Re: ANNOUNCE: mdadm 4.0 - A tool for managing md Soft RAID under Linux

2017-01-10 Thread Bruce Dubbs
ble at: http://anduin.linuxfromscratch.org/~bdubbs/mdadm-logs/ -- Bruce Dubbs linuxfromscratch.org

Re: ANNOUNCE: mdadm 4.0 - A tool for managing md Soft RAID under Linux

2017-01-10 Thread Bruce Dubbs
ble at: http://anduin.linuxfromscratch.org/~bdubbs/mdadm-logs/ -- Bruce Dubbs linuxfromscratch.org

Re: [ANNOUNCE] util-linux v2.25-rc1

2014-06-18 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Karel Zak wrote: The util-linux release v2.25 is available at ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/util-linux/v2.25 Feedback and bug reports, as always, are welcomed. In an LFS build environment, the configure, make, and make check are all clean. It is especially nice the way you tell

Re: [ANNOUNCE] util-linux v2.25-rc1

2014-06-18 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Karel Zak wrote: The util-linux release v2.25 is available at ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/util-linux/v2.25 Feedback and bug reports, as always, are welcomed. In an LFS build environment, the configure, make, and make check are all clean. It is especially nice the way you tell

Re: [ANNOUNCE] kmod 10

2012-09-16 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Jan Engelhardt wrote: On Thursday 2012-09-06 21:37, Lucas De Marchi wrote: kmod 10 is out: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/kernel/kmod/kmod-10.tar.xz ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/kernel/kmod/kmod-10.tar.sign make check fails here with glibc-2.15, gcc-4.7, x86_64, due to what

Re: [ANNOUNCE] kmod 10

2012-09-16 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Jan Engelhardt wrote: On Thursday 2012-09-06 21:37, Lucas De Marchi wrote: kmod 10 is out: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/kernel/kmod/kmod-10.tar.xz ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/kernel/kmod/kmod-10.tar.sign make check fails here with glibc-2.15, gcc-4.7, x86_64, due to what

[PATCH] Add additional error check to mm/mincore.c

2007-03-24 Thread Bruce Dubbs
I some circumstances, mincore can succeed when it shouldn't. Example: Two files are mmapped to a process and they are adjacent in memory. If mincore is run with a requested length that is too large, the function does not differentiate between the different file pointers within the different vma

[PATCH] Add additional error check to mm/mincore.c

2007-03-24 Thread Bruce Dubbs
I some circumstances, mincore can succeed when it shouldn't. Example: Two files are mmapped to a process and they are adjacent in memory. If mincore is run with a requested length that is too large, the function does not differentiate between the different file pointers within the different vma

Re: Possible Bug in mincore or mmap

2007-03-22 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Nick Piggin wrote: > Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> When testing an installation with tests from the Linux Test Project, my >> kernels fail one instance of the mincore01 tests: >> >> mincoremincore011 PASS : expected failure: errno = 22 (Invalid >> argument) >

Possible Bug in mincore or mmap

2007-03-22 Thread Bruce Dubbs
When testing an installation with tests from the Linux Test Project, my kernels fail one instance of the mincore01 tests: mincoremincore011 PASS : expected failure: errno = 22 (Invalid argument) mincore012 PASS : expected failure: errno = 14 (Bad address) mincore013 FAIL :

Possible Bug in mincore or mmap

2007-03-22 Thread Bruce Dubbs
When testing an installation with tests from the Linux Test Project, my kernels fail one instance of the mincore01 tests: mincoremincore011 PASS : expected failure: errno = 22 (Invalid argument) mincore012 PASS : expected failure: errno = 14 (Bad address) mincore013 FAIL :

Re: Possible Bug in mincore or mmap

2007-03-22 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Nick Piggin wrote: Bruce Dubbs wrote: When testing an installation with tests from the Linux Test Project, my kernels fail one instance of the mincore01 tests: mincoremincore011 PASS : expected failure: errno = 22 (Invalid argument) mincore012 PASS : expected failure: errno