Hi,
After performing various tests I came to the following workaround for
APIC lockups which people observe under IRQ load, mostly for networking
stuff. I believe the test should work in all cases as it basically
implements a manual replacement for EOI messages. In my simulated
environment I
I have some further info here.
I performed strace on ifup -a and ifdown -a.
They aren't more than 4Kb each, but I'll cut and paste what appear to be
most relevant:
ifup.strace:
fork() = 17974
wait4(17974, [WIFEXITED(s) && WEXITSTATUS(s) == 0], 0, NULL) = 17974
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001 07:06:44 -0600 (CST), Jeff Garzik
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12 Feb 2001, Jes Sorensen wrote:
>> In fact one has to look out for this and disable the feature in some
>> cases. On the acenic not disabling Memory Write and Invalidate costs
>> ~20% on performance on some
This is basically just a resync point for the ISDN maintainers, but if
anyone wants to run it go ahead 8)
2.2.19pre11
o Corrected version of ipc/shm.c fix (Christoph Rohland)
o Update/cleanup starfire (Ion Badulescu)
o Update isdn makefiles
BTW, same result on sparc32 smp+X. xfs segfaults, so does X itself. It
doesn't even get to trying to start. I didn't even think of trying to
go back to a UP kernel. I'll have to try that now.
Aaron
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Rogerio Brito wrote:
> On Feb 13 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Yeah I've
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (James Antill) writes:
>"Henning P. Schmiedehausen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> % telnet mail.bar.org smtp
>> 220 mail.foo.org ESMTP ready
>>
>>
>> This kills loop detection. Yes, it is done this way =%-) and it breaks
>> if done wrong.
> This is humour,
On Feb 13 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> Yeah I've seen this claim repeatedly. XFree 4.0.2 crashes for me in similar
> ways on 3dfx and matrox cards and it happens with 2.2 kernels as well.
I thought that I was going crazy or that it was just my
inability to configure things correctly,
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Jaswinder Singh wrote:
> Dear Mike and others ,
>
> I am using compressed ramdisk , i can not turn off cramfs .
(ok.. really is compressed)
> my error messages are very strange and irreregular .
>
> i am getting 3 different kind of error messages :-
>
> invalid
Manfred Spraul wrote:
> "N. Jason Kleinbub" wrote:
>> People,
>>
>> Not sure where to go from here but
>>
>> ( Yes I have read the FAQ )=
>>
>> For practical reasons, I have created some modification to the
>> Linux kernel. These changes were to make our implementation
Hello,
Can someone please give me some initial info or pointer regarding
kiobuff, what is it all about and its purpose etc..
regards
sourav
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
Hi all,
Yesterday I see a request for help from the cups printing system
mentainer:
http://linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2001-02-12-009-04-OS-CY-HW
Basicly it ask you to read the options from the PJL enabled printer you
may have by running this small shell script:
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Andrew Morton wrote:
Thanks Andrew, I appreciate your note. I'll try it again with 509 as a module.
I had forgotten about linkage order problems.
> al goldstein wrote:
> >
> > I have 2 ether cards 59x (eth0) and 509 (eth1). I have been adding 509
> > at boot in lilo.conf.
There seems to be a heisenbug embedded in the 2.4 loopback driver. The
symptom is that at some point a kernel call just fails to return. I've
tried to reduce this to the simplest possible example and came up with the
following trace for a generic 2.4.1 kernel.
[root@crush jl]# ls -l bigrandom
Dear Mike and others ,
Sometimes i also get :-
incomplete literal tree
OR
incomplete distance tree
along with
invalid compressed format (err=1)
OR
invalid compressed format (err=2)
OR
crc error
And it is very strange because for the same ramdisk , linux2.4.1 shows me
all the error messages .
Dear Mike and others ,
I am using compressed ramdisk , i can not turn off cramfs .
my error messages are very strange and irreregular .
i am getting 3 different kind of error messages :-
invalid compressed format (err=1)
OR
invalid compressed format (err=2)
OR
crc error
I am using gzip 1.2.4
Manfred Spraul wrote:
> Martin Rode wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Run this oops message through ksymoops please. It will make debugging
> > > it alot easier.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Since I did not compile the kernel myself, ksymoops is not too happy with
> > what is has to analyse the dump. I
On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 06:22:26PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
> > LDT allocated for cloned task!
> >
> > I'm seeing this message come up fairly often while running vanilla
> > 2.4.2-pre3 on my dual Celeron system. I don't think I saw it before
> > while running 2.4.1, but I may have just missed
Re-ran ksymoops:
; Martin
kernel BUG at sched.c:714!
invalid operand:
CPU: 0
EIP: 0010:[]
Using defaults from ksymoops -t elf32-i386 -a i386
EFLAGS: 00010282
eax: 001b ebx ecx df4f6000 edx 0001
esi: 001cffe3 edi db5eede0 ebp dc0e9f40 esp dc0e9ef0
stack: c01f26f3 c01f2856
> My system:
> Pentium-II, 350 MHz, 64MB
> Adaptec AHA-2940A (-> aic7xxx.o)
> kernel: 2.4.0
> patch: SGI-debugger (kdb-v1.7-2.4.0)
>
> Some more details:
> My jukebox consists of a picker device (sg.o) and some MO-drives (sd_mod.o)
> The sg.o attaches to all these devices, while sd attaches to
Hello, Keith!
I also noticed this error when I upgraded from ac9 to ac11.
My understanding is that if "make depend" is run on the sources that have
already been compiled, then names.o depends on devlist.h (with full path)
is ".depend".
If I run "make clean" first, then everything is fine. But
Alan Cox writes:
> cd linux
> patch -p1 <../patchfile
patch -p1 -i ../patchfile means that patch won't read the whole patchfile
into a temporary file first, which it will do if patch reads from stdin.
--
Russell King ([EMAIL PROTECTED])The developer of ARM Linux
> The attached patch makes tmpfs behave more like other fs's. Apparently
> perl expects this.
A few apps assume this. All of them are buggy. I'll apply the patch.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More
> LDT allocated for cloned task!
>
> I'm seeing this message come up fairly often while running vanilla
> 2.4.2-pre3 on my dual Celeron system. I don't think I saw it before
> while running 2.4.1, but I may have just missed it.
Are you running wine or dosemu ?
-
To unsubscribe from this list:
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Timur Tabi wrote:
>> Which is retarded. The subject line is for the subject. Other
>> headers exist for letting one know where they came from.
>
>There's only one problem with this. It assumes that for every
>mailing list you are on, you will have a folder into which all
On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 10:59:57AM +0100, Krzysztof Rusocki wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Here's what i've found today in logs:
>
> Feb 13 02:10:41 main kernel: __alloc_pages: 1-order allocation failed.
> Feb 13 02:10:42 main last message repeated 143 times
> Feb 13 02:10:47 main kernel: ed.
> Feb 13
To address the concerns of Andi Kleen, with a good suggestion from Richard
Johnson, I have revised my previous patch attempt. Please check this out
and comment.
Changelog:
1) use get_gendisk() instead of walking array manually
2) pass in struct instead of guessing..
+ struct {
+
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, David D.W. Downey wrote:
> I can see that the error codes are actually the values of ESR both before
> and after the apic_write() call. I see that the codes are the modulus'd
> value before and after the apic_write call. What I'm not understanding is
> how to translate that
LDT allocated for cloned task!
I'm seeing this message come up fairly often while running vanilla
2.4.2-pre3 on my dual Celeron system. I don't think I saw it before
while running 2.4.1, but I may have just missed it.
My system has been up around two days and has 11 of these messages in the
Hi Alan,
The attached patch makes tmpfs behave more like other fs's. Apparently
perl expects this.
Greetings
Christoph
diff -uNr 2.4.1-ac10/mm/shmem.c 2.4.1-ac10-nlink/mm/shmem.c
--- 2.4.1-ac10/mm/shmem.c Mon Feb 12 15:01:47 2001
+++ 2.4.1-ac10-nlink/mm/shmem.c Tue Feb 13
On Sat, 10 Feb 2001, Pavel Machek wrote:
>
> > Junichi Morita and I have worked out how to access the crusoe
> > "longrun" settings on the crusoe based VAIO. This allows you to enable
> > power saving mode and slow the cpu down. It should help battery life a
> > lot.
>
> There is no
Does it make sense to try and keep up with the latest and greatest in
chipsets
when there is a hardware independent way of doing things? You may be able
to
get information on current chipsets, but every time something changes, the
kernel may be broken for a time. If we rely on the BIOS, the
** Reply to message from "Mike A. Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on
Tue, 13 Feb 2001 03:53:13 -0500 (EST)
> >I disagree, and while I may be in the minority on this list, I am certainly
> >not in the minority across the board, given that virtually every mailing list
> >I am subscribed to DOES
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Tim Wright wrote:
> I believe that, in general, we want working fixup routines so the we don't
> have to rely on the BIOS. That said, it's apparent that the ServerWorks
> routines are broken. Fixing them is going to be troublesome, given ServerWorks
> attitude towards
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/alan/2.4/
2.4.1-ac11
o Hack the setup code to do the right thing for (me)
Cyrix processors. Cpuid on cyrix should now work
o Change sigmatel codec inits (Jeff Garzik)
o Revised TLB shootdown
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Tigran Aivazian wrote:
> Hi Alan,
>
> The only case in schedule_timeout() which does not call schedule() does
> set tsk->state = TASK_RUNNING explicitly before returning. Therefore, any
> code which unconditionally calls schedule_timeout() (and, of course
> schedule()) does
I had problems with XFree86 4.0 and 4.0.1 locking solidly up under Linux 2.4.x
after about 10mins until I upgraded to XFree86 4.0.2. Now it seems rock solid.
XFree86 3.3.x was always okay.
I've got a Dual-PII machine and an NVidia GeForce.
David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
I believe that, in general, we want working fixup routines so the we don't
have to rely on the BIOS. That said, it's apparent that the ServerWorks
routines are broken. Fixing them is going to be troublesome, given ServerWorks
attitude towards releasing specs. It's on my list of things to try to
>> I have RTFM but on the matter of enabling DRI for the
>> ATI Mobility video chipset, which on that notebook is
>> a PCI model, there is practically nil information. The
>> DRI website mentions using PCI GART, but there is no
>> option for that in the kernel. How do I enable this?
>
>You need
> From: Elmer Joandi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Dunlap, Randy wrote:
>
> > If USB mice had serial numbers (like some USB storage devices
> > do), then we could tell that it's the same mouse on the
> > same connector and not change from mouse0 to mouse1.
> > Currently
Hi Alan,
The only case in schedule_timeout() which does not call schedule() does
set tsk->state = TASK_RUNNING explicitly before returning. Therefore, any
code which unconditionally calls schedule_timeout() (and, of course
schedule()) does not need to set TASK_RUNNING afterwards.
I have seen
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Dunlap, Randy wrote:
>
> If USB mice had serial numbers (like some USB storage devices
> do), then we could tell that it's the same mouse on the
> same connector and not change from mouse0 to mouse1.
> Currently it looks like a new device attachment.
>
> One possible
> From: Elmer Joandi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> I dont know, if it is bug or feature, but,
>
> USB mouse jumps around (between) /dev/input/mouse0 and mouse1
> when taken out and put back in(to same connector), 2.4.0 kernel.
>
> Annoys, should not be the default behaviour, IMHO.
If USB
Dear mailing-list,
Currently I'm working on a device-virtualizing robotic driver for HP jukeboxes
(magneto-optical media) an a WORM filesystem for linux.
Both work really nice now, but it seems there are some weak spots in the SCSI
subsystem which I cannot work around.
The worst situation I
On Mon, Feb 12, Olaf Hering wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 12, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
> > Olaf Hering wrote:
> > >
> > > The autofs4.o is the culprit, it works perfect with autofs.o.
> > >
> > > What would happen if I stick with autofs.o now?
> > > The docu recommends autofs4 in modules.conf.
> > >
>
Martin Rode wrote:
>
> >
> > Run this oops message through ksymoops please. It will make debugging
> > it alot easier.
> >
> >
>
> Since I did not compile the kernel myself, ksymoops is not too happy with
> what is has to analyse the dump. I tried compile the Mandrake kernel myself
> but there
i have been running 4.0.2 on my smp system using the 2.4.1 kernel. the
one thing is, i was using the xfree out of precision insite's cvs with
the g400 binary-only hal lib dri module loaded. every-so-often,
especially when closing windows or switching virtual desktops, the
kernel would crash.
from linux (/usr/src/linux) directory, if the patch is
up a level (/usr/src):
patch -p1 <../patch-2.4.1-ac9
hth,
bradley mclain
ps -- probably a google search with the string 'how to
install ac patches' will find some instructions for
you.
--- Thomas Foerster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
> |+++ linux.ac/CREDITS Fri Feb 9 13:19:13 2001
> --
> File to patch:
> [root@space src]#
>
> Do i have to create linux.vanilla and linux.ac, or what's the magic?! :-)
Calling it linux.ac is one answer. Another one is
cd linux
patch -p1 <../patchfile
-
To
>
> Run this oops message through ksymoops please. It will make debugging
> it alot easier.
>
>
Since I did not compile the kernel myself, ksymoops is not too happy with
what is has to analyse the dump. I tried compile the Mandrake kernel myself
but there seems to be something
On 13-Feb-2001 David Woodhouse wrote:
> The crashes got less frequent when I started running X against
> glibc-2.1
> (note _running_ against glibc-2.1, not just compiling against it
> and running
> against glibc-2.2). But they were still happening.
I'm running RH6.2 with glibc-2.1.3-22
>
>
Alan's patches are installed like this:
# cd /usr/src
# tar xIf linux-2.4.1.tar.bz2
# cd linux
# patch -sp1 < ../patch-2.4.1-ac6
# chown -R root:root .
Note the "-sp1" and that you need to be _inside_ the tree. Also, you don't
need to waste another process ("cat") and create a pipe, just use
Em Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 04:03:02PM +0100, Thomas Foerster escreveu:
> Hi folks,
>
> sorry for the silly question, but i can't get it to work :
>
> I have linux-2.4.1 unpacked, configured and installed.
> Now i want to apply Alan Cox patche (linux-2.4.1-ac9), but i always get
> these errors :
>
Hi folks,
sorry for the silly question, but i can't get it to work :
I have linux-2.4.1 unpacked, configured and installed.
Now i want to apply Alan Cox patche (linux-2.4.1-ac9), but i always get
these errors :
[root@space src]# cat /home/puck/patch-2.4.1-ac9 | patch -p0
can't find file to
Hi all,
I have a machine with kernel 2.4.1 . It exports some volume via NFS
(installed with RedHat 7.0 + custom 2.4.1 kernel)
NFSD dies unexpectedly with a Oops (see below).
At the beginning, I have 8 NFSD processes, but suddenly, they all die. I
can't see why it happens, because the machine is
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Michèl Alexandre Salim wrote:
>This might not be the proper place to ask - my
>apologies - but since it pertains to the Sony
>Picturebook (C1VE - Crusoe) that people have been
>discussing on this list anyway, I hope people don't
>mind too much :)
>
>I have RTFM but on the
"N. Jason Kleinbub" wrote:
>
> People,
>
> Not sure where to go from here but
>
> ( Yes I have read the FAQ )
>
> For practical reasons, I have created some modification to the
> Linux kernel. These changes were to make our implementation of
> software more convenient (elegant).
On Tue Feb 13, 2001 at 12:20:14 +0100, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 12:38:15AM +0100, Adam Lackorzynski wrote:
> > On Mon Feb 12, 2001 at 14:04:20 +0100, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> > > I've got a "Bull Express5800/Series" (dual P3) with a DAC1164 RAID
> > > controller. The
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>
>This is a long-standing problem with 2.3 and 2.4 SMP kernels. I
> believe it is a kernel bug and isn't the XFree86 project's problem.
> The problem does not exist on 2.2 SMP kernels nor on 2.3/4 UP kernels.
> The symptoms are random segfaults in perfectly fine
Alan Cox wrote:
> Yeah I've seen this claim repeatedly. XFree 4.0.2 crashes for me in
similar
> ways on 3dfx and matrox cards and it happens with 2.2 kernels as well. What
> makes me suspicious its XFree triggered is that there isnt really anything
> XFree does that would trigger mm bugs on x86
ext2_find_entry is quite expensive for directories with lots of entries
- what about caching the block and offset in the dcache?
Each dentry contains 2 values reserved for the filesystem:
dentry->d_fsdata
dentry->d_time
ext2 doesn't use them - yet.
I've written a small patch that caches the
Hi Andre,
hi lkml,
I need to add support for a maximum transfer mode selection on
drives and channels.
Reason: I have an ata flash disk as boot & root disk, that can
only sucessfully do pio2 and it takes several minutes (5-10)
until it will use pio2. This is not acceptable for embedded
Martin Rode wrote:
>
> After upgrading to kernel 2.4.1 my box locked hard after starting the
> regular arkeia backup. I had previously problems with MM on kernel
> 2.2.18 and > 2.2.19pre2. My report a few days ago is still unanswered.
>
> I would be glad if someone would be comment this time.
>
People,
Not sure where to go from here but
( Yes I have read the FAQ )
For practical reasons, I have created some modification to the
Linux kernel. These changes were to make our implementation of
software more convenient (elegant). Essentially, I have modified the
select()
After upgrading to kernel 2.4.1 my box locked hard after starting the
regular arkeia backup. I had previously problems with MM on kernel
2.2.18 and > 2.2.19pre2. My report a few days ago is still unanswered.
I would be glad if someone would be comment this time.
Here's the typed crash
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Marcus Ramos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> After compiling files "ttime.c" and "ttime.h", I try to load them into
> the kernel using the command /sbin/insmod ttime.o. However, the
> following message suggests that a version conflict has prevented the
> loading to be performed
On 13-Feb-2001 Alan Cox wrote:
>> Having experienced a number of crashes with Xfree 4.0 with 2.4
>> kernels, that I wasn't getting with 2.2 kernels, a quick search on
>> the xfree Xpert mailing list reveals this:
>
> Yeah I've seen this claim repeatedly. XFree 4.0.2 crashes for me in
> similar
Le 13 Feb 2001 07:58:56 -0600, Matt Stegman a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> Anything in 2.4 isn't an option right now. I'm using, and am really happy
> with, the ext3 journalling patch. I'm not planning on a 2.4 upgrade until
> ext3 has been ported. Damn shame I don't have the skill to do that
>
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Russell King wrote:
> James Sutherland writes:
> > If the kernel starts spewing data faster than you can send it to the far
> > end, either the data gets dropped, or you block the kernel. Having the
> > kernel hang waiting to send a printk to the far end seems like a bad
> >
Hello,
Anything in 2.4 isn't an option right now. I'm using, and am really happy
with, the ext3 journalling patch. I'm not planning on a 2.4 upgrade until
ext3 has been ported. Damn shame I don't have the skill to do that
myself...
ext2 compression would be great. First off, though, I'm
On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 10:59:57AM +0100, Krzysztof Rusocki wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Here's what i've found today in logs:
>
> Feb 13 02:10:41 main kernel: __alloc_pages: 1-order allocation failed.
> Feb 13 02:10:42 main last message repeated 143 times
> Feb 13 02:10:47 main kernel: ed.
> Feb 13
Hi Alan,
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
>> Yes, I understand that. But I never got any note that my fix is
>> broken and I still do not understand what's the concern.
>
> Unless Im misreading the code the segment you poke at has
> potentially been freed before it is written too.
Oh yes I
James Sutherland writes:
> If the kernel starts spewing data faster than you can send it to the far
> end, either the data gets dropped, or you block the kernel. Having the
> kernel hang waiting to send a printk to the far end seems like a bad
> situation...
It can actually be useful. Why?
Hello,
After compiling files "ttime.c" and "ttime.h", I try to load them into
the kernel using the command /sbin/insmod ttime.o. However, the
following message suggests that a version conflict has prevented the
loading to be performed correctly:
"kernel-module version mismatch. ttime.o was
This is a crash from nfsd on 2.4.2pre3. Cpuinfo below ksymoops output.
Top state at crash below ksymoops.
Exported disks are 3 partitions of one scsi disk device.
All three filesystems are ext2.
Scsi adapter is buslogic.
Two tulip network cards.
Two heavy use write-mostly nfs clients.
gcc
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>
> > Could you please try the attached patch on top of latest Rik's patch?
>
> Sure thing.. (few minutes later) no change.
That's because your problem requires a change to the
balancing between swap_out()
Hi Alan,
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
>> No, I do not think that it's minor. We had to bring down running
>> application servers to be able to start another one, because the
>> new one couldn't create or attach the systemwide os-monitoring
>> segment and thus refused to start. That's
> Yes, I understand that. But I never got any note that my fix is broken
> and I still do not understand what's the concern.
Unless Im misreading the code the segment you poke at has potentially been
freed before it is written too.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
Some people keep telling me that the way mutt handles headers is
'broken'. I've looked at it myself and don't see anything wrong and no
one explains their accusations.
Anyone know anything about this or are they blowing hot air?
Alan Cox wrote:
>
> I've played with both pine and mutt. mutt is
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Tony Gale wrote:
> Having experienced a number of crashes with Xfree 4.0 with 2.4
> kernels, that I wasn't getting with 2.2 kernels, a quick search on
> the xfree Xpert mailing list reveals this:
>
>
>
"David S. Miller" wrote:
>
> Andrew Morton writes:
> > Changing the memory copy function did make some difference
> > in my setup. But the performance drop on send(8k) is only approx 10%,
> > partly because I changed the way I'm testing it - `cyclesoak' is
> > now penalised more heavily by
> Having experienced a number of crashes with Xfree 4.0 with 2.4
> kernels, that I wasn't getting with 2.2 kernels, a quick search on
> the xfree Xpert mailing list reveals this:
Yeah I've seen this claim repeatedly. XFree 4.0.2 crashes for me in similar
ways on 3dfx and matrox cards and it
You might consider UPX (http://upx.tsx.org)
Very cool. The beta version supports compressing the kernel
and "direct-to-memory" compression. I think it still
has the disadvantage of not sharing segments between many
instances of the same program. Is there any way of fixing
this? (probably would
On 12 Feb 2001, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> > "Gérard" == Gérard Roudier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Gérard> In PCI, it is the Memory Write and Invalidate PCI transaction
> Gérard> that is intended to allow core-logics to optimize DMA this
> Gérard> way. For normal Memory Write PCI transactions
Having experienced a number of crashes with Xfree 4.0 with 2.4
kernels, that I wasn't getting with 2.2 kernels, a quick search on
the xfree Xpert mailing list reveals this:
> I have RTFM but on the matter of enabling DRI for the
> ATI Mobility video chipset, which on that notebook is
> a PCI model, there is practically nil information. The
> DRI website mentions using PCI GART, but there is no
> option for that in the kernel. How do I enable this?
You need to get
> > Possibly but its a minor item that doesnt really matter anyway so leaving it
> > is fine
>
> No, I do not think that it's minor. We had to bring down running
> application servers to be able to start another one, because the new
> one couldn't create or attach the systemwide os-monitoring
>
Attached is a patch against 2.4.1-ac-XX which changes the initialization
of SigmaTel audio codecs. All recent reports of "no sound at all" with
Via audio have been users with this codec. With the Via audio driver,
you can find out if you have one of the problematic Sigmatel codecs like
so:
>
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Well, an external keyboard in a Dell Latitude works just fine here.
> Perhaps you should remove it from the docking station and test
> with an external keyboard?
yes, I can try that. In the meantime you can see for yourself -- just plug
into the
>
> On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Mike Harrold wrote:
>
> >> Those would all be your problems and I would suggest using a different account
> >> for mail then.
> >
> >Out of interest, how would that solve anything? So I use an ISP instead.
> >Then I have to download all my mail to home to read it. Talk
Hi Alan,
I am now running 2.2.19-pre9 and it is working fine. Also, just in case, I
retyped this same message in pine in xterm and on the console. No
character loss whatsoever. Also, licq stopped losing characters as well.
I will continue using 2.2.19-pre9 until the evening and report anything
Hi Alan,
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
>> First, I'm glad I wasn't hallucinating, and that the mail did
>> indeed get seen by someone.
>>
>> Second, instead of reverting, can't we simply move those two lines
>> up a bit:
>
> Possibly but its a minor item that doesnt really matter anyway
Hi Admin,
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Admin Mailing Lists wrote:
>
> I've been using the 2.2.x series successfully, latest i used was
> 2.2.19pre7. Today i upgraded to 2.4.1-ac9 and noticed that shared
> memory shows 0. I searched the list archive briefly and someone
> said the stats have been
Hello,
This might not be the proper place to ask - my
apologies - but since it pertains to the Sony
Picturebook (C1VE - Crusoe) that people have been
discussing on this list anyway, I hope people don't
mind too much :)
I have RTFM but on the matter of enabling DRI for the
ATI Mobility video
On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 08:40:31AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Feb 2001 23:09:39 -0600 (CST) Matt Stegman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Is there any kernel patch that would allow Linux to properly recognize,
> >and execute gzipped executables?
>
> Perhaps you could put it in the
Tigran Aivazian wrote:
>
> Ok, I decided to write this email inine on the console and... see? the
> "inine" was supped to be "in pine" (not to mention the "supped" :)
>
Well, an external keyboard in a Dell Latitude works just fine here.
Perhaps you should remove it from the docking station and
Ok, I decided to write this email inine on the console and... see? the
"inine" was supped to be "in pine" (not to mention the "supped" :)
Yes, I do lose characters when working in pine on the console!
So, it is not X-specific.
Now, what I was going to write this email about was -- I get the
Hi
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Meelis Roos wrote:
I also tried 2.4.1-ac10, but without acpi=no-idle, my machine crashes.
Part of the output is bellow:
ACPI: Core Subsystem Version [20010208]
ACPI: Subsystem enabled
ACPI: System firmware supports: C2 C3
ACPI: plvl2lat=10 plvl3lat=20
ACPI: C2
> > When you say 2.2.x works does that include 2.2.18.
>
> no, I meant the plain 2.2.x as of Red Hat 7.0 which is labelled as
> "2.2.16-22".
Can you try 2.2.18/2.2.19pre. Those if my first guess is right will behave
like 2.4 does to you.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
Hi Andrew,
Keyboard internal, but... you are right -- this _only_ happens when the
laptop is plugged into the docking station... that could be an extra clue
(i.e. two PS/2 controllers simultaneously -- maybe the docking station one
needs to be somehow explicitly disabled).
How come I can't
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> > PS. This only happens on this Dell latitude CPx (notice lost shift in
> > Latitude?) H450GT.
> >
> > PPS. No, my laptop is fine -- rebootingnto 2.2.x makes it type without
> > loosing characters...
>
> 2.2 and 2.4 handle keyboard error cases quite
101 - 200 of 444 matches
Mail list logo
