Hi!
> I discovered a minor change in 2.6.10-mm1, changing this value back
> corrects the "ok" button issue.
>
>
> diff -urN linux/drivers/usb/input/ati_remote.c
> linux-2.6.11/drivers/usb/input/ati_remote.c
> --- linux/drivers/usb/input/ati_remote.c2005-08-02
> 17:56:26.0 +1200
Christoph wrote:
> Could you rework the patch to all of that?
Next week - I am on vacation at the moment.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe
Christoph wrote:
> Ok. The str_to_mpol function needs to be executed from the task whose
> memory policies are to be displayed but why would mpol_to_str need that?
You are probably right. I doubt mpol_to_str needs that. I was
probably painting with too wide a brush.
> I am quite concerned
HI David ,
Thanks a Lot for clearing all the doubts , yes its the drawback of my
hardware which i cant use high speed compact flash as DMA is not supported
,
Is there anyway with the help of software to message that , this compact
flash cant be used anymore , first of all is this a good idea
The kexec boot is not successful on some power machines since all CPUs
are getting removed from global interrupt queue (GIQ) before kexec boot.
Some systems always expect at least one CPU in GIQ. Hence, this patch
will make sure that only secondary CPUs are removed from GIQ.
[This only affects
Jens Axboe wrote:
If I am reading the specs correctly, that'd mean the ahci driver is
wrong in setting the SActive bit.
I completely agree, that was my reading of the spec as well and hence my
original posts about this in the NCQ thread.
Have you (or has anybody else) also seen the wrong
From: Haren Myneni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For soft reset during system hang, got an error "CPU did not take
control" for some CPUs even though they responded to soft-reset (called
SystemReset, die and called debugger - xmon). First these CPUs entered
into xmon by IPI callback and then got a
Michael Krufky wrote:
Why not just have the scripts plug values into a database, and have the
html/php be formatted like Bodo suggests, and reads content from database?
Very simple, less maintenance... Only requires 1 initial redesign, and
easier maintainence of the scripts that you speak of.
H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Bodo Eggert wrote:
I hacked some changes to create vogon-compatibility. Maybe you like it.
I'm not completely happy, but it's too late now.
Changes:
- Make first column more terse
- Move full download links to a seperate table, where they can be found.
- Add headings
Bodo Eggert wrote:
I hacked some changes to create vogon-compatibility. Maybe you like it.
I'm not completely happy, but it's too late now.
Changes:
- Make first column more terse
- Move full download links to a seperate table, where they can be found.
- Add headings above the patches and
--"Martin J. Bligh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote (on Tuesday, August 02, 2005
18:17:33 -0700):
> --Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote (on Thursday, July 28, 2005
> 23:10:29 -0700):
>
>> "Martin J. Bligh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> NUMA-Q boxes are still crashing on boot with -mm BTW.
On Aug 2, 2005, at 21:00:02, Hans Reiser wrote:
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
because reiser got merged before jbd. Next question.
That is the wrong reason. We use our own journaling layer for the
reason that Vivaldi used his own melody.
I don't know anything about GFS, but expecting a filesystem
Edward Falk wrote:
Hi Tejun; I'm the guy at Google working on SATA drivers (port
multipliers right now). As soon as I can (next week perhaps, I'll start
looking at the driver you wrote. From what I can see, it looks quite good.
+
+static u8 sil24_check_status(struct ata_port *ap)
+{
+
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 09:45:24AM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> * The on disk structures are defined in terms of uint32_t and friends,
> which are NOT endian neutral. Why are they not le32/be32 and thus
> endian-defined? Did you run bitwise-sparse on GFS yet ?
GFS has had proper endian
Bodo/Andrew,
This small patch will allow no_overlay flag to disable BTTV driver to
report OVERLAY capabilities. It should fix your troubles by enabling
no_overlay=1 when inserting bttv module.
This patch is against our CVS tree, but should apply with some hunk on
2.6.13-rc4 or
On Tuesday 02 August 2005 22:13, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
>> >I've been complaining about this for some time. Kernel.org really
>> > needs to show more information about the rc kernels and how to
>> > create them. We want more testers, but I wonder how many people
>> > go through the above steps and
Hi,
my box with nForce2 doesn't turn off automatically with 2.6.13-rc5
(perhaps also with -rc4). Everything seems to go as it should (both with
"poweroff" and ) (even disks park) except for the actual
turn-off.
With -rc3 it works fine.
Martin
P.S.: It's a Gigabyte 7NNXP with latest BIOS.
-
On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 22:42 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 19:25 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 20:00 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 16:38 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > > > Couldn't you just do some math off
On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 19:25 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 20:00 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 16:38 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > > Couldn't you just do some math off current->timestamp to see how long
> > > the task has been running? This per arch
On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 19:13 -0700, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
>
> Was the request cc-ed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (along with
> the [KORG] in the subject line)?
> I can't tell from the email archives.
Yep, my first (and only?) post on this CC'ed [EMAIL PROTECTED] and I
added [KORG] to the subject. Hopefully
On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 20:00 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 16:38 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > Couldn't you just do some math off current->timestamp to see how long
> > the task has been running? This per arch stuff seems a bit invasive..
>
> The thing is, I'm tracking how
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 04:20:00PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> Hi Marcelo,
>
> Another fix from 2.6.12.3 that seems approprite for 2.4.
> Should apply cleanly to your tree.
Please ignore this. I sent the wrong patch.
I don't think thie cx88 driver is in 2.4 at all.
> Signed-off-by: Horms <[EMAIL
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005, Puneet Vyas wrote:
> Hmmm . They put it such that it plays only in microsoft media player. Case
> closed :)
I think you're vastly underestimating the skills of MPlayer. ;-)
For instance
mplayer
Keith Owens wrote:
On Tue, 02 Aug 2005 18:12:27 -0700,
George Anzinger wrote:
How about something like:
if (current + THREAD_SIZE/sizeof(long) - (regs + sizeof(pt_regs)) >
MAGIC)
current points to the current struct task, regs points to the kernel
stack. Those two data areas can
On Tue, 02 Aug 2005 22:04:16 -0400 Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Tuesday 02 August 2005 15:21, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> >On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 14:54 -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
> >> On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 11:36 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
> >> > On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 14:36 -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
> >> > > On
On Tuesday 02 August 2005 15:21, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 14:54 -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
>> On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 11:36 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 14:36 -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
>> > > On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 11:33 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
>> > > >
>> >
Thanks for this wonderful effort! Add one more to the testing team.
~Puneet
Jesper Juhl wrote:
Hi,
How to apply the -rc, -git, -mm and the 2.6.x.y (-stable) patches is a quite
frequently asked question on LKML and elsewhere.
Since so many people seem to be confused by this I gathered it
On Tue, 02 Aug 2005 18:12:27 -0700,
George Anzinger wrote:
>How about something like:
> if (current + THREAD_SIZE/sizeof(long) - (regs + sizeof(pt_regs)) >
> MAGIC)
current points to the current struct task, regs points to the kernel
stack. Those two data areas can be completely
Denis Vlasenko wrote:
Linux 2.6.12
Was running for months with this simple iptables rule:
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -s 172.17.6.44 -d 172.16.42.201 -p tcp --dport
9100 -j REDIRECT --to 9123
Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes)
00 REDIRECT tcp -- * *
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 16:57 +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>
>
>>>* Why use your own journalling layer and not say ... jbd ?
>>>
>>>
>>Why does reiser use its own journalling layer and not say ... jbd ?
>>
>>
>
>because reiser got merged before jbd. Next
--Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote (on Thursday, July 28, 2005 23:10:29
-0700):
> "Martin J. Bligh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> NUMA-Q boxes are still crashing on boot with -mm BTW. Is the thing we
>> identified earlier with the sched patches ...
>>
>>
Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 16:38 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
Couldn't you just do some math off current->timestamp to see how long
the task has been running? This per arch stuff seems a bit invasive..
The thing is, I'm tracking how long the task is running in the kernel
Hi Bjorn,
static void
-pnpacpi_parse_allocated_irqresource(struct pnp_resource_table * res, int irq)
+pnpacpi_parse_allocated_irqresource(struct pnp_resource_table * res, u32 irq)
{
int i = 0;
while (!(res->irq_resource[i].flags & IORESOURCE_UNSET) &&
@@ -85,13 +85,13 @@
Thank you! I agree that having a link off of kernel.org makes sense.
Richard
On 8/2/05, Jesper Juhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> How to apply the -rc, -git, -mm and the 2.6.x.y (-stable) patches is a quite
> frequently asked question on LKML and elsewhere.
> Since so many people seem
On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 09:55 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> Any objections to the patch below? I posted it last Wednesday,
> but haven't heard anything. Once we have this fix, 8250_pnp
> should have sufficient functionality that we can get rid of
> 8250_acpi.
>
>
>
> Use types that match the
Sean Bruno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 15:21 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> I've been complaining about this for some time. Kernel.org really needs
>> to show more information about the rc kernels and how to create them.
>> We want more testers, but I wonder how many
On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 14:51, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 02:29:36PM -0700, Bruce Allan wrote:
> > [resending to Neil, Trond and linux-nfs list; initial copy to lkml]
> >
> > When registering an RPC cache, cache_register() always sets the owner as
> > the sunrpc module.
For those interested, there is a discussion regarding pmu usage and
kernel functionality requirements happening on the perfctr mailing list
([EMAIL PROTECTED]). The goal is to understand what
functionality people need so that we can eventually have better support
for pmu's in the kernel.
-
To
On 8/2/05, Bill Davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Athul Acharya wrote:
> > Hey folks,
> >
> > Is there a quick way to determine if the current processor is
> > Hyperthreaded, and if so, which logical processor represents the other
> > thread on the chip? Please cc replies to me as I am not
Thanks for testing the RCs, we need more users to do that.
If any of your hardware stops working, make sure to report it, don't
assume that it will fix itself! Assume you're the first to notice the
bug.
I've been complaining about this for some time. Kernel.org really needs
to show more
On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 16:38 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> Couldn't you just do some math off current->timestamp to see how long
> the task has been running? This per arch stuff seems a bit invasive..
The thing is, I'm tracking how long the task is running in the kernel
without doing a schedule.
Couldn't you just do some math off current->timestamp to see how long
the task has been running? This per arch stuff seems a bit invasive..
Daniel
On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 15:45 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 12:19 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Steven Rostedt <[EMAIL
Hmmm . They put it such that it plays only in microsoft media
player. Case closed :)
~Puneet
Alejandro Bonilla wrote:
Hi Guys/Gals,
I watched some commercials and I almost puked when I looked at the
Microsoft Get the Facts for Linux vs Windows Server stuff.
They have a url
We have increased PCIBIOS_MIN_IO to 0x4000, but still want
motherboard resources to be allocated properly. So we need
to state 0x1000 (according to the comment) limit explicitely.
Signed-off-by: Ivan Kokshaysky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- 2.5.13-rc5/drivers/acpi/motherboard.c Fri Jun 17
util-linux 2.13-pre1 is available at
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/util-linux/testing/util-linux-2.13-pre1.tar.gz
Changes:
* use GNU autoconf/automake/libtool for building
* added schedutils
* removed support for curses implementations other than ncurses
* removed programs: arch,
I have a 7 TB JFS volume on a sparc64 box (sun enterprise 220R)
running 2.6.12.2 on debian sparc. When copying large numbers of
files, files start to dissappear, but they are not actually gone they
just stop showing up. when you delete enough files from the
directory, all of a sudden all of the
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 02:57:19PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> But you don't need to split up any patches you've already prepared: I can
> easily just edit away the part I already committed.
OK, I keep your change here - mostly for Mikael, so he can try that ASAP.
There is a number of x86
Hi Tejun; I'm the guy at Google working on SATA drivers (port
multipliers right now). As soon as I can (next week perhaps, I'll start
looking at the driver you wrote. From what I can see, it looks quite good.
+
+static u8 sil24_check_status(struct ata_port *ap)
+{
+ return ATA_DRDY;
Lee Revell wrote:
On Wed, 2005-08-03 at 00:14 +0400, Dmitrij Bogush wrote:
This happens when some software check battery state or current cpu
rate too often.
Acer laptops are notorious for buggy SMM implementations that disable
interrupts for many timer ticks. Does it work any better with
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Looking forward to your feedback (and possible inclusion).
>
> I guess this document could also be placed somewhere on kernel.org and linked
> to from the front page so that people downloading the various patches will
> have this information
The enclosed patch creates Documentation/kprobes.txt, a guide to using
the existing Kprobes facility for dynamic kernel instrumentation.
Please apply.
Jim Keniston
Acked-by: Prasanna S Panchamukhi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Jim Keniston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005, Luck, Tony wrote:
> Yes this is an SMP system (Intel Tiger4). Cpu0 is the boot cpu, and is
> indeed the one that takes the write lock, and thus the fast-return from
> the get_counter() code. I'm just very confused as to why I only see these
> 10X worse outliers on cpu3.
Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On 8/2/05, Sid Boyce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
New SuSE 9.3 x86_64 install after HD crash. With 2.6.13-rc3 and up to
2.6.13-rc4-git4. I can't remember seeing these errors for quite a long
time, thought they were fixed, perhaps there is a regression in recent
kernels.
It
>Acer laptops are notorious for buggy SMM implementations that disable
>interrupts for many timer ticks. Does it work any better with HZ=100?
Maybe, but I do not see any difference between 100 and 1000 hz on 2.6.13-rc5.
With 2.6.13(from rc4) I do not get "crazy jumps" like in 2.6.12 or
later,
On Wed, 3 Aug 2005, Ivan Kokshaysky wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 02:21:44PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > Nice, care to make up a single patch with these two changes in it?
>
> Yep, I'll do it shortly, plus some minor additions as separate
> patches.
Actually, since everybody seems to like
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 02:29:36PM -0700, Bruce Allan wrote:
> [resending to Neil, Trond and linux-nfs list; initial copy to lkml]
>
> When registering an RPC cache, cache_register() always sets the owner as
> the sunrpc module. However, there are RPC caches owned by other modules.
> With the
>> I'm still seeing the asymmetric behavior where cpu3 sees the really high
>> times,
>> while cpu0,1,2 are seeing peaks of 170us, which is still not pretty.
>
>Is this an SMP system? Updates are performed by cpu0 and therefore the
>cacheline is mostly exclusively owned by that processor and
On Mon, 2005-08-01 at 11:13 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > Good question. I was about to submit a patch that created
> > drivers/platform because the toplevel driver for MQ11xx is a
> > platform_device driver. Any thoughts on this?
>
> drivers/platform sounds good to me.
In another thread (about
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 02:21:44PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> Nice, care to make up a single patch with these two changes in it?
Yep, I'll do it shortly, plus some minor additions as separate
patches.
Ivan.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a
ostdinc -isystem
/home/jbglaw/vax-linux/scm/build-20050802-171439-vax-linux/install/usr/lib/gcc/vax-linux/4.1.0/include
-D__KERNEL__ -Iinclude -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs
-fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -ffreestanding -O1 -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe
-Wdeclaration-aft
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 04:09:17PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> I have a patch here which I still need to do more testing with,
> which might help performance on HT systems.
>
> I found that idle siblings could cause SMP and NUMA balancing to
> be too aggressive in some cases.
> --
> If an idle
Sean Bruno wrote:
On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 15:21 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
I've been complaining about this for some time. Kernel.org really needs
to show more information about the rc kernels and how to create them.
We want more testers, but I wonder how many people go through the above
Hi,
How to apply the -rc, -git, -mm and the 2.6.x.y (-stable) patches is a quite
frequently asked question on LKML and elsewhere.
Since so many people seem to be confused by this I gathered it ought to be
properly documented once and for all so we a) get more people testing those
trees and
[resending to Neil, Trond and linux-nfs list; initial copy to lkml]
When registering an RPC cache, cache_register() always sets the owner as
the sunrpc module. However, there are RPC caches owned by other modules.
With the incorrect owner setting, the real owning module can be removed
The ATA specification tells large disk drives to return C/H/S data of
16383/16/63 regardless of their actual size (other variations on this
return include 15 heads and/or 4092 cylinders). Unfortunately these CHS
data confuse the existing IDE code and cause it to report invalid
geometries in
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 10:11:40AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> So I think it would be much easier to just make the change in
> "pci_bus_alloc_resource()", and say that if the parent resource that we're
> testing starts at some non-zero value, we just use that instead of "min"
> when we call
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 01:13:37AM +0400, Ivan Kokshaysky wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 10:11:40AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > So I think it would be much easier to just make the change in
> > "pci_bus_alloc_resource()", and say that if the parent resource that we're
> > testing starts at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This patch adds USB gadget support for the USB peripheral controller
on the MQ11xx graphics chip.
Signed-off-by: Jamey Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Zabolotny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The email subject. "Re: **SPAM** [PATCH 3/3] usb gadget driver
3/3? I seem to be missing the other two patches...
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 03:20:47PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> This patch adds USB gadget support for the USB peripheral controller
> on the MQ11xx graphics chip.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jamey Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Signed-off-by:
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Sadly, running my test case (running 1-4 tasks, each bound to a cpu, each
> pounding
> on gettimeofday(2)) I'm still seeing significant time spent spinning in this
> loop.
> Things are better: worst case time was down to just over 2ms from 34ms ...
I'm running comedi-0.7.70, but the issue is seems be be coming from the fact
that I'm using a nommu arch.
grepping through my arch and include/asm, these symbols are indeed not
defined.
This makes sense because uClinux has no true virtual memory, vmalloc is just a
wrapper for kmalloc.
The
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005, Alejandro Bonilla wrote:
> Hi Guys/Gals,
>
> I watched some commercials and I almost puked when I looked at the
> Microsoft Get the Facts for Linux vs Windows Server stuff.
>
> They have a url which is http://www.microsoft.com/getthefacts
>
> Is this crap any close to
* Martin Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 09:54:26PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > We could perhaps add a CAP_SYS_ADMIN-only sysctl for this hack,
> > >
> > > That would be more appropriate.
> > >
> > >
This patch adds a framebuffer driver for MQ11xx system-on-chip
graphics chip. This chip is used in several non-PCI ARM and MIPS
platforms such as the iPAQ H5550. This driver depends on the overall
platform_device driver for the chip.
Signed-off-by: Jamey Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 15:21 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> I've been complaining about this for some time. Kernel.org really needs
> to show more information about the rc kernels and how to create them.
> We want more testers, but I wonder how many people go through the above
> steps and just
This patch adds USB gadget support for the USB peripheral controller
on the MQ11xx graphics chip.
Signed-off-by: Jamey Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Zabolotny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
commit 9b2407962e0786705efeed755ab1d399deba8685
tree 7c9e5187687bec3112af0f83e9e3831b18c41fa5
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> Go for it, I think whatever we do won't be wonderfully pretty.
Here we are: get_user_pages quite untested, let alone the racy case,
but I think it should work. Please all hack it around as you see fit,
I'll check mail when I get home, but won't be
Hi,
> Is this crap any close to real or by any chance "realistic" ? Are these
> "benchmarks" simple marketing?
they're marketing.
Just the same stuff like the studies paid by Microsoft.
It's not worth to spend any thought on it.
Greets,
Manuel
--
Manuel Schneider
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 8/2/05, Dmitrij Bogush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi.
> I have the same issue on Acer Aspire 1520 notebook. On SuSE 9.3 system
> can not boot with acpi=off.
> In 2.6.13-rc4-git4 this crazy touchpad jumps reports as:
>
> warning: many lost ticks.
> Your time source seems to be instable or
It seems that the subject patch generates a warning (missed it on the
compile). Here is a patch to eliminate the warning.
--
George Anzinger george@mvista.com
HRT (High-res-timers): http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers/
Source: MontaVista Software, Inc. George Anzinger
Type:
On Wed, 2005-08-03 at 00:14 +0400, Dmitrij Bogush wrote:
> This happens when some software check battery state or current cpu
> rate too often.
Acer laptops are notorious for buggy SMM implementations that disable
interrupts for many timer ticks. Does it work any better with HZ=100?
Lee
-
To
Hi!
This patch tries to fix the strange behaviour in /proc//,
where it is currently possible for the owner of a process to
temporarily chmod the entries.
Since the inodes for these entries are only temporary, the
permissions will suddenly be reset when the cache is reclaimed.
This is confusing
Hi.
I have the same issue on Acer Aspire 1520 notebook. On SuSE 9.3 system
can not boot with acpi=off.
In 2.6.13-rc4-git4 this crazy touchpad jumps reports as:
warning: many lost ticks.
Your time source seems to be instable or some driver is hogging interupts
rip handler_IRQ_event+0x20/0x60
and
On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 15:45 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Here it is (Finally). I just had to be patient with the kjournal
> lockup. I had to wait some time before the lockup occurred, but when it
> did, I got my message out:
Oh yeah, this goes against 52-10.
-- Steve
-
To unsubscribe from
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> >
> > Yes, good point. If the thing is still marked dirty in the TLB, some other
> > thread might be writing to the page after we've cleared dirty but before
> > we've flushed the TLB - causing the new dirty bit to be lost. I think.
>
> Would that
On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 12:19 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Steven Rostedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > In my custom kernel, I have a wchan field of the task that records
> > where the task calls something that might schedule. This way I can see
> > where things locked up if I don't have a
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 09:18:51PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > I did not notice before, but my values (capacity and so on) are completely
> > wrong. It should contain values in mWh instead of mAh.
>
> There's a new kernel boot oprion ec_polling that you may want to try.
Now it's ok
On Tuesday 02 Aug 2005 20:05, Lukas Hejtmanek wrote:
[snip]
>
> I did not notice before, but my values (capacity and so on) are completely
> wrong. It should contain values in mWh instead of mAh.
mWh is mAh x operational voltage. They're not "completely wrong", probably
just whatever unit your
On 2005-08-02T10:52:00, Lee Revell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Power consumption matters to server, desktop, and laptop.
> >
> > Assuming this is a laptop issue is wildly incorrect.
>
> I would think you'd get the best power/performance ration from a desktop
> by just having it suspend after
On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 14:54 -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 11:36 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
> > On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 14:36 -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 11:33 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I have been trying to test the 2.6.13 and can't
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Aug 2005, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> >
> > It might not be so bad. It's going to access the struct page anyway.
> > And clearing dirty from parent and child at fork time could save two
> > set_page_dirtys at exit time. But I'm not sure that we
On Tuesday, 2 of August 2005 21:05, Lukas Hejtmanek wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 08:59:08PM +0200, Alessandro Suardi wrote:
> > On 8/2/05, Lukas Hejtmanek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > newly with 2.6.13-rc5 (previous -rc1 was quite ok)
> > >
> > > $ time cat
The definition of __NR_set_zone_reclaim is still in the i386 and
ia64 versions of . Was this intentional (keep the
system call number reserved in case this is resurrected), or just
an oversight in the removal patch?
-Tony
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 08:59:08PM +0200, Alessandro Suardi wrote:
> On 8/2/05, Lukas Hejtmanek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > newly with 2.6.13-rc5 (previous -rc1 was quite ok)
> >
> > $ time cat /proc/acpi/battery/BAT0/info
> > present: yes
> > design capacity:
On 8/2/05, Lukas Hejtmanek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> newly with 2.6.13-rc5 (previous -rc1 was quite ok)
>
> $ time cat /proc/acpi/battery/BAT0/info
> present: yes
> design capacity: 6000 mAh
> last full capacity: 6000 mAh
> battery technology:
On 8/2/05, Michael D. Setzer II <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm working on the ghost for linux project, which uses various
> kernels. The older version 0.14 version had two kernels that support
> some configurations. I've added a number of additional builds
> adding extra features, but left
On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 11:36 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 14:36 -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
> > On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 11:33 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > I have been trying to test the 2.6.13 and can't quite get the patches
> > > applied cleanly.
> > >
> > > What
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005, Hugh Dickins wrote:
>
> It might not be so bad. It's going to access the struct page anyway.
> And clearing dirty from parent and child at fork time could save two
> set_page_dirtys at exit time. But I'm not sure that we could batch the
> the dirty bit clearing into one
Sean Bruno wrote:
I have been trying to test the 2.6.13 and can't quite get the patches
applied cleanly.
What kernel version (full kernel source tar ball) should I be using to
apply the patches(rc5) with? Is it 2.6.12.3?
2.6.13-rc* patches apply against 2.6.12 NOT 2.6.12.x
--
Michael
On Llu, 2005-08-01 at 19:57 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I notice that when one closes a pty, rather than the master side'd read
> returning 0, it's an EIO. Seems to be this code, from n_tty.c.
> if (test_bit(TTY_OTHER_CLOSED, >flags)) {
> retval = -EIO;
>
1 - 100 of 555 matches
Mail list logo
