Gabriel C wrote:
Hello,
on current git head I see this new warning caused by commit
c70df74376c1e29a04e07e23dd3f4c384d6166dd
...
MODPOST vmlinux
WARNING: arch/i386/kernel/built-in.o(.text+0xc290): Section mismatch:
reference to .init.data:cpu_llc_id (between 'set_cpu_sibling_map' and
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 05:25:30 -0400 (EDT) Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007, Stefan Richter wrote:
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
...
I would consider it more ugly to special case this and that in the
kconfig code when plain
On Thursday 19 July 2007 17:07, Ingo Molnar wrote:
i crashed the laptop in a weird way and had to power-cycle it in an
unusual fashion. After that i wanted to try your latest BUG_ON() theory
but the network hang went away!
Should I rejoice, or regret? :-)
maybe it's not the power-cycling
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 07:17:07AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
so you're saying you'll drop that include from util-linux, is that
it? but it's still a good plan to generate a warning whenever
userspace includes that file, so i'll submit a
Jan Glauber wrote:
This patch introduces a cpu time clock for s390 (only ticking
if the virtual cpu is running) and bases the s390 implementation
of sched_clock() on it.
The times lice length on a virtual cpu can be anything
between the calculated time slice and zero. In reality
this
Christoph Hellwig napsal(a):
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 07:17:07AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
so you're saying you'll drop that include from util-linux, is that it?
but it's still a good plan to generate a warning whenever userspace
includes that file, so i'll submit a quick patch to generate
* Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ugh. Something really weird happened with this e1000 problem.
i crashed the laptop in a weird way and had to power-cycle it in an
unusual fashion. After that i wanted to try your latest BUG_ON()
theory but the network hang went away!
For 3 hours
This removes the requirement for callers to get_cpu() to check in simple
cases. i386 and x86_64 already received a similar treatment.
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
arch/ia64/kernel/smp.c |8 +---
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git
This removes the requirement for callers to get_cpu() to check in simple
cases. i386 and x86_64 already received a similar treatment.
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c |7 ++-
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 10:16:14AM +1000, Neil Brown wrote:
On Wednesday July 18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 12:29:33AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 12:27:37 +1000 NeilBrown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+static void exp_flags(struct seq_file *m,
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
Stefan Richter wrote:
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
...
it's not clear if that means that it was a *one-time* transition
aid which is now unnecessary, or whether it's an *ongoing* aid which
might be used at any time. currently, there are no
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 08:29:06AM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
- * Monotonic_clock - returns # of nanoseconds passed since time_init()
+ * Scheduler clock - returns current time in nanosec units.
+ * Now based on virtual cpu time to only account time the guest
+ * was actually
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007, Stefan Richter wrote:
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
...
it's not clear if that means that it was a *one-time* transition
aid which is now unnecessary, or whether it's an *ongoing* aid which
might be used at any time. currently, there are no invocations of
Olaf Kirch wrote:
On Thursday 19 July 2007 12:58, Ingo Molnar wrote:
i.e. it's the classic 'eth0 got stuck somehow' tx/rx state machine
hickup symptoms, with no other bad symptoms such as lockups or crashes.
Duh, I found it.
The e1000 poll routine does this to leave polling mode.
* Jeremy Fitzhardinge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yeah. But then it should not be using sched_clock() but CFS's new
rq_clock() method - which does try to construct a globally valid
timesource out of sched_clock(). [that fix is not backportable
though]
Hm, that doesn't look quite
* Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hm, that doesn't look quite right. Doesn't rq_clock measure time
spent running? Unstolen time includes idle time too (it just
excludes time in which a VCPU is runnable but not actually running).
generally rq_clock() also includes idle time, so
Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Not at runtime, acceleration is always on if you compile kernel with vlan
support. That is a design mistake as far as I can tell.
I think so.
However seeing unknown tags on master device (with tcpdump etc)
would certainly be useful.
Only in
The consensus seems to be that skb's need to carry vlan accelerated tags in
their cb's, on rx as well as tx. VLAN_TX_SKB_CB() is perfect for that.
[Patrick] On the TX path, it could simply use the CB, but this is actually
also wrong (for both macvlan and real devices) since qdiscs have
Hi,
Now in the GFS2 git tree. Thanks,
Steve.
On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 00:27 +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
Greetings,
There's a memory leak in fs/dlm/member.c::dlm_add_member().
If dlm_node_weight(ls-ls_name, nodeid) returns 0, then
we'll return without freeing the memory allocated to the (at
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
Stefan Richter wrote:
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
...
it's not clear if that means that it was a *one-time* transition
aid which is now unnecessary, or whether it's an *ongoing* aid which
might be used at any time. currently,
On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 22:19 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 18:23:33 -0700 Badari Pulavarty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Andrew,
Here is the patch to support read() for hugetlbfs, needed to get
oprofile working on executables backed by largepages.
If you plan to
James Bottomley wrote:
On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 16:31 +0200, Gabriel C wrote:
No is not an SATA controller.
sda and sdb are SCSI disks connected to an Adaptec AIC-7892P U160/m
controller using the aic7xxx driver.
OK, this definitely works for me, that's what my root disk is on. I
If lpfc_hbq_alloc() fails, an hbq_buffer is leaked. Found by Coverity
(1775).
Signed-off-by: Florin Malita [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c |4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c
* Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ah! Just found the reason: the bug apparently depends on the precise
kernel command-line contents. I accidentally dropped ignore_loglevel
(found this while comparing with the older logs i sent to you), adding
it back in produces hung networking too.
Hi,
In get_page(), the parameter page is changed by
page = compound_head(page);
if the page is not the first page of compound pages.
My question: is this behavior correct?
Regards
Yin, Fengwei
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a
On 7/19/07, Paul Clements [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you name n as tmp (as in the previous code) so that it's clear
that's only a temporary variable. Other than that, this looks good.
Sure. I just use the name n as in the declaration of
list_for_each_entry_safe in the header file
From: Segher Boessenkool [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...since this won't work (compiler bug, see http://gcc.gnu.org/
PR31490).
The bug report says IA64 is broken, too. Please verify and extend the
patch if possible...
The GCC bug exists on all architectures. Linux build is only
affected on PowerPC,
Hi Pierre,
Lots of Linux handhelds use MMC/SD devices as the root file system. This
has worked quite reliably for many kernel versions. In 2.6.22, it seems
that if you suspend such a system then resume it, the device locks up.
Trying to execute anything on the filesystem results in a Permission
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007, Andi Kleen wrote:
qemu testing and booting test machines with i386 kernels wasn't very
successfull
with recent git kernels. I got either BUGs because of failing sysfs
initialization
or oopses in kmalloc, but no user land.
Can you send in the oopses and BUGs? The
One additional thought: with the proposed changes in my prev message, the
driver can be set to hw vlan accelerated mode, even if no vlan interfaces are
configured. We would not have to switch hw vlan accelerated mode anymore, when
vlan interfaces are created or destroyed.
On Jul 19 2007 10:41, Jean Delvare wrote:
Well, just check if /sys/devices/ exists, that should be cheap enough. :)
Yes, this is a possibility, and one I had considered at first. But I
wasn't sure which subdirectory to check. sysfs isn't well known for its
stability, and I didn't know which
* Jeremy Fitzhardinge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
/*
- * Monotonic_clock - returns # of nanoseconds passed since time_init()
+ * Scheduler clock - returns current time in nanosec units.
+ * Now based on virtual cpu time to only account time the guest
+ * was actually running.
* Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i'll now check whether removing ignore_on_loglevel (no other changes)
makes the hang go away. Maybe ignore_on_loglevel is buggy - or it
produces an immediate printk (going out to the interface) during a
particularly sensitive period of network
* Kok, Auke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't have a fix ready yet - I hope I'll have something later this
afternoon.
interesting, you seem to found the cause allright. I can't confirm the
problem but I know that netpoll and NAPI has historically been an
issue. I look forward to your
Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hm, that doesn't look quite right. Doesn't rq_clock measure time
spent running? Unstolen time includes idle time too (it just
excludes time in which a VCPU is runnable but not actually running).
generally rq_clock()
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007, Jiri Slaby wrote:
Christoph Hellwig napsal(a):
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 07:17:07AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
so you're saying you'll drop that include from util-linux, is
that it? but it's still a good plan to generate a warning
whenever userspace includes that
* Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i'll now check whether removing ignore_on_loglevel (no other
changes) makes the hang go away. Maybe ignore_on_loglevel is buggy -
or it produces an immediate printk (going out to the interface)
during a particularly sensitive period of network
* Jeremy Fitzhardinge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
how about the patch below instead? (which, unlike the first one,
happens to build and boot ;-)
Yes, that should be fine if its just based on sched_clock. Presumably
that means that any architecture (eg, s390) which chooses to implement
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 09:19:56AM -0400, James Morris wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007, James Morris wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007, Jim Kovaric wrote:
IBMs TAMOS (Tivoli Access Manager for Operating systems) contains a
loadable module,
which is an out of tree module, and registers
Ingo Molnar wrote:
yeah, that's the idea.
Good. But the real question: does it help Andrew?
J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please
Hi,
When a device is in D3 state, is it possible to read from the PCI
config space header ? Or does a D3 state imply that the whole PC
itself is in standby ?
I am trying to relate whether a device that i have, a new device that
i am working upon, starts up in D3 state. whether that could be the
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 08:47:01 -0700 (PDT)
andrei radulescu-banu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The consensus seems to be that skb's need to carry vlan accelerated tags in
their cb's, on rx as well as tx. VLAN_TX_SKB_CB() is perfect for that.
[Patrick] On the TX path, it could simply use the CB,
* Jeremy Fitzhardinge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ingo Molnar wrote:
yeah, that's the idea.
Good. But the real question: does it help Andrew?
that's still an important question, but these changes are still needed
nevertheless, to unbreak softlockup.c ... I havent been watching while
doing
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 05:25:30 -0400 (EDT) Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007, Stefan Richter wrote:
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
...
I would consider it more ugly to special case this and
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 04:38:09PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
Looking at two random servers here and a desktop, interrupts are
unshared except for usb. A laptop was not so lucky. So no chance is
a bit extreme.
I agree it's far from optimal, but it is less limited than you imply.
Well with
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
the removal entry is/was for the symbols *marked*, not for the
infrastructure
ah, gotcha. so the infrastructure itself is still useful from time to
time, then. ok.
rday
--
Andi Kleen wrote:
From: Chris Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I fixed this in x86_64. Looks like the kind of thing that will break voyager
on i386.
All those Voyagers with hpet?
J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
On Jul 18 2007 22:52, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 09:03:13PM +0300, S.Çağlar Onur wrote:
With 3f1b0e1f287547903f11fa1e6de7d2765597766e Linus's current git tree
starts
to ignore any *.orig or *.rej files (for example git status cannot show
what are they) but if there are
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 08:37:27AM -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting James Morris ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
It's already pretty clear.
I doubt anyone not on lkml or linux-security-module has heard of this.
So we'll see.
(I
Ingo Molnar wrote:
that's still an important question, but these changes are still needed
nevertheless, to unbreak softlockup.c
Well, I'm happy with using jiffies as the backport fix for softlockup
(if sched_clock is indeed a problem there), but mainly because it won't
affect Xen. I don't
On 7/18/07, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
so please consider them as 2.6.23 material.
The door for new 2.6.23 material shut two weeks ago. Here, at least.
So do you have a general guideline as to when you'd like patches sent
to you for the next merge window? The releases are
On Jul 18 2007 16:26, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
http://www.tglx.de/private/hjk/cif-orig-2.6.tar.bz2
WARNING: Don't look at the code for too long, you might become sick :-)
Taking precautions for people? I get a 404...
Jan
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
andrei radulescu-banu wrote:
The consensus seems to be that skb's need to carry vlan accelerated tags in
their cb's, on rx as well as tx. VLAN_TX_SKB_CB() is perfect for that.
No its not. Its only legal to use while something has ownership
of the skb. Between VLAN devices and real devices
Op Thu, 19 Jul 2007, schreef Dmitry Torokhov:
Hi Daniel,
On 7/14/07, Daniel Mantione [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
A while back a patch was merged to make that only root can program the
keyboard:
Hi all,
Here is a list of some known regressions in 2.6.22-git.
Feel free to add new regressions/remove fixed etc.
http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions
List of Aces
NameRegressions fixed since 21-Jun-2007
Adrian Bunk3
Andi Kleen
Hi all,
Here is a list of some known regressions in 2.6.22-git.
Feel free to add new regressions/remove fixed etc.
http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions
List of Aces
NameRegressions fixed since 21-Jun-2007
Adrian Bunk3
Andi Kleen
Hi all,
Here is a list of some known regressions in 2.6.22-git
with patches available.
Feel free to add new regressions/remove fixed etc.
http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions
List of Aces
NameRegressions fixed since 21-Jun-2007
Adrian Bunk3
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 01:41:03PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Jul 19 2007 02:01, Jacob A wrote:
How can a device driver go over the list of all the files that are open on
a
specific inode instance?
pseudo-code:
task_list_lock;
for each process; do
lock_fdtable;
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 06:34:55PM +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
SYSFS
Subject : sysfs root link count broken in 2.6.22-git5
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/7/15/62
Last known good : ?
Submitter : Jean Delvare [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Caused-By : ?
Handled-By
On Jul 19 2007 11:54, Andi Kleen wrote:
Subject: [PATCH] [8/58] x86_64: Use string instruction memcpy/memset on AMD
Fam10
What processors carry 0x10?
Jan
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More
On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 16:57 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
Lots of Linux handhelds use MMC/SD devices as the root file system. This
has worked quite reliably for many kernel versions. In 2.6.22, it seems
that if you suspend such a system then resume it, the device locks up.
Trying to execute
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 11:07:40PM +0900, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote:
The content of mkdfinfo file has been increasing whenever adding
features and correcting bugs. The content is increasing even now.
And, the feature addition is done not only for new kernels but also
for old upstream kernels.
There is separate notifier header, but no separate notifier .c file.
Extract notifier code out of kernel/sys.c which will remain for
misc syscalls I hope. Merge kernel/die_notifier.c into kernel/notifier.c.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
include/linux/notifier.h |2
andrei radulescu-banu wrote:
[Ben] I think a better method would be to allow disabling VLAN HW accel for a
NIC with ethtool.
This requires changes to ethtool and e1000 driver, +other drivers. It is a
handy thing to have. I don't view it as a solution to tcpdump - or to the vlan
On 7/19/07, rae l [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/19/07, Paul Clements [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you name n as tmp (as in the previous code) so that it's clear
that's only a temporary variable. Other than that, this looks good.
Sure. I just use the name n as in the declaration of
Michal Piotrowski wrote:
Unclassified
Subject : a52b1752c07 broke !SMP: error: implicit declaration of
function `WARN_ON'
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/7/17/600
Last known good : ?
Submitter : Uwe Kleine-König [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Caused-By : Avi Kivity [EMAIL
* Don Zickus [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-07-19 18:39]:
I am not a big fan of this approach as it forces distros to require
kexec-tools when building a kernel. Even Joe Hacker who wants a custom
kernel (and not interested in kexec) would have to not only download the
kernel.src.rpm but
Linus, please pull the latest scheduler git tree from:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mingo/linux-2.6-sched.git
4 small changes only. It includes an cleanup: Ralf Baechle noticed that
sched_cacheflush() is now unused, a new kernel-internal API for future
use
On 19/07/07, Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 06:34:55PM +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
SYSFS
Subject : sysfs root link count broken in 2.6.22-git5
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/7/15/62
Last known good : ?
Submitter : Jean Delvare [EMAIL
Here's a small patch to plug ocfs2 into the new -fallocate callback which
was just merged.
--Mark
Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mfasheh/ocfs2.git upstream-linus
to receive the following updates:
fs/ocfs2/file.c | 77
On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 11:54 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
Move it into an own file for easy sharing.
Do everything per CPU. This avoids problems with TSCs that
tick at different frequencies per CPU.
Resync properly on cpufreq changes. CPU frequency is instable
around cpu frequency changing, so
Right, the ability to boot with security.capability=disabpled (or
whatever) and then load a custom module without having to use a whole
new kernel is something I'm sure end-users want.
Especially since compiling a kernel which works with, say, a default
fedora install, with lvm etc, is not
Subject: afs: build fix
From: Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
this fresh commit:
commit e8d6c554126b830217c5e9f549e0e21f865a0a8a
Author: David Howells [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun Jul 15 23:40:12 2007 -0700
AFS: implement file locking
Implement file locking for AFS.
did not even
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 08:51:49 -0700 Badari Pulavarty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ }
+
+ offset += ret;
+ retval += ret;
+ len -= ret;
+ index += offset HPAGE_SHIFT;
+ offset = ~HPAGE_MASK;
+
+
On 19/07/07, Avi Kivity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michal Piotrowski wrote:
Unclassified
Subject : a52b1752c07 broke !SMP: error: implicit declaration of
function `WARN_ON'
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/7/17/600
Last known good : ?
Submitter : Uwe Kleine-König
On 7/19/07, Jan Engelhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 19 2007 11:54, Andi Kleen wrote:
Subject: [PATCH] [8/58] x86_64: Use string instruction memcpy/memset on AMD
Fam10
What processors carry 0x10?
Quad core Opteron.
YH
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
On Thursday 19 July 2007 16:08:34 Pekka Enberg wrote:
Hi Andi,
On 7/19/07, Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
qemu testing and booting test machines with i386 kernels wasn't very
successfull
with recent git kernels. I got either BUGs because of failing sysfs
initialization
or
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 16:53:39 +0100
Richard Purdie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Pierre,
Lots of Linux handhelds use MMC/SD devices as the root file system.
This has worked quite reliably for many kernel versions. In 2.6.22,
it seems that if you suspend such a system then resume it, the device
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 11:30:54 -0500 Josh Boyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/18/07, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
so please consider them as 2.6.23 material.
The door for new 2.6.23 material shut two weeks ago. Here, at least.
So do you have a general guideline as to when
Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- if (posix_test_lock(file, fl) == 0) {
+ posix_test_lock(file, fl);
+ if (fl-fl_type == F_UNLCK) {
Yep. Andrew Morton already has a patch of this form.
David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body
On 7/19/07, Michal Piotrowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Subject : Section mismatch: reference to .init.data:cpu_llc_id (between
'set_cpu_sibling_map' and 'initialize_secondary')
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/7/19/202
Last known good : ?
Submitter : Gabriel C [EMAIL
On Thursday 19 July 2007 16:46:31 Dave Jones wrote:
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 03:48:36PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
I didn't. If you guys really want to have a thread to criticize the changelog
(which seems quite bogus, after all we're interested in code here,
not changelogs) then please at least
On Wed, 18 Jul 2007, Rene Herman wrote:
On 07/18/2007 01:19 AM, Bodo Eggert wrote:
Please post a list of things you have designed, so I can avoid them.
- The ability to read
- The ability to understand
You're doing a hell of a job already.
If you designed them like you design secure
Subject : ext4 build warnings
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/7/18/420
Last known good : ?
Submitter : Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Caused-By : ?
Handled-By : Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Status : unknown
Mingming Cao fixed this:
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 06:49:53PM +0200, Bernhard Walle wrote:
* Don Zickus [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-07-19 18:39]:
I am not a big fan of this approach as it forces distros to require
kexec-tools when building a kernel. Even Joe Hacker who wants a custom
kernel (and not interested in
Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Bill Davidsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does the patch below help?
Doesn't seem to apply against 2.6.22.1, I'm trying 2.6.22.6 as soon as I
recreate it.
Spectacularly no! With this patch the glitch1 script with multiple
scrolling windows has all xterms and glxgears
On 19.07.2007 [09:58:50 -0700], Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 08:51:49 -0700 Badari Pulavarty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ }
+
+ offset += ret;
+ retval += ret;
+ len -= ret;
+ index += offset
Hi Michal;
19 Tem 2007 Per tarihinde, Michal Piotrowski şunları yazmıştı:
Block layer
Subject : bsg.c:(.init.text+0x43d): undefined reference to
`scsi_register_interface' References :
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/7/16/343
Last known good : ?
Submitter : Larry Finger [EMAIL
On 7/19/07, Avi Kivity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Changes from kvm-29:
[...]
- revert ide enable changes that caused an I/O regression
Not really. Dave is seeing the regression when IDE ports are enabled
and KVM BIOS does enable them.
Reverting the patch allows running another BIOS (e.g. QEMU
* Bill Davidsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Bill Davidsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does the patch below help?
Doesn't seem to apply against 2.6.22.1, I'm trying 2.6.22.6 as soon as
I recreate it.
hm, it's against recent -git.
dont waste your time on 2.6.21.6-cfsv19,
What about using the cycles2ns() clocksource helpers, it would eliminate
the duplication of the shift/multiply math .
They are completely different from what clocksource provides.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
On 7/19/07, Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: David Rientjes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In acpi_scan_nodes(), we immediately return -1 if acpi_numa = 0, meaning
we haven't detected any underlying ACPI topology or we have explicitly
disabled its use from the command-line with numa=noacpi.
Satyam Sharma wrote:
On 7/19/07, Michal Piotrowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Subject : Section mismatch: reference to .init.data:cpu_llc_id
(between 'set_cpu_sibling_map' and 'initialize_secondary')
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/7/19/202
Last known good : ?
Fix ia64 build failure on fs/qutoa.c. A recent patch used the
type compat_u64 which on ia64 is only available if CONFIG_COMPAT
is defined.
From: Tony Luck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Doug Chapman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
--- a/fs/quota.c
+++ b/fs/quota.c
@@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ asmlinkage long
* Bill Davidsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Bill Davidsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does the patch below help?
Doesn't seem to apply against 2.6.22.1, I'm trying 2.6.22.6 as soon as
I recreate it.
the patch below is merged against 2.6.22.1-cfs-v19 - does it solve the
From: Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Add kernel-doc entry in linux/irq.h for:
Warning(linux-2.6.22-git12//include/linux/irq.h:177): No description found for
parameter 'last_unhandled'
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
include/linux/irq.h |1 +
1 file changed, 1
Quoting Arjan van de Ven ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Right, the ability to boot with security.capability=disabpled (or
whatever) and then load a custom module without having to use a whole
new kernel is something I'm sure end-users want.
Especially since compiling a kernel which works with,
On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 19:13 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
What about using the cycles2ns() clocksource helpers, it would eliminate
the duplication of the shift/multiply math .
They are completely different from what clocksource provides.
How so?
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send
From: Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fix docbook warnings:
Warning(linux-2.6.22-git12//drivers/base/power/main.c): no structured comments
found
Warning(linux-2.6.22-git12//include/linux/splice.h): no structured comments
found
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
1) It all can be reduced to 4K + 4K by asuming all IRQ happen on one CPU.
no it's separate stacks for soft and hard irqs, so it's really 4+4+4
Thanks, I missed that information. Unfortunately this change still does
not help if one of these
1101 - 1200 of 1493 matches
Mail list logo