Hi Mark,
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 08:26:19AM -0400, Mark M. Hoffman wrote:
> Hi Joerg:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 11:56:42PM -0400, Mark M. Hoffman wrote:
> > > Thanks for sending all that. I see one bug clearly, and I'm pretty close
> > > to
> > > seeing the other one. But for tonight, I ne
Hi Mark,
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 11:56:42PM -0400, Mark M. Hoffman wrote:
> Hi Joerg:
>
> * Joerg Sommrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-08-08 17:17:16 +0200]:
> > Hi Mark,
> >
> > just to eliminate as many impacts as possible, I did:
> > - reinstall the unmo
Sound alarm disabled
bear:~/hwmon# exit
Script done on Wed Aug 8 16:43:20 2007
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 09:03:16PM -0400, Mark M. Hoffman wrote:
> Hi Joerg:
>
> (I tried to follow-up using the gmane.org mail/news gateway... didn't seem
> to work.)
>
> * Jo
-jo
On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 01:20:23PM +0200, Rene Herman wrote:
> On 08/05/2007 12:26 PM, Joerg Sommrey wrote:
>
> >after upgrading from 2.6.21 to 2.6.22 the CPU temperatures shown by
> >w83781d look unreal. They were in a range from 40°C when idle to
> >75°C under full load
Hi,
after upgrading from 2.6.21 to 2.6.22 the CPU temperatures shown by
w83781d look unreal. They were in a range from 40°C when idle to
75°C under full load with 2.6.21. The values shown now are in a very
small range from 77°C to 82°C. From the (low) noise of the fan I can
tell that the temper
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 09:36:24AM +0200, Joerg Sommrey wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 11:38:34PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 18:39 +0200, Joerg Sommrey wrote:
> > > Here it is. Maybe this problem is related to the usage of the
> > > &quo
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 11:38:34PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 18:39 +0200, Joerg Sommrey wrote:
> > Here it is. Maybe this problem is related to the usage of the
> > "experimental" amd76x_pm module?
>
> Can you please verify what hap
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 06:23:36PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 14:52 +0200, Joerg Sommrey wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > after switching to 2.6.21 the system clock sporadically loses time on my
> > box (i386, Athlon MP).
> > It's alw
Hi all,
after switching to 2.6.21 the system clock sporadically loses time on my
box (i386, Athlon MP).
It's always around 4.68 seconds and happened 7 times in the last 12
hours. A simple calculation (2 ^ ACPI_PM_MASK / PMTMR_TICKS_PER_SEC =
2 ^ 24 / 3579545 = 4.686968875) shows: There is almost
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 10:00:01AM +0300, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050906 15:28]:
> > Hi!
> >
> > > > > +NOTE: Currently there's a bug somewhere where the reading the
> > > > > + P_LVL2 for the first time causes the system to sleep instead
> > > > > of
> >
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 04:51:45PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > This patch adds some experimental features to amd76x_pm, namely C3, NTH
> > and POS support. These features are not enabled by default and are
> > intended for kernel hackers only.
> >
>
> Could those wait until ready?
Th
: Joerg Sommrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff -Nru linux-2.6.13/Documentation/amd76x_pm.txt
linux-2.6.13-jo/Documentation/amd76x_pm.txt
--- linux-2.6.13/Documentation/amd76x_pm.txt1970-01-01 01:00:00.0
+0100
+++ linux-2.6.13-jo/Documentation/amd76x_pm.txt 2005-09-01 21:50:12.0
This patch adds some experimental features to amd76x_pm, namely C3, NTH
and POS support. These features are not enabled by default and are
intended for kernel hackers only.
Signed-off-by: Joerg Sommrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- linux-2.6.13-jo/drivers/acpi/amd76x_pm.c2005-09-01
Hi all,
just tried 2.6.12-rc2 and I still have the same errors from my SATA
disks as with 2.6.11. The setup is a bit complex. The relevant parts (I
think) are:
Adaptec AHA-2940UW SCSI-controller, attached are:
1 harddisk /dev/sda
1 DDS3 streamer /dev/st0
Promise SATA150 TX4 controller, attache
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 11:06:23PM +0100, Joerg Sommrey wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 03:43:38PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > Joerg Sommrey wrote:
> > >On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 01:07:16PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > >
> > >>Joerg Sommrey wrote:
> >
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 03:43:38PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Joerg Sommrey wrote:
> >On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 01:07:16PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >
> >>Joerg Sommrey wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 02:10:14AM -0500, Jeff Garzik
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 01:07:16PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Joerg Sommrey wrote:
> >On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 02:10:14AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >
> >>Joerg Sommrey wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 11:09:26PM -0500, Jeff Garzik
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 02:10:14AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Joerg Sommrey wrote:
> >On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 11:09:26PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >
> >>Joerg Sommrey wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 05:43:59PM -0500, Jeff Garzik
On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 11:09:26PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Joerg Sommrey wrote:
> >On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 05:43:59PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >
> >>Joerg Sommrey wrote:
> >>
> >>>Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>Patch:
&
On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 05:43:59PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Joerg Sommrey wrote:
> >Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >>Patch:
> >>http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/jgarzik/libata/2.6.11-rc5-bk4-libata-dev1.patch.bz2
> >
> >
> >Still not usable her
Jeff Garzik wrote:
>BK users:
> bk pull bk://gkernel.bkbits.net/libata-dev-2.6
>Patch:
>http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/jgarzik/libata/2.6.11-rc5-bk4-libata-dev1.patch.bz2
Still not usable here. The same errors as before when backing up:
Mar 2 21:09:50 bear kernel: ata1:
Hi all,
a problem that was introduced between 2.6.10-ac9 and 2.6.10-ac11 made
it's way into 2.6.11-rc5. While taking a backup onto a SCSI-streamer one
of my RAID1-arrays gets corrupted. Afterwards the system hangs and
isn't even bootable. Need to raidhotadd the failed partition in single
user m
On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 02:39:49PM -0800, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> >
> > there's something I don't understand: With IRQBALANCE *enabled* almost
> > all interrupts are processed on CPU0. This changed in an unexpected way
> > after disabling IRQBALANCE: now all interrupts are distributed uniformly
Hi all,
there's something I don't understand: With IRQBALANCE *enabled* almost
all interrupts are processed on CPU0. This changed in an unexpected way
after disabling IRQBALANCE: now all interrupts are distributed uniformly
to both CPUs. Maybe it's intentional, but it's not what I expect when a
Jeff Garzik wrote::
>Johannes Resch wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> [please CC me on replies]
>>
>> I've got a box running 2.6.10 (with the patch[0] needed to support the
>> Promise SATAII 150 TX4 controller).
>> This box has three software raid1 partitions mirrored on a SATA disk on
>> the Promise control
* my ASUS A7M266-D motherboard.
+ *
+ * 20030601: Pasi Savolainen
+ * Simple port to 2.5
+ * Added sysfs interface for making nice graphs with mrtg.
+ * Look for /sys/devices/pci0/00:00.0/C2_cnt & lazy_idle (latter writable)
+ *
+ * 20041204: Joerg Sommrey (jo)
+ *
Hi all,
a few times in the last couple of months I experienced some strange key
repeating in X. A single key-press sometimes results in 2-8 typed
keys. This started around 2.6.8 but I'm not sure. It was last seen on
2.6.10-ac8.
There were similar problems reported for Toshiba laptops and withi
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 04:02:42PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
>Arjan van de Ven is now building RPMS of the kernel and those can be found
>in the RPM subdirectory and should be yum-able. Expect the RPMS to lag the
>diff a little as the RPM builds and tests do take time.
>Nothing terribly exciting her
Hello,
2.6.10-ac11 causes strange errors on a sata-md-raid-1. It starts like this:
Jan 31 23:21:07 bear kernel: ata2: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error
}Jan 31 23:21:07 bear kernel: SCSI error : <2 0 0 0> return code = 0x802
Jan 31 23:21:07 bear kernel: FMK Current sdc: sense = 70
29 matches
Mail list logo
