Re: Which companies are helping developing the kernel

2007-10-14 Thread Benoit Boissinot
On 10/15/07, Alistair John Strachan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sunday 14 October 2007 23:06:22 Stefan Heinrichsen wrote: Hello, I posted this question at comp.linux.misc and where told this would be a better place therefore. I would like to do a internship in the field of the Linux

Re: What still uses the block layer?

2007-10-14 Thread Tilman Schmidt
Am 14.10.2007 19:46 schrieb Stefan Richter: David Newall wrote: That is so rude. Such responses sometimes happen after provocative posts like the thread starter's. Provocation is often in the eye of the beholder, and basic manners should be observed nevertheless. He could have asked

Re: [2.4 patch] Port of adutux driver from 2.6 kernel to 2.4.

2007-10-14 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 11:45:36PM +0300, Vitaliy Ivanov wrote: Also, while I understand you would be very glad to get your work merged (we all once had our first piece of code), I'd like to mention that you seem to be the only user of this hardware under 2.4 (since it is currently not

Re: Which companies are helping developing the kernel

2007-10-14 Thread Guilherme Amadio
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 12:06:22AM +0200, Stefan Heinrichsen wrote: Hello, I posted this question at comp.linux.misc and where told this would be a better place therefore. I would like to do a internship in the field of the Linux kernel. Can someone tell me where to find a list of

Re: Which companies are helping developing the kernel

2007-10-14 Thread Jiri Kosina
On Mon, 15 Oct 2007, Stefan Heinrichsen wrote: I posted this question at comp.linux.misc and where told this would be a better place therefore. I would like to do a internship in the field of the Linux kernel. Can someone tell me where to find a list of companies (don't matter in which

Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings

2007-10-14 Thread David Chinner
On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 09:58:43AM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: Hi Dave other XFS folk, I'm tracking down a bug which appears to be a bad interaction between XFS and Xen. It looks like XFS is holding RW mappings on free pages, which Xen is trying to get an exclusive RO mapping on so

Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings

2007-10-14 Thread Jeremy Fitzhardinge
David Chinner wrote: You mean xfs_buf.c. Yes, sorry. And yes, we delay unmapping pages until we have a batch of them to unmap. vmap and vunmap do not scale, so this is batching helps alleviate some of the worst of the problems. How much performance does it cost? What kind of

PROBLEM: kernel memory subsystem incorrectly invokes OOM killer under certain situations

2007-10-14 Thread Chris Drake
Hi linux-kernel, [1.] One line summary of the problem: kernel memory subsystem incorrectly invokes OOM killer under certain situations [2.] Full description of the problem/report: My guess is that whatever invokes the OOM killer is incorrectly deciding that memory allocated for disk cache

Re: [PATCH] Version 7 (2.6.23) Smack: Simplified Mandatory Access Control Kernel

2007-10-14 Thread Ahmed S. Darwish
Hi Casey, On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 10:15:42AM -0700, Casey Schaufler wrote: + +CIPSO Configuration + +It is normally unnecessary to specify the CIPSO configuration. The default +values used by the system handle all internal cases. Smack will compose CIPSO +label values to match the Smack

Re: MSI interrupts and disable_irq

2007-10-14 Thread Yinghai Lu
On 10/14/07, Benjamin Herrenschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 2007-10-14 at 09:15 +0200, Manfred Spraul wrote: Yinghai Lu wrote: On 10/13/07, Manfred Spraul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Someone around with a MSI capable board? The forcedeth driver does dev-irq = pci_dev-irq

[PATCH] doc: add uio document to docbook compilation target

2007-10-14 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
Add uio document to DocBook compilation target. `make *docs' doesn't generate The Userspace I/O HOWTO, the user space I/O document written in DocBook. Signed-off-by: Satoru Takeuchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] Index: linux/Documentation/DocBook/Makefile

Re: [PATCH] Hook compat_sys_nanosleep up to high res timer code

2007-10-14 Thread Anton Blanchard
Hi Arnd, The code looks correct, but I think it would be nicer to change hrtimer_nanosleep to take a kernel pointer and have all three callers (common_nsleep, sys_nanosleep and compat_sys_nanosleep) do the copy_to_user/put_compat_timespec in the caller. Good idea, I had considered that

Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings

2007-10-14 Thread Nick Piggin
On Monday 15 October 2007 09:12, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: David Chinner wrote: You mean xfs_buf.c. Yes, sorry. And yes, we delay unmapping pages until we have a batch of them to unmap. vmap and vunmap do not scale, so this is batching helps alleviate some of the worst of the

WANTED: kernel projects for CS students

2007-10-14 Thread Rik van Riel
The kernel newbies community often gets inquiries from CS students who need a project for their studies and would like to do something with the Linux kernel, but would also like their code to be useful to the community afterwards. In order to make it easier for them, I am trying to put together a

Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings

2007-10-14 Thread David Chinner
On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 04:12:20PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: David Chinner wrote: You mean xfs_buf.c. Yes, sorry. And yes, we delay unmapping pages until we have a batch of them to unmap. vmap and vunmap do not scale, so this is batching helps alleviate some of the worst

Re: MSI interrupts and disable_irq

2007-10-14 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Sun, 2007-10-14 at 16:15 -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote: On 10/14/07, Benjamin Herrenschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 2007-10-14 at 09:15 +0200, Manfred Spraul wrote: Yinghai Lu wrote: On 10/13/07, Manfred Spraul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Someone around with a MSI capable

Re: What still uses the block layer?

2007-10-14 Thread Rob Landley
On Sunday 14 October 2007 12:46:12 pm Stefan Richter wrote: David Newall wrote: That is so rude. When a reply contains as a reply to the first paragraph you're wrong with no elaboration, and as a reply to the second paragraph nothing but expletives and personal insults, I tend to stop

Re: hdparm standby timeout not working for WD raptors?

2007-10-14 Thread Mark Lord
1. How are you forcing the drives into standby? 2. Have you reproduced this with a stock kernel.org kernel yet? One possibility is that these drives may be the kind that generate a spurious interrupt when they spin-down via the timer, and perhaps libata is processing that interrupt and sending

Re: What still uses the block layer?

2007-10-14 Thread Rob Landley
On Sunday 14 October 2007 5:24:32 pm James Bottomley wrote: On Sat, 2007-10-13 at 16:05 -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote: On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 08:11:21PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote: My impression from asking questions on the linux-scsi mailing list is that the scsi upper/middle/lower layers

NO_HZ and cpu monitoring tools

2007-10-14 Thread Anton Blanchard
Hi, When using a NO_HZ kernel on ppc64, I noticed top gives some interesting results: Cpu0 : 0.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni,100.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st Cpu1 : 0.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 0.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st Cpu2 : 0.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 0.0%id, 0.0%wa,

Re: hdparm standby timeout not working for WD raptors?

2007-10-14 Thread Mark Weber
On 10/14/07, Mark Lord [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1. How are you forcing the drives into standby? hdparm -y 2. Have you reproduced this with a stock kernel.org kernel yet? No; maybe later this week. One possibility is that these drives may be the kind that generate a spurious interrupt

nfsd updates for 2.6.24

2007-10-14 Thread J. Bruce Fields
You can pull the following nfs server changes from git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/linux.git nfs-server-stable Nothing earth-shaking this time; mainly small bugfixes and cleanups. --b. Andrew Morton (1): nfsd warning fix Christoph Hellwig (1): nfsd: fix horrible indentation in

Re: RFC: reviewer's statement of oversight

2007-10-14 Thread Neil Brown
On Wednesday October 10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 10:49:20AM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote: Neil Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: + (b) Any problems, concerns, or questions relating to the patch have been + communicated back to the submitter. I am

Re: RFC: reviewer's statement of oversight

2007-10-14 Thread Neil Brown
On Tuesday October 9, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Neil. From:The Author, Primary Author, or Authors of the patch. Authors should also provide a Signed-off-by: tag. Purpose: to give credit to authors The SCM should include this info and we

Re: What still uses the block layer?

2007-10-14 Thread Luben Tuikov
--- James Bottomley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 2007-10-13 at 16:05 -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote: On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 08:11:21PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote: My impression from asking questions on the linux-scsi mailing list is that the scsi upper/middle/lower layers doesn't use

WTF is HIDIOCGRDESC supposed to do (aside of being a roothole)?

2007-10-14 Thread Al Viro
This + if (get_user(len, (int __user *)arg)) + return -EFAULT; + if (copy_to_user(*((__u8 **)(user_arg + + sizeof(__u32))), +

Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings

2007-10-14 Thread Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Nick Piggin wrote: Yes, as Dave said, vmap (more specifically: vunmap) is very expensive because it generally has to invalidate TLBs on all CPUs. I see. I'm looking at some more general solutions to this (already have some batching / lazy unmapping that replaces the XFS specific one),

Re: [PATCH]: drm: cleanup DRM_DEBUG() parameters

2007-10-14 Thread Dave Airlie
On 10/14/07, Németh Márton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Márton Németh [EMAIL PROTECTED] As DRM_DEBUG macro already prints out the __FUNCTION__ string (see drivers/char/drm/drmP.h), it is not worth doing this again. At some other places the ending \n was added. Signed-off-by: Márton Németh

[git pull] drm patches for 2.6.24-rc1

2007-10-14 Thread Dave Airlie
Hi Linus, This contains a major macro removal and ioctl related usercopy cleanups, it also fixes a bug in the intel interrupt code with a dodgy calloc size. Please pull the 'drm-patches' branch from ssh://master.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/airlied/drm-2.6.git drm-patches Dave.

[git pull] agp patches for 2.6.24-rc1

2007-10-14 Thread Dave Airlie
Hi Linus, Please pull from 'agp-patches' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/airlied/agp-2.6.git agp-patches to receive the following updates: drivers/char/agp/agp.h|7 +-- drivers/char/agp/ali-agp.c| 27 ---

Re: What still uses the block layer?

2007-10-14 Thread Neil Brown
On Sunday October 14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sunday 14 October 2007 12:46:12 pm Stefan Richter wrote: David Newall wrote: That is so rude. When a reply contains as a reply to the first paragraph you're wrong with no elaboration, and as a reply to the second paragraph nothing but

Re: wierd file perms

2007-10-14 Thread vignesh babu
ls --version ls (GNU coreutils) 5.97 An fsck did it :) and had the source restored by checkout -f Think Jan is right, there is a diff between the two... On 10/15/07, Mark Lord [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jan Engelhardt wrote: On Oct 14 2007 09:27, Mark Lord wrote: Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:

Re: [2.6.24 PATCH 02/25] dm io:ctl use constant struct size

2007-10-14 Thread Alasdair G Kergon
On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 12:16:29AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: This change seems rather bogus, you're changing the ABI just to work around a bug in the compat_ioctl layer. Why not just do the compat code the right way, like the patch below? The underlying ABI is not changing, I hope - the

Re: [PATCH -mm -v5 0/3] i386/x86_64 boot: 32-bit boot protocol

2007-10-14 Thread Huang, Ying
Hi, Peter and Andi, Do you think this patch set is ready for merging? Otherwise what I can do to make it ready? Best Regards, Huang Ying On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 13:52 +0800, Huang, Ying wrote: This patchset defines a 32-bit boot protocol for i386/x86_64 platform, adds an extensible boot

Re: What still uses the block layer?

2007-10-14 Thread Theodore Tso
On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 06:45:44PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote: I admit a certain amount of personal annoyance that once the SCSI layer consumes a category of device (USB, SATA, PATA), they can often _only_ be used by going through the SCSI midlayer. (This strikes me as analogous to TCP/IP

Re: [PATCH 01/52] CRED: Introduce a COW credentials record

2007-10-14 Thread David Chinner
On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 05:05:24PM +0100, David Howells wrote: diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_acl.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_acl.c index 4ca4beb..a460508 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_acl.c +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_acl.c @@ -383,7 +383,7 @@ xfs_acl_allow_set( error = bhv_vop_getattr(vp, va, 0, NULL); if (error)

[RFC] vivi, videobuf_to_vmalloc() and related breakage

2007-10-14 Thread Al Viro
AFAICS, videobuf-vmalloc use of mem-vma and mem-vmalloc is bogus. You obtain the latter with vmalloc_user(); so far, so good. Then you have retval=remap_vmalloc_range(vma, mem-vmalloc,0); where vma is given to you by mmap(); again, fine - we get the memory pointed to be

Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings

2007-10-14 Thread Nick Piggin
On Monday 15 October 2007 10:57, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: Nick Piggin wrote: Yes, as Dave said, vmap (more specifically: vunmap) is very expensive because it generally has to invalidate TLBs on all CPUs. I see. I'm looking at some more general solutions to this (already have some

Re: 2.6.23.1 x86 hardware monitoring bug?

2007-10-14 Thread Mark M. Hoffman
Hi Justin: (added some CCs) * Justin Piszcz [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-10-14 15:30:18 -0400]: As a regular user, I cannot see the sensors on the A-bit board, but I can see the CPU temperature, how come I can see one but not the other? Kernel: $ uname -a Linux mybox 2.6.23.1 #4 SMP PREEMPT

Re: Which companies are helping developing the kernel

2007-10-14 Thread Greg KH
On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 11:28:46PM +0100, Alistair John Strachan wrote: On Sunday 14 October 2007 23:06:22 Stefan Heinrichsen wrote: Hello, I posted this question at comp.linux.misc and where told this would be a better place therefore. I would like to do a internship in the field of the

Re: [2.6 patch] __inet6_csk_dst_store(): fix check-after-use

2007-10-14 Thread Masahide NAKAMURA
On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 19:52:12 +0200 Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Coverity checker spotted that we have already oops'ed if dst was NULL. Since dst being NULL doesn't seem to be possible at this point this patch removes the NULL check. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL

Re: git-sched patch won't boot on SN arch, 2.6.23-mm1

2007-10-14 Thread Paul Jackson
Update to list - Ingo sent me offlist a broken out patch set of this sched work, and I'm working with him to isolate the change that is causing this problem. -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson

Re: [RFC] vivi, videobuf_to_vmalloc() and related breakage

2007-10-14 Thread Nick Piggin
On Monday 15 October 2007 12:01, Al Viro wrote: AFAICS, videobuf-vmalloc use of mem-vma and mem-vmalloc is bogus. You obtain the latter with vmalloc_user(); so far, so good. Then you have retval=remap_vmalloc_range(vma, mem-vmalloc,0); where vma is given to you by mmap();

Re: [PATCH] Version 7 (2.6.23) Smack: Simplified Mandatory Access Control Kernel

2007-10-14 Thread Casey Schaufler
--- Ahmed S. Darwish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Casey, On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 10:15:42AM -0700, Casey Schaufler wrote: + +CIPSO Configuration + +It is normally unnecessary to specify the CIPSO configuration. The default +values used by the system handle all internal cases.

Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings

2007-10-14 Thread Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Nick Piggin wrote: Yeah, it would be possible. The easiest way would just be to shoot down all lazy vmaps (because you're doing the global IPIs anyway, which are the expensive thing, at which point you may as well purge the rest of your lazy mappings). Sure. If it is sufficiently rare,

Re: [PATCH] doc: add uio document to docbook compilation target

2007-10-14 Thread Randy Dunlap
On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 08:21:01 +0900 Satoru Takeuchi wrote: Add uio document to DocBook compilation target. `make *docs' doesn't generate The Userspace I/O HOWTO, the user space I/O document written in DocBook. Signed-off-by: Satoru Takeuchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] Index:

Re: [2.6 patch] __inet6_csk_dst_store(): fix check-after-use

2007-10-14 Thread Noriaki TAKAMIYA
Hi, Mon, 15 Oct 2007 11:45:10 +0900 [Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] __inet6_csk_dst_store(): fix check-after-use] Masahide NAKAMURA [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote... On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 19:52:12 +0200 Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Coverity checker spotted that we have already oops'ed if

[GIT PATCH] SCSI updates for 2.6.24

2007-10-14 Thread James Bottomley
This is the accumulated updates queued for 2.6.24. It contains the usual slew of driver updates, plus some gdth and advansys rewrites. We still have some outstanding bugs in gdth and fc4 for which I'm hoping to sweep fixes into the next update. The patch is available here:

Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings

2007-10-14 Thread David Chinner
On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 08:42:34PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: Nick Piggin wrote: That's not going to happen for at least a cycle or two though, so in the meantime maybe an ifdef for that XFS vmap batching code would help? For now I've proposed a patch to simply eagerly

Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings

2007-10-14 Thread Jeremy Fitzhardinge
David Chinner wrote: With defaults - little effect as vmap should never be used. It's only when you start using larger block sizes for metadata that this becomes an issue. The CONFIG_XEN workaround should be fine until we get a proper vmap cache Hm, well I saw the problem with a

Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings

2007-10-14 Thread David Chinner
On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 09:18:17PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: David Chinner wrote: With defaults - little effect as vmap should never be used. It's only when you start using larger block sizes for metadata that this becomes an issue. The CONFIG_XEN workaround should be fine until we

[PATCH 000 of 5] md: Five minor md patch, some for 2.6.24.

2007-10-14 Thread NeilBrown
Following are 5 minor patches for md in current -mm. The first 4 are suitable to flow into 2.6.24. The last fixes a small bug in Dan Williams' patches currently in -mm, which are not scheduled for 2.6.24. Thanks, NeilBrown [PATCH 001 of 5] md: Fix a bug in some never-used code. [PATCH 002

[PATCH 001 of 5] md: Fix a bug in some never-used code.

2007-10-14 Thread NeilBrown
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3277 There is a seq_printf here that isn't being passed a 'seq'. Howeve as the code is inside #ifdef MD_DEBUG, nobody noticed. Also remove some extra spaces. Signed-off-by: Neil Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] ### Diffstat output ./drivers/md/raid0.c | 10

[PATCH 002 of 5] md: 'sync_action' in sysfs returns wrong value for readonly arrays

2007-10-14 Thread NeilBrown
When an array is started read-only, MD_RECOVERY_NEEDED can be set but no recovery will be running. This causes 'sync_action' to report the wrong value. We could remove the test for MD_RECOVERY_NEEDED, but doing so would leave a small gap after requesting a sync action, where 'sync_action' would

[PATCH 003 of 5] md: Expose the degraded status of an assembled array through sysfs

2007-10-14 Thread NeilBrown
From: Iustin Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] The 'degraded' attribute is useful to quickly determine if the array is degraded, instead of parsing 'mdadm -D' output or relying on the other techniques (number of working devices against number of defined devices, etc.). The md code already keeps track of

[PATCH 004 of 5] md: Make sure read errors are auto-corrected during a 'check' resync in raid1

2007-10-14 Thread NeilBrown
Whenever a read error is found, we should attempt to overwrite with correct data to 'fix' it. However when do a 'check' pass (which compares data blocks that are successfully read, but doesn't normally overwrite) we don't do that. We should. Signed-off-by: Neil Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] ###

[PATCH 005 of 5] md: Fix type that is stopping raid5 grow from working.

2007-10-14 Thread NeilBrown
This kmem_cache_create is creating a cache that already exists. We could us the alternate name, just like we do a few lines up. Signed-off-by: Neil Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Dan Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] ### Diffstat output ./drivers/md/raid5.c |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1

[ patch .24-rc0 0/5 ] SuperIO locks coordinator

2007-10-14 Thread Jim Cromie
this patchset (on hwmon-git) re-introduces superio_locks module, previously RFC'd here, where I 'borrowed' another thread.. http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernelm=115821759424601w=2 The module shares out slots/shared-reservations containing a mutex, so that multiple modules can coordinate access to

[ patch .24-rc0 1/5 ] SuperIO locks coordinator - add the module

2007-10-14 Thread Jim Cromie
01 - adds superio_locks module User-drivers specify the sio-port characteristics they can support device-ids, sio-port-addrs, enter exit sequences, etc in a struct superio_search (in __devinit, preferably). superio_find() then searches existing slots/shared-reservations for a matching

[ patch .24-rc0 2/5 ] SuperIO locks coordinator - use in hwmon/w83627hf

2007-10-14 Thread Jim Cromie
02 - use superio-locks in drivers/hwmon/w83627hf.c tested on an AMD-Barton mobo. Signed-off-by: Jim Cromie [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- hwmon-superio-w83627hf Kconfig|1 w83627hf.c | 140 - 2 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 83

[ patch .24-rc0 3/5 ] SuperIO locks coordinator - use in hwmon/pc87360

2007-10-14 Thread Jim Cromie
03 - use superio-locks in drivers/hwmon/pc87360 this driver keeps the slot for only during __init, since it only needs the sio-port to read the ISA addresses of the Logical Devices in the chip, which are then used exclusively. Signed-off-by: Jim Cromie [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---

[ patch .24-rc0 4/5 ] SuperIO locks coordinator - use in drivers/char/pc8736x-gpio

2007-10-14 Thread Jim Cromie
04 - use superio-locks in drivers/char/pc8736x_gpio this driver keeps the slot for the lifetime of the driver ( __init til __exit ), since the driver needs the sio-port to change pin configurations. patches 03,04 were tested on a soekris 4801 a year ago, the box is currently busy. Together

[ patch .24-rc0 5/5 ] SuperIO locks coordinator - use in other hwmon/*.c

2007-10-14 Thread Jim Cromie
05 - use superio-locks in rest of drivers/hwmon/*.c this patch is compile-tested only, please review for sanity before you try running them. Things to look for - missing superio_release(), opportunities to use superio_devid(), superio_inw(), etc. Signed-off-by: Jim Cromie [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[PATCH] jiffies_round - jiffies_round_relative conversion in EDAC drivers

2007-10-14 Thread Anton Blanchard
When rounding a relative timeout we need to use round_jiffies_relative(). Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- diff --git a/drivers/edac/edac_device.c b/drivers/edac/edac_device.c index f3690a6..46400ec 100644 --- a/drivers/edac/edac_device.c +++ b/drivers/edac/edac_device.c @@

[PATCH][resend] param_sysfs_builtin memchr argument fix

2007-10-14 Thread Dave Young
If memchr argument is longer than strlen(kp-name), there will be some weird result. It will casuse duplicate filenames in sysfs for the nousb. kernel warning messages are as bellow: sysfs: duplicate filename 'usbcore' can not be created WARNING: at fs/sysfs/dir.c:416 sysfs_add_one() [c01c4750]

[PATCH] jiffies_round - jiffies_round_relative conversion - rt2x00

2007-10-14 Thread Anton Blanchard
When rounding a relative timeout we need to use round_jiffies_relative(). Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2x00lib.h b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2x00lib.h index 298faa9..06d9bc0 100644 ---

[PATCH] jiffies_round - jiffies_round_relative conversion - ipw2100/ipw2200

2007-10-14 Thread Anton Blanchard
When rounding a relative timeout we need to use round_jiffies_relative(). Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ipw2100.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ipw2100.c index 2d46a16..739d060 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ipw2100.c +++

Re: What still uses the block layer?

2007-10-14 Thread Stefan Richter
Rob Landley wrote: I was at least attempting to ask a serious question. ... Actually, I was going through Documentation/block thinking about making a 00-INDEX for it, but my earlier questions of the scsi guys left me with the impression that the block layer is _not_ used by the SCSI layer.

[PATCH] jiffies_round - jiffies_round_relative conversion - b43/b43legacy

2007-10-14 Thread Anton Blanchard
When rounding a relative timeout we need to use round_jiffies_relative(). Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/b43/main.c index c141a26..41049a4 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/b43/main.c +++

Re: usb+sysfs: duplicate filename 'bInterfaceNumber'

2007-10-14 Thread Dave Young
On 10/14/07, Borislav Petkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, i get the following warning on yesterday's git tree (v2.6.23-2840-g752097c): Oct 14 09:07:15 zmei kernel: [ 49.368030] sysfs: duplicate filename 'bInterfaceNumber' can not be created Oct 14 09:07:15 zmei kernel: [ 49.368086]

<    1   2   3   4   5