Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] PCI: mediatek: Add new generation controller support

2017-08-07 Thread Honghui Zhang
On Sun, 2017-08-06 at 10:06 +0800, Ryder Lee wrote: > Hi Honghui, > > If you plan to send next version, then I would suggest some minor > changes. > > On Fri, 2017-08-04 at 20:06 +0800, honghui.zh...@mediatek.com wrote: > > +#define PCIE_CRSTB BIT(3) > > +#define PCIE_PERSTB

Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] PCI: mediatek: Add new generation controller support

2017-08-06 Thread Honghui Zhang
On Sat, 2017-08-05 at 14:16 +0800, Ryder Lee wrote: > On Sat, 2017-08-05 at 12:52 +0800, Ryder Lee wrote: > > Hi Honghui, Bjorn, > > > > On Fri, 2017-08-04 at 08:18 -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 04:39:36PM +0800, Honghui Zhang wrote: >

Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] PCI: mediatek: Add new generation controller support

2017-08-06 Thread Honghui Zhang
On Sat, 2017-08-05 at 14:16 +0800, Ryder Lee wrote: > On Sat, 2017-08-05 at 12:52 +0800, Ryder Lee wrote: > > Hi Honghui, Bjorn, > > > > On Fri, 2017-08-04 at 08:18 -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 04:39:36PM +0800, Honghui Zhang wrote: >

Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] PCI: mediatek: Add new generation controller support

2017-08-04 Thread Honghui Zhang
Hi, Bjorn, Thanks very much for your reviews. The mis-spells will be fixed in next version. On Thu, 2017-08-03 at 17:42 -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: .. > > +} > > + > > +static struct mtk_pcie_port *mtk_pcie_find_port(struct mtk_pcie *pcie, > > +

Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] PCI: mediatek: Add new generation controller support

2017-08-04 Thread Honghui Zhang
Hi, Bjorn, Thanks very much for your reviews. The mis-spells will be fixed in next version. On Thu, 2017-08-03 at 17:42 -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: .. > > +} > > + > > +static struct mtk_pcie_port *mtk_pcie_find_port(struct mtk_pcie *pcie, > > +

Re: [PATCH v2] memory: mtk-smi: Use of_device_get_match_data helper

2017-08-01 Thread Honghui Zhang
On Wed, 2017-07-26 at 20:37 +0800, honghui.zh...@mediatek.com wrote: > From: Honghui Zhang <honghui.zh...@mediatek.com> > > Replace custom code with generic helper to retrieve driver data. Hi, Joerg, would you please take this one, because my last patch[1]([patch v2 0/3] Add larb

Re: [PATCH v2] memory: mtk-smi: Use of_device_get_match_data helper

2017-08-01 Thread Honghui Zhang
On Wed, 2017-07-26 at 20:37 +0800, honghui.zh...@mediatek.com wrote: > From: Honghui Zhang > > Replace custom code with generic helper to retrieve driver data. Hi, Joerg, would you please take this one, because my last patch[1]([patch v2 0/3] Add larbid init routine for mediatek's gen1

Re: [PATCH 1/3] memory: mtk-smi: add larbid init routine

2017-07-28 Thread Honghui Zhang
On Fri, 2017-07-28 at 10:59 +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: > On 28/07/17 02:15, Honghui Zhang wrote: > > On Thu, 2017-07-27 at 17:42 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote: > >> > >> On 07/27/2017 04:01 AM, honghui.zh...@mediatek.com wrote: > >>> From: Ho

Re: [PATCH 1/3] memory: mtk-smi: add larbid init routine

2017-07-28 Thread Honghui Zhang
On Fri, 2017-07-28 at 10:59 +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: > On 28/07/17 02:15, Honghui Zhang wrote: > > On Thu, 2017-07-27 at 17:42 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote: > >> > >> On 07/27/2017 04:01 AM, honghui.zh...@mediatek.com wrote: > >>> From: Honghui Zhang

Re: [PATCH 1/3] memory: mtk-smi: add larbid init routine

2017-07-27 Thread Honghui Zhang
On Thu, 2017-07-27 at 17:42 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote: > > On 07/27/2017 04:01 AM, honghui.zh...@mediatek.com wrote: > > From: Honghui Zhang <honghui.zh...@mediatek.com> > > > > In the commit 3c8f4ad85c4b ("memory/mediatek: add support for mt270

Re: [PATCH 1/3] memory: mtk-smi: add larbid init routine

2017-07-27 Thread Honghui Zhang
On Thu, 2017-07-27 at 17:42 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote: > > On 07/27/2017 04:01 AM, honghui.zh...@mediatek.com wrote: > > From: Honghui Zhang > > > > In the commit 3c8f4ad85c4b ("memory/mediatek: add support for mt2701"), > > the larb->larbid wa

Re: [PATCH 0/3] Add larbid init routine for mediatek's gen1 smi larb driver

2017-07-27 Thread Honghui Zhang
On Thu, 2017-07-27 at 14:58 +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 10:01:09AM +0800, honghui.zh...@mediatek.com wrote: > > From: Honghui Zhang <honghui.zh...@mediatek.com> > > > > Mediatek's gen1 smi need the hardware larbid to identify the offset for >

Re: [PATCH 0/3] Add larbid init routine for mediatek's gen1 smi larb driver

2017-07-27 Thread Honghui Zhang
On Thu, 2017-07-27 at 14:58 +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 10:01:09AM +0800, honghui.zh...@mediatek.com wrote: > > From: Honghui Zhang > > > > Mediatek's gen1 smi need the hardware larbid to identify the offset for > > the register which co

Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] dt-bindings: PCI: add support for new generation controller

2017-07-26 Thread Honghui Zhang
On Thu, 2017-07-27 at 10:58 +0800, honghui.zh...@mediatek.com wrote: > From: Ryder Lee <ryder@mediatek.com> > > Add support for MediaTek new generation controller and update related > properities. > > Signed-off-by: Ryder Lee <ryder@mediatek.com>

Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] dt-bindings: PCI: add support for new generation controller

2017-07-26 Thread Honghui Zhang
On Thu, 2017-07-27 at 10:58 +0800, honghui.zh...@mediatek.com wrote: > From: Ryder Lee > > Add support for MediaTek new generation controller and update related > properities. > > Signed-off-by: Ryder Lee > Signed-off-by: Honghui Zhang > --- > .../devicetree/bin

Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] dt-bindings: PCI: add support for new generation controller

2017-07-26 Thread Honghui Zhang
On Thu, 2017-07-27 at 10:58 +0800, honghui.zh...@mediatek.com wrote: > From: Ryder Lee <ryder@mediatek.com> > > Add support for MediaTek new generation controller and update related > properities. > > Signed-off-by: Ryder Lee <ryder@mediatek.com>

Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] dt-bindings: PCI: add support for new generation controller

2017-07-26 Thread Honghui Zhang
On Thu, 2017-07-27 at 10:58 +0800, honghui.zh...@mediatek.com wrote: > From: Ryder Lee > > Add support for MediaTek new generation controller and update related > properities. > > Signed-off-by: Ryder Lee > Signed-off-by: Honghui Zhang > --- > .../devicetree/bin

Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] PCI: mediatek: Add a structure to abstract the controller generations

2017-07-26 Thread Honghui Zhang
On Thu, 2017-07-27 at 11:19 +0800, Honghui Zhang wrote: > On Thu, 2017-07-27 at 10:58 +0800, honghui.zh...@mediatek.com wrote: > > From: Ryder Lee <ryder@mediatek.com> > > > > Introduce a structure "mtk_pcie_soc" to abstract the differences between > &g

Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] PCI: mediatek: Add a structure to abstract the controller generations

2017-07-26 Thread Honghui Zhang
On Thu, 2017-07-27 at 11:19 +0800, Honghui Zhang wrote: > On Thu, 2017-07-27 at 10:58 +0800, honghui.zh...@mediatek.com wrote: > > From: Ryder Lee > > > > Introduce a structure "mtk_pcie_soc" to abstract the differences between > > controller generat

Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] PCI: mediatek: Add a structure to abstract the controller generations

2017-07-26 Thread Honghui Zhang
> some SoC-dependent related setting. In doing so, the common code which > will be reused by future chips. > > In addition, we change the approaches to waiting Gen2 training by using > readl_poll_timeout() calls. > > Signed-off-by: Ryder Lee <ryder@mediatek.com> >

Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] PCI: mediatek: Add a structure to abstract the controller generations

2017-07-26 Thread Honghui Zhang
ated setting. In doing so, the common code which > will be reused by future chips. > > In addition, we change the approaches to waiting Gen2 training by using > readl_poll_timeout() calls. > > Signed-off-by: Ryder Lee > Signed-off-by: Honghui Zhang

Re: [PATCH] memory: mtk-smi: Use of_device_get_match_data helper

2017-07-26 Thread Honghui Zhang
On Wed, 2017-07-26 at 11:36 +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: > On 26/07/17 10:59, honghui.zh...@mediatek.com wrote: > > From: Honghui Zhang <honghui.zh...@mediatek.com> > > > > * for mtk smi gen 1, we need to get the ao(always on) base to config > > * m4u por

Re: [PATCH] memory: mtk-smi: Use of_device_get_match_data helper

2017-07-26 Thread Honghui Zhang
On Wed, 2017-07-26 at 11:36 +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: > On 26/07/17 10:59, honghui.zh...@mediatek.com wrote: > > From: Honghui Zhang > > > > * for mtk smi gen 1, we need to get the ao(always on) base to config > > * m4u port, and we need to enable the aync

Re: [PATCH 5/5] dt-bindings: PCI: add support for new generation controller

2017-07-24 Thread Honghui Zhang
properities. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ryder Lee <ryder....@mediatek.com> > > Signed-off-by: Honghui Zhang <honghui.zh...@mediatek.com> > > --- > > .../devicetree/bindings/pci/mediatek-pcie.txt | 84 > > -- > > 1 file c

Re: [PATCH 5/5] dt-bindings: PCI: add support for new generation controller

2017-07-24 Thread Honghui Zhang
igned-off-by: Ryder Lee > > Signed-off-by: Honghui Zhang > > --- > > .../devicetree/bindings/pci/mediatek-pcie.txt | 84 > > -- > > 1 file changed, 79 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devic

Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] arm: dts: mt2701: Add iommu/smi device node

2017-01-15 Thread Honghui Zhang
On Fri, 2017-01-13 at 16:05 +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote: > Hi Erin, > > I just took the patch from Honghui he send in june. > Please see my comment inline. > > On 13/01/17 09:42, Erin Lo wrote: > > From: Honghui Zhang <honghui.zh...@mediatek.com> > > >

Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] arm: dts: mt2701: Add iommu/smi device node

2017-01-15 Thread Honghui Zhang
On Fri, 2017-01-13 at 16:05 +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote: > Hi Erin, > > I just took the patch from Honghui he send in june. > Please see my comment inline. > > On 13/01/17 09:42, Erin Lo wrote: > > From: Honghui Zhang > > > > Add the device node of iommu an

Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] ARM: dts: mt2701: add iommu/smi dtsi node for mt2701

2017-01-15 Thread Honghui Zhang
On Fri, 2017-01-13 at 15:54 +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote: > > On 04/07/16 10:00, Matthias Brugger wrote: > > > > > > On 04/07/16 03:32, Honghui Zhang wrote: > >> On Sun, 2016-07-03 at 21:12 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote: > >>> > &g

Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] ARM: dts: mt2701: add iommu/smi dtsi node for mt2701

2017-01-15 Thread Honghui Zhang
On Fri, 2017-01-13 at 15:54 +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote: > > On 04/07/16 10:00, Matthias Brugger wrote: > > > > > > On 04/07/16 03:32, Honghui Zhang wrote: > >> On Sun, 2016-07-03 at 21:12 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote: > >>> > &g

Re: [PATCH] iommu: mtk: add common-clk dependency

2016-11-17 Thread Honghui Zhang
On Thu, 2016-11-17 at 15:35 -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 11/17, Honghui Zhang wrote: > > On Wed, 2016-11-16 at 11:38 -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > > On 11/16, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > After the MT2701 clock driver was added, we get a harmless warnin

Re: [PATCH] iommu: mtk: add common-clk dependency

2016-11-17 Thread Honghui Zhang
On Thu, 2016-11-17 at 15:35 -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 11/17, Honghui Zhang wrote: > > On Wed, 2016-11-16 at 11:38 -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > > On 11/16, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > After the MT2701 clock driver was added, we get a harmless warnin

Re: [PATCH] iommu: mtk: add common-clk dependency

2016-11-16 Thread Honghui Zhang
On Wed, 2016-11-16 at 11:38 -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 11/16, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > After the MT2701 clock driver was added, we get a harmless warning for > > the iommu driver that selects it, when compile-testing without > > COMMON_CLK. > > > > warning: (MTK_IOMMU_V1) selects

Re: [PATCH] iommu: mtk: add common-clk dependency

2016-11-16 Thread Honghui Zhang
On Wed, 2016-11-16 at 11:38 -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 11/16, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > After the MT2701 clock driver was added, we get a harmless warning for > > the iommu driver that selects it, when compile-testing without > > COMMON_CLK. > > > > warning: (MTK_IOMMU_V1) selects

Re: [PATCH v9 2/4] soc: mediatek: Init MT8173 scpsys driver earlier

2016-11-15 Thread Honghui Zhang
On Mon, 2016-10-31 at 10:08 +0800, James Liao wrote: > On Mon, 2016-10-31 at 01:08 +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote: > > Hi James, > > > > On 10/20/2016 10:56 AM, James Liao wrote: > > > Some power domain comsumers may init before module_init. > > > So the power domain provider (scpsys) need to be

Re: [PATCH v9 2/4] soc: mediatek: Init MT8173 scpsys driver earlier

2016-11-15 Thread Honghui Zhang
On Mon, 2016-10-31 at 10:08 +0800, James Liao wrote: > On Mon, 2016-10-31 at 01:08 +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote: > > Hi James, > > > > On 10/20/2016 10:56 AM, James Liao wrote: > > > Some power domain comsumers may init before module_init. > > > So the power domain provider (scpsys) need to be

Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] ARM: dts: mt2701: add iommu/smi dtsi node for mt2701

2016-07-03 Thread Honghui Zhang
On Sun, 2016-07-03 at 21:12 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote: > > On 07/03/2016 08:24 AM, Matthias Brugger wrote: > > > > > > On 06/08/2016 11:51 AM, honghui.zh...@mediatek.com wrote: > >> From: Honghui Zhang <honghui.zh...@mediatek.com> > >> &g

Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] ARM: dts: mt2701: add iommu/smi dtsi node for mt2701

2016-07-03 Thread Honghui Zhang
On Sun, 2016-07-03 at 21:12 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote: > > On 07/03/2016 08:24 AM, Matthias Brugger wrote: > > > > > > On 06/08/2016 11:51 AM, honghui.zh...@mediatek.com wrote: > >> From: Honghui Zhang > >> > >> Add the dtsi node of iommu a

Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] ARM: dts: mt2701: add iommu/smi dtsi node for mt2701

2016-06-22 Thread Honghui Zhang
On Wed, 2016-06-22 at 10:31 +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: > On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 03:45:47PM +0800, Honghui Zhang wrote: > > This one is based on CCF "arm: dts: mt2701: Add clock controller device > > nodes"[1] and power domain patch "Mediatek MT2701 SCPSYS

Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] ARM: dts: mt2701: add iommu/smi dtsi node for mt2701

2016-06-22 Thread Honghui Zhang
On Wed, 2016-06-22 at 10:31 +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: > On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 03:45:47PM +0800, Honghui Zhang wrote: > > This one is based on CCF "arm: dts: mt2701: Add clock controller device > > nodes"[1] and power domain patch "Mediatek MT2701 SCPSYS

Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] ARM: dts: mt2701: add iommu/smi dtsi node for mt2701

2016-06-22 Thread Honghui Zhang
On Wed, 2016-06-22 at 13:45 +0800, Eddie Huang wrote: > On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 17:57 +0800, Joerg Roedel wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 05:51:01PM +0800, honghui.zh...@mediatek.com wrote: > > > From: Honghui Zhang <honghui.zh...@mediatek.com> > > > > &g

Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] ARM: dts: mt2701: add iommu/smi dtsi node for mt2701

2016-06-22 Thread Honghui Zhang
On Wed, 2016-06-22 at 13:45 +0800, Eddie Huang wrote: > On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 17:57 +0800, Joerg Roedel wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 05:51:01PM +0800, honghui.zh...@mediatek.com wrote: > > > From: Honghui Zhang > > > > > > Add the dtsi node of iommu and

Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] ARM: dts: mt2701: add iommu/smi dtsi node for mt2701

2016-06-21 Thread Honghui Zhang
On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 11:41 +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: > On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 05:51:01PM +0800, honghui.zh...@mediatek.com wrote: > > From: Honghui Zhang <honghui.zh...@mediatek.com> > > > > Add the dtsi node of iommu and smi for mt2701. > > > > S

Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] ARM: dts: mt2701: add iommu/smi dtsi node for mt2701

2016-06-21 Thread Honghui Zhang
On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 11:41 +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: > On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 05:51:01PM +0800, honghui.zh...@mediatek.com wrote: > > From: Honghui Zhang > > > > Add the dtsi node of iommu and smi for mt2701. > > > > Signed-off-by: Honghui Zhang > >

Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] MT2701 iommu support

2016-06-05 Thread Honghui Zhang
On Fri, 2016-05-27 at 16:56 +0800, honghui.zh...@mediatek.com wrote: > From: Honghui Zhang <honghui.zh...@mediatek.com> > Is there will be some comments for this version patchset? Any comments is welcome. Thanks. > Mediatek's m4u(Multimedia Memory Management Unit) and SMI(Sma

Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] MT2701 iommu support

2016-06-05 Thread Honghui Zhang
On Fri, 2016-05-27 at 16:56 +0800, honghui.zh...@mediatek.com wrote: > From: Honghui Zhang > Is there will be some comments for this version patchset? Any comments is welcome. Thanks. > Mediatek's m4u(Multimedia Memory Management Unit) and SMI(Smart > Multimedia Interf

Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] iommu/mediatek: add support for mtk iommu generation one HW

2016-05-25 Thread Honghui Zhang
On Tue, 2016-05-24 at 16:36 +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: > On 24/05/16 10:57, Honghui Zhang wrote: > [...] > >>> @@ -48,6 +48,9 @@ struct mtk_iommu_domain { > >>> struct io_pgtable_ops *iop; > >>> > >>>

Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] iommu/mediatek: add support for mtk iommu generation one HW

2016-05-25 Thread Honghui Zhang
On Tue, 2016-05-24 at 16:36 +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: > On 24/05/16 10:57, Honghui Zhang wrote: > [...] > >>> @@ -48,6 +48,9 @@ struct mtk_iommu_domain { > >>> struct io_pgtable_ops *iop; > >>> > >>>

Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] iommu/mediatek: add support for mtk iommu generation one HW

2016-05-24 Thread Honghui Zhang
Hi, Robin, Thanks very much for your comments. On Mon, 2016-05-23 at 20:31 +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: > On 19/05/16 12:49, honghui.zh...@mediatek.com wrote: > > From: Honghui Zhang <honghui.zh...@mediatek.com> > > > > Mediatek SoC's M4U has two generations of HW

Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] iommu/mediatek: add support for mtk iommu generation one HW

2016-05-24 Thread Honghui Zhang
Hi, Robin, Thanks very much for your comments. On Mon, 2016-05-23 at 20:31 +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: > On 19/05/16 12:49, honghui.zh...@mediatek.com wrote: > > From: Honghui Zhang > > > > Mediatek SoC's M4U has two generations of HW architcture. Generation one > > use

Re: [PATCH 4/5] iommu/mediatek: add support for mtk iommu generation one HW

2016-05-12 Thread Honghui Zhang
Hi, Robin, Thanks very much for your comment, and sorry for the last reply format. On Tue, 2016-05-10 at 11:28 +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: > On 09/05/16 09:00, honghui.zh...@mediatek.com wrote: > [...] > > +static void *mtk_iommu_alloc_pgt(struct device *dev, size_t size, gfp_t > > gfp) > > +{ >

Re: [PATCH 4/5] iommu/mediatek: add support for mtk iommu generation one HW

2016-05-12 Thread Honghui Zhang
Hi, Robin, Thanks very much for your comment, and sorry for the last reply format. On Tue, 2016-05-10 at 11:28 +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: > On 09/05/16 09:00, honghui.zh...@mediatek.com wrote: > [...] > > +static void *mtk_iommu_alloc_pgt(struct device *dev, size_t size, gfp_t > > gfp) > > +{ >

Re: [PATCH] sched/rt: Decrease number of calls of push_rt_task() in push_rt_tasks()

2013-02-05 Thread Honghui Zhang
On 2013/2/5 15:22, Kirill Tkhai wrote: >> >> Suppose we have a large number of cpus(say 4096), with the last one running >> a low-priority task on it. Is it possible with this patch we will never reach >> the last cpu in case that previous cpu has complete the pulled task? > > Yes. But this patch

Re: [PATCH] sched/rt: Decrease number of calls of push_rt_task() in push_rt_tasks()

2013-02-05 Thread Honghui Zhang
On 2013/2/5 15:22, Kirill Tkhai wrote: Suppose we have a large number of cpus(say 4096), with the last one running a low-priority task on it. Is it possible with this patch we will never reach the last cpu in case that previous cpu has complete the pulled task? Yes. But this patch is about

Re: [PATCH] sched/rt: Decrease number of calls of push_rt_task() in push_rt_tasks()

2013-02-04 Thread Honghui Zhang
On 2013/2/1 5:57, Kirill Tkhai wrote: > > > 31.01.2013, 20:08, "Steven Rostedt" : >> On Mon, 2013-01-28 at 03:46 +0400, Kirill Tkhai wrote: >> >>> The patch aims to decrease the number of calls of push_rt_task() >>> in push_rt_tasks(). >>> >>> It's not necessary to push more than

Re: [PATCH] sched/rt: Decrease number of calls of push_rt_task() in push_rt_tasks()

2013-02-04 Thread Honghui Zhang
On 2013/2/1 5:57, Kirill Tkhai wrote: 31.01.2013, 20:08, Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org: On Mon, 2013-01-28 at 03:46 +0400, Kirill Tkhai wrote: The patch aims to decrease the number of calls of push_rt_task() in push_rt_tasks(). It's not necessary to push more than

<    1   2