From: Lee Jones
Most of the new resource table handling function are now in place, so
it's time to put it all together. Once new resource table information
has been requested, the structures will be held in a holding pen until
boot-time. During boot-time
From: Lee Jones
Most of the new resource table handling function are now in place, so
it's time to put it all together. Once new resource table information
has been requested, the structures will be held in a holding pen until
boot-time. During boot-time rproc_apply_resource_overrides() will
On 10/12/2016 05:16 AM, Grzegorz Andrejczuk wrote:
> @@ -211,6 +219,25 @@ static void early_init_intel(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
> }
>
> check_mpx_erratum(c);
> +
> + /*
> + * Setting ring 3 MONITOR/MWAIT for all threads
> + * when CPU is Xeon Phi Family x200
> + * This
On 10/12/2016 05:16 AM, Grzegorz Andrejczuk wrote:
> @@ -211,6 +219,25 @@ static void early_init_intel(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
> }
>
> check_mpx_erratum(c);
> +
> + /*
> + * Setting ring 3 MONITOR/MWAIT for all threads
> + * when CPU is Xeon Phi Family x200
> + * This
From: Markus Elfring
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 13:37:10 +0200
The script "checkpatch.pl" pointed information out like the following.
Comparison to NULL could be written ...
Thus fix the affected source code places.
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring
From: Markus Elfring
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 13:37:10 +0200
The script "checkpatch.pl" pointed information out like the following.
Comparison to NULL could be written ...
Thus fix the affected source code places.
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring
---
Another send try because of the following
From: Markus Elfring
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 15:20:34 +0200
The script "checkpatch.pl" pointed information out like the following.
Comparison to NULL could be written ...
Thus fix the affected source code places.
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring
From: Markus Elfring
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 15:20:34 +0200
The script "checkpatch.pl" pointed information out like the following.
Comparison to NULL could be written ...
Thus fix the affected source code places.
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring
---
Another send try because of the following
Commit 41a3da2b8e163 ("mfd: intel-lpss: Save register context on
suspend") saved the register context while going to suspend and
also put the device in reset state.
Due to the resetting of device, system cannot enter S3/S0ix
states when no_console_suspend flag is enabled. The system
and serial
Commit 41a3da2b8e163 ("mfd: intel-lpss: Save register context on
suspend") saved the register context while going to suspend and
also put the device in reset state.
Due to the resetting of device, system cannot enter S3/S0ix
states when no_console_suspend flag is enabled. The system
and serial
Hi Linus,
The following changes since commit 29b4817d4018df78086157ea3a55c1d9424a7cfc:
Linux 4.8-rc1 (2016-08-07 18:18:00 -0700)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/thierry.reding/linux-pwm.git
tags/pwm/for-4.9-rc1
for you to fetch
Hi Linus,
The following changes since commit 29b4817d4018df78086157ea3a55c1d9424a7cfc:
Linux 4.8-rc1 (2016-08-07 18:18:00 -0700)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/thierry.reding/linux-pwm.git
tags/pwm/for-4.9-rc1
for you to fetch
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 11:27:11AM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> > > Are the CPUs on always-on power down ?
> >
> > For now they are always on and don't even have the sleep instruction
> > (i.e. stop cpu clock until interrupt) implemented. Adding sleep will
> > be the first power-saving step,
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 11:27:11AM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> > > Are the CPUs on always-on power down ?
> >
> > For now they are always on and don't even have the sleep instruction
> > (i.e. stop cpu clock until interrupt) implemented. Adding sleep will
> > be the first power-saving step,
With new rproc_request_resource API, rproc driver has now the
capability to provide resources to remoteproc in order to modify
firmware resource table.
But in some cases, other operations are needed like compatibility
check between resources defined at firmware level and those handled
by rproc
With new rproc_request_resource API, rproc driver has now the
capability to provide resources to remoteproc in order to modify
firmware resource table.
But in some cases, other operations are needed like compatibility
check between resources defined at firmware level and those handled
by rproc
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 08:33:20PM +0800, l...@kernel.org wrote:
> From: Zefan Li
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.4.113 release.
> There are 125 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 08:33:20PM +0800, l...@kernel.org wrote:
> From: Zefan Li
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.4.113 release.
> There are 125 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied,
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 12:37:44AM +0800, Yang Ling wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 07:54:03AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On 10/11/2016 07:10 AM, Yang Ling wrote:
> > >Add watchdog timer specific driver for Loongson1 SoC.
> > >
> > >Signed-off-by: Yang Ling
> > >
> >
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 12:37:44AM +0800, Yang Ling wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 07:54:03AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On 10/11/2016 07:10 AM, Yang Ling wrote:
> > >Add watchdog timer specific driver for Loongson1 SoC.
> > >
> > >Signed-off-by: Yang Ling
> > >
> > >---
> > >V1.1:
> > >
This patch adds force mode to rproc_update_resource_table_entry function.
When force is unset, resource will be updated only if no specific
addresses are requested by firmware.
When force is set, resource is directly overwritten.
Signed-off-by: Loic Pallardy
---
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 09:27:35AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 9:03 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c: kxcjk1013_runtime_resume()
> > drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel-core.c:bmc150_accel_runtime_resume()
> >
To guarantee remoteproc won't overwrite firmware data when copying
back modified resource table, rproc_add_resource_table_entry verifies
first that .resource_table elf section is large enough to support new
resource appending.
Signed-off-by: Loic Pallardy
---
This patch adds force mode to rproc_update_resource_table_entry function.
When force is unset, resource will be updated only if no specific
addresses are requested by firmware.
When force is set, resource is directly overwritten.
Signed-off-by: Loic Pallardy
---
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 09:27:35AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 9:03 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c: kxcjk1013_runtime_resume()
> > drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel-core.c:bmc150_accel_runtime_resume()
> >
To guarantee remoteproc won't overwrite firmware data when copying
back modified resource table, rproc_add_resource_table_entry verifies
first that .resource_table elf section is large enough to support new
resource appending.
Signed-off-by: Loic Pallardy
---
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 6:40 PM, Benjamin Tissoires
wrote:
> From: David Arcari
>
> acpi_dev_gpio_irq_get() currently ignores the error returned
> by acpi_get_gpiod_by_index() and overwrites it with -ENOENT.
>
> Problem is this error can be
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 6:40 PM, Benjamin Tissoires
wrote:
> From: David Arcari
>
> acpi_dev_gpio_irq_get() currently ignores the error returned
> by acpi_get_gpiod_by_index() and overwrites it with -ENOENT.
>
> Problem is this error can be -EPROBE_DEFER, which just blows
> up some drivers when
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 9:16 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
>> (but with the new world order you actually *can* combine KERN_CONT
>> with a loglevel, so that if the beginning od the line got flushed, the
>> continuation can still be printed with the right log level).
>
> I think that
As old and new carveout name length may be different and the two
names may have a common part, name comparison must cover the complete
name field.
Limit strncmp to carveout name length, i.e. 32 Bytes.
Signed-off-by: Loic Pallardy
---
drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c |
As old and new carveout name length may be different and the two
names may have a common part, name comparison must cover the complete
name field.
Limit strncmp to carveout name length, i.e. 32 Bytes.
Signed-off-by: Loic Pallardy
---
drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 3 +--
1 file changed,
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 9:16 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
>> (but with the new world order you actually *can* combine KERN_CONT
>> with a loglevel, so that if the beginning od the line got flushed, the
>> continuation can still be printed with the right log level).
>
> I think that might not be a good
On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 01:13:08PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Oct 2016, Tim Chen wrote:
> > On Wed, 2016-10-05 at 16:35 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > > + if (itmt_supported) {
> > > > + itmt_sysctl_header =
> > > > +
On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 01:13:08PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Oct 2016, Tim Chen wrote:
> > On Wed, 2016-10-05 at 16:35 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > > + if (itmt_supported) {
> > > > + itmt_sysctl_header =
> > > > +
When a firmware is build, it can be loaded with a resource
usually detailing shared; memory, virtual device, trace log
information etc.
However, some SoCs or platforms require some hard-coded information.
Information may be fixed on both sides: firmware and rproc.
Until now, no method exists which
When a firmware is build, it can be loaded with a resource
usually detailing shared; memory, virtual device, trace log
information etc.
However, some SoCs or platforms require some hard-coded information.
Information may be fixed on both sides: firmware and rproc.
Until now, no method exists which
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 9:03 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c: kxcjk1013_runtime_resume()
> drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel-core.c:bmc150_accel_runtime_resume()
> drivers/iio/accel/mma8452.c:mma8452_runtime_resume()
>
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 9:03 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c: kxcjk1013_runtime_resume()
> drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel-core.c:bmc150_accel_runtime_resume()
> drivers/iio/accel/mma8452.c:mma8452_runtime_resume()
> drivers/iio/accel/mma9551_core.c:mma9551_sleep()
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 11:18:49PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> This is the second part of the XFS updates for this merge cycle.
> This pullreq contains the new shared data extents feature for XFS,
> and can be found at:
>
>
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 11:18:49PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> This is the second part of the XFS updates for this merge cycle.
> This pullreq contains the new shared data extents feature for XFS,
> and can be found at:
>
>
From: David Arcari
acpi_dev_gpio_irq_get() currently ignores the error returned
by acpi_get_gpiod_by_index() and overwrites it with -ENOENT.
Problem is this error can be -EPROBE_DEFER, which just blows
up some drivers when the module ordering is not correct.
Cc:
From: David Arcari
acpi_dev_gpio_irq_get() currently ignores the error returned
by acpi_get_gpiod_by_index() and overwrites it with -ENOENT.
Problem is this error can be -EPROBE_DEFER, which just blows
up some drivers when the module ordering is not correct.
Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 02:13:06AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 10/10/2016 10:41 AM, Kyle Roeschley wrote:
> > Because the SMSC PHY completes auto-negotiation before the driver is
> > ready to handle interrupts, the PHY state machine never realizes that we
> > have a link. Clear the
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 02:13:06AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 10/10/2016 10:41 AM, Kyle Roeschley wrote:
> > Because the SMSC PHY completes auto-negotiation before the driver is
> > ready to handle interrupts, the PHY state machine never realizes that we
> > have a link. Clear the
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 07:54:03AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 10/11/2016 07:10 AM, Yang Ling wrote:
> >Add watchdog timer specific driver for Loongson1 SoC.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Yang Ling
> >
> >---
> >V1.1:
> > Add a little debugging information.
> >---
> >
>>> To get some throughput improvement, I propose removal of that
>>> sync_for_device() before reusing buffer. Will you accept such a patch ;)
>>
>> Not one that gets rid of sync_for_device() in the driver. From what I
>> can tell there are some DMA APIs that use that to perform the
>>
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 07:54:03AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 10/11/2016 07:10 AM, Yang Ling wrote:
> >Add watchdog timer specific driver for Loongson1 SoC.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Yang Ling
> >
> >---
> >V1.1:
> > Add a little debugging information.
> >---
> > drivers/watchdog/Kconfig
>>> To get some throughput improvement, I propose removal of that
>>> sync_for_device() before reusing buffer. Will you accept such a patch ;)
>>
>> Not one that gets rid of sync_for_device() in the driver. From what I
>> can tell there are some DMA APIs that use that to perform the
>>
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 10:18:02AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Oct 2016, Rich Felker wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 09:23:58PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > On Sun, 9 Oct 2016, Rich Felker wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 01:03:10PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 10:18:02AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Oct 2016, Rich Felker wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 09:23:58PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > On Sun, 9 Oct 2016, Rich Felker wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 01:03:10PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >
For coherency with the rest of the function, mention the resource
table entry when an invalid resource is detected.
Signed-off-by: Loic Pallardy
---
drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git
To reduce CPU usage, limit rproc_dump_resource_table calls only when
DEBUG or CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG flags are activated.
Signed-off-by: Loic Pallardy
---
drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 6 --
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git
For coherency with the rest of the function, mention the resource
table entry when an invalid resource is detected.
Signed-off-by: Loic Pallardy
---
drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
To reduce CPU usage, limit rproc_dump_resource_table calls only when
DEBUG or CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG flags are activated.
Signed-off-by: Loic Pallardy
---
drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 6 --
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git
- Original Message -
> From: "Catalin Marinas"
> To: linux...@kvack.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Andrew Morton"
> , "Andy Lutomirski" ,
> "CAI Qian"
> Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2016
- Original Message -
> From: "Catalin Marinas"
> To: linux...@kvack.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Andrew Morton"
> , "Andy Lutomirski" ,
> "CAI Qian"
> Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2016 5:57:03 AM
> Subject: [PATCH] mm: kmemleak: Ensure that the task stack is not freed
On 10/12/2016 06:34 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> > + if (c->x86 == 6 &&
>> > + c->x86_model == INTEL_FAM6_XEON_PHI_KNL &&
>> > + phir3mwait) {
>> > + u64 prev;
>> > +
>> > + rdmsrl(MSR_PHI_MISC_THD_FEATURE, prev);
>> > + if ((prev &
On 10/12/2016 06:34 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> > + if (c->x86 == 6 &&
>> > + c->x86_model == INTEL_FAM6_XEON_PHI_KNL &&
>> > + phir3mwait) {
>> > + u64 prev;
>> > +
>> > + rdmsrl(MSR_PHI_MISC_THD_FEATURE, prev);
>> > + if ((prev &
*ping*
2016-08-28 11:00 GMT-06:00 Darren Hart :
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 12:50:55PM -0600, Azael Avalos wrote:
>> Bug 150611 uncovered that the WMI ID used by the toshiba-wmi driver
>> is not Toshiba specific, and as such, the driver was being loaded
>> on non Toshiba
From: Chao Yu
tests/generic/251 of fstest reports a f2fs bug in below message:
[ cut here ]
invalid opcode: [#1] PREEMPT SMP
CPU: 1 PID: 109 Comm: kworker/u8:2 Tainted: GW O4.8.0-rc4+ #22
Hardware name: innotek GmbH
*ping*
2016-08-28 11:00 GMT-06:00 Darren Hart :
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 12:50:55PM -0600, Azael Avalos wrote:
>> Bug 150611 uncovered that the WMI ID used by the toshiba-wmi driver
>> is not Toshiba specific, and as such, the driver was being loaded
>> on non Toshiba laptops too.
>>
>> This
From: Chao Yu
tests/generic/251 of fstest reports a f2fs bug in below message:
[ cut here ]
invalid opcode: [#1] PREEMPT SMP
CPU: 1 PID: 109 Comm: kworker/u8:2 Tainted: GW O4.8.0-rc4+ #22
Hardware name: innotek GmbH VirtualBox/VirtualBox, BIOS
From: Chao Yu
For readability, no functionality change.
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu
---
fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c | 2 +-
fs/f2fs/data.c | 2 +-
fs/f2fs/dir.c| 6 +++---
fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 2 +-
fs/f2fs/file.c | 24
From: Chao Yu
For readability, no functionality change.
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu
---
fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c | 2 +-
fs/f2fs/data.c | 2 +-
fs/f2fs/dir.c| 6 +++---
fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 2 +-
fs/f2fs/file.c | 24
fs/f2fs/super.c | 4 ++--
On 12/10/16 16:45, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On 12 October 2016 at 17:03, Dietmar Eggemann
> wrote:
>> On 26/09/16 13:19, Vincent Guittot wrote:
[...]
>>> @@ -6607,6 +6609,10 @@ static void update_blocked_averages(int cpu)
>>>
>>> if
On 12/10/16 16:45, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On 12 October 2016 at 17:03, Dietmar Eggemann
> wrote:
>> On 26/09/16 13:19, Vincent Guittot wrote:
[...]
>>> @@ -6607,6 +6609,10 @@ static void update_blocked_averages(int cpu)
>>>
>>> if
>>> On 12.10.16 at 17:42, wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 8:39 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 12.10.16 at 16:58, wrote:
>>> On 10/12/16 05:32 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 12.10.16 at 12:33,
>>> On 12.10.16 at 17:42, wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 8:39 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 12.10.16 at 16:58, wrote:
>>> On 10/12/16 05:32 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 12.10.16 at 12:33, wrote:
> The layout is shown as the following diagram.
>
>
On 10/12/2016 08:20 AM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On 8 October 2016 at 13:49, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>> On Sat, 2016-10-08 at 13:37 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>>> On 8 October 2016 at 10:39, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On 10/12/2016 08:20 AM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On 8 October 2016 at 13:49, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>> On Sat, 2016-10-08 at 13:37 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>>> On 8 October 2016 at 10:39, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 03:38:23PM -0400,
Add dump of cfg field of vdev struct.
Signed-off-by: Loic Pallardy
---
drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 13 +
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
index
Add dump of cfg field of vdev struct.
Signed-off-by: Loic Pallardy
---
drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 13 +
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
index ce62546..ae8e934 100644
---
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 9:01 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 12.10.16 at 17:42, wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 8:39 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 12.10.16 at 16:58, wrote:
On 10/12/16 05:32
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 9:01 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 12.10.16 at 17:42, wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 8:39 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 12.10.16 at 16:58, wrote:
On 10/12/16 05:32 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 12.10.16 at 12:33, wrote:
>> The layout is shown as
From: Andi Kleen
We had some problems with pages getting unmapped in single threaded
affinitized processes. It was tracked down to NUMA scanning.
In this case it doesn't make any sense to unmap pages if the
process is single threaded and the page is already on the
node the
On Wed, 2016-10-12 at 08:47 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
< We'll see. But the other issues are easily fixed by just adding
> KERN_CONT where appropriate. It was actually very much what you were
> supposed to do before too, if only as a marker to others that "yes,
> I'm actually doing this, and no,
From: Andi Kleen
We had some problems with pages getting unmapped in single threaded
affinitized processes. It was tracked down to NUMA scanning.
In this case it doesn't make any sense to unmap pages if the
process is single threaded and the page is already on the
node the process is running
On Wed, 2016-10-12 at 08:47 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
< We'll see. But the other issues are easily fixed by just adding
> KERN_CONT where appropriate. It was actually very much what you were
> supposed to do before too, if only as a marker to others that "yes,
> I'm actually doing this, and no,
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 11:54:17AM -0400, CAI Qian wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Catalin Marinas"
> > To: linux...@kvack.org
> > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Andrew Morton"
> > , "Andy Lutomirski" ,
> >
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 11:54:17AM -0400, CAI Qian wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Catalin Marinas"
> > To: linux...@kvack.org
> > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Andrew Morton"
> > , "Andy Lutomirski" ,
> > "CAI Qian"
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2016 5:57:03 AM
> >
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 02:03:32AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> > +
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_LED_TRIGGER_PHY
> > +
> > +#include
> > +#include
> > +
> > +#define PHY_LINK_LED_MAX_TRIGGERS 5
> > +#define PHY_LED_TRIGGER_SPEED_SUFFIX_SIZE 7
> > +#define PHY_MII_BUS_ID_SIZE(20 - 3)
>
>
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 02:03:32AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> > +
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_LED_TRIGGER_PHY
> > +
> > +#include
> > +#include
> > +
> > +#define PHY_LINK_LED_MAX_TRIGGERS 5
> > +#define PHY_LED_TRIGGER_SPEED_SUFFIX_SIZE 7
> > +#define PHY_MII_BUS_ID_SIZE(20 - 3)
>
>
On Wed, 2016-10-12 at 16:35 +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 12-10-16 22:30:03, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > I noticed that current linux.git generates hardly readable console output
> > due to KERN_CONT changes. Are you suggesting developers that output like
> > this be fixed?
>
>
On Wed, 2016-10-12 at 16:35 +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 12-10-16 22:30:03, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > I noticed that current linux.git generates hardly readable console output
> > due to KERN_CONT changes. Are you suggesting developers that output like
> > this be fixed?
>
>
From: Lee Jones
Sometimes the firmware does not know best.
When a firmware is built, it can be loaded with a resource table, usually
detailing shared; memory, virtual device, trace log information etc.
However, some vendors require this hard-coded information to be amended
From: Lee Jones
Sometimes the firmware does not know best.
When a firmware is built, it can be loaded with a resource table, usually
detailing shared; memory, virtual device, trace log information etc.
However, some vendors require this hard-coded information to be amended
with new/improved
Once this patch-set has been applied; platform-specific remoteproc
drivers will be able to amend existing resource table entries,
provide new entries to be appended to an existing resource table
(if one already exists), start a new resource table (if one does
not already exist), and dump out
From: Lee Jones
Currently, when a remote processor does not require resources, the
platform-specific remoteproc driver has to create a fake resource
table in order to by-pass the strict checking. But there is no hard
requirement for a remote processor so require or support
Add the possibility for platform specific driver to submit resource
request related to VDEV.
Signed-off-by: Loic Pallardy
---
drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 7 +++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
Once this patch-set has been applied; platform-specific remoteproc
drivers will be able to amend existing resource table entries,
provide new entries to be appended to an existing resource table
(if one already exists), start a new resource table (if one does
not already exist), and dump out
From: Lee Jones
Currently, when a remote processor does not require resources, the
platform-specific remoteproc driver has to create a fake resource
table in order to by-pass the strict checking. But there is no hard
requirement for a remote processor so require or support shared
resources.
Add the possibility for platform specific driver to submit resource
request related to VDEV.
Signed-off-by: Loic Pallardy
---
drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 7 +++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 02:04:02PM -0700, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> Users of usleep_range() expect that it will _never_ return in less time
> than the minimum passed parameter. However, nothing in any of the code
> ensures this. Specifically:
>
> usleep_range() => do_usleep_range() =>
On 11 October 2016 at 22:38, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 07-10-16, 16:21, Markus Mayer wrote:
>> +static int brcm_avs_cpufreq_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>> +{
>> + struct private_data *priv = policy->driver_data;
>> +
>> + iounmap(priv->base);
>> +
On 11 October 2016 at 22:38, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 07-10-16, 16:21, Markus Mayer wrote:
>> +static int brcm_avs_cpufreq_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>> +{
>> + struct private_data *priv = policy->driver_data;
>> +
>> + iounmap(priv->base);
>> + iounmap(priv->avs_intr_base);
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 02:04:02PM -0700, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> Users of usleep_range() expect that it will _never_ return in less time
> than the minimum passed parameter. However, nothing in any of the code
> ensures this. Specifically:
>
> usleep_range() => do_usleep_range() =>
Firmware can be loaded with a resource table, which details
resources needed by coprocessor like carevout memory, virtual
device, trace log buffer etc.
Until now, no method exists to display resource table content.
This function adds the capability to display the different
resources associated to
Firmware can be loaded with a resource table, which details
resources needed by coprocessor like carevout memory, virtual
device, trace log buffer etc.
Until now, no method exists to display resource table content.
This function adds the capability to display the different
resources associated to
From: Lee Jones
In order to amend or add a new resource table entry we need a method
for a platform-specific to submit them. rproc_request_resource() is a
new public API which provides this functionality.
It is to be called between rproc_alloc() and rproc_add().
Signed-off-by: Ramiro Oliveira
---
.../devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ov5647.txt | 19 +++
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ov5647.txt
diff --git
401 - 500 of 1382 matches
Mail list logo