Dear All Customers,
===
Original Toner Cartridge promotion
===
HP toner:
1) C7115A = RM170;
2) C3906F = RM175;
3) Q2612A = RM 199;
4) Q5949A = RM 199;
Samsung toner:
1) ML-1710 = RM 249;
2) ML-2010 = RM 239;
Xerox toner:
1) 203A = RM 149;
*
Hi All,
I know toolchain support the target powerpcle-elf. it enable the
little-endian on powerpc. I see that there is -melf32ppc param for ld
in arch/ppc/Makefile. Can I modify it to -melf32lppc? what will occur?
Can kernel suport little-endian on powerpc well?
thanks
Jason
-
To unsubscribe from
Alexandr Andreev wrote:
>
> David L. Parsley wrote:
>
> >Mathias Killian wrote a patch to allow cramfs initrd's, see:
> >http://www.cs.helsinki.fi/linux/linux-kernel/2001-01/1064.html
> >
> Thank you. I applied this patch, and recompiled my kernel.
&g
ing list.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
Da
nt of an
integrator/system admin? I'd happily check it out if I thought it
would solve any of the problems I regularly see.
regards,
David
--
David L. Parsley
Network Administrator, Roanoke College
"If I have seen further it is by standing on ye shoulders of
Giants."
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> What the hell are you doing? Compiling with debugging or something?
I'll bet he's using a rootkit 'ls' that shows file sizes in bits.
;-)
regards,
David
--
David L. Parsley
Network Administrator, Roanoke College
"If I have seen fur
s it exist and
I've somehow missed it?
regards,
David
--
David L. Parsley
Network Administrator
Roanoke College
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.o
regards,
David
--
David L. Parsley
Network Administrator
Roanoke College
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please re
Dale Amon wrote:
>
> Talk about syncronicity... I had just last week asked
> about the pro's and con's on this on the crypto list and
> have heard nothing at all back. So I'll drop the body
> of that message in here:
why not port one of the twenty or thirty preexisting tools
that let you mount
Christoph Rohland wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>
> On Sun, 22 Apr 2001, David L. Parsley wrote:
> > I'm still working on a packaging system for diskless
> > (quasi-embedded) devices. The root filesystem is all tmpfs, and I
> > attach packages inside it. Since syml
ery
little memory, but I'm wondering if I'll run into problems when I start
having many hundreds of bind mountings. Any feel for this?
regards,
David
--
David L. Parsley
Roanoke College Network Administrator
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux
e got union mounting patches for testing, I'd be
interested. ;-)
regards,
David
--
David L. Parsley
Network Administrator
Roanoke College
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majord
Our Dell 4300, plus raid card, works okay with a 2.2.14
kernel, which has a version 107 megaraid.o module. This
is many versions behind the version present in 2.4.3. More
recent driver modules for the card hand on booting, thus this
problem report.
The module source does not indicate a recent
ompress into.
My first thought was echo (bigger numbers) > /proc/sys/vm/freepages -
but lo! - it's not writable anymore. I found comments in page_alloc.c
indicating it had to be read-only, but it seems it's only a safety
precaution. Something along the lines of values too small be
Alan Cox wrote:
> The extreme answer to the 2.4 networking performance is the tux specweb
> benchmarks but they dont answer for all cases clearly.
However, I think you've hit the nail on the head here; much of tux is
just general-purpose network file-blasting. The right hacker could turn
it in
posed
to work? (using mount from latest redhat beta)
BTW, pivot_root is nifty, too. ;-)
regards,
David
--
David L. Parsley
Network Administrator
Roanoke College
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED
[david@nicol1 linux]$ make dep
make[3]: Entering directory `/mnt/sdb2/src/linux-2.4.2/drivers'
make -C acpi fastdep
make[4]: Entering directory `/mnt/sdb2/src/linux-2.4.2/drivers/acpi'
Makefile:29: *** target pattern contains no `%'. Stop.
make[4]: Leaving directory `/mnt/sdb2/src/linux-2.4.2/dr
Zack Brown wrote:
>
> Just curious, are there any plans to put Mosix into the standard kernel,
> maybe in 2.5, so folks could just configure it and go? it seems that the
> number of people with more than one computer might make this a feature many
> would at least want to try, especially if it wa
According to the Understanding the Linux Kernel book I
plowed through yesterday afternoon the EXT2 file system
has a defined file type "socket," distinct from fifo.
How does one set up a named socket in a file system? Is it
a legacy constant that has never been supported or what?
Understanding the Linux Kernel
Daniel P. Bovet and Marco Cesati
O'Reilly, 2000
Book web site (including a sample chapter) is here:
http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/linuxkernel/
Developed and tested as lecture notes for university classes
in which the 2.2 kernel was examined, the new O'Reil
Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > I'm porting some software to Linux that requires use of a bidirectional,
> > named pipe. The architecture is as follows: A server creates a named pipe
>
> Pipes are not bidirectional in Linux. We follow traditional non stream
> behaviour
>
> > /dev/spx". I experiemented
Peter Samuelson wrote:
> A more useful thing to fall out of the same hacking is loopback
> mounting -- i.e. the same filesystem mounted multiple places. In
> Linux-land I guess we call it 'mount --bind'.
>
> Peter
Does this kind of thing play nice with nfs and coda, in terms of
change notific
Donghui Wen wrote:
>
> I am hacking the implementation of linux2.4's
> networking (IPV4) . Can anyone give me some idea
> what material I should read to understand the
> data structures and algorithms. I have stevens's
> books which talked about BSD's implementation.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Donghui
Pr
I think I must need to upgrade my assembler, but:
2.4.0/Documentation/Changes does not list an assembler version.
make[2]: Entering directory `/mnt/sdb2/src/linux-2.4.0/drivers/md'
gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/mnt/sdb2/src/linux-2.4.0/include -Wall -Wstrict-proto
types -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-s
configured for specific server environments, where performance is
more imporant than POSIX/Unix98, but you still don't want to completely
break the system. Just a thought, brain-damaged as it might be. ;-)
regards,
David
--
David L. Parsley
Network Administrator
Roanoke College
-
T
This makes me wonder...
If the kernel only kept a queue of the three smallest unused fd's, and
when the queue emptied handed out whatever it liked, how many things
would break? I suspect this would cover a lot of bases...
regards,
David
--
David L. Parsley
Network Admini
on the cramfs wanting 4096
blocksize... but without this fix, that doesn't matter much. ;-)
regards,
David
--
David L. Parsley
Network Administrator
Roanoke College
--- linux.linus/fs/buffer.c Wed Jan 3 23:45:26 2001
+++ linux/fs/buffer.c Wed Jan 10 15:49:36 2001
@@ -1145,13 +1
I read the FAQ and SubmittingPatches, but how best to generate a patch
that moves a file from on dir to another? diff -urNP makes the patch a
lot longer than it seems like it should be... (fortunately it's just a
short header file)
Is there a better way?
regards,
David
--
Da
hardlinks (to busybox); but that didn't affect whether it mounted. I
haven't tested whether this fixes the 'access beyond end of device'
problems.
regards,
David
--
David L. Parsley
Network Administrator
Roanoke College
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
kernel, the romfs mounts &
init runs fine. I just saw this with ac3.
ramfs croaks with 'kernel BUG in filemap.c line 2559' anytime I make a
file in ac2 and ac3. Works fine in 2.4.0 vanilla. Should be quite
repeatable...
BTW, nice work on 2.4 everyone.
regards,
David
--
David L
30 matches
Mail list logo