Re: sk98lin for 2.6.23-rc1

2007-11-06 Thread Chris Stromsoe
On Tue, 6 Nov 2007, Stephen Hemminger wrote: On Sun, 9 Sep 2007 05:54:45 -0700 (PDT) Chris Stromsoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sat, 8 Sep 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote: On Sat, Sep 08, 2007 at 01:44:20PM -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote: Haven't tried later kernels, don't intend to, while no n

Re: sk98lin for 2.6.23-rc1

2007-11-06 Thread Chris Stromsoe
On Tue, 6 Nov 2007, Stephen Hemminger wrote: On Sun, 9 Sep 2007 05:54:45 -0700 (PDT) Chris Stromsoe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 8 Sep 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote: On Sat, Sep 08, 2007 at 01:44:20PM -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote: Haven't tried later kernels, don't intend to, while no network

Re: sk98lin for 2.6.23-rc1

2007-09-09 Thread Chris Stromsoe
On Sat, 8 Sep 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote: On Sat, Sep 08, 2007 at 01:44:20PM -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote: Haven't tried later kernels, don't intend to, while no network is really secure, it not really useful. You are a regular reader of linux-kernel, and therefore the sk98lin removal can hardly

Re: sk98lin for 2.6.23-rc1

2007-09-09 Thread Chris Stromsoe
On Sat, 8 Sep 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote: On Sat, Sep 08, 2007 at 01:44:20PM -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote: Haven't tried later kernels, don't intend to, while no network is really secure, it not really useful. You are a regular reader of linux-kernel, and therefore the sk98lin removal can hardly

Re: sk98lin for 2.6.23-rc1

2007-07-26 Thread Chris Stromsoe
On Thu, 26 Jul 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote: On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 11:16:36AM -0400, Kyle Rose wrote: From http://www.krose.org/~krose/computing.html: Since the sky2 driver continues to suck ass (which is a technical description for "it hangs all the time under load, at least on my hardware"

Re: sk98lin for 2.6.23-rc1

2007-07-26 Thread Chris Stromsoe
On Thu, 26 Jul 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote: On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 11:16:36AM -0400, Kyle Rose wrote: From http://www.krose.org/~krose/computing.html: Since the sky2 driver continues to suck ass (which is a technical description for it hangs all the time under load, at least on my hardware :-)

Re: [RFT] skge: fiber carrier handling

2007-07-12 Thread Chris Stromsoe
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007, Stephen Hemminger wrote: Does this fix your problems? I don't have dual port boards but have an old SK-9843 fiber board. Nope. It still hangs with: fresno:~# ip li set eth2 up fresno:~# ip li set eth2 down fresno:~# ip li set eth3 up This is with 2.6.22.1 If I load

Re: [RFT] skge: fiber carrier handling

2007-07-12 Thread Chris Stromsoe
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007, Stephen Hemminger wrote: Does this fix your problems? I don't have dual port boards but have an old SK-9843 fiber board. Nope. It still hangs with: fresno:~# ip li set eth2 up fresno:~# ip li set eth2 down fresno:~# ip li set eth3 up This is with 2.6.22.1 If I load

Re: [git patches] net driver updates

2007-07-11 Thread Chris Stromsoe
This is probably going to cause a new entry in regressions list, as at least Chris Stromsoe has reported bonding-related problems with skge that don't happen with sklin - http://www.uwsg.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0707.1/1158.html It's worse than just bonding related. This also causes a reliable

Re: [git patches] net driver updates

2007-07-11 Thread Chris Stromsoe
This is probably going to cause a new entry in regressions list, as at least Chris Stromsoe has reported bonding-related problems with skge that don't happen with sklin - http://www.uwsg.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0707.1/1158.html It's worse than just bonding related. This also causes a reliable

Re: [2.6 patch] the scheduled sk98lin removal

2007-07-10 Thread Chris Stromsoe
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, Chris Stromsoe wrote: On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, Stephen Hemminger wrote: On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 12:44:35 -0400 Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Adrian Bunk wrote: This patch contains the scheduled removal of the sk98lin driver. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL

Re: [2.6 patch] the scheduled sk98lin removal

2007-07-10 Thread Chris Stromsoe
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, Stephen Hemminger wrote: On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 12:44:35 -0400 Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Adrian Bunk wrote: This patch contains the scheduled removal of the sk98lin driver. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Stephen -- ACK? Yes. Existing

Re: [2.6 patch] the scheduled sk98lin removal

2007-07-10 Thread Chris Stromsoe
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, Stephen Hemminger wrote: On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 12:44:35 -0400 Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Adrian Bunk wrote: This patch contains the scheduled removal of the sk98lin driver. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Stephen -- ACK? Yes. Existing driver is

Re: [2.6 patch] the scheduled sk98lin removal

2007-07-10 Thread Chris Stromsoe
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, Chris Stromsoe wrote: On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, Stephen Hemminger wrote: On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 12:44:35 -0400 Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Adrian Bunk wrote: This patch contains the scheduled removal of the sk98lin driver. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED