Silicon Image contributed a patch which should help some of the situations
that users were seeing. If you are having problems with sata_sil, please do
try out this patch.
I'm concerned that the sata_sil blacklist has been growing beyond the older
Seagate drives which definitely had buggy firmw
On Fri, 2005-03-25 at 18:25 +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 10:19:55AM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> >
> > Noone will complain on Linux if NIC is broken and produces wrong
> > checksum
> > and HW checksum offloading is enabled using ethtools.
>
> This is completely different
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 11:45:44PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 08:22:15PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > Miles Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 24fc1024
> > > >
Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 08:22:15PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Miles Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 24fc1024
> > > c0198448
> > > *pde =
> > > Oops: [#1]
> > > CPU:
Can someone (Ingo?) recommend me CPU scheduler tests which are usually
used to test CPU scheduler perfomance, context switch performance,
SMP/migration/balancing performance etc.?
Thanks in advance,
Kirill
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 08:22:15PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Miles Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 24fc1024
> > c0198448
> > *pde =
> > Oops: [#1]
> > CPU:0
> > EIP:0060:[]Not tainted VLI
>
> I wonder
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 05:21:27PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Coywolf Qi Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >>--- 2.6.12-rc1-mm2/mm/oom_kill.c 2005-03-03 17:12:18.0 +0800
> > >>+++ 2.6.12-rc1-mm2-cy/mm/oom_kill.c 2005-03-25 08:07:19.0
> > >>+0800
> > >>@@ -20,6 +20,7
On Fri, 2005-03-25 at 02:19 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> > Noone will complain on Linux if NIC is broken and produces wrong
> > checksum
> > and HW checksum offloading is enabled using ethtools.
>
>
> Actually, that is a problem and people have definitely complained about
On Fri, 2005-03-25 at 04:17 +1000, Triffid Hunter wrote:
> you can limit the max number of processes by putting the following into
> /etc/security/limits.conf (on my distro, and quite a number of others
> according to google too)
>
> * hardnproc
>
> you can also limit quite a number
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 10:19:55AM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
>
> Noone will complain on Linux if NIC is broken and produces wrong
> checksum
> and HW checksum offloading is enabled using ethtools.
This is completely different. The worst that can happen with checksum
offloading is that the p
Hi.
I used to have this old laptop that went through hell, and time after time
I revived it (it got ran over by a car, stolen, etc), finally it started
locking up on me after about 5-10 minutes of use and this occured at the
same time my other desktop was dying, and I got angry and punched it a
cou
Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
Noone will complain on Linux if NIC is broken and produces wrong
checksum
and HW checksum offloading is enabled using ethtools.
Actually, that is a problem and people have definitely complained about
it in the past.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the l
Søren Lott wrote:
in the SATA kconfig menu, the help message from
Intel PIIX/ICH SATA support says:
CONFIG_SCSI_ATA_PIIX:
This option enables support for ICH5 Serial ATA.
If PATA support was enabled previously, this enables
support for select Intel PIIX/ICH PATA host controllers.
anyone care
Silicon Image contributed a patch which should help some of the
situations that users were seeing. If you are having problems with
sata_sil, please do try out this patch.
I'm concerned that the sata_sil blacklist has been growing beyond the
older Seagate drives which definitely had buggy firmw
On Fri, 2005-03-25 at 17:56 +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 09:59:18AM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> >
> > It is not only about userspace/kernelspace system calls and data
> > copying,
> > but about whole revalidation process, which can and is quite expensive,
> > due to syst
in the SATA kconfig menu, the help message from
Intel PIIX/ICH SATA support says:
CONFIG_SCSI_ATA_PIIX:
This option enables support for ICH5 Serial ATA.
If PATA support was enabled previously, this enables
support for select Intel PIIX/ICH PATA host controllers.
anyone care to clarify if th
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 09:59:18AM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
>
> It is not only about userspace/kernelspace system calls and data
> copying,
> but about whole revalidation process, which can and is quite expensive,
> due to system calls, copying and validating itself,
What I meant is if you
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005, Pavel Machek wrote:
> This is WONTFIX for 2.6.11, but you can be pretty sure it is going to
> be fixed for SuSE 9.3, and patch is already in 2.6.12-rc1. Feel free
> to betatest SuSE 9.3 ;-).
Unfortunately the celebration was premature. I compiled 2.6.12-rc1,
noticing the
On Fri, 2005-03-25 at 17:33 +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 09:34:19AM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> >
> > Such hardware is used mostly in embedded world where SW crypto
> > processing
> > is too expensive, so users of such HW likely want to trust to
> > theirs hardware and l
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 05:00:18PM -0800, Patrick Mochel wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 Mar 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > Laurent Riffard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > hello,
> > >
> > > Same kinds of problem here. It depends on the removed module. I mean:
> > > "rmmod loop" or "rmmod pcspkr"
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 09:34:19AM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
>
> Such hardware is used mostly in embedded world where SW crypto
> processing
> is too expensive, so users of such HW likely want to trust to
> theirs hardware and likely will turn in on.
That's fine. All you need for these embe
On Fri, 2005-03-25 at 17:13 +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 09:16:01AM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> > On Fri, 2005-03-25 at 00:58 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >
> > > If its disabled by default, then you and 2-3 other people will use this
> > > feature. Not enough justificat
On Fri, 2005-03-25 at 00:58 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> > So I still insist on creating ability to contribute entropy directly,
> > without userspace validation.
> > It will be turned off by default.
>
> If its disabled by default, then you and 2-3 other people will use t
* Esben Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I like the idea of having the scheduler take care of it - it is a very
> optimal coded queue-system after all. That will work on UP but not on
> SMP. Having the unlock operation to set the mutex in a "partially
> owned" state will work better. The o
[EMAIL PROTECTED], 2005-03-24 18:58:45-08:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[driver core] Call klist_del() instead of klist_remove().
- Can't wait on removing the current item in the list (the positive refcount
*because*
we are using it causes it to deadlock).
Signed-off-by: Patrick Mochel <[EMA
[EMAIL PROTECTED], 2005-03-24 13:02:28-08:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[driver core] Fix up bus code and remove use of rwsem.
- Don't add devices to bus's embedded kset, since it's not used by anyone
anymore.
- Don't need to take the bus rwsem when calling {device,driver}_attach(),
since
tho
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 09:16:01AM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-03-25 at 00:58 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> > If its disabled by default, then you and 2-3 other people will use this
> > feature. Not enough justification for a kernel API at that point.
>
> It is only because the
[EMAIL PROTECTED], 2005-03-24 13:08:05-08:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[driver core] Remove struct device::driver_list.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Mochel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff -Nru a/drivers/base/core.c b/drivers/base/core.c
--- a/drivers/base/core.c 2005-03-24 20:33:16 -08:00
+++ b/drivers/b
[EMAIL PROTECTED], 2005-03-24 13:03:35-08:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[driver core] Remove struct device::bus_list.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Mochel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff -Nru a/drivers/base/core.c b/drivers/base/core.c
--- a/drivers/base/core.c 2005-03-24 20:33:23 -08:00
+++ b/drivers/base
[EMAIL PROTECTED], 2005-03-24 12:58:57-08:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[klist] add klist_node_attached() to determine if a node is on a list or not.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Mochel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff -Nru a/include/linux/klist.h b/include/linux/klist.h
--- a/include/linux/klist.h 2005-03-2
[EMAIL PROTECTED], 2005-03-24 18:59:59-08:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[klist] Don't reference NULL klist pointer in klist_remove().
Signed-off-by: Patrick Mochel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff -Nru a/lib/klist.c b/lib/klist.c
--- a/lib/klist.c 2005-03-24 20:33:01 -08:00
+++ b/lib/klist.c 20
[EMAIL PROTECTED], 2005-03-24 19:03:59-08:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[scsi] Use device_for_each_child() to unregister devices in
scsi_remove_target().
Signed-off-by: Patrick Mochel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff -Nru a/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysf
[EMAIL PROTECTED], 2005-03-24 20:08:04-08:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[driver core] Fix up bogus comment.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Mochel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff -Nru a/drivers/base/driver.c b/drivers/base/driver.c
--- a/drivers/base/driver.c 2005-03-24 20:32:39 -08:00
+++ b/drivers/base/driver.
[EMAIL PROTECTED], 2005-03-24 19:08:30-08:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[driver core] Use a klist for device child lists.
- Use klist iterator in device_for_each_child(), making it safe to use for
removing devices.
- Remove unused list_to_dev() function.
- Kills all usage of devices_subsys.rw
Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
So I still insist on creating ability to contribute entropy directly,
without userspace validation.
It will be turned off by default.
If its disabled by default, then you and 2-3 other people will use this
feature. Not enough justification for a kernel API at that point.
[EMAIL PROTECTED], 2005-03-24 10:50:24-08:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[driver core] Use bus_for_each_{dev,drv} for driver binding.
- Now possible, since the lists are locked using the klist lock and not the
global rwsem.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Mochel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff -Nru a/drivers
[EMAIL PROTECTED], 2005-03-24 13:00:16-08:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[usb] Fix up USB to use klist_node_attached() instead of list_empty() on
lists that will go away.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Mochel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff -Nru a/drivers/usb/core/usb.c b/drivers/usb/core/usb.c
--- a/drivers/usb/
Here is the next round of driver model locking changes. These build off of
the previous set of changes, including the klist patch. They eradicate all
of the uses of the subsystems' rwsem in the driver core.
It does include the fix posted earlier that happened when removing the
driver.
A summary
[EMAIL PROTECTED], 2005-03-24 10:48:35-08:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[driver core] Remove the unused device_find().
Signed-off-by: Patrick Mochel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff -Nru a/drivers/base/core.c b/drivers/base/core.c
--- a/drivers/base/core.c 2005-03-24 20:34:00 -08:00
+++ b/drivers/bas
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 11:45:53PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> I agree with this sentiment; this is mainly a policy decision that
> kernel programmers should not make.
Exactly. Policy decisions like this as well as entropy checking
should be done in user-space.
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at
On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 14:59 +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> For example here is patch to enable acrypto support for hw_random.c
> It is very simple and support only upto 4 bytes request, of course it
> is not interested for anyone, but it is only 2-minutes example:
Full port.
--- ./drivers/char
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 11:02:45PM -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-03-25 at 12:15 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > I think I found the cause. Special requests submitted using
> > scsi_do_req() never initializes ->end_io(). Normally, SCSI midlayer
> > terminates special requests ins
Nick Piggin wrote:
Hugh Dickins wrote:
And the range to sparc64's flush_tlb_pgtables? It's less clear to me
now that we need to do more than is done here - every PMD_SIZE ever
occupied will be flushed, do we really have to flush every PGDIR_SIZE
ever partially occupied? A shame to complicate it u
Hugh Dickins wrote:
And the range to sparc64's flush_tlb_pgtables? It's less clear to me
now that we need to do more than is done here - every PMD_SIZE ever
occupied will be flushed, do we really have to flush every PGDIR_SIZE
ever partially occupied? A shame to complicate it unnecessarily.
It lo
On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 23:48 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > And how HIFN driver can contribute entropy?
>
> Use the current chrdev->rngd method.
Why HIFN must be chardev?
> > You may say, that hardware can be broken and thus produces
> > wrong data, but if user want, it can turn it on or off.
>
On Fri, 2005-03-25 at 12:15 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> I think I found the cause. Special requests submitted using
> scsi_do_req() never initializes ->end_io(). Normally, SCSI midlayer
> terminates special requests inside the SCSI midlayer without passing
> through the blkdev layer. However, if
Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 15:56 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
See the earlier discussion, when data validation was -removed- from the
original Intel RNG driver, and moved to userspace.
I'm not arguing against userspace validation, but if data produced
_is_ cryptographically strong,
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 11:09:17PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >Indeed there does seem to be new firmware out as of 2/23/05. I ran my
> >tests with the 9/10/04 firmware but I did not adjust the CARM_MAX_Q
> >value. Do either of you happen to know what firmware revisions you
> >tested under?
BIO
Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 15:39 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
hw_random.c already does it using userspace daemons,
which is bad idea for very fast HW - like VIA xstore/xcrypt
instructions.
This is incorrect, because it implies that a user would want to use t
On Mar 24, 2005, at 23:15, Miles Lane wrote:
Hi,
Was this change intentional or accidental? I have successfully built
ndiswrapper-1.0rc1 with the other recent kernel trees.
warning: passing arg 4 of `call_usermodehelper' makes pointer from
integer without a cast
error: too few arguments to functi
applied patches 1-3, thanks much.
Small administrivia request, though: after using my patch merging
script to merge your patches, I have to do the following things manually:
* delete diffstat output
* delete patch filename
* un-indent patch description text
It would be great if I didn't have to
On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 15:56 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > Idea to validate entropy data is good in general,
> > but it should be implemented in a way allowing external both in-kernel
> > and userspace
> > processes to contribute data.
> > So for in-kernel use we need such a mechanism, and userspa
Miles Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/sys/class/i2c-adapter# ls * -l
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/sys# cat */*/*/*
>
> ksymoops 2.4.9 on i686 2.6.12-rc1-mm2. Options used
> -o /lib/modules/2.6.12-rc1-mm2 (specified)
> -m /boot/System.map-2.6.12-rc1-mm2 (specified)
>
On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 15:39 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> > hw_random.c already does it using userspace daemons,
> > which is bad idea for very fast HW - like VIA xstore/xcrypt
> > instructions.
>
> This is incorrect, because it implies that a user would want to use the
>
Hi,
Was this change intentional or accidental? I have successfully built
ndiswrapper-1.0rc1 with the other recent kernel trees.
/usr/src/ndiswrapper-1.0rc1/driver/wrapper.c: In function `wrapper_init':
/usr/src/ndiswrapper-1.0rc1/driver/wrapper.c:1485: warning: passing
arg 4 of `call_usermodehel
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/sys/class/i2c-adapter# ls * -l
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/sys# cat */*/*/*
ksymoops 2.4.9 on i686 2.6.12-rc1-mm2. Options used
-o /lib/modules/2.6.12-rc1-mm2 (specified)
-m /boot/System.map-2.6.12-rc1-mm2 (specified)
Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address
Vladimir Kondratiev wrote:
I did posted once; it was long time ago. I am sure I sent it to Dave. I can
resend if needed. Basically, I made Dave's stack work on 2.6 kernels; did
some changes toward QoS and provided simple utility to imitate low level
driver. I was concentrated on interfaces, it i
Matthew Collins wrote:
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Bernard Blackham wrote:
Hi,
Playing with a recently acquired Promise SX8 card, we've found
similar performance results to Matt's post to lkml a few months back
at http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=110175890323356&w=2
It appears that the driver
Hello, James and Jens.
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 06:45:58PM -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-03-23 at 16:25 +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > Let me guess, it is hanging in wait_for_completion()?
>
> Yes, I have the trace now. Why is curious. This is the trace of the
> failure:
>
> Mar 2
Adrian Bunk wrote:
This patch fixes a check after use found by the Coverity checker.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- linux-2.6.12-rc1-mm1-full/drivers/net/tulip/dmfe.c.old 2005-03-23 05:05:36.0 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.12-rc1-mm1-full/drivers/net/tulip/dmfe.c 2005-03-23 05:06:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005, David S. Miller wrote:
> Erm... were any of your test builds done with the new CONFIG_CLEAR_COLD
> option enabled? :-)
These were all fixed but I failed to do a "quilt refresh" sigh... The
email issues are also fixed now sigh. What a day.
> Next, replace your arch/
On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 20:15 -0600, Robert Hancock wrote:
> There is no need to use any binary drivers on the nForce4 - the only
> ones even available are for the network and audio. The network works
> fine with the forcedeth driver included in the kernel - I don't know
> about the audio, I'm not
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 14:49:55 -0800 (PST)
Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could you help me fix up this patch replacing the old clear_pages patch?
Ok, first you need to mark the order and gfp arguments as unsigned
for mm/page_alloc.c:prep_zero_page() so that it matches the prototype
Thanks Adrian and Chris. That seems to work.
Ravi
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Bunk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 5:08 PM
To: Ravinandan Arakali
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Leonid. Grossman (E-mail)
Subject: Re: Problem applying latest 2.6 kernel prepat
Asfand Yar Qazi wrote:
NForce4 Ultra is brilliant - in many ways. Except it requires binary
drivers, which I really don't want to use. And apparently, the hardware
firewall seems to restrict bandwidth a bit. And even when its off,
external chips that end up being faster (http://tinyurl.com/4z
On Fri, 2005-03-25 at 02:29 +0100, Felix von Leitner wrote:
> My shiny new nforce 4 main board has sound that is detected OK by ALSA:
>
> intel8x0_measure_ac97_clock: measured 49970 usecs
> intel8x0: clocking to 46877
> ALSA device list:
> #0: NVidia CK804 with ALC850 at 0xd2003000, irq
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 07:18:45PM -0800, Chris Wright wrote:
> * Adrian Bunk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > --- linux-2.6.12-rc1-mm1-full/fs/attr.c.old 2005-03-23 04:44:40.0
> > +0100
> > +++ linux-2.6.12-rc1-mm1-full/fs/attr.c 2005-03-23 04:45:40.0
> > +0100
> > @@ -112,7 +1
The Coverity checker found that if req was NULL because find_request
returned NULL, this resulted in a break from the switch, but req was
later dereferenced (look at the last line of this patch).
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- linux-2.6.12-rc1-mm2-full/fs/smbfs/request.c.old
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 05:34:03PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 11:30:56PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>...
> > Is this "if" simply superfluous?
> > Or should the && be an || ?
>
> Yes, it looks like it should be "||".
Patch below.
> Jeff
cu
Adrian
<-- snip -->
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Bodo Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > atkbd.c: Keyboard on isa0060/serio0 reports too many keys pressed.
> > (I'm using a keyboard switch and a IBM PS/2 keyboard)
>
> This one should be just taken out. It is as far as I can figure out
> completely u
There's no need for a function that only calls kfree.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
net/atm/resources.c | 11 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
--- linux-2.6.12-rc1-mm1-full/net/atm/resources.c.old 2005-03-23
18:21:31.0 +0100
+++ lin
Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
[]
I've a 9835 card with two serial and no parallel ports:
:01:00.0 0700: 9710:9835 (rev 01) (prog-if 02)
Subsystem: 1000:0002
[]
But after reloading parport_pc, it does not see the built-in
port anymore; more, after unloading 8250_pci and 8250,
parport_pc finds one
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 04:41:14AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>...
> Chages since 2.6.12-rc1-mm1:
>...
> -revert-allow-oem-written-modules-to-make-calls-to-ia64-oem-sal-functions.patch
>
> Drop this - the modules are now in the kernel.
>...
As already discussed, there's still no module using th
This patch fixes a check after use found by the Coverity checker.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- linux-2.6.12-rc1-mm1-full/drivers/net/tulip/dmfe.c.old 2005-03-23
05:05:36.0 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.12-rc1-mm1-full/drivers/net/tulip/dmfe.c 2005-03-23
05:06:00.00
Hi!
> Changelog:
> - Drop clear_pages and the approach to zero pages of higher order
> first
> - Zero a percentage of pages from all orders to avoid fragmentation
>
> Adds management of ZEROED and NOT_ZEROED pages and a background daemon
> called scrubd. /proc/sys/vm/scrubd_load, /proc/sys/vm_s
* Ravinandan Arakali ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I am trying to submit patches to our driver in the kernel. Since I need a
> copy of latest kernel
> for this, I installed the latest stable version(2.6.5.11). When I apply the
> latest prepatch (2.6.12-rc1)
> on top of this, I have the following pro
Lutz Vieweg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm currently investigating the following problem, which seems to indicate
> a misbehaviour of the kernel:
>
> A server software we implemented is sporadically "hanging" in a select()
> call since we upgraded from kernel 2.4 to (currently) 2.6.9 (we have
This patch removes some obviously dead code found by the Coverity
checker.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- linux-2.6.12-rc1-mm1-full/drivers/usb/class/usb-midi.c.old 2005-03-24
04:51:19.0 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.12-rc1-mm1-full/drivers/usb/class/usb-midi.c 2005-03-2
I didn't find any possible modular usage in the kernel.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
This patch was already sent on:
- 6 Mar 2005
--- linux-2.6.11-mm1-full/mm/slab.c.old 2005-03-04 16:14:03.0 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.11-mm1-full/mm/slab.c 2005-03-04 16:14:17.000
I didn't find any possible modular usage in the kernel.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
This patch was already sent on:
- 6 Mar 2005
--- linux-2.6.11-mm1-full/mm/swap_state.c.old 2005-03-04 16:25:54.0
+0100
+++ linux-2.6.11-mm1-full/mm/swap_state.c 2005-03-04
Coywolf Qi Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >>--- 2.6.12-rc1-mm2/mm/oom_kill.c2005-03-03 17:12:18.0 +0800
> >>+++ 2.6.12-rc1-mm2-cy/mm/oom_kill.c 2005-03-25 08:07:19.0 +0800
> >>@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
> >> #include
> >> #include
> >> #include
> >>+#include
> >>
> >> /* #defin
This patch contains the following cleanups:
- make needlessly global code static
- remove the completely unused smtparse.c
- remove the following unused global functions:
- drvfbi.c: init_dma
- drvfbi.c: dis_dma
- drvfbi.c: get_rom_byte
- drvfbi.c: mac_drv_vpd_read
- drvfbi.c: mac_drv_pci
My shiny new nforce 4 main board has sound that is detected OK by ALSA:
intel8x0_measure_ac97_clock: measured 49970 usecs
intel8x0: clocking to 46877
ALSA device list:
#0: NVidia CK804 with ALC850 at 0xd2003000, irq 185
but I can't get my stereo to play. It is connected via optical S/P
This patch removes #if's for kernel 2.2 .
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
This patch was already sent on:
- 12 Mar 2005
--- linux-2.6.11-mm2-full/sound/oss/rme96xx.c.old 2005-03-12
12:24:43.0 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.11-mm2-full/sound/oss/rme96xx.c 2005-03-12 12:2
This patch removes #if's for kernel 2.2 .
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
This patch was already sent on:
- 12 Mar 2005
drivers/char/mwave/tp3780i.c |8 +---
1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
--- linux-2.6.11-mm2-full/drivers/char/mwave/tp3780i.c.old
On Thursday 24 March 2005 23:21, Brice Goglin wrote:
> Andrew Morton a écrit :
> > Stefano Rivoir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>--- linux-mm/include/linux/agp_backend.h.old
> >>>+++ linux-mm/include/linux/agp_backend.h
> >>>+extern struct agp_bridge_data * (*agp_find_bridge)(struct pci_dev *);
I didn't find any possible modular usage in the kernel.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
This patch was already sent on:
- 6 Mar 2005
--- linux-2.6.11-mm1-full/mm/swapfile.c.old 2005-03-04 16:23:03.0
+0100
+++ linux-2.6.11-mm1-full/mm/swapfile.c 2005-03-04 16:23:1
I didn't find any possible modular usage in the kernel.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
This patch was already sent on:
- 6 Mar 2005
--- linux-2.6.11-mm1-full/mm/page_alloc.c.old 2005-03-04 16:00:09.0
+0100
+++ linux-2.6.11-mm1-full/mm/page_alloc.c 2005-03-04
I didn't find any possible modular usage in the kernel.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
This patch was already sent on:
- 6 Mar 2005
--- linux-2.6.11-mm1-full/mm/swap.c.old 2005-03-04 16:05:42.0 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.11-mm1-full/mm/swap.c 2005-03-04 16:05:57.000
I didn't find any possible modular usage of console_unblank in the
kernel.
This patch was already ACK'ed by Alan Cox.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
This patch was already sent on:
- 9 Mar 2005
- 3 Mar 2005
--- linux-2.6.11-rc5-mm1-full/kernel/printk.c.old 2005-03-03
Andrew Morton wrote:
Coywolf Qi Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Recent make-sysrq-f-call-oom_kill.patch calls oom-killer in interrupt context,
thus results into panic. This patch fixes out_of_memory() to avoid schedule
when in interrupt context.
Coywolf
Signed-off-by: Coywolf Qi Hunt <[EMAI
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 04:45:58PM -0800, Ravinandan Arakali wrote:
> Hi,
> I am trying to submit patches to our driver in the kernel. Since I need a
> copy of latest kernel
> for this, I installed the latest stable version(2.6.5.11). When I apply the
> latest prepatch (2.6.12-rc1)
> on top of this
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Laurent Riffard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > hello,
> >
> > Same kinds of problem here. It depends on the removed module. I mean:
> > "rmmod loop" or "rmmod pcspkr" works. But "rmmod snd_ens1371" or "rmmod
> > ohci1394" hangs.
> >
> > Sysrq-T when
This patch fixes a NULL dereference found by the Coverity checker.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- linux-2.6.12-rc1-mm1-full/drivers/usb/misc/usbtest.c.old2005-03-24
04:33:34.0 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.12-rc1-mm1-full/drivers/usb/misc/usbtest.c2005-03-24
04:33:
Hello,
akpm, I saw you noticed it,
http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0412.0/0424.html
Jim Nelson, this patch is to your post: 2.6.11-rc2-mm2 - kernel panic with
SysRq-f
Recent make-sysrq-f-call-oom_kill.patch calls oom-killer in interrupt context,
thus results into panic. This pat
Thus spake Jeremy Fitzhardinge ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Unfortunately, the Dothans *REQUIRE* some degree of ACPI support; the
> speedfreq-centrino needs to extract a table from ACPI to know what are
> valid operating (voltage/frequency) points to use for the CPU. The
> patch you're using is definite
On Wed, 2005-03-23 at 16:25 +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> Let me guess, it is hanging in wait_for_completion()?
Yes, I have the trace now. Why is curious. This is the trace of the
failure:
Mar 24 18:40:34 localhost kernel: usb 4-2: USB disconnect, address 3
Mar 24 18:40:34 localhost kernel: sd 0:0
On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 21:42, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thursday, 24 of March 2005 02:27, Li Shaohua wrote:
> > On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 09:03, Len Brown wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2005-03-23 at 18:49, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > On Wednesday, 23 of March 2005 23:39, Pa
Coywolf Qi Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Recent make-sysrq-f-call-oom_kill.patch calls oom-killer in interrupt context,
> thus results into panic. This patch fixes out_of_memory() to avoid schedule
> when in interrupt context.
>
> Coywolf
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Coywolf Qi Hunt <[EMAIL
Hi,
I am trying to submit patches to our driver in the kernel. Since I need a
copy of latest kernel
for this, I installed the latest stable version(2.6.5.11). When I apply the
latest prepatch (2.6.12-rc1)
on top of this, I have the following problems:
1. On application of the prepatch, it reports e
1 - 100 of 333 matches
Mail list logo
