Hi,
in 5.10 kernels up to and including 5.10.15 when trying to build the
kernel for an x86_64 skylake using binutils-2.36.1, gcc-10.2 and
glibic-2.33 I get a segfault in objtool if the orc unwinder is
enabled.
This has already been fixed in 5.11 by ''objtool: Fix seg fault with
Clang non-section
Hi Paul,
On Fri, 7 Dec 2018 at 15:32, Paul Menzel wrote:
>
> Dear Linux folks,
>
>
> What driver is recommended for current AMD Ryzen based processors
> like *AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 Quad-Core Processor* or *AMD EPYC 7601
> 32-Core Processor*?
>
> Only from the acpi-cpufreq Kconfig description, I
Hi Paul,
On Fri, 7 Dec 2018 at 15:32, Paul Menzel wrote:
>
> Dear Linux folks,
>
>
> What driver is recommended for current AMD Ryzen based processors
> like *AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 Quad-Core Processor* or *AMD EPYC 7601
> 32-Core Processor*?
>
> Only from the acpi-cpufreq Kconfig description, I
On 8 May 2018 at 21:29, Sasha Levin wrote:
>
> This is interesting. We have a group of power users who are testing out
> -rc releases, who are usually happy to test out a fast moving target and
> provide helpful reports back. We also have a group who run a -stable
On 8 May 2018 at 21:29, Sasha Levin wrote:
>
> This is interesting. We have a group of power users who are testing out
> -rc releases, who are usually happy to test out a fast moving target and
> provide helpful reports back. We also have a group who run a -stable
> kernel (-stable
I just tried to build 4.9 (rc3) for the first time (x86_64, i7 haswell)
After making my choices in make oldconfig, make -j8 failed in
less than 2 sec.
CC scripts/mod/empty.o
HOSTCC scripts/mod/mk_elfconfig
HOSTCC scripts/sortextable
CC scripts/mod/devicetable-offsets.s
In
I just tried to build 4.9 (rc3) for the first time (x86_64, i7 haswell)
After making my choices in make oldconfig, make -j8 failed in
less than 2 sec.
CC scripts/mod/empty.o
HOSTCC scripts/mod/mk_elfconfig
HOSTCC scripts/sortextable
CC scripts/mod/devicetable-offsets.s
In
On Sat, Jun 04, 2016 at 03:34:01PM -0400, Justin Keller wrote:
> Correct the grammar around the word however.
>
> Signed-off-by: Justin Keller
>
> ---
>
> index 1d9bbab..5d43510 100644
> --- a/Documentation/ntb.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/ntb.txt
> @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@
On Sat, Jun 04, 2016 at 03:34:01PM -0400, Justin Keller wrote:
> Correct the grammar around the word however.
>
> Signed-off-by: Justin Keller
>
> ---
>
> index 1d9bbab..5d43510 100644
> --- a/Documentation/ntb.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/ntb.txt
> @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ establishes a logical link
On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 01:04:46AM +0100, Boris Rybalkin wrote:
> Sorry for insisting, but I would like to explore potential solutions
> for fixing the root problem (missing relative shebang),
> I know there are ways to workaround that, but I would like to make
> sure the proper fix is not
On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 01:04:46AM +0100, Boris Rybalkin wrote:
> Sorry for insisting, but I would like to explore potential solutions
> for fixing the root problem (missing relative shebang),
> I know there are ways to workaround that, but I would like to make
> sure the proper fix is not
t uses a DP to VGA bridge chip.
>
> Alex
>
Thanks, I was not expecting such a quick response.
The radeon patch does fix it. If you wish, you can add
Tested-by: Ken Moffat <zarniwh...@ntlworld.com>
ĸen
--
This email was written using 100% recycled letters.
t uses a DP to VGA bridge chip.
>
> Alex
>
Thanks, I was not expecting such a quick response.
The radeon patch does fix it. If you wish, you can add
Tested-by: Ken Moffat
ĸen
--
This email was written using 100% recycled letters.
On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 02:38:11AM +, Ken Moffat wrote:
> One of my machines is an A10 Kaveri desktop, with a good old VGA
> connection to the monitor. I've only just started trying to boot
> any 4.5 kernel on it, but with 4.5.0-rc6 and now linus's tree from a
> few hours ago (4.5
On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 02:38:11AM +, Ken Moffat wrote:
> One of my machines is an A10 Kaveri desktop, with a good old VGA
> connection to the monitor. I've only just started trying to boot
> any 4.5 kernel on it, but with 4.5.0-rc6 and now linus's tree from a
> few hours ago (4.5
One of my machines is an A10 Kaveri desktop, with a good old VGA
connection to the monitor. I've only just started trying to boot
any 4.5 kernel on it, but with 4.5.0-rc6 and now linus's tree from a
few hours ago (4.5.0-rc6-00018-gf983cd3) I get a blank screen, with
no video signal, as soon as it
One of my machines is an A10 Kaveri desktop, with a good old VGA
connection to the monitor. I've only just started trying to boot
any 4.5 kernel on it, but with 4.5.0-rc6 and now linus's tree from a
few hours ago (4.5.0-rc6-00018-gf983cd3) I get a blank screen, with
no video signal, as soon as it
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 05:56:16PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> [add Jan Kara]
>
> On 02/10/16 13:29, Steve Kenton wrote:
> > Is anyone maintaining these or am I about to volunteer for another job?
>
> CUrrent MAINTAINERS file says:
>
> UDF FILESYSTEM
> M:Jan Kara
> S:Maintained
> F:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 05:56:16PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> [add Jan Kara]
>
> On 02/10/16 13:29, Steve Kenton wrote:
> > Is anyone maintaining these or am I about to volunteer for another job?
>
> CUrrent MAINTAINERS file says:
>
> UDF FILESYSTEM
> M:Jan Kara
> S:
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 07:08:09PM +0100, Karsten Malcher wrote:
> Hello,
>
> i am sorry, but is it possible that a kernel bug for a special chipset is
> alive since kernel 3.2?
>
On uncommon hardware, anything is possible. I don't actually know
if that hardware is "uncommon", only that I do
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 07:08:09PM +0100, Karsten Malcher wrote:
> Hello,
>
> i am sorry, but is it possible that a kernel bug for a special chipset is
> alive since kernel 3.2?
>
On uncommon hardware, anything is possible. I don't actually know
if that hardware is "uncommon", only that I do
On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 07:26:04PM +0100, Frederik wrote:
> On Sun, 13. Dec 19:15, Nicolai Stange wrote:
> > Frederik writes:
> >
> > W/o your series applied (so line numbering might be slightly
> > different), checkpatch.pl says:
> >
> > ERROR: trailing whitespace
> > #270: FILE: -:270:
>
On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 07:26:04PM +0100, Frederik wrote:
> On Sun, 13. Dec 19:15, Nicolai Stange wrote:
> > Frederik writes:
> >
> > W/o your series applied (so line numbering might be slightly
> > different), checkpatch.pl says:
> >
> > ERROR: trailing whitespace
>
On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 05:24:37PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> So it's Sunday, two weeks has passed, and so 4.4-rc1 is out there and
> the merge window is closed.
>
[...]
>
> Go out and test.
>
> Linus
>
After what I picked up during the 4.3 cycle, I tried using 'xzcat |
On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 05:24:37PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> So it's Sunday, two weeks has passed, and so 4.4-rc1 is out there and
> the merge window is closed.
>
[...]
>
> Go out and test.
>
> Linus
>
After what I picked up during the 4.3 cycle, I tried using 'xzcat |
On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 08:06:02PM -0300, Diego Viola wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Can someone please remove this commit from the repo:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/README?id=6609b638353c99c5736e05abd17197f1cb776e0e
>
> I made a huge grammar mistake in my
On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 08:06:02PM -0300, Diego Viola wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Can someone please remove this commit from the repo:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/README?id=6609b638353c99c5736e05abd17197f1cb776e0e
>
> I made a huge grammar mistake in my
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 05:52:58PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 12:59:14PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 12:40:15AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> > > (Cc'ing qemu-devel, please keep me in the Cc).
> > >
> > > TL;DR -
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 12:59:14PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 12:40:15AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> > (Cc'ing qemu-devel, please keep me in the Cc).
> >
> > TL;DR - qemu locks up my machine when I use 4.2-rc kernels.
> >
> Previous mail
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 12:40:15AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> (Cc'ing qemu-devel, please keep me in the Cc).
>
> TL;DR - qemu locks up my machine when I use 4.2-rc kernels.
>
Previous mail, or at least the copy to qemu, archived at
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2015
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 12:59:14PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 12:40:15AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
(Cc'ing qemu-devel, please keep me in the Cc).
TL;DR - qemu locks up my machine when I use 4.2-rc kernels.
Previous mail, or at least the copy to qemu, archived
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 05:52:58PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 12:59:14PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 12:40:15AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
(Cc'ing qemu-devel, please keep me in the Cc).
TL;DR - qemu locks up my machine when I use 4.2-rc kernels
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 12:40:15AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
(Cc'ing qemu-devel, please keep me in the Cc).
TL;DR - qemu locks up my machine when I use 4.2-rc kernels.
Previous mail, or at least the copy to qemu, archived at
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2015-08/msg02784.html
(Cc'ing qemu-devel, please keep me in the Cc).
TL;DR - qemu locks up my machine when I use 4.2-rc kernels.
I only use qemu from time to time, mostly to test changes to my own
scripts, or new package versions, in beyond.linuxfromscratch.org. A
few days ago I came back to that, building an LFS
(Cc'ing qemu-devel, please keep me in the Cc).
TL;DR - qemu locks up my machine when I use 4.2-rc kernels.
I only use qemu from time to time, mostly to test changes to my own
scripts, or new package versions, in beyond.linuxfromscratch.org. A
few days ago I came back to that, building an LFS
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 09:50:36AM +0300, Daniel Baluta wrote:
> scripts/package/builddeb already creates a linux-keader .deb
> package, but we need this feature also for non-Debian distros
> (e.g. Android or LFS).
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Baluta
In general, LFS does not need this - but
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 09:50:36AM +0300, Daniel Baluta wrote:
scripts/package/builddeb already creates a linux-keader .deb
package, but we need this feature also for non-Debian distros
(e.g. Android or LFS).
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baluta daniel.bal...@intel.com
In general, LFS does not need
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 12:05:05PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
> Before going nuts bisecting, it could be worth running perf record -a -g -e
> cycles (or perhaps -e task-clock instead of -e cycles). It could also be
> worth manually sampling /proc/PID/stack a few times for a process that
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 09:11:46PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> 2015-07-15 18:27 GMT+02:00 Ken Moffat :
> >
> > The config differences follow. Perhaps it is actually one of the
> > subsequent choices that is the problem. And I guess it could still
&
New title, I originally posted this last night but I've now made
a little progress in identifying what changed. Previous thread was
labelled for AMD Phenom, but it is more general. CC'ing Jeff
because he replied to the original, I guess he probably won't be
interested after this.
Yesterday was
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 09:23:31PM -0500, Jeff Epler wrote:
> GNU Make 4.1 has a problem that causes it to be unable to use the
> desired level of parallelism. Two people have reported that reverting a
> commit which changes from fork to vfork "fixes" it. (i'm one of them,
> unfortunately posting
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 09:11:46PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
2015-07-15 18:27 GMT+02:00 Ken Moffat zarniwh...@ntlworld.com:
The config differences follow. Perhaps it is actually one of the
subsequent choices that is the problem. And I guess it could still
be a gcc-5.1 issue
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 12:05:05PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
Before going nuts bisecting, it could be worth running perf record -a -g -e
cycles (or perhaps -e task-clock instead of -e cycles). It could also be
worth manually sampling /proc/PID/stack a few times for a process that isn't
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 09:23:31PM -0500, Jeff Epler wrote:
GNU Make 4.1 has a problem that causes it to be unable to use the
desired level of parallelism. Two people have reported that reverting a
commit which changes from fork to vfork fixes it. (i'm one of them,
unfortunately posting as
New title, I originally posted this last night but I've now made
a little progress in identifying what changed. Previous thread was
labelled for AMD Phenom, but it is more general. CC'ing Jeff
because he replied to the original, I guess he probably won't be
interested after this.
Yesterday was
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 12:39:20AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
>
> At that stage I assumed I must have somehow buggered up the 4.2
> config - if everybody was hitting this sort of slowdown, somebody
> would surely have noticed. So, I downloaded 4.2.0-rc2 and built
> that from 4.1
One of my machines is an AMD Phenom. I wanted to explore building
some new (to me) userspace, and this machine had a system which was
both recent enough (last month's LFS/BLFS) and with enough space to
make it seem like a good place to do it.
I finally got round to trying to build qt-5 (5.5.0),
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 12:39:20AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
At that stage I assumed I must have somehow buggered up the 4.2
config - if everybody was hitting this sort of slowdown, somebody
would surely have noticed. So, I downloaded 4.2.0-rc2 and built
that from 4.1.1, taking care to think
One of my machines is an AMD Phenom. I wanted to explore building
some new (to me) userspace, and this machine had a system which was
both recent enough (last month's LFS/BLFS) and with enough space to
make it seem like a good place to do it.
I finally got round to trying to build qt-5 (5.5.0),
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 03:41:49PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 10:53:00PM -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> > (Please always Cc netdev for networking bugs.)
> >
Sorry, didn't spot that. But anyway
>
> > For example:
> >
> > 1) What is your
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 10:53:00PM -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> (Please always Cc netdev for networking bugs.)
>
> On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 8:29 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
> > On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 03:43:52AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> >> Anybody else suffering frm lost netwo
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 10:53:00PM -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
(Please always Cc netdev for networking bugs.)
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 8:29 PM, Ken Moffat zarniwh...@ntlworld.com wrote:
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 03:43:52AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
Anybody else suffering frm lost network
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 03:41:49PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 10:53:00PM -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
(Please always Cc netdev for networking bugs.)
Sorry, didn't spot that. But anyway
For example:
1) What is your network setup? iptables? routes? etc.
I'm using
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 03:43:52AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> Anybody else suffering frm lost network connectivity in 4.0.x
> kernels ? A couple of times this week, vim on an nfs-3 mount hung
> and I had to reboot. Both of those occasions were on an AMD desktop
> with the r8169 dri
Anybody else suffering frm lost network connectivity in 4.0.x
kernels ? A couple of times this week, vim on an nfs-3 mount hung
and I had to reboot. Both of those occasions were on an AMD desktop
with the r8169 driver, running 4.0.3. I thought it might be
specific to that machine. For the last
Anybody else suffering frm lost network connectivity in 4.0.x
kernels ? A couple of times this week, vim on an nfs-3 mount hung
and I had to reboot. Both of those occasions were on an AMD desktop
with the r8169 driver, running 4.0.3. I thought it might be
specific to that machine. For the last
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 03:43:52AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
Anybody else suffering frm lost network connectivity in 4.0.x
kernels ? A couple of times this week, vim on an nfs-3 mount hung
and I had to reboot. Both of those occasions were on an AMD desktop
with the r8169 driver, running 4.0.3
On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 06:09:39PM +0100, linuxcbon linuxcbon wrote:
> On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 5:55 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
> > I suggest that you take the time to look at eudev and mdev, and
> > think about how you can use the facilities they offer.
> I was wishing the kerne
On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 01:54:27AM +0100, linuxcbon linuxcbon wrote:
> On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 11:26 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
> > I don't think you have ever given any context about what you are
> > trying to do. It looks to me as if there are two alternatives:
> (...)
>
On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 06:09:39PM +0100, linuxcbon linuxcbon wrote:
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 5:55 PM, Ken Moffat zarniwh...@ntlworld.com wrote:
I suggest that you take the time to look at eudev and mdev, and
think about how you can use the facilities they offer.
I was wishing the kernel would
On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 01:54:27AM +0100, linuxcbon linuxcbon wrote:
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 11:26 PM, Ken Moffat zarniwh...@ntlworld.com wrote:
I don't think you have ever given any context about what you are
trying to do. It looks to me as if there are two alternatives:
(...)
I am trying
On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 06:08:01PM +, linux cbon wrote:
> On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 11:24 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > You can build in the needed modules or just use udev...
>
> Sorry , but I don't want a monolithic or a huge kernel with many modules
> inside.
> I want a minimal and
On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 06:08:01PM +, linux cbon wrote:
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 11:24 PM, Richard Weinberger rich...@nod.at wrote:
You can build in the needed modules or just use udev...
Sorry , but I don't want a monolithic or a huge kernel with many modules
inside.
I want a minimal
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 08:44:34PM -0300, Thiago Farina wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 6:49 PM, Richard Weinberger
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 5:12 PM, Thiago Farina wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Does the kernel include a simple boot loader like FreeBSD does?
> >
> > Why don't you figure
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 08:44:34PM -0300, Thiago Farina wrote:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 6:49 PM, Richard Weinberger
richard.weinber...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 5:12 PM, Thiago Farina tfrans...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Does the kernel include a simple boot loader like FreeBSD
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 11:14:20AM +0800, Chen, Tiejun wrote:
> On 2015/3/7 3:27, Ken Moffat wrote:
> >On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 12:02:40AM +0000, Ken Moffat wrote:
> >> I have a very recent qemu i686 image, using a 3.19.0 kernel and
> >>dhclient, which works fine if t
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 11:14:20AM +0800, Chen, Tiejun wrote:
On 2015/3/7 3:27, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 12:02:40AM +, Ken Moffat wrote:
I have a very recent qemu i686 image, using a 3.19.0 kernel and
dhclient, which works fine if the host is running a 3.19.0 kernel
On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 12:02:40AM +, Ken Moffat wrote:
> I have a very recent qemu i686 image, using a 3.19.0 kernel and
> dhclient, which works fine if the host is running a 3.19.0 kernel,
> but breaks when the host runs 4.0.0-rc1 or -rc2.
>
> On those, dhclient does not
On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 12:02:40AM +, Ken Moffat wrote:
I have a very recent qemu i686 image, using a 3.19.0 kernel and
dhclient, which works fine if the host is running a 3.19.0 kernel,
but breaks when the host runs 4.0.0-rc1 or -rc2.
On those, dhclient does not get an address, so I
I have a very recent qemu i686 image, using a 3.19.0 kernel and
dhclient, which works fine if the host is running a 3.19.0 kernel,
but breaks when the host runs 4.0.0-rc1 or -rc2.
On those, dhclient does not get an address, so I have no network.
There is a message
e1000 :00:03.0 eth0: Reset
I have a very recent qemu i686 image, using a 3.19.0 kernel and
dhclient, which works fine if the host is running a 3.19.0 kernel,
but breaks when the host runs 4.0.0-rc1 or -rc2.
On those, dhclient does not get an address, so I have no network.
There is a message
e1000 :00:03.0 eth0: Reset
On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 10:01:16PM +0800, Yaowei Bai wrote:
> As we have moved to 4.x, it should be reflected in README.
>
Not something I can affect, but just a couple of comments on what
looks like a useful, but unadventurous, change :
1. Firing patches at the list, without copying them to a
On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 10:01:16PM +0800, Yaowei Bai wrote:
As we have moved to 4.x, it should be reflected in README.
Not something I can affect, but just a couple of comments on what
looks like a useful, but unadventurous, change :
1. Firing patches at the list, without copying them to a
On Sun, Oct 05, 2014 at 09:15:11PM +, Gregory Smith wrote:
> Just because you disagree with something does not make it a troll.
> Just because someone continued to post to a mailing list which he
> was unrightly banned from (because systemd negativity is a no-no
> for some), does not mean the
On Sun, Oct 05, 2014 at 09:15:11PM +, Gregory Smith wrote:
Just because you disagree with something does not make it a troll.
Just because someone continued to post to a mailing list which he
was unrightly banned from (because systemd negativity is a no-no
for some), does not mean the
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 11:35:09PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 12:55:26PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > On 06/24/2014 11:33 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 11:30:05AM -0700, Michael Marineau wrote:
> > >> On Jun 24, 2014
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 03:17:23AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm getting 15 lines of the following in -rc2
>
> /bin/sh: firmware/rtl_nic/rtl8168e-3.fw.gen.S: No such file or directory
>
> followed by
> firmware/Makefile:185: recipe for target
> 'firmware/
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 03:17:23AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
Hi,
I'm getting 15 lines of the following in -rc2
/bin/sh: firmware/rtl_nic/rtl8168e-3.fw.gen.S: No such file or directory
followed by
firmware/Makefile:185: recipe for target
'firmware/rtl_nic/rtl8168e-3.fw.gen.S' failed
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 11:35:09PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 12:55:26PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
On 06/24/2014 11:33 AM, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 11:30:05AM -0700, Michael Marineau wrote:
On Jun 24, 2014 11:23 AM, Alan Stern st
Hi,
I'm getting 15 lines of the following in -rc2
/bin/sh: firmware/rtl_nic/rtl8168e-3.fw.gen.S: No such file or directory
followed by
firmware/Makefile:185: recipe for target 'firmware/rtl_nic/rtl8168e-3.fw.gen.S'
failed
make[1]: *** [firmware/rtl_nic/rtl8168e-3.fw.gen.S] Error 1
I've now
Hi,
I'm getting 15 lines of the following in -rc2
/bin/sh: firmware/rtl_nic/rtl8168e-3.fw.gen.S: No such file or directory
followed by
firmware/Makefile:185: recipe for target 'firmware/rtl_nic/rtl8168e-3.fw.gen.S'
failed
make[1]: *** [firmware/rtl_nic/rtl8168e-3.fw.gen.S] Error 1
I've now
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 12:55:26PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On 06/24/2014 11:33 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 11:30:05AM -0700, Michael Marineau wrote:
> >> On Jun 24, 2014 11:23 AM, "Alan Stern" wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Michael and Greg:
> >>>
> >>> The help text for
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 12:55:26PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
On 06/24/2014 11:33 AM, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 11:30:05AM -0700, Michael Marineau wrote:
On Jun 24, 2014 11:23 AM, Alan Stern st...@rowland.harvard.edu wrote:
Michael and Greg:
The help text for
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 09:47:28PM +0200, Michal Marek wrote:
>
> The idea is that one should be able to compare as much as possible
> between the build of /usr/src/linux- built in
> /usr/src/linux-/build and /usr/src/linux- built in
> /usr/src/linux-/build.
Michal,
Now that you have sent a
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 09:47:28PM +0200, Michal Marek wrote:
The idea is that one should be able to compare as much as possible
between the build of /usr/src/linux-version_a built in
/usr/src/linux-version_a/build and /usr/src/linux-version_b built in
/usr/src/linux-version_b/build.
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 05:12:05PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
>
> "Tested-by:" tags would be more helpful if the test
> cases that were used were somehow sent along with the
> signature.
>
To me, that seems either a perverse, or else a bureaucratic,
interpretation of what should go where.
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 05:12:05PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
Tested-by: tags would be more helpful if the test
cases that were used were somehow sent along with the
signature.
To me, that seems either a perverse, or else a bureaucratic,
interpretation of what should go where.
Tested-by
On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 01:43:01AM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> (Please CC me on replies, not subscribed to LKML)
>
> Hi,
>
> Somewhat of an odd question, but none of the files in question seem to
> have a copyright header on them...
>
> For a kernel .config file, either from one of the
On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 01:43:01AM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
(Please CC me on replies, not subscribed to LKML)
Hi,
Somewhat of an odd question, but none of the files in question seem to
have a copyright header on them...
For a kernel .config file, either from one of the defconfig
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 7:49 PM, Ken Moffat
> >>> wrote:
> >>> > On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 06:25:21PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> >>> >> Hi Daniel,
> >>> >>
> >>> >
> >>> > [ correcting details, confirming that
, May 28, 2014 at 7:49 PM, Ken Moffat zarniwh...@ntlworld.com
wrote:
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 06:25:21PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
Hi Daniel,
[ correcting details, confirming that reverting this does fix the
problem, adding Cc:s ]
I've only started full testing of 3.15
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 06:25:21PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
[ correcting details, confirming that reverting this does fix the
problem, adding Cc:s ]
> I've only started full testing of 3.15 on one of my machines now
> that -rc7 has been released (this one ha
Hi Daniel,
I've only started full testing of 3.15 on one of my machines now
that -rc7 has been released (this one had two issues in the radeon
code, second was fixed in rc7). Unfortunately, suspend to RAM
(pm-suspend), or rather the wake-up, is broken on this box [ my
other two boxes are fine
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 06:25:21PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
Hi Daniel,
[ correcting details, confirming that reverting this does fix the
problem, adding Cc:s ]
I've only started full testing of 3.15 on one of my machines now
that -rc7 has been released (this one had two issues
Hi Daniel,
I've only started full testing of 3.15 on one of my machines now
that -rc7 has been released (this one had two issues in the radeon
code, second was fixed in rc7). Unfortunately, suspend to RAM
(pm-suspend), or rather the wake-up, is broken on this box [ my
other two boxes are fine
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 08:24:05PM -0500, David Hagood wrote:
> I have an old native Linux 32 bit copy of Civilization: Call to Power. It
> used to work under a 64 bit environment back in the 3.0.x days. However,
> under recent versions (>3.5) it no longer runs - it complains that it cannot
> find
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 08:24:05PM -0500, David Hagood wrote:
I have an old native Linux 32 bit copy of Civilization: Call to Power. It
used to work under a 64 bit environment back in the 3.0.x days. However,
under recent versions (3.5) it no longer runs - it complains that it cannot
find
t;
> Christian.
>
Thanks, works like a charm. If it adds any utility, feel free to
add
Tested-by: Ken Moffat
ĸen
> Am 12.05.2014 18:32, schrieb Ken Moffat:
> >On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 09:32:54AM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> >>Hi Ken,
> >>
> >>*sigh* did
, works like a charm. If it adds any utility, feel free to
add
Tested-by: Ken Moffat zarniwh...@ntlworld.com
ĸen
Am 12.05.2014 18:32, schrieb Ken Moffat:
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 09:32:54AM +0200, Christian König wrote:
Hi Ken,
*sigh* did I already mentioned that I hate PLLs? As soon as you fix
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 01:34:06AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
/me swears at myself for failing to copy to lkml.
> Hi Christian, Alex -
>
> my A4 Trinity (Radeon HD7480D) was working fine by -rc3. But now
> that I've tested it in -rc5 it is again broken (the screen goes
> blank
1 - 100 of 259 matches
Mail list logo