Re: Your response is requested

On Tue, 17 Apr 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ^^ Arrggg!!! Mumble... grumble... F*cking spammer using my hostname as the from address for sending spam... Dave Zarzycki - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" i

Re: Your response is requested

On Tue, 17 Apr 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ^^ Arrggg!!! Mumble... grumble... F*cking spammer using my hostname as the from address for sending spam... Dave Zarzycki - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" i

Re: Incorrect mdelay() results on Power Managed Machines x86

e could get events out of > ACPI, APM or some other source. Specific events for Speedstep on/off would be nice, but in practice, can we re-calibrate when ever there is a change in the power status (on battery, charging, etc.)? davez -- Dave Zarzycki http://thor.sbay.org/~dave/ - To unsub

Re: Incorrect mdelay() results on Power Managed Machines x86

of ACPI, APM or some other source. Specific events for Speedstep on/off would be nice, but in practice, can we re-calibrate when ever there is a change in the power status (on battery, charging, etc.)? davez -- Dave Zarzycki http://thor.sbay.org/~dave/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send

Re: sys_sched_yield fast path

ield back to the threading wanting to acquire the lock. Feedback from the scheduling gurus would be appreciated. Thanks, davez -- Dave Zarzycki http://thor.sbay.org/~dave/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EM

Re: sys_sched_yield fast path

to the threading wanting to acquire the lock. Feedback from the scheduling gurus would be appreciated. Thanks, davez -- Dave Zarzycki http://thor.sbay.org/~dave/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More

Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1

abit ethernet link is saturated with the sendmsg(MSG_NOCOPY) API, what is CPU utilization like for a given clock speed and processor make? It is any different than the sendfile() case? davez -- Dave Zarzycki http://thor.sbay.org/~dave/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe li

Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1

its safe to reuse the buffer that was handed to sendmsg() with the MSG_NOCOPY flag? Or does sendmsg() with that flag block until the buffer isn't needed by the kernel any more? If it does block, doesn't that defeat the use of non-blocking I/O? davez -- Dave Zarzycki http://thor.sbay.org/~dave/ - To un

Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1

with the sendmsg(MSG_NOCOPY) API, what is CPU utilization like for a given clock speed and processor make? It is any different than the sendfile() case? davez -- Dave Zarzycki http://thor.sbay.org/~dave/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" i

Re: taskfs and kernfs

s?" In you earlier e-mail, you suggested that sysctl(2) would use path_walk(). Would that mean that your kernfs would have to be loaded into the kernel and mounted for sysctl(2) to work? Or am I missing something obvious? davez -- Dave Zarzycki http://thor.sbay.org/~dave/ - To unsub

taskfs and kernfs

? davez -- Dave Zarzycki http://thor.sbay.org/~dave/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: taskfs and kernfs

t; In you earlier e-mail, you suggested that sysctl(2) would use path_walk(). Would that mean that your kernfs would have to be loaded into the kernel and mounted for sysctl(2) to work? Or am I missing something obvious? davez -- Dave Zarzycki http://thor.sbay.org/~dave/ - To unsubscribe

Re: Linux's implementation of poll() not scalable?

erested_events)); r = read(q, events_that_happened, sizeof(events_that_happened)); num_of_resulting_events = r / sizeof(struct event); davez -- Dave Zarzycki http://thor.sbay.org/~dave/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: Linux's implementation of poll() not scalable?

r = read(q, events_that_happened, sizeof(events_that_happened)); num_of_resulting_events = r / sizeof(struct event); davez -- Dave Zarzycki http://thor.sbay.org/~dave/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[RFC] [Patch] Sony APM battery status fix

*bat = ecx; +#ifndef SONY_SR_SERIES *life = edx; +#else + *life = (edx >> 8) | 0x8000; + if (edx & 1) + *life += 0xff; +#endif return APM_SUCCESS; } davez -- Dave Zarzycki KF6ZSS http://thor.sbay.org/~dave/ http://www.sbay.net/ - To unsubs

[RFC] [Patch] Sony APM battery status fix

; +#ifndef SONY_SR_SERIES *life = edx; +#else + *life = (edx 8) | 0x8000; + if (edx 1) + *life += 0xff; +#endif return APM_SUCCESS; } davez -- Dave Zarzycki KF6ZSS http://thor.sbay.org/~dave/ http://www.sbay.net/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send