-Original Message-
From: Randy Dunlap [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2007 4:02 PM
To: Agarwal, Lomesh
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: TPM driver changes to support multiple locality
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 15:46:03 -0700 Agarwal
Attached is the patch which resolves all the comments.
tpm_tis.c.patch
Description: tpm_tis.c.patch
-Original Message-
From: Arjan van de Ven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2007 2:41 PM
To: Agarwal, Lomesh
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: TPM driver changes to support multiple locality
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 11:33:35 -0700
"Ag
functions. That's why it is global. Locality
parameter is initialized with 0 just to be safe. Are all the global
variables in driver is guaranteed to be init 0? Even if it is it doesn't
hurt to init it.
-Original Message-
From: Randy Dunlap [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursda
platform_device_unregister(pdev);
driver_unregister(&tis_drv);
+ kfree(devname);
}
return rc;
}
@@ -692,7 +720,9 @@
if (force) {
platform_device_unregister(pdev);
driver_unregister(&tis_drv);
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 12:46 PM
To: Agarwal, Lomesh
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: TPM driver changes to support multiple locality
On Tue, 09 Oct 2007 15:51:11 PDT, "Agarwal, Lomesh" said:
> Current TPM driver supports only locality
Current TPM driver supports only locality 0. I am planning to add
support so that it can access any locality. Locality parameter will be
passed as parameter. Will this change be acceptable? If yes then I will
modify the driver and send the patch.
Thanks,
Lomesh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: sen
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rafael J.
Wysocki
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 5:09 PM
To: Agarwal, Lomesh
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: what is the difference between shutdown command and writing
to /sys/power/state
On Wednesday, 19 September 2007 23:37, Agarwal
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rafael J.
Wysocki
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 5:09 PM
To: Agarwal, Lomesh
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: what is the difference between shutdown command and writing
to /sys/power
Wednesday, September 19, 2007 2:35 PM
To: Agarwal, Lomesh
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: what is the difference between shutdown command and writing
to /sys/power/state
On Wednesday, 19 September 2007 20:50, Agarwal, Lomesh wrote:
> Does linux handles writing "disk"
Does linux handles writing "disk" to /sys/power/state and shutdown -P
now differently (except writing to disk part)? I have a Xen system and
if I try both (in dom0 which is linux) then writing "disk" powers off
the system while issuing shutdown command halts the system but the
system is still power
This patch works for me too.
-Original Message-
From: Manfred Spraul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 11:49 AM
To: Pavel Machek
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Agarwal, Lomesh;
Nigel Cunningham
Subject: Re: which signal is sent to freeze process
, July 23, 2007 2:51 PM
To: Agarwal, Lomesh
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: which signal is sent to freeze process?
On Monday, 23 July 2007 22:57, Agarwal, Lomesh wrote:
> Why do you need try_to_freeze in below patch? Shouldn't
> !freezing(current) checkin
Why do you need try_to_freeze in below patch? Shouldn't
!freezing(current) checking is enough?
-Original Message-
From: Rafael J. Wysocki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2007 3:10 PM
To: Agarwal, Lomesh
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subjec
signal_pending(current)?
-Original Message-
From: Rafael J. Wysocki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2007 12:25 PM
To: Agarwal, Lomesh
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Pavel Machek
Subject: Re: which signal is sent to freeze process?
On Monday, 23 July 2007
The other problem I am facing that read from socket returns with ENODATA
when resuming. any ideas?
-Original Message-
From: Rafael J. Wysocki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2007 3:10 PM
To: Agarwal, Lomesh
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re
For future how do I trace a system call to a function in a kernel?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Karsten Wiese
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2007 5:09 PM
To: Agarwal, Lomesh
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: where is the code for
My application reads from socket. I need to change the behavior of read
system call for an experiment. Can someone point me to code?
thanks
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.ke
Can you suggest a way I can debug the issue why I am getting EINTR error
for system calls in resuming? What else can cause the system call
failure with EINTR?
-Original Message-
From: Rafael J. Wysocki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2007 4:24 AM
To: Agarwal, Lomesh
Cc
fine.
>From your mail it looks like freezer is not supposed to be interrupting
system calls. Is that true?
-Original Message-
From: Nigel Cunningham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 3:19 PM
To: Agarwal, Lomesh
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Rafael Wysocki; linu
this
error all over the place and somehow retry failed system call. Any
ideas?
-Original Message-
From: Nigel Cunningham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 9:59 PM
To: Agarwal, Lomesh; Rafael Wysocki
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: which signal is sent to
Can you point me to code where kernel captures process in signal
handling and code which runs after suspend to ram is finished?
-Original Message-
From: Nigel Cunningham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 7:19 PM
To: Agarwal, Lomesh
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
My understanding is that Linux kernel sends a signal to freeze processes
during suspend2ram operation. Which signal is used to achieve this?
The problem I am facing is that some of the system calls are failing
with EINTR errno during suspend operation and I want to install a signal
handler for free
I searched the archives but couldn't get much. Can you point me to code?
Thanks,
Lomesh
-Original Message-
From: Pavel Machek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 7:14 AM
To: Agarwal, Lomesh
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: S3 state transition
O
I am trying to understand how Linux handles S3 state transition.
Specially I want to understand what it does anything for processes
loaded at the time of transition. Any pointers to code/document will be
helpful.
Thanks,
Lomesh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kern
25 matches
Mail list logo
