till need something, just ask)
procpci -> output of cat /proc/pci
Does this help?
(Like my signature? It updates itself with the current Linux kernel
version I have installed. It's quite clever, just a 44 line Perl
script that tries to squeese a uname -a into that...)
--
+--
, I'll do that for you (I have a policy of not recompiling the same
kernel twice...I'm just odd that way. Everybody needs a way to be odd,
and this is mine. Odd is good). I like helping people.
Kernels are fun!
--
+------+---+
|
Check again, Alan...seems as though you've forgotten to change it so
that is reads -ac3 (or my download messed up, but that can't happen)
instead of -ac2. Just FYI. ;-)
--
+--+---+
| Eva
ry if I'm being slightly off topic...
Kernels are fun! I wish I could learn more!
--
+--+-------+
| Evan Thompson|POWERED BY:|
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Linux cd168990-a 2.4.0-ac2
Hmm...seems as though Alan released 2.4.0-ac2 1 year ago (check out
the time stamps on ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/alan/2.4/)
--
+--+---+
| Evan Thompson|POWERED BY:|
| [EMAIL
t are important and that should be sent due to
their high importancy."
--
+--+-------+
| Evan Thompson|POWERED BY:|
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Linux cd168990-a 2.4.0-prerelease |
Oh, and adding that option DID fix the lost interrupt problems
(ide1=0x170,0x376,15), so yeah, that fix fixed it.
Thanks for your help. Maybe it should become a config option to enable
that (CONFIG_BLK_DEV_MESSED_UP_VIA_CHIPSET_FIX).
--
| Evan Thompson| ICQ:2233067
up with your pirq table. That corrupted slot 4 entry
> still makes me go "Hmm..".
I've attached the output I got from doing cat /proc/pci from
2.4.0-prerelease. Because of a subtle configuration difference between
the two, there is a few I/O differences and output differences (bec
ld throw this thing out
of the window, go outside in this minus 40 weather and jump on it until
it turns into a nice fine powder, then go and buy a new computer from
VA or something. Then I'd have someone to complain to if it didn't
work. (I built my last one)).
Thanks,
--
| Evan Thomp
ven enough information, don't hesitate to ask for more.
I'd like some reply to this situation because it just seems odd for
this to happen. Like I said eariler, if I knew what to do, I'd be
happy to submit a patch, but I'm still learning C, so I'm not capable
to do that yet
ave to CC me
replies anymore.)
--
| Evan Thompson| ICQ:2233067 |
| Freelance Computer Nerd | AIM:Evaner517 |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Yahoo!: evanat|
| http://evaner.penguinpowered.com | MSN:evaner517 |
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send t
--(CC replies please)--
On Sat, Dec 30, 2000 at 06:34:14PM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote:
> Could you report the chip set type and revision? Quote the corresponding
> parts from the "lspci -v" output, please. I've been using PC Chips main
> boards with VIA chip sets without IDE difficulties ever s
REPOST: People have asked me to repost this message because their e-mail clients
don't wrap lines. I'd like to know which ones don't, but this isn't the list
for that kind of question, unless it is, which then means I'm posting to the
wrong list to start with and then I wouldn't have to repost.
---(CC answer please)---
I'm having a strange problem with my IDE controller. I believe (and that's what
Windows and the m/b manufaturer -- PC Chips -- say) that I have a VIA PCI BusMaster
IDE controller, and I've had some strange history with it. I've asked many people
before on various hel
14 matches
Mail list logo
