Re: [PATCH v2 09/12] gpio: sim: new testing module

2021-03-04 Thread Andy Shevchenko
0, sizeof(properties)); > + > + mutex_lock(>lock); > + > + properties[prop_idx++] = PROPERTY_ENTRY_U32("gpio-sim,nr-gpios", > + config->num_lines); > + > + if (config->label[0] != '\0') > + properties[prop_idx++] = PROPERTY_ENTRY_STRING("gpio-sim,label", > +config->label); > + > + if (config->line_names) > + properties[prop_idx++] = PROPERTY_ENTRY_STRING_ARRAY_LEN( > + "gpio-line-names", > + config->line_names, > + config->num_line_names); > + > + pdevinfo.id = ida_alloc(_sim_ida, GFP_KERNEL); > + if (pdevinfo.id < 0) { > + mutex_unlock(>lock); > + return pdevinfo.id; > + } > + > + pdevinfo.name = "gpio-sim"; > + pdevinfo.properties = properties; > + > + pdev = platform_device_register_full(); > + if (IS_ERR(pdev)) { > + ida_free(_sim_ida, pdevinfo.id); > + mutex_unlock(>lock); > + return PTR_ERR(pdev); > + } > + > + config->pdev = pdev; > + mutex_unlock(>lock); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static int gpio_sim_config_uncommit_item(struct config_item *item) > +{ > + struct gpio_sim_chip_config *config = to_gpio_sim_chip_config(item); > + int id; > + > + mutex_lock(>lock); > + id = config->pdev->id; > + platform_device_unregister(config->pdev); > + config->pdev = NULL; > + ida_free(_sim_ida, id); Isn't it atomic per se? I mean that IDA won't give the same ID until you free it. I.o.w. why is it under the mutex? > + mutex_unlock(>lock); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static struct configfs_group_operations gpio_sim_config_group_ops = { > + .make_item = gpio_sim_config_make_item, > + .commit_item= gpio_sim_config_commit_item, > + .uncommit_item = gpio_sim_config_uncommit_item, > +}; > + > +static const struct config_item_type gpio_sim_config_type = { > + .ct_group_ops = _sim_config_group_ops, > + .ct_owner = THIS_MODULE, > +}; > + > +static struct configfs_subsystem gpio_sim_config_subsys = { > + .su_group = { > + .cg_item = { > + .ci_namebuf = "gpio-sim", > + .ci_type= _sim_config_type, > + }, > + }, > +}; > + > +static int __init gpio_sim_init(void) > +{ > + int ret; > + > + ret = platform_driver_register(_sim_driver); > + if (ret) { > + pr_err("Error %d while registering the platform driver\n", ret); > + return ret; > + } > + > + config_group_init(_sim_config_subsys.su_group); > + mutex_init(_sim_config_subsys.su_mutex); > + ret = configfs_register_subsystem(_sim_config_subsys); > + if (ret) { > + pr_err("Error %d while registering the configfs subsystem %s\n", > +ret, gpio_sim_config_subsys.su_group.cg_item.ci_namebuf); > + mutex_destroy(_sim_config_subsys.su_mutex); > + platform_driver_unregister(_sim_driver); > + return ret; > + } > + > + return 0; > +} > +module_init(gpio_sim_init); > + > +static void __exit gpio_sim_exit(void) > +{ > + configfs_unregister_subsystem(_sim_config_subsys); > + mutex_destroy(_sim_config_subsys.su_mutex); > + platform_driver_unregister(_sim_driver); > +} > +module_exit(gpio_sim_exit); > + > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Bartosz Golaszewski "); > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("GPIO Simulator Module"); > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); > -- > 2.29.1 > -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko

Re: [PATCH v2 07/12] lib: bitmap: provide devm_bitmap_alloc() and devm_bitmap_zalloc()

2021-03-04 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 11:24:47AM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > From: Bartosz Golaszewski > > Provide managed variants of bitmap_alloc() and bitmap_zalloc(). Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko A few nit-picks below. > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski > --- > include/l

Re: [PATCH v2 06/12] lib: bitmap: order includes alphabetically

2021-03-04 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 11:24:46AM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > From: Bartosz Golaszewski > > For better readability and maintenance: order the includes in bitmap > source files alphabetically. Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski > --

Re: [PATCH v2 05/12] lib: bitmap: remove the 'extern' keyword from function declarations

2021-03-04 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 11:24:45AM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > From: Bartosz Golaszewski > > The 'extern' keyword doesn't have any benefits in header files. Remove it. Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko A few nitpicks below. > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski > --- &

Re: [V2][PATCH] vt: keyboard, fix uninitialized variables warning

2021-03-04 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 02:28:55PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 11:10:48AM +0800, Li Wang wrote: > > drivers/tty/vt/keyboard.c: In function 'vt_do_kdgkb_ioctl': > > drivers/tty/vt/keyboard.c: warning: 'ret' may be used uninitialized in this > &

Re: [V2][PATCH] vt: keyboard, fix uninitialized variables warning

2021-03-04 Thread Andy Shevchenko
ge, and not just some output of some tool w/o context - I want you to send a new version w/o chaining to the previous thread, so start new (email) thread every time you send a new version Waiting for v3 in a separate email thread, thanks! -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko

Re: [PATCH v1 4/4] gpiolib: Reuse device's fwnode to create IRQ domain

2021-03-04 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 09:06:08AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 10:35 AM Andy Shevchenko > wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 10:22:02AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > > > > But this: > > > > > > > @@ -1504,15 +1497

Re: [PATCH v4 05/15] pinctrl: add a pincontrol driver for BCM6328

2021-03-04 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 1:13 PM Álvaro Fernández Rojas wrote: > > El 4 mar 2021, a las 11:49, Andy Shevchenko > > escribió: > > On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 10:57 AM Álvaro Fernández Rojas > > wrote: ... > >> + stat

Re: [PATCH v4 03/15] pinctrl: bcm: add bcm63xx base code

2021-03-04 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 1:17 PM Álvaro Fernández Rojas wrote: > > El 4 mar 2021, a las 11:43, Andy Shevchenko > > escribió: > > On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 10:57 AM Álvaro Fernández Rojas > > wrote: > >> > >> Add a helper for registering BCM63XX pin co

Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] lib/cmdline: Export next_arg() for being used in modules

2021-03-04 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 09:53:28AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 6:00 PM Andy Shevchenko > wrote: > > At least one module will benefit from using next_arg() helper. > > Let's export it for that module and others if they consider it > > hel

Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] gpio: aggregator: Replace custom get_arg() with a generic next_arg()

2021-03-04 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 10:01:46AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Andy, > > On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 5:59 PM Andy Shevchenko > wrote: > > cmdline library provides next_arg() helper to traverse over parameters > > and their values given in command line.

[PATCH v1 1/1] pinctrl: intel: No need to disable IRQs in the handler

2021-03-04 Thread Andy Shevchenko
In IRQ handler interrupts are already disabled, hence no need to repeat it. Even in the threaded case, which is disabled here, it is not a problem because IRQ framework serializes descriptor handling. Remove disabling IRQ part in the handler. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko --- drivers/pinctrl

Re: [PATCH v4 05/15] pinctrl: add a pincontrol driver for BCM6328

2021-03-04 Thread Andy Shevchenko
in % 16) * 2), 3UL => #define BLABLA GENMASK(1, 0) > + mux << ((pin % 16) * 2)); ... > +static const struct of_device_id bcm6328_pinctrl_match[] = { > + { .compatible = "brcm,bcm6328-pinctrl", }, > + { }, No comma. > +}; Above comments to all your patches. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko

Re: [PATCH v4 03/15] pinctrl: bcm: add bcm63xx base code

2021-03-04 Thread Andy Shevchenko
t; +struct bcm63xx_pinctrl { > + struct device *dev; > + struct regmap *regs; > + > + struct pinctrl_desc pctl_desc; > + struct pinctrl_dev *pctl_dev; > + > + void *driver_data; > +}; -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko

Re: [PATCH v4 02/15] gpio: regmap: set gpio_chip of_node

2021-03-04 Thread Andy Shevchenko
we use fwnode from day 1, please? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko

Re: [PATCH v4 01/15] gpio: guard gpiochip_irqchip_add_domain() with GPIOLIB_IRQCHIP

2021-03-04 Thread Andy Shevchenko
n); > +#else > +static inline int gpiochip_irqchip_add_domain(struct gpio_chip *gc, > + struct irq_domain *domain) > +{ > + WARN_ON(1); > + return -EINVAL; > +} > +#endif > > int gpiochip_generic_request(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset); > v

Re: [PATCH 0/4] add device drivers for Siemens Industrial PCs

2021-03-04 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 12:19 PM Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 9:29 AM Henning Schild > wrote: > I have given a few comments here and there, so please check the entire > series and address them in _all_ similar locations. As I have noticed, > I have different

Re: [PATCH 0/4] add device drivers for Siemens Industrial PCs

2021-03-04 Thread Andy Shevchenko
s here and there, so please check the entire series and address them in _all_ similar locations. As I have noticed, I have different approach about P2SB code, I have to give the series a dust and see if you can utilize it. I would like to be Cc'ed on the next version. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko

Re: [PATCH 1/4] platform/x86: simatic-ipc: add main driver for Siemens devices

2021-03-04 Thread Andy Shevchenko
ld) patch series I can send you privately for testing. ... > + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify > + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as > + * published by the Free Software Foundation. Not needed when you have SPDX. ... > +#include Wrong header. Should be types.h ... > +#include > +#include Missed headers. You need to include ones that the code below is a direct user of. Like types.h -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko

Re: [PATCH 4/4] platform/x86: pmc_atom: improve critclk_systems matching for Siemens PCs

2021-03-04 Thread Andy Shevchenko
ical = pmc_clk_is_critical(d); > + if (clk_data->critical) > + pr_info("%s critclks quirk enabled\n", d->ident); > } ...somewhere here? Like clk_data->critical = global_var; if (...) pr_info(); It seems it will reduce burden on a callback by dropping strcmp() call. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko

Re: [PATCH 1/2] units: Add the HZ_PER_KHZ macro

2021-03-04 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 2:31 AM Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 24 Feb 2021 10:39:36 +0200 Andy Shevchenko > wrote: ... > Also, why make them signed types? Negative Hz is physically > nonsensical. If that upsets some code somewhere because it was dealing > with signed t

Re: Why do kprobes and uprobes singlestep?

2021-03-03 Thread Andy Lutomirski
> On Mar 3, 2021, at 10:11 AM, Daniel Xu wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 06:18:23PM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: >>> On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 5:46 PM Andy Lutomirski wrote: >>> >>> >>>> On Mar 2, 2021, at 5:22 PM, Alexei Starovoitov &

[PATCH v1 1/1] mfd: lpc_sch: Partially revert "Add support for Intel Quark X1000"

2021-03-03 Thread Andy Shevchenko
ec689a8a8155ce8b966bd5d7737a3916f5e48be3. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko --- drivers/mfd/lpc_sch.c | 32 ++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mfd/lpc_sch.c b/drivers/mfd/lpc_sch.c index f27eb8dabc1c..428a526cbe86 100644 --- a/drivers/mfd/lpc_sch.c

Re: [PATCH 5/7] printk: Make %pS and friends print module build ID

2021-03-03 Thread Andy Shevchenko
d) functions, etc. At least that was my (shallow) experience with perf last time I have tried it. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko

Re: [PATCH] crypto: mips/poly1305 - enable for all MIPS processors

2021-03-03 Thread Andy Polyakov
Hi, > I'm also CC'ing Andy on this, who wrote the original assembly, in case > he has some last minute objection. Just "what took you so long":-) On potentially related note cryptogams chacha-mips is as universal as poly1305-mips. "Universal" in sense that it can be com

Re: [PATCH] vt: keyboard, fix uninitialized variables warning

2021-03-03 Thread Andy Shevchenko
deed it is impossible to hit. > > > > but for compiler view, gcc should give 'used uninitialized' warning, too. > > Odd that no other compiler version does this right now, perhaps upgrade > to a newer version of gcc? 8.2 is really old :( But it's still supported. I think I can see why. We have a switch case without default, and probably that's how it makes that happen. So, the proper fix is to add default section AFAICT. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko

[PATCH v3 2/3] spi: butterfly: Switch to use module_parport_driver()

2021-03-03 Thread Andy Shevchenko
Switch to use module_parport_driver() to reduce boilerplate code. Note, device_initcall() is a default for module_init(). Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko Acked-by: Mark Brown --- drivers/spi/spi-butterfly.c | 13 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git

Re: [PATCH 5/7] printk: Make %pS and friends print module build ID

2021-03-03 Thread Andy Shevchenko
ose it could be surrounded by parenthesis or brackets and that > would be a little better? I'll try this approach again and see what > folks think. But you can do: Modules linked: module1 [buildidX] module2 [buildidY] module3 [buildidZ] ... i.o.w. one module per line. * Yes, I understand that downside maybe split message, so it's just for consideration. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko

[PATCH v3 0/3] parport: Introduce module_parport_driver() and use it

2021-03-03 Thread Andy Shevchenko
Introduce module_parport_driver() and use it. Greg or Mark, since we have this series tagged, can somebody of you pick it up? Changelog v3: - added tag on patch 1 (Sudip) - Cc'ed to Greg Andy Shevchenko (3): parport: Introduce module_parport_driver() helper macro spi: butterfly: Switch

[PATCH v1 1/1] vt: keyboard, Fix typo in the doc for vt_get_shift_state()

2021-03-03 Thread Andy Shevchenko
Kernel documentation validator is not happy: .../keyboard.c:2195: warning: expecting prototype for vt_get_shiftstate(). Prototype was for vt_get_shift_state() instead This is due to typo, fix it here. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko --- drivers/tty/vt/keyboard.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1

Re: [PATCH v1 4/4] gpiolib: Reuse device's fwnode to create IRQ domain

2021-03-03 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 10:22:02AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 4:35 PM Andy Shevchenko > wrote: > > > When IRQ domain is created for an ACPI case, the name of it becomes > > unknown-%d > > since for now it utilizes of_node member only

[PATCH v3 3/3] spi: lm70llp: Switch to use module_parport_driver()

2021-03-03 Thread Andy Shevchenko
Switch to use module_parport_driver() to reduce boilerplate code. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko Acked-by: Mark Brown --- drivers/spi/spi-lm70llp.c | 13 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-lm70llp.c b/drivers/spi/spi-lm70llp.c index

[PATCH v3 1/3] parport: Introduce module_parport_driver() helper macro

2021-03-03 Thread Andy Shevchenko
Introduce module_parport_driver() helper macro to reduce boilerplate in the existing and new code. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko Acked-by: Sudip Mukherjee --- include/linux/parport.h | 12 +++- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/include/linux/parport.h b

Re: anonymous enums in kernel doc

2021-03-03 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 10:44 AM Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Em Tue, 16 Feb 2021 19:12:58 +0200 > Andy Shevchenko escreveu: > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 7:05 PM Jonathan Corbet wrote: > > > Andy Shevchenko writes: > > > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2021

Re: [PATCH] mfd: stmpe: Revert "Constify static struct resource"

2021-03-03 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 12:47:10AM +0100, Rikard Falkeborn wrote: > Andy noted that constification of some static resource structs in (If you wish, you may use Reported-by:, I'm fine with either way) > intel_quark_i2c_gpio.c were incorrect. It turns out there is another > change from

Re: Why do kprobes and uprobes singlestep?

2021-03-03 Thread Andy Lutomirski
> On Mar 2, 2021, at 5:22 PM, Alexei Starovoitov > wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 1:02 PM Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> >> >>>> On Mar 2, 2021, at 12:24 PM, Alexei Starovoitov >>>> wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 1

Re: Why do kprobes and uprobes singlestep?

2021-03-02 Thread Andy Lutomirski
> On Mar 2, 2021, at 12:24 PM, Alexei Starovoitov > wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 10:38 AM Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> >> Is there something like a uprobe test suite? How maintained / >> actively used is uprobe? > > uprobe+bpf is heavily used in prod

Re: Why do kprobes and uprobes singlestep?

2021-03-02 Thread Andy Lutomirski
> On Mar 2, 2021, at 12:25 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > On 03/01, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 8:51 AM Oleg Nesterov wrote: >>> >>> But I guess this has nothing to do with uprobes, they do not single-step >>> in ke

Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] gpiolib: acpi: Add ACPI_GPIO_QUIRK_ABSOLUTE_NUMBER quirk

2021-03-02 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 05:07:55PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 4:21 PM Andy Shevchenko > wrote: > Do you want me to take these, or will you include them in your PR? I'll send PR. I'm waiting for vger to process the queue (it has some lags). -- With Bes

[PATCH v1 1/1] genirq/irq_sim: Fix typos in kernel doc (fnode -> fwnode)

2021-03-02 Thread Andy Shevchenko
: warning: Function parameter or member 'fwnode' not described in 'devm_irq_domain_create_sim' .../irq_sim.c:240: warning: Excess function parameter 'fnode' description in 'devm_irq_domain_create_sim' Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko --- kernel/irq/irq_sim.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2

Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] gpiolib: Unify the checks on fwnode type

2021-03-02 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 05:34:48PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > We have (historically) different approaches how we identify the type > of a given fwnode. Let's standardize them across the library code. This patch has one functional mistake (see below), otherwise I will anyway wait for

[PATCH v1 3/4] gpiolib: Introduce acpi_gpio_dev_init() and call it from core

2021-03-02 Thread Andy Shevchenko
In the ACPI case we may use the firmware node in the similar way as it's done for OF case. We may use that fwnode for other purposes in the future. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko --- drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c | 7 +++ drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.h | 4 drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 1

[PATCH v1 2/4] gpiolib: Move of_node operations to gpiolib-of and correct fwnode use

2021-03-02 Thread Andy Shevchenko
per. Amend gpiolib.c and gpiolib-of.c code in order to group OF operations. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko --- drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c | 6 -- drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c| 9 - 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c b/drivers/g

[PATCH v1 4/4] gpiolib: Reuse device's fwnode to create IRQ domain

2021-03-02 Thread Andy Shevchenko
: unknown-1 ==> \_SB.PCI0.GIP0.GPO unknown-2 ==> \_SB.NIO3 Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko --- drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 32 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c

[PATCH v1 1/4] gpiolib: Unify the checks on fwnode type

2021-03-02 Thread Andy Shevchenko
We have (historically) different approaches how we identify the type of a given fwnode. Let's standardize them across the library code. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko --- drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 28 +--- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git

Re: [PATCH 3/3] [v4] lib/vsprintf: no_hash_pointers prints all addresses as unhashed

2021-03-02 Thread Andy Shevchenko
; **\n"); > > + pr_warn("** the kernel, report this immediately to your system > > **\n"); > > + pr_warn("** administrator! > > **\n"); > > + pr_warn("** > > **\n"); > > + pr_warn("** NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE > > **\n"); > > + > > pr_warn("**\n"); > > Fortunately gcc is already smart enough to deduplicate identical strings, > but only in the same source file. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko

Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] gpio: Support interrupts in gpio-mlxbf2.c

2021-03-02 Thread Andy Shevchenko
future version of this, because some pieces of the code (AFAICS from this message) looks suboptimal or dup or... > On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 11:51 PM Asmaa Mnebhi wrote: That said, will wait for v2 of this. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko

Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] gpiolib: acpi: Add ACPI_GPIO_QUIRK_ABSOLUTE_NUMBER quirk

2021-03-02 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 05:14:30PM +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote: > On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 05:09:24PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 03:48:43PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 5:33 PM Andy Shevchenko > > > wrote: >

Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] parport: Introduce module_parport_driver() helper macro

2021-03-02 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 02:51:45PM +, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 12:12 PM Andy Shevchenko > wrote: > > > > On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 11:27:10PM +, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 07:03:09PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: &

Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] gpiolib: acpi: Add ACPI_GPIO_QUIRK_ABSOLUTE_NUMBER quirk

2021-03-02 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 03:48:43PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 5:33 PM Andy Shevchenko > wrote: > > > On some systems the ACPI tables has wrong pin number and instead of > > having a relative one it provides an absolute one in the global

[PATCH v1 2/5] mfd: intel_quark_i2c_gpio: Unregister resources in reversed order

2021-03-02 Thread Andy Shevchenko
In ->remove() unregister resources in reversed order, i.e. MFD devices first followed by I²C clock. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko --- drivers/mfd/intel_quark_i2c_gpio.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/mfd/intel_quark_i2c_gpio.c b/drivers/

[PATCH v1 4/5] mfd: intel_quark_i2c_gpio: Replace I²C speeds with descriptive definitions

2021-03-02 Thread Andy Shevchenko
I²C header provides a descriptive definitions for standard bus speeds. Use them instead of plain numbers. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko --- drivers/mfd/intel_quark_i2c_gpio.c | 9 + 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mfd/intel_quark_i2c_gpio.c b

[PATCH v1 5/5] mfd: intel_quark_i2c_gpio: Reuse BAR definitions for MFD cell indexing

2021-03-02 Thread Andy Shevchenko
It's convenient and less error prone to use definitions to address different cells in an array. For this purpose we may reuse existing BAR definitions. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko --- drivers/mfd/intel_quark_i2c_gpio.c | 20 ++-- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions

[PATCH v1 1/5] mfd: intel_quark_i2c_gpio: revert "Constify static struct resources"

2021-03-02 Thread Andy Shevchenko
Cc: Rikard Falkeborn Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko --- drivers/mfd/intel_quark_i2c_gpio.c | 6 -- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mfd/intel_quark_i2c_gpio.c b/drivers/mfd/intel_quark_i2c_gpio.c index 55a9e017edee..124c0ee84169 100644 --- a/d

[PATCH v1 3/5] mfd: intel_quark_i2c_gpio: Remove unused struct device member

2021-03-02 Thread Andy Shevchenko
The device pointer in the custom structure is not used anywhere, remove it for good. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko --- drivers/mfd/intel_quark_i2c_gpio.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mfd/intel_quark_i2c_gpio.c b/drivers/mfd/intel_quark_i2c_gpio.c index

[PATCH v1 1/1] ACPI: bus: Constify is_acpi_node() and friends (part 2)

2021-03-02 Thread Andy Shevchenko
The commit 8b9d6802583a ("ACPI: Constify acpi_bus helper functions, switch to macros") only changed functions for CONFIG_ACPI=y case. This part adjusts the rest. Fixes: 8b9d6802583a ("ACPI: Constify acpi_bus helper functions, switch to macros") Cc: Sakari Ailus Signed-off

Re: Re: Re: [PATCH] sata_dwc_460ex: Fix missing check in sata_dwc_isr

2021-03-02 Thread Andy Shevchenko
in sata_dwc_isr(), which is odd. Thanks for this information, it makes sense to me. Perhaps you need to put this into the commit message to justify the need of the change. > There is no issue currently does not > mean it will never happen in the future. So I suggest the maintainer of > function > sata_dwc_isr() to fix this issue. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko

Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] pinctrl: use to octal permissions for debugfs files

2021-03-02 Thread Andy Shevchenko
ot;checkpatch: look for symbolic permissions and suggest octal instead"). > > > > Note: S_IFREG flag is added to the mode by __debugfs_create_file() > > in fs/debugfs/inode.c > > > > Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko > > Signed-off-by: Drew Fustini > > Patch

Re: [PATCH] selftests/sgx: fix EINIT failure dueto SGX_INVALID_SIGNATURE

2021-03-02 Thread Andy Lutomirski
be6eJSE8Lk0bmu+ehYVMoYOng+JYHDWhSK67k6 > 05ijTQz52Yi+kDqCu3ZVzI7dzdp3KcMuOnEf5w0kRAaUa/5ZetwcIn9cy+UGtN6S > ZGsi4qu+ATziw0L3nPeWQ3TDIV9tI98qRo2Dger9uuXcdz8CgcA1J+UJh7WX9kT4 > OBIKkb1TftyT2LZyzBh2LcrueUIU3gka8IqI6X/B9lB6WTLCtuBGWZZLRAuuuWlL > nEm2TuTtU0Ir7/3lnZ/Fmc5/Ams4cGfxl1oXdiXoARSLR6HdvIIBZ8GdUqISR1M1 > IMMQtRIWomsRCfN0IUvgi0bTUkE5dZp8UFThZp22CahWgEq5h63pNF0K8hHdEyWb > aaMCoAFhIcU4UBUDUxREyY7y1eUCWKAl0B4xEvJoxolbYyTvQB4= > -END RSA PRIVATE KEY- > > good luck! > > Tianjia > -- Andy Lutomirski AMA Capital Management, LLC

Re: Why do kprobes and uprobes singlestep?

2021-03-01 Thread Andy Lutomirski
On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 6:22 PM Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > > Hi Oleg and Andy, > > On Mon, 1 Mar 2021 17:51:31 +0100 > Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > > Hi Andy, > > > > sorry for delay. > > > > On 02/23, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > > > > &

Re: Why do kprobes and uprobes singlestep?

2021-03-01 Thread Andy Lutomirski
On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 8:51 AM Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > Hi Andy, > > sorry for delay. > > On 02/23, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > > > A while back, I let myself be convinced that kprobes genuinely need to > > single-step the kernel on occasion, and I decided t

Re: [PATCH v3] x86/fault: Send a SIGBUS to user process always for hwpoison page access.

2021-03-01 Thread Andy Lutomirski
> On Mar 1, 2021, at 11:02 AM, Luck, Tony wrote: > >  >> >> Some programs may use read(2), write(2), etc as ways to check if >> memory is valid without getting a signal. They might not want >> signals, which means that this feature might need to be configurable. > > That sounds like an

[PATCH v1 1/2] lib/cmdline: Export next_arg() for being used in modules

2021-03-01 Thread Andy Shevchenko
At least one module will benefit from using next_arg() helper. Let's export it for that module and others if they consider it helpful. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko --- lib/cmdline.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/lib/cmdline.c b/lib/cmdline.c index 5d474c626e24

[PATCH v1 2/2] gpio: aggregator: Replace custom get_arg() with a generic next_arg()

2021-03-01 Thread Andy Shevchenko
cmdline library provides next_arg() helper to traverse over parameters and their values given in command line. Replace custom approach in the driver by it. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko --- drivers/gpio/gpio-aggregator.c | 39 +- 1 file changed, 5 insertions

Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] gpio: regression fixes

2021-03-01 Thread Andy Shevchenko
atches applied, thanks! Ooops, you are fast! Anyway, I have tested with gpio-aggregator (w/o this series it sparkles with all possible bugs). Tested-by: Andy Shevchenko -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko

Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] HID: i2c-hid: acpi: Drop redundant ACPI_PTR()

2021-03-01 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 04:34:41PM +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Mon, 1 Mar 2021, Benjamin Tissoires wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 8:34 PM Andy Shevchenko > > wrote: > > > > > > The driver depends on ACPI, ACPI_PTR() resolution is always the same. >

Re: [PATCH 2/2] software node: Fix device_add_software_node()

2021-03-01 Thread Andy Shevchenko
se a failure with > nodes that are already registered. > > Fixing that by incrementing the reference count of the nodes > that have already been registered, and only registering the > new nodes. Also, clarifying the behaviour in the function > documentation. Reviewed-by: An

Re: [PATCH 1/2] software node: Fix node registration

2021-03-01 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 05:30:11PM +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote: > Software node can not be registered before its parent. Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko Tested-by: Andy Shevchenko (On Intel Galileo Gen 2 with some custom patches to convert gpio-dwapb et al. to use swnodes. Those patc

[PATCH v1 2/4] mfd: intel-lpss: Constify device property structures

2021-03-01 Thread Andy Shevchenko
There is no point to have non-constant device properties in this driver. Thus, constify them for good. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko --- drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-acpi.c | 8 drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-pci.c | 10 +- drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.h | 2 +- 3 files changed, 10

[PATCH v1 1/4] mfd: core: Add support for software nodes

2021-03-01 Thread Andy Shevchenko
From: Heikki Krogerus The old device property API is going to be removed and replaced with the newer software node API. This prepares MFD subsystem for the transition. Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko --- drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c | 9 + include/linux/mfd

[PATCH v1 3/4] mfd: intel-lpss: Switch to use the software nodes

2021-03-01 Thread Andy Shevchenko
From: Heikki Krogerus Software node was always created for the device if it was supplied with additional device properties, so those nodes might as well be constant. Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko --- drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-acpi.c | 24

[PATCH v1 4/4] mfd: core: Remove support for dangling device properties

2021-03-01 Thread Andy Shevchenko
From: Heikki Krogerus >From now on only accepting complete software nodes. Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko --- drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c | 6 -- include/linux/mfd/core.h | 4 2 files changed, 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c b/driv

Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: acpi: Add missing IRQF_ONESHOT

2021-03-01 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 02:57:53PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 4:07 PM Andy Shevchenko > wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 01:51:53PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 04:35:58PM +0800, Yang Li wrote: > &

Re: [PATCH 3/5] HID: core: Export some report item parsing functions.

2021-03-01 Thread Andy Shevchenko
tem() or so. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko

Re: [PATCH 4/5] HID: apple-ibridge: Add Apple iBridge HID driver for T1 chip.

2021-03-01 Thread Andy Shevchenko
on 2016 and 2017 MacBookPro's, also known as the iBridge. The > drivers > + for the Touch Bar (apple-touchbar) and light sensor (hid-sensor-hub > + and hid-sensor-als) need to be enabled separately. > + > + To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the > + module will be called apple-ibridge. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko

Re: Re: [PATCH] sata_dwc_460ex: Fix missing check in sata_dwc_isr

2021-03-01 Thread Andy Shevchenko
follow everything that some (non-ideal) tool reports? I don't think so. For all my experiments with that hardware, I haven't heard about the issue with NULL pointers. Useless checks make code harder to read and CPU to waste cycles. It might be maintainers of this driver consider otherwise, so not my call. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko

Re: [PATCH v5] i2c: virtio: add a virtio i2c frontend driver

2021-03-01 Thread Andy Shevchenko
sgs[outcnt++] = _buf; > + } ... > + > + One blank line is enough. ... > + ret = virtio_i2c_send_reqs(vq, reqs, msgs, num); > + if (ret == 0) > + goto err_unlock_free; > + else Redundant. > + nr = ret; -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko

Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] parport: Introduce module_parport_driver() helper macro

2021-03-01 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 11:27:10PM +, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 07:03:09PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 01:07:39PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > Introduce module_parport_driver() helper macro to reduce boilerplate >

Re: [PATCH v5] i2c: virtio: add a virtio i2c frontend driver

2021-03-01 Thread Andy Shevchenko
d SMBus support bidirectional transfers as well. I think two buffers is the right thing to do. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko

Re: [PATCH v5] i2c: virtio: add a virtio i2c frontend driver

2021-03-01 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 02:09:25PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 05:24:41PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > > On 01-03-21, 14:41, Jie Deng wrote: > > > +/** > > > + * struct virtio_i2c_req - the virtio I2C request structure > > > + * @o

Re: [RESEND][PATCH v4 1/2] Added AMS tsl2591 driver implementation

2021-03-01 Thread Andy Shevchenko
enum iio_event_info info, int *val, > > + int *val2) Ditto. ... > > +static int __maybe_unused tsl2591_resume(struct device *dev) > > +{ > > + struct iio_dev *indio_dev = dev_get_drvdata(dev); > > + struct tsl2591_chip *chip = iio_priv(indio_dev); > > + int ret; > > + int power_state; > > + > > + if (chip->events_enabled) > > + power_state = TSL2591_PWR_ON | > > + TSL2591_ENABLE_ALS_INT | > > + TSL2591_ENABLE_ALS; At least the last two can be on one line. > > + else > > + power_state = TSL2591_PWR_ON | TSL2591_ENABLE_ALS; > > + > > + mutex_lock(>als_mutex); > > + ret = tsl2591_set_power_state(chip, power_state); > > + mutex_unlock(>als_mutex); > > + > > + return ret; > > +} ... > > +static const struct dev_pm_ops tsl2591_pm_ops = { > > + SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(pm_runtime_force_suspend, > > + pm_runtime_force_resume) One line? > > + SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(tsl2591_suspend, tsl2591_resume, NULL) > > +}; ... > > +static irqreturn_t tsl2591_event_handler(int irq, void *private) > > +{ > > + /* Clear ALS irq */ > > + ret = i2c_smbus_write_byte(client, TSL2591_CMD_SF_CALS_NPI); > > + if (ret < 0) > > + dev_err(>dev, "Failed to clear als irq\n"); In the IRQ handler? Hmm... It potentially floods the logs. > > + return IRQ_HANDLED; > > +} ... > > +static const struct of_device_id tsl2591_of_match[] = { > > + { .compatible = "amstaos,tsl2591"}, > > + {}, Comma is not needed on the terminator line. > > +}; -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko

Re: [PATCH] sata_dwc_460ex: Fix missing check in sata_dwc_isr

2021-03-01 Thread Andy Shevchenko
reproduce this? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko

Re: [PATCH 2/2] drivers: misc: add ripple counter driver

2021-02-28 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 11:29 AM Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 11:07 AM Andy Shevchenko > wrote: > > On Friday, February 26, 2021, Rasmus Villemoes > > wrote: > >> > >> The only purpose of this driver is to serve as a consumer of t

Re: [PATCH 2/2] drivers: misc: add ripple counter driver

2021-02-28 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 11:07 AM Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Friday, February 26, 2021, Rasmus Villemoes > wrote: >> >> The only purpose of this driver is to serve as a consumer of the input >> clock, to prevent it from being disabled by clk_disable_unused(). >

Re: [PATCH v3] x86/fault: Send a SIGBUS to user process always for hwpoison page access.

2021-02-26 Thread Andy Lutomirski
On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 8:47 PM Aili Yao wrote: > > On Tue, 23 Feb 2021 08:42:59 -0800 > "Luck, Tony" wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 07:33:46AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > > > > > > On Feb 23, 2021, at 4:44 AM, Aili Yao wrote: &

[PATCH v2 2/4] HID: i2c-hid: acpi: Switch to new style i2c-driver probe function

2021-02-26 Thread Andy Shevchenko
Switch to the new style i2c-driver probe_new probe function. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko --- v2: new patch drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid-acpi.c | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid-acpi.c b/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid-acpi.c

[PATCH v2 3/4] HID: i2c-hid: acpi: Move GUID out of function and described it

2021-02-26 Thread Andy Shevchenko
Move static GUID variable out of the function and add a comment how it looks like in the human readable representation. While at it, include uuid.h since the guid_t type is defined in it. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko --- v2: rebased on top of patch 1 that used to be separate change drivers

[PATCH v2 1/4] HID: i2c-hid: acpi: Get ACPI companion only once and reuse it

2021-02-26 Thread Andy Shevchenko
Currently the ACPI companion and handle are retrieved and checked a few times in different functions. Instead get ACPI companion only once and reuse it everywhere. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko --- v2: used companion indeed everywhere (i2c_hid_acpi_shutdown_tail() included) drivers/hid/i2c-hid

[PATCH v2 4/4] HID: i2c-hid: acpi: Drop redundant ACPI_PTR()

2021-02-26 Thread Andy Shevchenko
The driver depends on ACPI, ACPI_PTR() resolution is always the same. Otherwise a compiler may produce a warning. That said, the rule of thumb either ugly ifdeffery with ACPI_PTR or none should be used in a driver. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko --- v2: no changes drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid

Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] HID: i2c-hid: acpi: Drop redundant ACPI_PTR()

2021-02-26 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 8:35 PM Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > The driver depends on ACPI, ACPI_PTR() resolution is always the same. > Otherwise a compiler may produce a warning. > > That said, the rule of thumb either ugly ifdeffery with ACPI_PTR or > none should be used in a drive

Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] HID: i2c-hid: acpi: Move GUID out of function and described it

2021-02-26 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 8:32 PM Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > Move static GUID variable out of the function and add a comment > how it looks like in the human readable representation. > > While at it, include uuid.h since the guid_t type is defined in it. Oh, I see more improvements

Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] HID: i2c-hid: acpi: Get ACPI companion only once and reuse it

2021-02-26 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 8:44 PM Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > Currently the ACPI companion and handle are retrieved and checked > a few times in different functions. Instead get ACPI companion only > once and reuse it everywhere. > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko > --- > &g

[PATCH v1 1/1] HID: i2c-hid: acpi: Get ACPI companion only once and reuse it

2021-02-26 Thread Andy Shevchenko
Currently the ACPI companion and handle are retrieved and checked a few times in different functions. Instead get ACPI companion only once and reuse it everywhere. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko --- It depends on previously sent patch that moves GUID out of the function. If needed I can resend

[PATCH v1 1/1] HID: i2c-hid: acpi: Drop redundant ACPI_PTR()

2021-02-26 Thread Andy Shevchenko
The driver depends on ACPI, ACPI_PTR() resolution is always the same. Otherwise a compiler may produce a warning. That said, the rule of thumb either ugly ifdeffery with ACPI_PTR or none should be used in a driver. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko --- drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid-acpi.c | 2 +- 1

[PATCH v1 1/1] HID: i2c-hid: acpi: Move GUID out of function and described it

2021-02-26 Thread Andy Shevchenko
Move static GUID variable out of the function and add a comment how it looks like in the human readable representation. While at it, include uuid.h since the guid_t type is defined in it. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko --- drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid-acpi.c | 9 ++--- 1 file changed, 6

Re: [PATCH v1 1/7] pps: clients: gpio: Bail out on error when requesting GPIO echo line

2021-02-26 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 01:31:48PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > When requesting optional GPIO echo line, bail out on error, > so user will know that something wrong with the existing property. Guys, any comments on this series? > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko > --- > driv

Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] parport: Introduce module_parport_driver() helper macro

2021-02-26 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 01:07:39PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > Introduce module_parport_driver() helper macro to reduce boilerplate > in the existing and new code. Sudip, any comments on this? > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko > --- > v2: fixed typo in the macro > inclu

Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] PCI: Introduce pcim_alloc_irq_vectors()

2021-02-26 Thread Andy Shevchenko
place some code in pcim_release(), > they are equivalent, and no functional change. It is more explicit > that pcim_alloc_irq_vectors() is a device-managed function. Thanks! Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko > Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko > Signed-off-by: Dejin Zheng > --- > v4

Re: [PATCH] staging: atomisp: reduce kernel stack usage

2021-02-26 Thread Andy Shevchenko
v4l2_pix_format structure > directly. This reduces the stack usage to 612 bytes, and it could > be reduced further by only storing the three members that are used. Good to me! Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann > --- > .../staging/media/atomisp/pci/atom

[PATCH v1 3/3] gpio: pca953x: Set IRQ type when handle Intel Galileo Gen 2

2021-02-25 Thread Andy Shevchenko
OPROBE set unexpected IRQ trap at vector 20 Fixes: ba8c90c61847 ("gpio: pca953x: Override IRQ for one of the expanders on Galileo Gen 2") Depends-on: 0ea683931adb ("gpio: dwapb: Convert driver to using the GPIO-lib-based IRQ-chip") Signed-off-by: Andy Shev

<    5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   >