On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 05:53:55PM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
> Driver can now work with both ID and VBUS pins or either one of
> them.
>
> There can be the following 3 cases
>
> 1) Both ID and VBUS GPIOs are available:
>
> ID = LOW -> USB_HOST active, USB inactive
> ID = HIGH -> USB_HOST
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 05:53:55PM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
> Driver can now work with both ID and VBUS pins or either one of
> them.
>
> There can be the following 3 cases
>
> 1) Both ID and VBUS GPIOs are available:
>
> ID = LOW -> USB_HOST active, USB inactive
> ID = HIGH -> USB_HOST
Hi Christoph,
On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 07:04:15 +0200 Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 11:23:34AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Doug,
> >
> > After merging the rdma tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> Please just
Hi Christoph,
On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 07:04:15 +0200 Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 11:23:34AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Doug,
> >
> > After merging the rdma tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> Please just disable
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 7:12AM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Wood [mailto:o...@buserror.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 7:12 AM
> To: Qiang Zhao
> Cc: linuxppc-...@lists.ozlabs.org; pku@gmail.com; X.B. Xie
>
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 7:12AM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Wood [mailto:o...@buserror.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 7:12 AM
> To: Qiang Zhao
> Cc: linuxppc-...@lists.ozlabs.org; pku@gmail.com; X.B. Xie
> ; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>
> When you need to make changes to patches that are part of a series,
> you must resubmit the entire series,
I imagine that will happen when the patch review time passed by a bit
more as Paul Bolle requested it yesterday.
> not just the things that are changes.
Thanks for your reminder.
> When you need to make changes to patches that are part of a series,
> you must resubmit the entire series,
I imagine that will happen when the patch review time passed by a bit
more as Paul Bolle requested it yesterday.
> not just the things that are changes.
Thanks for your reminder.
Andrey Utkin writes:
>> Does (only) adding the
>>
>> pci_read_config_word(solo_dev->pdev, PCI_STATUS, );
>>
>> in solo_reg_write() help?
>
> Yes.
> I have posted a patch with this change few days ago, I thought you have
> noticed it.
Well, I think you haven't
Andrey Utkin writes:
>> Does (only) adding the
>>
>> pci_read_config_word(solo_dev->pdev, PCI_STATUS, );
>>
>> in solo_reg_write() help?
>
> Yes.
> I have posted a patch with this change few days ago, I thought you have
> noticed it.
Well, I think you haven't sent me a copy. Anyway, it
These patches configure
* the EEPROM
* the LEDs (with some default triggers)
* the USR1 gpio button
for the OMAP5 UEVM board.
H. Nikolaus Schaller (3):
DT: EVM: add EEPROM
DT: EVM: add LEDs
DT: EVM: add USR1 button
arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-uevm.dts | 92
These patches configure
* the EEPROM
* the LEDs (with some default triggers)
* the USR1 gpio button
for the OMAP5 UEVM board.
H. Nikolaus Schaller (3):
DT: EVM: add EEPROM
DT: EVM: add LEDs
DT: EVM: add USR1 button
arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-uevm.dts | 92
Signed-off-by: H. Nikolaus Schaller
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-uevm.dts | 25 +
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-uevm.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-uevm.dts
index 19f5f0a..1b919f5 100644
---
Signed-off-by: H. Nikolaus Schaller
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-uevm.dts | 25 +
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-uevm.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-uevm.dts
index 19f5f0a..1b919f5 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-uevm.dts
+++
Signed-off-by: H. Nikolaus Schaller
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-uevm.dts | 7 +++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-uevm.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-uevm.dts
index 36ff7c3..be659e8 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-uevm.dts
+++
Signed-off-by: H. Nikolaus Schaller
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-uevm.dts | 60
1 file changed, 60 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-uevm.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-uevm.dts
index be659e8..19f5f0a 100644
---
Signed-off-by: H. Nikolaus Schaller
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-uevm.dts | 7 +++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-uevm.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-uevm.dts
index 36ff7c3..be659e8 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-uevm.dts
+++
Signed-off-by: H. Nikolaus Schaller
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-uevm.dts | 60
1 file changed, 60 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-uevm.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-uevm.dts
index be659e8..19f5f0a 100644
---
>> Memory was not released (as it would be expected) when one call
>> of further resource reservations failed.
>
> This was the only thing in this series that triggered more than a,
> very uninspired, "meh" on first read.
Will it matter here if the function "kfree" will be called for the
data
>> Memory was not released (as it would be expected) when one call
>> of further resource reservations failed.
>
> This was the only thing in this series that triggered more than a,
> very uninspired, "meh" on first read.
Will it matter here if the function "kfree" will be called for the
data
>> Use kmalloc_array() in two functions
>> Improve another size determination in gigaset_initcs()
>> Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation
>> Release memory in gigaset_initcs() after an allocation failure
>
> Which "static source code analysis" was used for that
>> Use kmalloc_array() in two functions
>> Improve another size determination in gigaset_initcs()
>> Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation
>> Release memory in gigaset_initcs() after an allocation failure
>
> Which "static source code analysis" was used for that
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Gleixner [mailto:t...@linutronix.de]
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 3:01 AM
To: Liav Rehana
Cc: john.stu...@linaro.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Elad Kanfi
; Noam Camus
Subject: Re:
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Gleixner [mailto:t...@linutronix.de]
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 3:01 AM
To: Liav Rehana
Cc: john.stu...@linaro.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Elad Kanfi
; Noam Camus
Subject: Re: [PATCH] timekeeping: Change type of nsec variable to unsigned
Hi Linus,
Today's linux-next merge of the gpio tree got a conflict in:
arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-peripherals.c
between commit:
9b7141d01a76 ("ARM: OMAP2+: Drop legacy board file for n900")
from the arm-soc tree and commit:
9132ce450bd1 ("ARM: omap2: fix missing include")
from the
Hi Linus,
Today's linux-next merge of the gpio tree got a conflict in:
arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-peripherals.c
between commit:
9b7141d01a76 ("ARM: OMAP2+: Drop legacy board file for n900")
from the arm-soc tree and commit:
9132ce450bd1 ("ARM: omap2: fix missing include")
from the
fix Touchpad cursor does not work after touching Touchpad
by 3 or more fingers.
Issue reproduction procedure
1.Three or more fingers put on Touchpad.
2.release fingers from Touchpad.
3.move the cursor by one finger.
4.the cursor does not move.
Cause
This code does not notify multi fingers state
fix Touchpad cursor does not work after touching Touchpad
by 3 or more fingers.
Issue reproduction procedure
1.Three or more fingers put on Touchpad.
2.release fingers from Touchpad.
3.move the cursor by one finger.
4.the cursor does not move.
Cause
This code does not notify multi fingers state
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 11:23:34AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> After merging the rdma tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
Please just disable broken staging code like lustre for the linux-next
builds. We had that discussion before, didn't
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 11:23:34AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> After merging the rdma tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
Please just disable broken staging code like lustre for the linux-next
builds. We had that discussion before, didn't
Hi Linus,
Today's linux-next merge of the gpio tree got a conflict in:
drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c
between commit:
6212e1d6ed40 ("gpio: pca953x: variable 'id' was used twice")
from the i2c tree and commit:
e23efa30 ("gpio: pca954x: Add vcc regulator and enable it")
from the gpio
Hi Linus,
Today's linux-next merge of the gpio tree got a conflict in:
drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c
between commit:
6212e1d6ed40 ("gpio: pca953x: variable 'id' was used twice")
from the i2c tree and commit:
e23efa30 ("gpio: pca954x: Add vcc regulator and enable it")
from the gpio
Hi Babu.
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 03:31:37PM -0700, Babu Moger wrote:
> Adding the new config parameter CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING_SMALL for sparc.
>
> This feature limits the space used for "Lock debugging: prove locking
> correctness" by about 4MB. The current sparc systms have the limitation of
>
Hi Babu.
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 03:31:37PM -0700, Babu Moger wrote:
> Adding the new config parameter CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING_SMALL for sparc.
>
> This feature limits the space used for "Lock debugging: prove locking
> correctness" by about 4MB. The current sparc systms have the limitation of
>
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 11:44:50AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Peter Chen (2016-09-25 20:29:27)
> > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 11:51:02AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > > Quoting Peter Chen (2016-09-16 18:16:05)
> > > > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 01:55:02AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > > > >
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 11:44:50AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Peter Chen (2016-09-25 20:29:27)
> > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 11:51:02AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > > Quoting Peter Chen (2016-09-16 18:16:05)
> > > > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 01:55:02AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > > > >
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 01:14:18PM +0200, Fabien Lahoudere wrote:
> Changes in V2:
> - Patches sent to early with bad contents
> Changes in V3:
> - Change subject
> - Split "configure imx for ULPI phy" for disable-oc code
> Changes in V4:
> - Fix "Change switch order"
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 01:14:18PM +0200, Fabien Lahoudere wrote:
> Changes in V2:
> - Patches sent to early with bad contents
> Changes in V3:
> - Change subject
> - Split "configure imx for ULPI phy" for disable-oc code
> Changes in V4:
> - Fix "Change switch order"
Hi Ulf,
On 9/23/2016 3:37 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
[...]
Is there anything else needed in msm sdhci driver so that the auto
tuning is taken care of?
I am not familiar with any other than sdhci-esdhc-imx which supports
the SDHCI_TUNING_MODE_3. I may be wrong though.
In the sdhci-esdhc-imx
Hi Ulf,
On 9/23/2016 3:37 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
[...]
Is there anything else needed in msm sdhci driver so that the auto
tuning is taken care of?
I am not familiar with any other than sdhci-esdhc-imx which supports
the SDHCI_TUNING_MODE_3. I may be wrong though.
In the sdhci-esdhc-imx
Hello,
Ping?
- Sanchayan.
On 16-09-19 10:41:51, Sanchayan Maity wrote:
> Remove the use of DDC I2C bus bitbang to support reading of EDID
> and rely on support from internal HDMI I2C master controller instead.
> As a result remove the device tree property ddc-i2c-bus.
>
> Signed-off-by:
Hello,
Ping?
- Sanchayan.
On 16-09-19 10:41:51, Sanchayan Maity wrote:
> Remove the use of DDC I2C bus bitbang to support reading of EDID
> and rely on support from internal HDMI I2C master controller instead.
> As a result remove the device tree property ddc-i2c-bus.
>
> Signed-off-by:
Hello,
Ping?
- Sanchayan.
On 16-09-21 16:54:38, Sanchayan Maity wrote:
> Add support for Toradex Colibri iMX6 module.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sanchayan Maity
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile | 1 +
> arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6dl-colibri-eval-v3.dts |
Hello,
Ping?
- Sanchayan.
On 16-09-21 16:54:38, Sanchayan Maity wrote:
> Add support for Toradex Colibri iMX6 module.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sanchayan Maity
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile | 1 +
> arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6dl-colibri-eval-v3.dts | 253
>
Emilio López writes:
> El 22/09/16 a las 06:43, Michael Ellerman escribió:
>> Emilio López writes:
>>
>> Please don't include the *kernel* headers, they're really not meant to
>> be used in userspace programs :)
>>
>>> +CFLAGS +=
Emilio López writes:
> El 22/09/16 a las 06:43, Michael Ellerman escribió:
>> Emilio López writes:
>>
>> Please don't include the *kernel* headers, they're really not meant to
>> be used in userspace programs :)
>>
>>> +CFLAGS += -I../../../../usr/include/
>>
>> That is the correct place to get
> -Original Message-
> From: Baoyou Xie [mailto:baoyou@linaro.org]
> Sent: Monday, September 26, 2016 5:31 PM
> To: subbu.seethara...@broadcom.com; ketan.muka...@broadcom.com;
> jitendra.bhiv...@broadcom.com; j...@linux.vnet.ibm.com;
> martin.peter...@oracle.com
> Cc:
> -Original Message-
> From: Baoyou Xie [mailto:baoyou@linaro.org]
> Sent: Monday, September 26, 2016 5:31 PM
> To: subbu.seethara...@broadcom.com; ketan.muka...@broadcom.com;
> jitendra.bhiv...@broadcom.com; j...@linux.vnet.ibm.com;
> martin.peter...@oracle.com
> Cc:
Mike Galbraith wrote:
>Whew, no mythical creature infestation. Thanks, next encounter with
>such an artifact should provide markedly less entertainment.
Oh, no worries. Next time it'll be something else.
There's no dull day with this this kernel thing ;-)
--
Sent
Mike Galbraith wrote:
>Whew, no mythical creature infestation. Thanks, next encounter with
>such an artifact should provide markedly less entertainment.
Oh, no worries. Next time it'll be something else.
There's no dull day with this this kernel thing ;-)
--
Sent from a small device:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 10:37:05AM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> This contains assorted cleanups in the splice area:
>
> - add helpers for pipe buf ops instead of directly calling them
>
> - page cache buf doesn't seem to need confirming (since ages)
>
> - generic_file_splice_read() and
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 10:37:05AM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> This contains assorted cleanups in the splice area:
>
> - add helpers for pipe buf ops instead of directly calling them
>
> - page cache buf doesn't seem to need confirming (since ages)
>
> - generic_file_splice_read() and
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the percpu tree got a conflict in:
include/asm-generic/percpu.h
between commit:
acbdf0e98066 ("percpu: make this_cpu_generic_read notrace")
from the asm-generic tree and commit:
1b5ca1212742 ("percpu: improve generic percpu modify-return
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the percpu tree got a conflict in:
include/asm-generic/percpu.h
between commit:
acbdf0e98066 ("percpu: make this_cpu_generic_read notrace")
from the asm-generic tree and commit:
1b5ca1212742 ("percpu: improve generic percpu modify-return
On 2016-09-26 04:07, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
Not sure if that's expected behaviour or not.
Why don't you sample the stacks of some of those kworker processes to
see if they are all executing a parituclar piece of work. That might
help you narrow down where they originate from. Cat multiple
On 2016-09-26 04:07, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
Not sure if that's expected behaviour or not.
Why don't you sample the stacks of some of those kworker processes to
see if they are all executing a parituclar piece of work. That might
help you narrow down where they originate from. Cat multiple
Statements should start on tabstops.
Use a single statement and test instead of multiple tests.
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_mac.c | 15 ++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git
Statements should start on tabstops.
Use a single statement and test instead of multiple tests.
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_mac.c | 15 ++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the kvm-arm tree got a conflict in:
arch/arm/include/asm/arch_gicv3.h
between commit:
91ef84428a86 ("irqchip/gic-v3: Reset BPR during initialization")
from the tip tree and commit:
3d9cd95f90b2 ("ARM: gic-v3: Work around definition of
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the kvm-arm tree got a conflict in:
arch/arm/include/asm/arch_gicv3.h
between commit:
91ef84428a86 ("irqchip/gic-v3: Reset BPR during initialization")
from the tip tree and commit:
3d9cd95f90b2 ("ARM: gic-v3: Work around definition of
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 10:37:14AM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> What __generic_file_splice_read() does is get a series of uptodate pages
> and put them into the pipe buffer.
>
> The get_page_for_read() helper can now be used to get the pages,
> simplifying the code and making sure the splice(2)
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 10:37:14AM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> What __generic_file_splice_read() does is get a series of uptodate pages
> and put them into the pipe buffer.
>
> The get_page_for_read() helper can now be used to get the pages,
> simplifying the code and making sure the splice(2)
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 10:37:13AM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> Getting the page for reading is pretty complicated. This functionality is
> also duplicated between generic_file_read() generic_file_splice_read().
>
> So first extract the common code from do_generic_file_read() into a
> separate
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 10:37:13AM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> Getting the page for reading is pretty complicated. This functionality is
> also duplicated between generic_file_read() generic_file_splice_read().
>
> So first extract the common code from do_generic_file_read() into a
> separate
On 2016년 09월 23일 01:53, bseg...@google.com wrote:
> Jeehong Kim writes:
>
>>> Peter Zijlstra writes:
>>>
You forgot to Cc Ben, who gave you feedback on v1, which is rather poor
style. Also, I don't see how kernel-janitors is relevant to
On 2016년 09월 23일 01:53, bseg...@google.com wrote:
> Jeehong Kim writes:
>
>>> Peter Zijlstra writes:
>>>
You forgot to Cc Ben, who gave you feedback on v1, which is rather poor
style. Also, I don't see how kernel-janitors is relevant to this patch.
This is very much not a
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 10:37:11AM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> Things could happen to that page that make it not uptodate while sitting in
> the pipe, but it's questionable whether we should care about that.
> Checking for being uptodate in the face of such page state change is always
> going
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 10:37:11AM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> Things could happen to that page that make it not uptodate while sitting in
> the pipe, but it's questionable whether we should care about that.
> Checking for being uptodate in the face of such page state change is always
> going
On Tuesday, September 27, 2016 12:20 AM Vlastimil Babka wrote
>
> When increasing the compaction priority, also reset retries. Otherwise we can
> consume all retries on the lower priorities. Also pull the retries increment
> into should_compact_retry() so it counts only the rounds where we
On Tuesday, September 27, 2016 12:20 AM Vlastimil Babka wrote
>
> When increasing the compaction priority, also reset retries. Otherwise we can
> consume all retries on the lower priorities. Also pull the retries increment
> into should_compact_retry() so it counts only the rounds where we
Move some data to text
$ size drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_ethtool.o*
textdata bss dec hex filename
25012 0 32 2504461d4
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_ethtool.o.new
228682120 32 2502061bc
Move some data to text
$ size drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_ethtool.o*
textdata bss dec hex filename
25012 0 32 2504461d4
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_ethtool.o.new
228682120 32 2502061bc
v1-v2: Fix memory allocation issue in interrupt context.
Yijing Wang (2):
libsas: Alloc dynamic work to avoid missing sas events
libsas: Fix hotplug issue in libsas
drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c | 34 ++---
drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_discover.c | 245
v1-v2: Fix memory allocation issue in interrupt context.
Yijing Wang (2):
libsas: Alloc dynamic work to avoid missing sas events
libsas: Fix hotplug issue in libsas
drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c | 34 ++---
drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_discover.c | 245
Now libsas hotplug work is static, LLDD driver queue
the hotplug work into shost->work_q. If LLDD driver
burst post lots hotplug event to libsas, the hotplug
events may pending in the workqueue like
shost->workq
tail | PHYE_LOSS_OF_SIGNAL | PORTE_BYTES_DMAED | head
In this case, if a new
Now libsas hotplug work is static, LLDD driver queue
the hotplug work into shost->work_q. If LLDD driver
burst post lots hotplug event to libsas, the hotplug
events may pending in the workqueue like
shost->workq
tail | PHYE_LOSS_OF_SIGNAL | PORTE_BYTES_DMAED | head
In this case, if a new
Hold off on this one. Currently reworking a patch series that won't
need this change after all.
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 8:32 PM, Matt Ranostay wrote:
> bq24190_register_reset() function needs to reset the bdi->first_time
> condition every time to avoid spurious interrupts in
Hold off on this one. Currently reworking a patch series that won't
need this change after all.
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 8:32 PM, Matt Ranostay wrote:
> bq24190_register_reset() function needs to reset the bdi->first_time
> condition every time to avoid spurious interrupts in suspend/resume.
>
>
Now the libsas hotplug has some issues, Dan Williams report
a similar bug here:
https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org/msg39187.html
The root cause of the issues is we use one workqueue(shost->work_q) to
process libsas event, and we divide a hot-on or hot-remove flow to several
Now the libsas hotplug has some issues, Dan Williams report
a similar bug here:
https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org/msg39187.html
The root cause of the issues is we use one workqueue(shost->work_q) to
process libsas event, and we divide a hot-on or hot-remove flow to several
On Mon, 2016-09-26 at 15:35 -0400, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Sep 2016, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > Can you please provide your .config and the dmesg of a bad and a good run?
>
> Don't bother. I found it.
>
> It's a merge artifact. So git bisect pointing at the merge commit is
> entirely
On Mon, 2016-09-26 at 15:35 -0400, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Sep 2016, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > Can you please provide your .config and the dmesg of a bad and a good run?
>
> Don't bother. I found it.
>
> It's a merge artifact. So git bisect pointing at the merge commit is
> entirely
On 2016.09.26 18:31 Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-09-26 at 19:48 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
>> On 09/26/2016 07:21 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 1:53 AM, Larry Finger wrote:
>>> But for both we need a reproducer anyway.
>> I do not have a reliable
On 2016.09.26 18:31 Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-09-26 at 19:48 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
>> On 09/26/2016 07:21 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 1:53 AM, Larry Finger wrote:
>>> But for both we need a reproducer anyway.
>> I do not have a reliable
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 09:29:02PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> The first patch is actually a bug fix, but I put it into this bunch for
> simplicity...
>
> The rest are really cleanups as well as minor bugfixes that are byproducts
> of the cleanups.
>
> This series builds on the fact that
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 09:29:02PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> The first patch is actually a bug fix, but I put it into this bunch for
> simplicity...
>
> The rest are really cleanups as well as minor bugfixes that are byproducts
> of the cleanups.
>
> This series builds on the fact that
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 02:43:17PM -0300, Marcelo Cerri wrote:
>
> Wouldn't be enough to provide a pair of import/export functions as the
> padlock-sha driver does?
I don't think that will help as ultimately you need to call the
export function on the fallback and that's what requires the extra
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 02:43:17PM -0300, Marcelo Cerri wrote:
>
> Wouldn't be enough to provide a pair of import/export functions as the
> padlock-sha driver does?
I don't think that will help as ultimately you need to call the
export function on the fallback and that's what requires the extra
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 10:30:56AM +0800, Johnny.Chuang wrote:
> There is only one different which is adding a new empty line for coding
> style.
>
> > if (!error)
> > - error = elants_i2c_query_fw_id(ts);
> > + error = error2;
> > +
> > if (!error)
> >
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 10:30:56AM +0800, Johnny.Chuang wrote:
> There is only one different which is adding a new empty line for coding
> style.
>
> > if (!error)
> > - error = elants_i2c_query_fw_id(ts);
> > + error = error2;
> > +
> > if (!error)
> >
On 09/26/2016 08:30 PM, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
On Mon, 2016-09-26 at 19:48 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
On 09/26/2016 07:21 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 1:53 AM, Larry Finger wrote:
On 09/26/2016 05:16 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On
On 09/26/2016 08:30 PM, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
On Mon, 2016-09-26 at 19:48 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
On 09/26/2016 07:21 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 1:53 AM, Larry Finger wrote:
On 09/26/2016 05:16 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 12:09
On 09/26/2016 11:57 AM, Brian Boylston wrote:
iLO5 will offer the same watchdog timer as previous generations, but the
PCI subsystem vendor ID will be PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP_3PAR (0x1590) instead of
PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP (0x103c). Add 0x1590 to the whitelist and be more
specific when ignoring the
On 09/26/2016 11:57 AM, Brian Boylston wrote:
iLO5 will offer the same watchdog timer as previous generations, but the
PCI subsystem vendor ID will be PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP_3PAR (0x1590) instead of
PCI_VENDOR_ID_HP (0x103c). Add 0x1590 to the whitelist and be more
specific when ignoring the
On 2016/9/27 9:39, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 08:57:41AM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
>> Hi Jaegeuk,
>>
>> On 2016/9/27 2:33, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>> Hi Chao,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 12:09:52AM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
From: Chao Yu
In
On 2016/9/27 9:39, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 08:57:41AM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
>> Hi Jaegeuk,
>>
>> On 2016/9/27 2:33, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>> Hi Chao,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 12:09:52AM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
From: Chao Yu
In sync_node_pages, we won't check
Hi tglx,
I'm sorry for the late reply.
Awfully sorry that I could not do anything help.
In fact, it's my fault.
I should re-base my patches after the commit c291b0151585 in time.
I learned a lot from it.
Thank a lot, and once again my apologies.
Thanks,
Dou
At 09/27/2016 01:36 AM, Thomas
Hi tglx,
I'm sorry for the late reply.
Awfully sorry that I could not do anything help.
In fact, it's my fault.
I should re-base my patches after the commit c291b0151585 in time.
I learned a lot from it.
Thank a lot, and once again my apologies.
Thanks,
Dou
At 09/27/2016 01:36 AM, Thomas
There exists almost same codes when get the value of pre_version
and cur_version in function validate_checkpoint, this patch adds
get_checkpoint_version to clean up redundant codes.
Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang
---
fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c | 63
There exists almost same codes when get the value of pre_version
and cur_version in function validate_checkpoint, this patch adds
get_checkpoint_version to clean up redundant codes.
Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang
---
fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c | 63 ++--
1
1 - 100 of 1270 matches
Mail list logo