sem.patch on normal Apache.
It is good performance on normal Apache.
Andrew Morton writes:
> Kouichi, could you please test the performance of this on
> your 8-way with Apache+fcntl serialisation? (the normal
> Apache). Please use 2.4.0-test10-pre5, no
On Mon, 6 Nov 2000 16:31:23 -0500 (EST),
"Richard B. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>However when running, the new kernel 2.4.0-test9, can't be used to
>make a usable initrd ram disk. The result being that 2.4.0-test9
>can't, itself, build an "initrd" bootable system.
>
>Before everybody scr
On Mon, 6 Nov 2000 16:24:13 -0300,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Is it possible to access symbols exported by modules from inside the kernel ?
Not via symbol name, the linkage goes module => kernel, not the other
way round. Your module needs to register its data when it loads, then
any code can use
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> > No, that code is correct, provided (current->state == TASK_RUNNING)
> > on entry. If it isn't, there's a race window which can cause
> > lost wakeups. As a check you could add:
> >
> > if ((current->state & (TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE|TASK_UNINTERRUPTIB
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> I'm still not sure why it's been decided not to do fallback or how this
> whole situation is any different from path MTU discovery.
Because this will add a Fallback (non ECN) packet to every denied target. I
think this is bad policy at least. It might v
"James A. Sutherland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
[...]
> That only happens if the driver is stupid enough to try guessing "correct"
> volume settings.
It did not touch anything: By a fluke, or by default, the sound output was
going full blast, and the mike input was patched over to it ==> feedba
We are seeing a performance slowdown between Windows PPP users and
servers running 2.4.0-test10. Attached is a tcpdump log of the
connection. The machines is without TCP ECN support. The Windows machine
is running Windows 98 SE 4.10. A dialed up over PPP w/ TCP header
compression. The Linux m
On Mon, 6 Nov 2000 23:00:05 + (GMT),
Paul Jakma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, Alan Cox wrote:
>> Its called modules.conf. It has all these nice preload directives in it
>
>cool..
>
>doesn't seem to be documented though in modutils 2.3.17. what exactly
>does it do?
man modul
On 06 Nov 2000 11:09:41 -0700,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric W. Biederman) wrote:
>Well we don't have auto unload.
Check crontab, if it contains rmmod -a then you have auto unload.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Martin Mares <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
[...]
> I think that automatic loading / unloading of modules has been a terrible hack
> since its first days (although back in these times a useful one) and that the
> era of its usefulness is over. There are zillions of problems with this
> mechanism, the
Oliver Xymoron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> say:
[...]
> Ioctl (or alternate device for plan9 groupies) is fine. My point is final
> initialization of the device is obviously delayed until the firmware is
> loaded.
Let's play perverse: What if I load the module, but don't initialize the
firmware, then u
David Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
[...]
> No. You should initialise the hardware completely when the driver is
> reloaded. Although the expected case is that the levels just happen to be
> the same as the last time the module was loaded, you can't know that the
> machine hasn't been s
David Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > No funny "persistent data" mechanisms or screwups when the worker
> > gets removed and reinserted. In many cases the data module could be
> > shared among several others, in other cases it would have to be able
> > lo load se
"James A. Sutherland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Mon, 06 Nov 2000, Horst von Brand wrote:
[...]
> > The problem (AFAIU) is that if the levels aren't set on startup, they are
> > random in some cases.
> So set them on startup. NOT when the driver is first loaded. Put it in
> the rc.d scripts
> Then none of this is relevant to you, since you can't unload any modules! And
> now you're the one doing the trolling... WTF do you think module code is
> supposed to do when you don't use modules?!
>
Simple ... I'd rather the hardware was set to 0 on startup but I know what
problems that pres
Now that we've taken to heart the "one lock does not fit all" and we
made the kernel increasingly fine-grained with regards to locking,
there are many more locks appearing in the code. While Linux does not
currently support hierarchical locks, it is still true that the order
in which you acquire m
On Tue, 07 Nov 2000, Gerhard Mack wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, James A. Sutherland wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 06 Nov 2000, Gerhard Mack wrote:
> > > Sure .. lets see you start a laptop in class or buisness meeting and have
> > > everyone turn to look at you wondering why your laptop let off an ear
> >
On Tue, 07 Nov 2000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > changing settings. If I plug in a hotplug soundcard and load the driver, I do
> > NOT want the driver to decide to set some settings. If I want settings set,
> > I'll do it myself (or have a script to do it).
>
> How about if your stuff is already nicely s
On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, James A. Sutherland wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Nov 2000, Gerhard Mack wrote:
> > Sure .. lets see you start a laptop in class or buisness meeting and have
> > everyone turn to look at you wondering why your laptop let off an ear
> > piercing shreak because the hardware defaults to al
David Hinds wrote:
> Incidentally, the i82365 module should work ok (using ISA interrupts)
> despite the "No IRQ known" messages. The Yenta driver won't work at
> all if PCI interrupts aren't set up. So I guess another question
> would be, what card(s) are you using and how are they misbehaving
FACT!
The average male reaches climax in 9-12 minutes!
FACT!
The average female reaches climax in 20-29
minutes!
CLOSE THE
GAP! Order the number one selling delay spray
worldwide! Click here to learn more!
"THIS MESSAGE IS BEING SENT IN COMPLIANCE OF THE EMAIL BILL: SECTION
On Mon, 06 Nov 2000, Gerhard Mack wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, James A. Sutherland wrote:
>
> > Except this isn't possible with the hardware in question! If it were, there
> > would be no problem. In cases where the hardware doesn't support the
> > functionality userspace "needs", why put the klu
Incidentally, the i82365 module should work ok (using ISA interrupts)
despite the "No IRQ known" messages. The Yenta driver won't work at
all if PCI interrupts aren't set up. So I guess another question
would be, what card(s) are you using and how are they misbehaving?
-- Dave
-
To unsubscribe
> changing settings. If I plug in a hotplug soundcard and load the driver, I do
> NOT want the driver to decide to set some settings. If I want settings set,
> I'll do it myself (or have a script to do it).
How about if your stuff is already nicely set up and you remove then replug
a device, or r
Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
By author:Igmar Palsenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> I'm missing ptmx. You NEED a writable /dev/pts dir.
>
Actually, what you need is the devpts filesystem mounted onto
/dev/pts.
-hpa
--
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at work, <[
On Mon, 06 Nov 2000, Evan Jeffrey wrote:
> > On Mon, 06 Nov 2000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > >
> > > No. You have to reset the hardware fully each time you load the module.
> > > Although you _expect_ it to be in the state in which you left it, you can't
> >
> > > be sure of that.
> >
> > If
Attached patches add VCD support in isofs.
Against 2.2.16 and 2.4.0-test10.
diff -ur isofs.orig/file.c isofs/file.c
--- isofs.orig/file.c Mon Mar 8 07:25:23 1999
+++ isofs/file.cTue Nov 7 08:07:57 2000
@@ -54,3 +54,24 @@
NULL, /* truncate */
N
On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, Tomasz Motylewski wrote:
> 2.2.18pre19:
> ide-probe.c:400: `rtc_lock' undeclared (first use this function)
> ide-probe.c:400: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> ide-probe.c:400: for each function it appears in.)
See the attached patch. Just declares it as an
Hi,
I'm running 2.4.0-test10 on my desktop machine. The system works
perfectly well, but I get some strange PCI messages at boot time. Here
is part it:
PCI: PCI BIOS revision 2.10 entry at 0xf0560, last bus=1
PCI: Using configuration type 1
PCI: Probing PCI hardware
Unknown bridge resour
David Hinds wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 04:45:52PM -0700, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
> >
> > On a related topic, I've pulled down your stuff at sourceforge and we
> > are using it for our 2.4 build. Is this the baest place or do you have
> > somewhere more recent and is this the list to repo
David Hinds wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 03:19:41PM -0800, David Ford wrote:
> >
> > Undoubtedly :( But it used to work when I used your i82365 module instead of
> > the kernel's yenta module. The i82365 module now gives the same failure
> > output as the yenta module.
>
> How long ago was
2.2.18pre19:
/usr/bin/gcc272 -D__KERNEL__ -I/home/22/linux/include -Wall
-Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -D__SMP__ -pipe
-fno-strength-reduce -m486 -malign-loops=2 -malign-jumps=2
-malign-functions=2 -DCPU=586 -c -o fork.o fork.c
ide-probe.c: In function `probe_cmos_for_drives':
On Mon, 06 Nov 2000, Dan Hollis wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, James A. Sutherland wrote:
> > So autoload the module with a "dont_screw_with_mixer" option. When the kernel
> > first boots, initialise the mixer to suitable settings (load the module with
> > "do_screw_with_mixer" or whatever); therea
Paul Gortmaker wrote:
>
> >
> > Well, I have tried it with 2.4.0-test10, both SMP and non-SMP, and the
> > result is a little confusing.
> >
> > Under SMP a ping -s 5 -f other_host takes down the network access
> > with no messages (ne2k-pci), and no possibility of being restored
> > without
Any hints on what caused this one?
Nov 6 18:28:53 phlegmish kernel: Unable to handle kernel paging request at
virt
ual address 9cca
Nov 6 18:28:53 phlegmish kernel: c012cdd6
Nov 6 18:28:53 phlegmish kernel: *pde =
Nov 6 18:28:53 phlegmish kernel: Oops:
Nov 6 18:28:53 phleg
[s/rutgers.edu/kernel.org/]
On Tue, 7 Nov 2000 09:19:12 +1100 (EST), Neil Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Monday November 6, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> If multiple interrupts are hitting a single code path (like IDE irqs 14
>> -and- 15), you definitely have to think about that. The reent
The address_space::writepage callback is called from try_to_swap_out()
path, and also from the filemap_sync_pte() path. There appears to be no
way to tell the difference between the two callers. This is not good
because the semantics are very different: "sync this page" versus "page
is going aw
Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> > While Jeff and I basically agree on the short-term
> > solution (if one is still needed, altho I'm not aware of
> > any init order problems in USB in 2.4.0-test10), my
> > recollection of Linus's preference (without
> > looking it up) is to remove the calls from init/main.c
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 04:45:52PM -0700, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
>
> On a related topic, I've pulled down your stuff at sourceforge and we
> are using it for our 2.4 build. Is this the baest place or do you have
> somewhere more recent and is this the list to report bugs? We have seen
> some pro
David [Hinds],
On a related topic, I've pulled down your stuff at sourceforge and we
are using it for our 2.4 build. Is this the baest place or do you have
somewhere more recent and is this the list to report bugs? We have seen
some problems with IBM thinkpads with DSP devices having some issu
On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, Paul Powell wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have created a trimmed down /dev directory to be
> used with my custom bootable Linux CD. I've run into
> a problem where I can't start an xterm. I get the
> error...
>
> xterm: no available ptys
>
> I'm not sure which device I'm missing
From: "Leen Besselink" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, Jeff Dike wrote:
>
> > After a stranger than usual late-night #kernelnewbies session on Thursday, I
> > was inspired to come up with Kernel Hangman. This is the traditional game
of
> > hangman, except that the words you have to gue
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 03:19:41PM -0800, David Ford wrote:
>
> Undoubtedly :( But it used to work when I used your i82365 module instead of
> the kernel's yenta module. The i82365 module now gives the same failure
> output as the yenta module.
How long ago was this? I would need to know what
I can't get raid-2.2.18-A2 to apply cleanly on 2.2.18pre19. Does
anyone know of a newer raid-2.2.18preX patch? (pre18 or pre19 would
be great).
Here's the output I get...
[root@server linux]# patch -p1 < raid-2.2.18-A2
patching file init/main.c
Hunk #4 succeeded at 1631 (offset 4 lines).
patch
On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, James A. Sutherland wrote:
> Except this isn't possible with the hardware in question! If it were, there
> would be no problem. In cases where the hardware doesn't support the
> functionality userspace "needs", why put the kludge in the kernel?
>
> If userspace wants to know
The UID/GID mapper should be sepatate from the regex rewriting rules.
Both should be separate from NFS, because they have little to do with NFS.
These are useful generic VFS features. It would be perfectly reasonable
to use these features on a Zip disk with UFS (from MacOS X maybe).
Another examp
hi,
As you've suggested, you'd be better off not using the load
average but rather some other measure (or combination of
measures) to figure out when you have enough spare cycles or
bandwidth.
The "pmie" tool might be useful to you - here's a contrived
example I just knocked up (instead of a "pr
(cc: lkml)
David Hinds wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 01:10:24AM -0800, David Ford wrote:
> > :(
> >
> > Ok. Here's the story. 2.3/2.4 kernel pcmcia gave up the ghost on my
> > socket controller several versions back. It is unable to assign an irq.
>
> PCMCIA in 2.4 (whether you build the mo
On Sun, Nov 05, 2000 at 06:01:29PM -0700, Tim Riker wrote:
> In short the impact of adding code to gcc that is not copyright FSF is
> minimal. Only the FSF copyrighted code would be defensible by the FSF. Any
> other code GPL violations would be the responsibility of the copyright
> owners to defe
On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, Alan Cox wrote:
> Its called modules.conf. It has all these nice preload directives in it
cool..
doesn't seem to be documented though in modutils 2.3.17. what exactly
does it do?
regards,
--
Paul Jakma [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP5 key: http://www.clubi.ie/jakma/publickey.txt
Hello everybody,
I am fairly new to the kernel programming, in fact it's my first attemt
at it. As an exercise I was trying to back-port cramfs code to the 2.2.x
kernel, and I seem to have succeeded! The only thing still not working
are symlinks. There are 2 routines in the code, cramfs_readlink(
This sounds to me like the most flexible way to do it. If the module accepts
parameters then those who want the sound card initialized at every load can put
the desired settings in modules.conf. The rest of us can just initialize it
once at boot time and the rest of the time the settings will
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> > No, that code is correct, provided (current->state == TASK_RUNNING)
> > on entry. If it isn't, there's a race window which can cause
> > lost wakeups. As a check you could add:
> >
> > if ((current->state & (TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE|TASK_UNINTERRUPTIB
What's up with CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM_SIZE? It is
set in .config by "make config", but it not
used by the kernel.
I checked the cvs tree and see that it was used
for in a single rev of the file. Looks to me
like this change may have been lost by accident.
Can anyone confirm or deny? Is someone
1 - 100 of 267 matches
Mail list logo