With apic enabled on this board, some normal amount of disk access
(including building a kernel) is successful. However, irqs are messed up.
The eepro100 module for the onboard 82559 nic loads, but prints this after
the revision history: PCI: No IRQ known for interrupt pin A of device
00:07.0.
"Jim Roland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What some people don't realize is that Microsoft *DID* do Unix a long time
> ago, they were even into OS/2 Development. :-)
And they annoyed not just a few application vendors when just a few
months after giving the message "Go with OS/2, it is the
G'damn That's so poetically accurate, I've added it to my sig list.
I've worked in a large tech corporation for many years, (20+) and I've
relatively recently had to attempt to `open` some managerial minds, and
discovered futility of it all.
"A company's public perception is an invaluable
This type of invasive marketing is why people aren't going to be buying MS
products. (Not al people, just those who choose.) If you want to be a MS
user, they have you over a barrel, if you *have* to use MS products, they
have you over a barrel. Some folks, myself included, have to use MS
Recently I tried running the Debian installer on top of a 2.4.6-pre6
kernel. It got up to the point of installing libc and then the system
hung. It was still taking interrupts (I could change vt's, etc.) but
no user processes were running.
What was happening was rather interesting. The init
Correction: I said -ac13 was bad, but ac13 was actually ok. It was ac14
that was the problem spot.
Also note how Alan happened to merge the MM patches in the reverse order
from the preX series: in the -ac series, Rik's page_launder() patch is in
-ac14, while my VM changes are merged in -ac15.
On Monday 02 July 2001 04:58, Michael Rothwell wrote:
> While on the topic of reslilent, high-performance filesystems, what ever
> became of "Tux", Daniel Philip's mythical WAFL-type filesystem?
He's working on it.
--
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
Good god, I've created a monster.
I intended to just make one point and that be the end of it, but obviously I
misjudged. I should have just sent it privately so as to prevent this flood
of OT posts. I apologize for that. I made a mistake, and now I know better.
Sorry for the trouble.
--
I re-subscribed for this? Blarg. When did the LKML turn into slashdot?
On 01 Jul 2001 17:33:38 -0700, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Jul 2001, Ben Ford wrote:
>
> > Name a single tech company anywhere in the world that doesn't have to
> > deal with microsoftisms.
>
>
On Sun, 1 Jul 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Jul 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > > "me: undo page_launder() LRU changes, they have nasty side effects"
> > >
> > > Can you be more verbose about this ?
> >
> > I think this was fixed by the GFP_BUFFER vs. GFP_CAN_FS + GFP_CAN_IO
> > thing and
While on the topic of reslilent, high-performance filesystems, what ever
became of "Tux", Daniel Philip's mythical WAFL-type filesystem?
On 01 Jul 2001 23:33:52 -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Jun 2001, Alex Khripin wrote:
>
> > There was a discussion in October, 2000, about the Granger
On Sun, 1 Jul 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > "me: undo page_launder() LRU changes, they have nasty side effects"
> >
> > Can you be more verbose about this ?
>
> I think this was fixed by the GFP_BUFFER vs. GFP_CAN_FS + GFP_CAN_IO
> thing and Linus accidentally backed out the wrong code ;)
You
On Sat, 30 Jun 2001, Alex Khripin wrote:
> There was a discussion in October, 2000, about the Granger and
> McKusick paper on soft updates for the BSD FFS. Reading the thread,
> nothing conclusive seemed to come out of it.
What you want is ext3.
It is a journaling version of ext2, which
On Sat, 30 Jun 2001, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> In pre7:
>
> "me: undo page_launder() LRU changes, they have nasty side effects"
>
> Can you be more verbose about this ?
I think this was fixed by the GFP_BUFFER vs. GFP_CAN_FS + GFP_CAN_IO
thing and Linus accidentally backed out the wrong code ;)
On Sun, 1 Jul 2001, William T Wilson wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Jul 2001, Ben Ford wrote:
> My understanding is that astronauts going up on the shuttle take turns
> bringing a laptop computer so they have actual computing power available
> to them.
actually the mission related laptops are thinkpads
On Sun, 1 Jul 2001, William T Wilson wrote:
> My understanding is that astronauts going up on the shuttle take turns
> bringing a laptop computer so they have actual computing power available
> to them. The shuttle computer is not adequate for many tasks because it
> is something like 30 years
- Original Message -
From: "William T Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ben Ford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, July 01, 2001 8:09 PM
Subject: Re: Uncle Sam Wants YOU!
> On Sun, 1 Jul 2001, Ben Ford wrote:
>
> > This seems to be meant as a joke, but I don't
On Sun, 1 Jul 2001, Ben Ford wrote:
> This seems to be meant as a joke, but I don't think it's all that unlikely.
>
> I seem to recall that MS products cannot be used in aircraft control
> rooms for this reason.
It's not just MS. Aircraft control rooms (as well as nuclear power
plants,
On Sun, 1 Jul 2001, Justin Guyett wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Jul 2001, Dan Hollis wrote:
> > On Sun, 1 Jul 2001, Kurt Maxwell Weber wrote:
> > As demonstrated many times over the past several years, it is becoming
> > increasingly difficult to buy a PC without bundled m$-ware. Even if you
> > dont use
I get an occasional panic in __tcp_inherit_port(sk,child). I believe the
reason is tb=sk->prev is NULL.
sk->prev is set to NULL in only few places including __tcp_put_port(sk).
Perhaps there is a serialization problem between __tcp_inherit_port and
__tcp_put_port ??? One possibility is that
On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 04:50:44PM -0700, Ben Ford wrote:
Microsoft is like a mountain with their installed base. Like it
or not, no matter how loud the wind howls, the mountain cannot bow
to it.
:-)
Jeff
> Paul Mundt wrote:
>
> >On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 01:35:24PM -0400, Adam
I wanted to show someone how nice SAK works, pressed it twice,
and lo! it not only killed the processes on the console, but
also the kernel. Very effective.
The patch below (for a private, patched 2.4.3 - line numbers
may differ) diminish this effectiveness a little. My kernel
now survives.
- Original Message -
From: "Adam Schrotenboer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jim Roland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Paul Mundt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "LKML"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, July 01, 2001 7:56 PM
Subject: Re: Uncle Sam Wants YOU!
> Jim Roland wrote:
>
[snip]
> Good for
On Sun, 1 Jul 2001, Marius Nita wrote:
> _I_ think it's childish to claim the above. You _may_ have a choice, yes, but
> is that choice equal or fair? Microsoft has infected both the user area as
Problem: I don't like company policy
Solution: Deal or get another job
Why should I have to spend
Jim Roland wrote:
>[snip]
>
>>>Get real, look at all the moronic things that various linux distributions
>>>
>do.
>
>>>Is this a reason to hate linux and demand the head of Linus as
>>>
>compensation
>
>>>for your troubles?
>>>
>>>This kind of attitude, and you wonder why MS attacks linux.
>>>
- Original Message -
From: "Ben Ford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "David Schwartz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Marius Nita" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, July 01, 2001 7:03 PM
Subject: Re: Uncle Sam Wants YOU!
> >
> >
> >It's hard to understand the point of such
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Mundt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ben Ford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Adam Schrotenboer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "LKML"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, July 01, 2001 7:11 PM
Subject: Re: Uncle Sam Wants YOU!
> On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 04:50:44PM -0700, Ben
Paul Mundt wrote:
>On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 04:50:44PM -0700, Ben Ford wrote:
>
>>Name a single tech company anywhere in the world that doesn't have to
>>deal with microsoftisms.
>>
>This depends on your definition of dealing with MSisms. If you mean having a
>copy of an MS product physically
- Original Message -
From: "Marius Nita" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, July 01, 2001 5:32 PM
Subject: Re: Uncle Sam Wants YOU!
> On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 01:01:51PM -0700, Paul Mundt wrote:
>
> > You always have a choice, work elsewhere. If you're in a
On Sun, 1 Jul 2001, Ben Ford wrote:
> Name a single tech company anywhere in the world that doesn't have to
> deal with microsoftisms.
http://www.wasabisystems.com/
> Well, when you realize that Bill Gates (not MS, just Bill Gates
> personally) has enough money to give every person in the
- Original Message -
From: "Tony Hoyle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Paul Mundt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Adam Schrotenboer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "LKML"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, July 01, 2001 4:57 PM
Subject: Re: Uncle Sam Wants YOU!
> Paul Mundt wrote:
>
> >
> > You always have a
[snip]
> >Get real, look at all the moronic things that various linux distributions
do.
> >Is this a reason to hate linux and demand the head of Linus as
compensation
> >for your troubles?
> >
> >This kind of attitude, and you wonder why MS attacks linux.
> >
> Why would that make MS afraid of
Hi Peter.
Wasn't 2.2.12 the kernel that included the `lock halt` bug patch?
>>> Perhaps, but is has absolutely nothing to do with the rest of
>>> this discussion.
>> The `lock halt` bug patch was specific to the Cyrix processors
>> (not to be confused with the `lock registers` patch
- Original Message -
From: "Adam Schrotenboer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "LKML" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, July 01, 2001 12:35 PM
Subject: Re: Uncle Sam Wants YOU!
> Kurt Maxwell Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > I'm going to take a break from lurking to point out that I am not
>
- Original Message -
From: "Jesse Pollard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Kurt Maxwell Weber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "J Sloan"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, July 01, 2001 3:03 PM
Subject: Re: Uncle Sam Wants YOU!
[snip]
> >In that case, I have
Riley Williams wrote:
> Hi Peter.
>
> >> Wasn't 2.2.12 the kernel that included the `lock halt` bug patch?
>
> > Perhaps, but is has absolutely nothing to do with the rest of
> > this discussion.
>
> The `lock halt` bug patch was specific to the Cyrix processors (not to
> be confused with
Hi Peter.
>> Wasn't 2.2.12 the kernel that included the `lock halt` bug patch?
> Perhaps, but is has absolutely nothing to do with the rest of
> this discussion.
The `lock halt` bug patch was specific to the Cyrix processors (not to
be confused with the `lock registers` patch for the Intel
On Sun, 1 Jul 2001, Kurt Maxwell Weber wrote:
> You can choose to work somewhere else, or choose to enter a different field.
As demonstrated many times over the past several years, it is becoming
increasingly difficult to buy a PC without bundled m$-ware. Even if you
dont use m$-ware you are
At the Partition Check stage, I start getting "hde: lost interrupt"
messages. /dev/hde is an IBM DTLA-307030, sitting on an HPT370
controller (motherboard is KA7-100). Eventually the partitions appear
in the list, interspersed with these lost interrupt messages, but very
slowly. Then there was
On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 04:50:44PM -0700, Ben Ford wrote:
> Name a single tech company anywhere in the world that doesn't have to
> deal with microsoftisms.
>
This depends on your definition of dealing with MSisms. If you mean having a
copy of an MS product physically present at a business
>
>
>It's hard to understand the point of such arguments. Surely you shouldn't
>be upset at someone for providing you the best option you have, should you?
>
The point is they aren't offering the best solution! They are taking
away all others! That is why people dislike the company.
-b
--
Perhaps I should say again that my current IT job is working w/ small
businesses and personal/home installations. In these cases, as well as
with others, it is not so much the OS that I have a problem w/. It is
the insistence of an all Macroshaft solution. Windows isn't totally bad.
I would
Riley Williams wrote:
>
> Wasn't 2.2.12 the kernel that included the `lock halt` bug patch?
>
Perhaps, but is has absolutely nothing to do with the rest of this
discussion.
-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Hi HPA.
>> Some time ago I installed Linux (Redhat 6.0) on my pc (Cx486 8M
>> RAM) and gcc had a lot of signal 11 (a couple every hour) I was
>> upgrading the kernel every time there was a new kernel and from
>> 2.2.12(or 14) no more signal 11 (very rare) Is this still a
>> hardware problem
Jesse Pollard wrote:
>On Sun, 01 Jul 2001, Jesse Pollard wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 01 Jul 2001, Kurt Maxwell Weber wrote:
>>
>>>I'll just have to decide which I value more. As long as I won't be killed
>>>for using a different OS, I still have a choice.
>>>
>>No, but you might be forced out of a job.
On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 03:32:51PM -0700, Marius Nita wrote:
> _I_ think it's childish to claim the above. You _may_ have a choice, yes, but
> is that choice equal or fair? Microsoft has infected both the user area as
> much as the business/work area. If you want to purchase a PC because your
On Sat, 23 Jun 2001, watermodem wrote:
[snip interior quotes]
> Would never work with the ac-series. Not enough time
> to form a neural pattern between builds. There is
> a semi-prior art here. Unix on the Tandem (now Compaq)
> Helix shipped (and maybe still does) with a Neural Net
> for
Paul Mundt wrote:
>On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 01:35:24PM -0400, Adam Schrotenboer wrote:
>
>>So as a user you are free to not use M$ products.
>>What if you are IT. Then you do not have a choice.
>>
>You always have a choice, work elsewhere. If you're in a position where you're
>working with MS
On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 12:23:17PM -0700, Justin Guyett wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Jul 2001, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 01:50:00PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> >
> > > I'm not a file sustem hacker, nor since I work for one vendor the
> > > appropriate owner for larg chunks of code
> _I_ think it's childish to claim the above. You _may_ have a
> choice, yes, but
> is that choice equal or fair? Microsoft has infected both the
> user area as
> much as the business/work area. If you want to purchase a PC because your
> computer just fried and you want to finish a paper or
Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
By author:szonyi calin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> Almost always ?
> It seems like gcc is THE ONLY program which gets
> signal 11
> Why the X server doesn't get signal 11 ?
> Why others programs don't get signal 11 ?
>
gcc
>Ever since building this system there have been spontaneous and
> unpredictable lockups, usually at least once per day. Sometimes several per
> day. The lockup is sometimes preceded by X starting to display things
> strangely (on a Voodoo 3 w/XF 4.X). Then I have a few minutes to reboot
>
Hi,
I think I've triggered a bug in the ipchains/iptables part of the kernel. Here is the
story :
The server was a 866MHz PIII with 384 MByte of RAM running RH7.1 with a 2.4.5-ac21
kernel.
It was used as a router/firewall with 2 netcards (not sure which type, but I don't
think
that's
On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 01:01:51PM -0700, Paul Mundt wrote:
> You always have a choice, work elsewhere. If you're in a position where you're
> working with MS products, you were the one who made the decision to do so.
> MS is not at fault, claiming so is childish.
_I_ think it's childish to
linux-2.4.6-pre8/drivers/mtd/nand/spia.c references four
undefined symbols, presumably intended to be #define constants,
although I am not sure what their values are supposed to be:
IO_BASE
FIO_BASE
PEDR
PEDDR
Adam J. Richter __ __
Paul Mundt wrote:
>
> You always have a choice, work elsewhere. If you're in a position where you're
> working with MS products, you were the one who made the decision to do so.
> MS is not at fault, claiming so is childish.
Nobody chooses to work with MS, they merely take the job that's
On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 12:16:34AM -0400, Trever L. Adams wrote:
> > I am doing very well with my consulting projects, but to be honest,
> > my family has sufferred horribly in the past four years fighting with
> > Novell every other week, and there's a very strong chance I will be
> > moving
On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 01:50:00PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > There are several areas that need restructuring and work, and I am
> > available to answer questions, and assist with technical consulting,
>
> I'm not a file sustem hacker, nor since I work for one vendor the
> appropriate owner
On Sat, Jun 30, 2001 at 10:59:59PM -0500, Paul Fulghum wrote:
>
> From: "Jeff V. Merkey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > Novell has recently threatened to try to take my house and
> > assets if I post any more NWFS releases or MANOS.
> [snip]
> > They are wounded in the market ...
>
> A quote for
On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 02:54:18AM +1200, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 01:50:00PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > I'm not a file sustem hacker, nor since I work for one vendor the
> > appropriate owner for larg chunks of code in some people's eyes. I
> > suspect the FSF is a much
> The bad network behavior was due to shared irqs somehow screwing
> things up. This explained most but not all of the problems.
ah, that's why your test pgm succeeded on my systems..
> When I last posted I had a reproducible test case which spewed a bunch
> of packets from a server to a
For quite some time now I've wanted to try and do something in the kernel.
And I need a simple project to start with, so I decided to create a
filesystem that reads and writes to a XML file. It's really basic right now
(does not support permissions, but that should not be too hard to add)
It's working beautifully here. I'll forward the patch to the
maintainer, since I have no idea if he's seen this thread.
Cheers!
PGP signature
On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 02:11:47PM -0400, Hua Zhong wrote:
> There are a lot of people who don't know how to use Linux/Unix. Windows is
> much easier for them and has more applications. They practically have no
> other choice if they have to use a computer in their jobs (maybe they can
>
> On Sun, 1 Jul 2001, Kurt Maxwell Weber wrote:
> > In that case, I have the following options:
> > 1) Start my own ISP
> > 2) Use Windows XP
> > 3) Not use Windows XP and not be able to use my current ISP
> > 4) Go to a different ISP
Argument.
> > I'll just have to decide which I
Paul Mundt wrote:
>
> Oh please, next you'll be blaming world hunger on MS because third world
> countries can't afford licenses of win2k.
Absolutely. If their governments didn't have to shell out such a large
amount of money on M$ licenses, they'd have more money to feed their
people with...
Paul Mundt wrote:
>On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 01:35:24PM -0400, Adam Schrotenboer wrote:
>
>>So as a user you are free to not use M$ products.
>>What if you are IT. Then you do not have a choice.
>>
>You always have a choice, work elsewhere. If you're in a position where you're
>working with MS
No need to worry, I'm already downloading the ISOs. All will be well soon
enough :-D
--
www.kuro5hin.org -- technology and culture, from the trenches.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More
On Sun, 01 Jul 2001, Jesse Pollard wrote:
>On Sun, 01 Jul 2001, Kurt Maxwell Weber wrote:
>>I'll just have to decide which I value more. As long as I won't be killed
>>for using a different OS, I still have a choice.
>
>No, but you might be forced out of a job.
Apologies for the followup to a
On Sun, 01 Jul 2001, Kurt Maxwell Weber wrote:
>On Sunday 01 July 2001 13:48, you wrote:
>> Kurt Maxwell Weber wrote:
>> > I'm going to take a break from lurking to point out that I am not
>> > dissatisfied with Windows. It has its uses, as do Linux (and NetBSD, and
>> > Solaris, and the other
On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 01:35:24PM -0400, Adam Schrotenboer wrote:
> So as a user you are free to not use M$ products.
> What if you are IT. Then you do not have a choice.
>
You always have a choice, work elsewhere. If you're in a position where you're
working with MS products, you were the one
I would like to report a bug that I've seen in a few linux kernels now. This
may be a serious problem with the IDE controler software because it may cause
a hard drive to ware out over a period of time. I've noticed for a long time
that when linux is loaded the hard drive light on my computer
Hua Zhong wrote:
>-> From Kurt Maxwell Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
>
>>You can choose to work somewhere else, or choose to enter a different field.
>>
>
>There are a lot of people who don't know how to use Linux/Unix. Windows is
>much easier for them and has more applications. They
On Sun, 1 Jul 2001, Kurt Maxwell Weber wrote:
> In that case, I have the following options:
> 1) Start my own ISP
> 2) Use Windows XP
> 3) Not use Windows XP and not be able to use my current ISP
> 4) Go to a different ISP
>
> I'll just have to decide which I value more. As long as I won't be
On Mon, 2 Jul 2001, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 01:50:00PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > I'm not a file sustem hacker, nor since I work for one vendor the
> > appropriate owner for larg chunks of code in some people's eyes. I
> > suspect the FSF is a much much better asignee
Ever since building this system there have been spontaneous and
unpredictable lockups, usually at least once per day. Sometimes several per
day. The lockup is sometimes preceded by X starting to display things
strangely (on a Voodoo 3 w/XF 4.X). Then I have a few minutes to reboot
before it
Nope, I'm using hard ones.
- Johan.
---
Yoda of Borg are we: Futile is resistance. Assimilate you, we will.
On 29 Jun 2001, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> > " " == J R de Jong writes:
>
> > Hi all, Recently I upgraded from 2.4.4 to 2.4.5, but after that
> > I got users complaining
On Sunday 01 July 2001 13:48, you wrote:
> Kurt Maxwell Weber wrote:
> > I'm going to take a break from lurking to point out that I am not
> > dissatisfied with Windows. It has its uses, as do Linux (and NetBSD, and
> > Solaris, and the other operating systems I have installed at home).
> >
-> From Kurt Maxwell Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
>
> You can choose to work somewhere else, or choose to enter a different field.
There are a lot of people who don't know how to use Linux/Unix. Windows is
much easier for them and has more applications. They practically have no
other choice
On Sunday 01 July 2001 12:12, you wrote:
> > I'm going to take a break from lurking to point out that I am not
> > dissatisfied with Windows. It has its uses, as do Linux (and NetBSD, and
> > Solaris, and the other operating systems I have installed at home).
> > Frankly, I don't have a problem
Kurt Maxwell Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'm going to take a break from lurking to point out that I am not
> dissatisfied with Windows. It has its uses, as do Linux (and NetBSD, and
> Solaris, and the other operating systems I have installed at home).
Frankly,
> I don't have a problem
Chris/Adam/Mark,
Have just sucked down the SRPM of the kernel that sees to run OK. As per you
suggestions, checking out the config and patches ...
Thanks,
Daniel.
> -Original Message-
>
>
> Download the source-RPM for the 'fast' kernel, and also the virgin
> version of the same kernel,
On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 11:36:51PM +0800, Daniel Harvey wrote:
> The Compaq Armada doesn't appear to have a BIOS setting for the
> power settings.
> I still don't get the fact that one kernel will run fast, while the
> rest do the real SLOW thing.
Not answering your question, but you might
On Sat, 30 Jun 2001, Dylan Griffiths wrote:
> I'd love to do some of this, but since the box is now being shipped to a
> colo facility in New York, I don't really have a choice in the matter.
>
> Hopefully someone here doing SMP + EEPro100 can see if they can reproduce
> the issue (2.4.5
Try this, as root:
[root@mnm akpm]# /var/log/messages
bash: /var/log/messages: Text file busy
Strange return value, that.
It happens because vfs_permission() sees CAP_DAC_OVERRIDE
and returns "yes" on a file which has no `x' bits set.
Then open_exec() falls through to deny_write_access() which
On Sunday 01 July 2001 11:02, Rick Hohensee ignorantly blabbered:
> > Pardon me, but what does this have to do with Linux or the Linux
> > Kernel?!?! Post this on the usenet under advocacy, but please don't
> > litter up the kernel listserver with this.
>
> What this has to do with Linux is that
>
> Pardon me, but what does this have to do with Linux or the Linux Kernel?!?!
> Post this on the usenet under advocacy, but please don't litter up the
> kernel listserver with this.
What this has to do with Linux is that throughout the whole process
Microsoft has been putting Linux in the
The Compaq Armada doesn't appear to have a BIOS setting for the power
settings.
I still don't get the fact that one kernel will run fast, while the rest do
the real SLOW thing.
Thanks,
--
Daniel Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Phone/Fax +61 8 9389 7844/33
Director, Amristar Pty Ltd;
Daniel Harvey wrote:
> [1.] Linux SLOW on Compaq Armada 110 PIII Speedstep
Intel will not release docs for SpeedStep, so we cannot do anything
about this except annoy Intel (or buy competing, documented processors).
I have a Toshiba P-III laptop with SpeedStep. It was similarly slow
until I
On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 01:50:00PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> I'm not a file sustem hacker, nor since I work for one vendor the
> appropriate owner for larg chunks of code in some people's eyes. I
> suspect the FSF is a much much better asignee for the code itself
I assume the legal threats that
Hi,
[1.] Linux SLOW on Compaq Armada 110 PIII Speedstep
[2.]
I have a just brought a Compaq Armade 110 PIII, and am having a lot of
trouble getting the kernel to operate effectively. The problem is that any
kernel I run (except one pre-compiled RedHat kernel) runs very slowly. The
thing is
I'm hopelessly behind on my mail, so this has probably been dealt with,
already, but here goes: It's a userspace problem.
That is, any automagical VM tuner ought to be a daemon. If the kernel
doesn't expose enough information or knobs to make a good VM tuner, add
what is needed.
Meanwhile, if
Hi,
I installed crash2.6 on my machine.
When I give the command "crash" from the prompt it says "no debugging
symbols found in /boot/vmlinux2.2.14-12". Why does this message show.
Thanks in advance,
Regs,
sathish
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the
... 2.4.0 - 2.4.5-pre1 work just fine.
Since the last changes related to the softirq stuff I'm getting an OOPS at
boot after:
Calibrating delay loop... kernel BUG at softirq.c:206!
Here is the decode trace:
ksymoops 2.3.4 on i686 2.4.5-pre1. Options used
-v /usr/src/linux/vmlinux
> There are several areas that need restructuring and work, and I am
> available to answer questions, and assist with technical consulting,
I'm not a file sustem hacker, nor since I work for one vendor the
appropriate owner for larg chunks of code in some people's eyes. I suspect
the FSF is a
On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 01:26:39PM +0200, Guest section DW wrote:
> > > To understand the details of the code, trace the steps:
> > > (i) The USB code can be found e.g. on
> > > http://www.win.tue.nl/~aeb/linux/kbd/scancodes-5.html
> > > We find that Power is 102 and that Keypad-= is 103.
> >
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Torrey Hoffman) wrote on 30.06.01 in
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> So they compile it into the linux_logo.h image. It's now under the
> GPL, of course... what does that do to the legal status of the logo?
Copyright: you named it.
Any other right: unchanged. (The GPL doesn't
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chuck Wolber) wrote on 29.06.01 in
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Does sed tell you who programmed it on startup?
> >
> > Awk?
> >
> > Perl?
> >
> > Groff?
> >
> > Gcc?
> >
> > See a pattern here?
>
> Yeah, the output of these programms are usually parsed by other programs.
Mike Black wrote:
>
> 2.4.6-pre6 and ext3-2.4-0.0.8-246p5 (had to to hand patch a little).
>
> This message popped up on an idle system -- there were no "odd" cronjobs
> scheduled around this time. Nobody was logged on. System had been up for
> a
> little over a day...first time seeing
2.4.6-pre6 and ext3-2.4-0.0.8-246p5 (had to to hand patch a little).
This message popped up on an idle system -- there were no "odd" cronjobs
scheduled around this time. Nobody was logged on. System had been up for
a
little over a day...first time seeing any messages like this.
The source
1 - 100 of 211 matches
Mail list logo
