On Fri, 2005-04-01 at 21:23 +0200, Jacek Luczak wrote:
> Michael Thonke napisał(a):
> > Hello Jacek,
> >
> > I finially got it working :-) my PCI-Express devices working now...
> > I grabbed the last bk-snapshot from kernel.org 2.6.12-rc1-bk3 and et volia
> > everything except the Marvell Yokon
I submitted a fix for this a while ago, I think ..
interruptible_sleep_on()'s are broken ..
Daniel
On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 13:15, Lee Revell wrote:
> Kernel is 2.6.12-rc1-RT-V0.7.43-05.
>
> BUG: scheduling with irqs disabled: umount/0x/20612
> caller is schedule_timeout+0x63/0xc0
> []
My workarea was based on 2.6.12-rc1-mm4 plus Guilluame's patch.
Your patch caused 5 out of 8 hunks failure at connector.c
and one failure at connector.h.
Could you generate a new patch based on my version? A tar
file of complete source of drivers/connector would work
also. :)
Thanks!
- jay
Lee Revell wrote:
On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 15:15 -0500, K.R. Foley wrote:
Lee Revell wrote:
On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 16:22 +0100, Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
Our first victim!! :-)
No kidding!?
V0.7.44-02 does not even compile for me. It appears to be full of merge
errors.
I must be in the twilight zone
On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 15:15 -0500, K.R. Foley wrote:
> Lee Revell wrote:
> > On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 16:22 +0100, Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
> >
> >>>Our first victim!! :-)
> >>>
> >>
> >>No kidding!?
> >>
> >
> >
> > V0.7.44-02 does not even compile for me. It appears to be full of merge
> >
Hi!
> >>As mentioned in the email, you want netdev, not linux-net...
> >
> >
> >Just out of curiosity: why are there two mailing lists? Especially if
> >one of them is the Wrong One.
>
>
>
> linux-net is mostly dead. I get the impression it is occasionally used
> by users.
>
> netdev (as,
Kernel is 2.6.12-rc1-RT-V0.7.43-05.
BUG: scheduling with irqs disabled: umount/0x/20612
caller is schedule_timeout+0x63/0xc0
[] dump_stack+0x23/0x30 (20)
[] schedule+0xea/0x140 (36)
[] schedule_timeout+0x63/0xc0 (64)
[] interruptible_sleep_on_timeout+0x74/0xe0 (64)
[]
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 10:11:51PM +0200, Ragnar Kj?rstad wrote:
> It does, so why isn't there a way to do this without the disgusting
> hack? (Your words, not mine :) )
inode sorting probably a good guess for a number of filesystems, you
can map the blocks used to do better still (somewhat fs
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 12:39:26PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> One of the reasons I do inode numbers in the "index" file (apart from
> checking that the inode hasn't changed) is in fact that "stat()" is damn
> slow if it causes seeks. Since your stat loop is entirely
>
> You can optimize
On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 11:14 -0500, Kylene Jo Hall wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 13:33 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 04:04:25PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > > Greg KH wrote:
> > > >On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 09:02:24PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > > >
> > > >>Kylene Hall wrote:
Hello.
I have noticed a problem with a race condition fix introduced in
2.4.27-pre2 that causes the kernel to hang when disconnecting a
Bluetooth USB dongle or doing 'hciconfig hci0 down'. No message is
printed, the kernel just doesn't respond anymore.
Seen in Changelog:
Marcel Holtmann:
o
Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 07:42:51PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>> Le vendredi 08 avril 2005 à 19:34 +0200, Adrian Bunk a écrit :
>> GFDL documentation will still be available in the non-free archive.
>
> Assuming you have an online connection and a
On Fri, 8 Apr 2005 21:43:55 +0200 Adrian Bunk wrote:
| On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 05:24:42PM +0100, Paulo Marques wrote:
| > Adrian Bunk wrote:
| > >[...]
| > >>>On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 05:26:31PM +0100, Paulo Marques wrote:
| > >>
| > >>Hi Adrian,
| > >
| >...
| > >Joerg's list of recursions should
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 09:38:09PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Does sorting by inode number make a difference?
It almost certainly would. But I can sort more intelligently than
that even (all the world isn't ext2/3).
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"
Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Fri, 8 Apr 2005, Matthias-Christian Ott wrote:
But as mentioned you need to _open_ each file (It doesn't matter if it's
cached (this speeds up only reading it) -- you need a _slow_ system call
and _very slow_ hardware access anyway).
Nope. System calls aren't
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 05:24:42PM +0100, Paulo Marques wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >[...]
> >>>On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 05:26:31PM +0100, Paulo Marques wrote:
> >>
> >>Hi Adrian,
> >
> >Hi Paolo,
>
> Paulo, please :)
>...
The second name I got wrong today...
Sorry.
>...
> >Joerg's list of
On Fri, 8 Apr 2005, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
>
> > It doesn't matter so much for the cached case, but it _does_ matter
> > for the uncached one.
>
> Doing the minimal stat cold-cache here is about 6s for local disk.
> I'm somewhat surprised it's that bad actually.
One of the reasons I do inode
* Chris Wedgwood:
>> It doesn't matter so much for the cached case, but it _does_ matter
>> for the uncached one.
>
> Doing the minimal stat cold-cache here is about 6s for local disk.
Does sorting by inode number make a difference?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
On Fri, 8 Apr 2005, Matthias-Christian Ott wrote:
>
> But as mentioned you need to _open_ each file (It doesn't matter if it's
> cached (this speeds up only reading it) -- you need a _slow_ system call
> and _very slow_ hardware access anyway).
Nope. System calls aren't slow. What crappy OS
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 12:03:49PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Yes, doing the stat just on the directory (on leaf directories only, of
> course, but nlink==2 does say that on most filesystems) is indeed a huge
> potential speedup.
Here I measure about 6ms for cache --- essentially below the
Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Fri, 8 Apr 2005, Matthias-Christian Ott wrote:
Ok, but if you want to search for information in such big text files it
slow, because you do linear search
No I don't. I don't search for _anything_. I have my own
content-addressable filesystem, and I guarantee you
Eric A. Cottrell wrote:
Hello,
I made the mistake of getting the Plextor SATA DVD Recorder with my new
system not realizing that SATA support is just coming online. I want to
turn this into an opportunity to make the Plextor work. Thanks to the
IDE information pages I got a good start.
I
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 04:57:11PM +0200, Rao Davide wrote:
> My name is David Rao and I have an old alpha DS10 ds10 (ev6
> Tsunami-webbrick cpu) with internal HDU on a LSI controller and external
> HSZ80 storage attached to a Qlogic.
Well, the CONFIG_SCSI_QLOGIC_ISP driver isn't supported, and
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 01:08:28PM -0500, Franco Sensei wrote:
>...
> Actually changing a kernel results in creating a /lib/modules/version
> directory, creating a heavy confusion for a user, especially when
> compiling other modules outside the official kernel release: he juts
> looses the
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 03:19:44PM +0100, Ian Molton wrote:
> This allows common drivers used in different SoC devices to be shared in
> a clean and healthy manner, for example, the MMC function on toshiba
> t7l66xb, tc6393xb, and Compaq IPAQ ASIC3.
Here's some comments on the patch itself.
On Fri, 8 Apr 2005, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
>
> Actually, I could probably make this *much* still faster with a
> caveat. Given that my editor when I write a file will write a
> temporary file and rename it, for files in directories where nlink==2
> I can check chat first and skip the stat of
* Jon Smirl:
> On Apr 8, 2005 2:14 PM, Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>How do you replicate your database incrementally? I've given you enough
>>clues to do it for "git" in probably five lines of perl.
>
> Efficient database replication is achieved by copying the transaction
>
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 11:47:10AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Don't use NFS for development. It sucks for BK too.
Some times NFS is unavoidable.
In the best case (see previous email wrt to only stat'ing the parent
directories when you can) for a current kernel though you can get away
with
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 05:50:42PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Nick Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The first patch adds a generic round_up_pow2() macro to kernel.h. The
> > remaining patches modify a few files to make use of the new macro.
>
> We already have ALIGN() and
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 07:51:23PM -0500, Christopher Li wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am sorry that the last patch about 32 bit compat ioctl on
> 64 bit kernel actually breaks the usbdevfs. That is on the current
> BK tree. I am retarded.
>
> Here is the patch to fix it. Tested with USB hard disk and
On Fri, 8 Apr 2005, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> Well... it took me over 30 seconds just to 'rm -rf' the unpacked
> tarballs of git and sparse-git, over my LAN's NFS.
Don't use NFS for development. It sucks for BK too.
That said, normal _use_ should actually be pretty efficient even over NFS.
Le vendredi 08 avril 2005 Ã 20:01 +0200, Adrian Bunk a Ãcrit :
> > Because we already know that patents on MP3 decoders are not
> > enforceable. Furthermore, the holders of these patents have repeatedly
>
> How do you know the patents aren't enforceable?
Because decoding a MP3 is a trivial
>tested on x86, and all other arches should work as well, but if an
>architecture has irqs-off assumptions in its switch_to() logic
>it might break. (I havent found any but there may such assumptions.)
The ia64_switch_to() code includes a section that can change a pinned
MMU mapping (when the
On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 20:17 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 07:09:18PM -0400, Allison wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is it possible to compile a 2.4.20 kernel on a 2.6 system ?
> > And use the new image successfully ?
>
> It doesn't matter what the system you are compiling on is
On Apr 8, 2005 2:14 PM, Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>How do you replicate your database incrementally? I've given you enough
>clues to do it for "git" in probably five lines of perl.
Efficient database replication is achieved by copying the transaction
logs and then
this clarifys the documentation on the behavier of strncpy().
From: walter harms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Domen Puncer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
[Geez, again, next time i'll send them to myself first]
kj-domen/lib/string.c |4
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff -puN
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Adrian Bunk a écrit :
> On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 09:14:19AM +0200, Mickael Marchand wrote:
>
>>...
>>-> compiling 2.6.12-rc2-mm1 on amd64 :
>>
>>arch/x86_64/kernel/nmi.c:116: error: static declaration of
>>'check_nmi_watchdog' follows non-static
On Fri, 8 April 2005 10:48:26 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Jörn Engel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Next step for inter_module removal. This patch makes the code
> > conditional on its last users and shrinks the kernel binary for the
> > huge majority of people.
>
> If we do this, nobody
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 07:09:18PM -0400, Allison wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to compile a 2.4.20 kernel on a 2.6 system ?
> And use the new image successfully ?
It doesn't matter what the system you are compiling on is running.
> thanks,
> Allison
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not
Its a T41 "without p" :)
On Apr 8, 2005 9:09 PM, Nish Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Apr 7, 2005 11:28 PM, AsterixTheGaul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > FWIW, I have the same problem on a T41p with 2.6.11 and 2.6.12-rc2,
> > > except that neither returns from suspend-to-ram with
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 09:14:19AM +0200, Mickael Marchand wrote:
>...
> -> compiling 2.6.12-rc2-mm1 on amd64 :
>
> arch/x86_64/kernel/nmi.c:116: error: static declaration of
> 'check_nmi_watchdog' follows non-static declaration
> include/asm/apic.h:102: error: previous declaration of
>
On Fri, 8 Apr 2005, Matthias-Christian Ott wrote:
>
> Ok, but if you want to search for information in such big text files it
> slow, because you do linear search
No I don't. I don't search for _anything_. I have my own
content-addressable filesystem, and I guarantee you that it's faster than
On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 11:10 -0700, Mingming Cao wrote:
> However I am still worried that the rw lock will allow concurrent files
> trying to lock the same window at the same time. Only one succeed
> though., high cpu usage then. And also, in the normal case the
> filesystem is not really full,
On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 15:40 +0100, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 00:37, Mingming Cao wrote:
>
> > Actually, we do not have to do an rbtree link and unlink for every
> > window we search. If the reserved window(old) has no free bit and the
> > new reservable window's
Hi. I'm new in the list... please excuse me, I'm probably naive.
I'm using linux from 1997, and now I'm wondering why the kernel
versioning system has been so strict. I've been following the thread
``RFD: Kernel release numbering'', but still I have some concerns...
Earlier versions used the
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 10:46:40AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> I can indeed stat the entire tree in that time (assuming it's in memory,
> of course, but my kernel trees are _always_ in memory ;), but in order to
> do so, I have to be good at finding the names to stat.
I just tested this (I
On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 10:48 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> JÃrn Engel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Next step for inter_module removal. This patch makes the code
> > conditional on its last users and shrinks the kernel binary for the
> > huge majority of people.
>
> If we do this, nobody
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 07:42:51PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le vendredi 08 avril 2005 à 19:34 +0200, Adrian Bunk a écrit :
> > > When there are several possible interpretations, you have to pick up the
> > > more conservative one, as it's not up to us to make the interpretation,
> > > but
On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 10:48 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Jörn Engel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Next step for inter_module removal. This patch makes the code
> > conditional on its last users and shrinks the kernel binary for the
> > huge majority of people.
>
> If we do this, nobody
>> Make your own initrd and put a bash into it. Then start that, e.g. (for
>> our linux live cd), initrd=initrd.sqfs root=/dev/ram0 init=/bin/bash
>
> I have tried these kernel parameters:
> init=/bin/bash
> init=/linuxrc
> init=/init
> init=/sbin/init
> None works.
What's the error message?
>
Jörn Engel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Next step for inter_module removal. This patch makes the code
> conditional on its last users and shrinks the kernel binary for the
> huge majority of people.
If we do this, nobody will get around to fixing up the remaining users.
-
To unsubscribe from
Ladislav Michl wrote:
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 01:08:46PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
Add support for DS1339. The only difference against DS1337 is Trickle
Charge register at address 10h, which is used to enable battery or gold
cap charging. Please note that value may vary for different batteries,
On Fri, 8 Apr 2005, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 10:14:22AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> > After applying a patch, I can do a complete "show-diff" on the kernel tree
> > to see the effect of it in about 0.15 seconds.
>
> How does that work? Can you stat the entire tree
Le vendredi 08 avril 2005 Ã 19:34 +0200, Adrian Bunk a Ãcrit :
> > When there are several possible interpretations, you have to pick up the
> > more conservative one, as it's not up to us to make the interpretation,
> > but to a court.
>
> If Debian was at least consistent.
>
> Why has Debian a
Hello,
I've created a pretty straight forward timer using setitimer, and noticed
some odd differences between 2.4 and 2.6, I wonder if I could get a
clarification if this is the way it should work, or if I should continue to
try to "fix" it.
I create a RealTime Thread( SCHED_FIFO,
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 09:22:00AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le jeudi 07 avril 2005 à 23:07 +0200, Adrian Bunk a écrit :
> > > You are mixing apples and oranges. The fact that the GFDL sucks has
> > > nothing to do with the firmware issue. With the current situation of
> > > firmwares in
Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Fri, 8 Apr 2005, Matthias-Christian Ott wrote:
SQL Databases like SQLite aren't slow.
After applying a patch, I can do a complete "show-diff" on the kernel tree
to see the effect of it in about 0.15 seconds.
Also, I can use rsync to efficiently replicate my database
This patch adds Force Feedback interface to joydev. I felt this
necessary because games usually don't run as root while evdev usually
can't be read or written by anyone else. Patch is against 2.6.12-rc2. If
there is a reason this can't be applied or needs modifications, please
say it :)
If I
On Apr 7, 2005 6:54 PM, Daniel Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So I propose that everybody who is interested, pick one of the above projects
> and join it, to help get it to the point of being able to losslessly import
> the version graph. Given the importance, I think that _all_ viable
>
Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Fri, 8 Apr 2005, Matthias-Christian Ott wrote:
SQL Databases like SQLite aren't slow.
After applying a patch, I can do a complete "show-diff" on the kernel tree
to see the effect of it in about 0.15 seconds.
Also, I can use rsync to efficiently replicate my
On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 19:08 +0200, JÃrn Engel wrote:
> Derived from a patch Arjan sent around.
>
Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
I get OOPs in log_do_checkpoint() while using ext3 quotas.
Is this anyway related to what you are working on ?
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address
printing eip:
801aeee1
*pde = 52b31001
Oops: 0002 [#1]
PREEMPT SMP
Modules linked in:
CPU:3
EIP:
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 08:54:40AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 02:31:36AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 11:05:05PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 10:56:47PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > >...
> > > > If your statement was
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 10:14:22AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> After applying a patch, I can do a complete "show-diff" on the kernel tree
> to see the effect of it in about 0.15 seconds.
How does that work? Can you stat the entire tree in that time? I
measure it as being higher than that.
-
On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 16:22 +0100, Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
> > Our first victim!! :-)
> >
>
> No kidding!?
>
V0.7.44-02 does not even compile for me. It appears to be full of merge
errors.
I get these errors with "make oldconfig":
HOSTLD scripts/kconfig/conf
scripts/kconfig/conf -o
Seeing strange results when using compact flash in a ThinkPad X31. Seems
to work OK, but when the card is inserted or the system is booted with
the card already inserted, I get a few hundred lines of complaint in the
syslog. Prior to 2.6.12-rc2-mm2, I also had problems shutting down.
Result would
Hello,
Did anyone make progress in the case of the VIA Rhine ethernet bug?
It gives messages like:
Apr 8 18:51:08 epia kernel: eth1: Oversized Ethernet frame spanned multiple
buffers, entry 0x9 length 0 status 0600!
Apr 8 18:51:08 epia kernel: eth1: Oversized Ethernet frame cca77090 vs
On Fri, 8 Apr 2005, Matthias-Christian Ott wrote:
>
> SQL Databases like SQLite aren't slow.
After applying a patch, I can do a complete "show-diff" on the kernel tree
to see the effect of it in about 0.15 seconds.
Also, I can use rsync to efficiently replicate my database without having
to
On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 23:28, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> this one looks really clean.
>
> it makes me wonder, what is the current status of fusyn's? Such a light
> datastructure would be much more mergeable upstream than the former
> 100-queues approach.
Inaky was telling me that 100
Derived from a patch Arjan sent around.
Jörn
--
The cheapest, fastest and most reliable components of a computer
system are those that aren't there.
-- Gordon Bell, DEC labratories
Next step for inter_module removal. This patch makes the code
conditional on its last users and shrinks the
Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Which is why I'd love to hear from people who have actually used various
> SCM's with the kernel. There's bound to be people who have already
> tried.
I (successfully) tried GNU Arch with the Linux kernel. I mirrored all
the BKCVS changesets since
Hi,
On Friday, 8 of April 2005 13:46, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, 8 of April 2005 12:08, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.12-rc2/2.6.12-rc2-mm2/
> >
> >
> > - Although small, bk-audit.patch was causing conflits with a
Dave Jones reported seeing bad pmd messages in 2.6.11.6. I've been
seeing them with 2.6.11 and today with 2.6.11.6. When I first saw the
problem I ran memtest86 and it didn't catch anything after ~3hours.
However, I don't see them when X starts. They tend to happen after a
program segfaults:
Sorry for joining this thread late.
Patches 1-3 are fine with me.
/james
Ladislav Michl wrote:
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 04:36:29PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
Oops, you forgot to add a Signed-off-by: line for every patch, as per
Documentation/SubmittingPatches. Care to redo them?
Here it is (I'm sorry
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 02:12:04PM +0200, Simon Derr wrote:
> I enabled the debug messages in random.c and I think I found the problem
> lying in the IA64 version of fls().
Good catch.
> It turns out that the generic and IA64 versions of fls() disagree:
>
> (output from a small test program)
Hi Ladislav,
> (...) (And in ideal world
> firmware (such as U-Boot, RedBoot, etc.) should set this register).
Thanks for pointing the obvious out to me. You convinced me, this simply
doesn't belong to the kernel. So your patch is not needed.
I would still welcome a patch documenting the fact
Adrian Bunk wrote:
[...]
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 05:26:31PM +0100, Paulo Marques wrote:
Hi Adrian,
Hi Paolo,
Paulo, please :)
Paolo is Spanish (or Italian), whereas Paulo is a Portuguese name.
[...]
I think most will agree that the second piece of code is more "readable".
In this case yes (but it
Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Fri, 8 Apr 2005, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
Why not to use sql as backend instead of the tree of directories?
Because it sucks?
I can come up with millions of ways to slow things down on my own. Please
come up with ways to speed things up instead.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The message handler and si are already using /proc/ipmi/. The
patch code simply reuse it. By the way, shouldn't we be using sysfs?
Yes, we should. There's not much sysfs support in the ipmi driver yet;
a patch to add class stuff is in the mm kernels, but nothing for
Hi
This patch - based on
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel=110055503031009=2 -
makes ACPI S3 wakeup work for me on a ThinkPad T40p laptop with a SMP
kernel. Without it only UP kernels work. I've been using the patch for
three months now without any issues.
The ACPI resume code
Shouldn't IPMI be using /sys instead /proc? I thought
we're trying to cleanup /proc?
---
List: linux-kernel
Subject:RE: [PATCH 2.6.11.6] Add power cycle to
ipmi_poweroff module
From:
Date: 2005-04-08 15:53:54
Message-ID:
[Download message RAW]
The message
> And rw locking is much better for concurrency, so
> we might be able to hold it over the whole bitmap search rather than
> taking it and dropping it at each window advance.
rw locks only help if readers are 10x more common than writers generally
speaking. They are quite expensive locks, so
The message handler and si are already using /proc/ipmi/. The
patch code simply reuse it. By the way, shouldn't we be using sysfs?
As for separating from power_off, it just seem so simple to integrate
the power cycle command into the power_off code. It could definitely be
a separate module.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> As per http://www.nist.gov/dads/HTML/shellsort.html, this should be
> referred to as a Shell sort. Shell-Metzner is a misnomer.
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Dickman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Signed-off-by: Domen Puncer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Why not use the sort routine from
On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 09:13 -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Input devices names are not guaranteed to be stable, they get them in
> order of their registration and therefore can change based on config,
> order in which modules are loaded and changes in other modules. In
> this case shift was
On Fri, 8 Apr 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Here's a partial solution. It does depend on a modified version of
> cat-file that behaves like cat. I found it easier to have cat-file
> just dump the object indicated on stdout. Trivial patch for that is included.
Your trivial patch is
> Timestamp of file modified through mmap are not changed in 2.6 (even
> after msync()). Observations on 2.4 and 2.6 kernels:
> - on 2.4, timestamps are altered a few seconds after the program exits.
> - on 2.6, timestamps are never altered.
>
> Is this behaviour a normal behaviour ?
>
>
Hi Marcelo,
* On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 05:20 PM (-0300), Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> This looks like corruption - ext3_get_block() jumps to a bogus function
> which contains bogus instructions. Like if ext3_get_block() had been
> overwritten with junk data.
Thank you very much for your quick
On Apr 7, 2005 11:28 PM, AsterixTheGaul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > FWIW, I have the same problem on a T41p with 2.6.11 and 2.6.12-rc2,
> > except that neither returns from suspend-to-ram with video restored on
> > the LCD. I believe I was able to get video restored on an external CRT
> > in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Below is a patch to add "power cycle" functionality to the IPMI power
off module ipmi_poweroff.
A new module param is added to support this:
parmtype: do_power_cycle:int
parm: do_power_cycle: Set to 1 to enable power cycle instead
of power down. Power cycle
> Our first victim!! :-)
>
No kidding!?
> On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 20:06 +0100, Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
>> >
>> I'm having plenty of this on boot, on my SMP/HT desktop (P4/x86), while
>> running RT-V0.7.44-01 (SMP+PREEMPT_RT):
>>
>> BUG: kstopmachine: RT task yield()-ing!
>>
>> See sample
Jan Dittmer wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
create-a-kstrdup-library-function.patch
create a kstrdup library function
create-a-kstrdup-library-function-fixes.patch
create-a-kstrdup-library-function-fixes
Oops, forgot to include slab.h. I guess the other #include's were
including it somewhere down
On Apr 8, 2005, at 9:19 AM, Ian Molton wrote:
Hi.
This patch add support for a new 'System on Chip' or SoC bus type.
This allows common drivers used in different SoC devices to be shared
in
a clean and healthy manner, for example, the MMC function on toshiba
t7l66xb, tc6393xb, and Compaq IPAQ
fre 2005-04-08 klockan 03:08 -0700 skrev Andrew Morton:
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.12-rc2/2.6.12-rc2-mm2/
>
I got this running ./runltp -x 2, can't recall this happening before. It
bothers me a bit as it's a GFP_KERNEL allocation and there's lots of
swap
Timestamp of file modified through mmap are not changed in 2.6 (even
after msync()). Observations on 2.4 and 2.6 kernels:
- on 2.4, timestamps are altered a few seconds after the program exits.
- on 2.6, timestamps are never altered.
Is this behaviour a normal behaviour ?
Program example to
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 03:19:44PM +0100, Ian Molton wrote:
> Hi.
>
> This patch add support for a new 'System on Chip' or SoC bus type.
Hi Ian.
A few general comments.
1) Please add kernel-doc style comments for all exported functions
2) Keep source within 80 coloumns
3) Do not use extern in
Below is a patch to add "power cycle" functionality to the IPMI power
off module ipmi_poweroff.
A new module param is added to support this:
parmtype: do_power_cycle:int
parm: do_power_cycle: Set to 1 to enable power cycle instead
of power down. Power cycle is contingent on
Hi,
On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 00:37, Mingming Cao wrote:
> Actually, we do not have to do an rbtree link and unlink for every
> window we search. If the reserved window(old) has no free bit and the
> new reservable window's is right after the old one, no need to unlink
> the old window from the
The following problem was found by Giovambattista Pulcini
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, who also provided a partial patch, and this has
been verified by our time guru Gabriel Paubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
The problem is that in do_settimeofday() we always set time_state to
TIME_ERROR and except on two
$B(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(B
$B2q0w?t(B10$BK|?M1[$((B,$BF|K\0l:GBg5i=P2q$$;Y1g%3%_%eFs%F%#!<(B
$B(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(B
$B(.(,"!(B*$B!~(B
101 - 200 of 663 matches
Mail list logo
