> that.
> Not really possible to have the latest kernel on the same target and may be
> reproduce the same race.
> Tried to track for changes in the other stable branches, but no change looks
> really relevant for this race.
> I might be wrong, please help if there is any co
Hi Kees,
On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 3:11 AM, Kees Cook wrote:
> [resending with the CCs I forgot...]
>
> On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 2:19 AM, wrote:
>> From: Sahara
>>
>> The old arch_within_stack_frames which used the frame
Hi Kees,
On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 3:11 AM, Kees Cook wrote:
> [resending with the CCs I forgot...]
>
> On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 2:19 AM, wrote:
>> From: Sahara
>>
>> The old arch_within_stack_frames which used the frame pointer is
>> now reimplemented to use frame pointer unwinder apis. So the
Hi Kees,
On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 2:55 AM, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 2:19 AM, wrote:
>> From: James Morse
>>
>> This implements arch_within_stack_frames() for arm64 that should
>> validate if a given object is
Hi Kees,
On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 2:55 AM, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 2:19 AM, wrote:
>> From: James Morse
>>
>> This implements arch_within_stack_frames() for arm64 that should
>> validate if a given object is contained by a kernel stack frame.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: James Morse
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 12:23 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 09:10:48AM +0400, kpark3...@gmail.com wrote:
>> From: Sahara
>
> I need a "Full" name here, I doubt you sign legal documents with just
> the single name, right?
For
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 12:23 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 09:10:48AM +0400, kpark3...@gmail.com wrote:
>> From: Sahara
>
> I need a "Full" name here, I doubt you sign legal documents with just
> the single name, right?
For a long time, I have been using this single name as my
FYI only if you missed my previous 2 replies which didn't reach the
mailing list.
Thanks.
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 12:13 PM, Sahara wrote:
>
> 2014년 08월 16일 03:34, Rusty Russell 쓴 글:
>
>> kpark3...@gmail.com writes:
>>>
>>> From: Sahara
>>>
>>> Although there are many obs_kernel_param and its
FYI only if you missed my previous 2 replies which didn't reach the
mailing list.
Thanks.
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 12:13 PM, Sahara keun-o.p...@windriver.com wrote:
2014년 08월 16일 03:34, Rusty Russell 쓴 글:
kpark3...@gmail.com writes:
From: Sahara keun-o.p...@windriver.com
Although there
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 2:34 PM, wrote:
> From: Sahara
>
> Somehow tracepoint_entry_add_probe function allows a null probe function.
> And, this may lead to unexpected result since the number of probe
> functions in an entry can be counted by checking whether probe is null
> or not in for-loop.
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 2:34 PM, kpark3...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Sahara keun-o.p...@windriver.com
Somehow tracepoint_entry_add_probe function allows a null probe function.
And, this may lead to unexpected result since the number of probe
functions in an entry can be counted by checking
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers
wrote:
> * Keun-O Park (kpark3...@gmail.com) wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers
>> wrote:
>> > * Keun-O Park (kpark3...@gmail.com) wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 8
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers
wrote:
> * Keun-O Park (kpark3...@gmail.com) wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 8:01 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 14:01 -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>> >> * Steven Rostedt (rost...@good
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Keun-O Park wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 8:01 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 14:01 -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>>> * Steven Rostedt (rost...@goodmis.org) wrote:
>>> > On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 12:18 +0
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 8:01 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 14:01 -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>> * Steven Rostedt (rost...@goodmis.org) wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 12:18 +0900, kpark3...@gmail.com wrote:
>> > > From: Sahara
>> > >
>> > > Somehow
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 8:01 AM, Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote:
On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 14:01 -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
* Steven Rostedt (rost...@goodmis.org) wrote:
On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 12:18 +0900, kpark3...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Sahara keun-o.p...@windriver.com
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Keun-O Park kpark3...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 8:01 AM, Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote:
On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 14:01 -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
* Steven Rostedt (rost...@goodmis.org) wrote:
On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 12:18 +0900
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers
mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com wrote:
* Keun-O Park (kpark3...@gmail.com) wrote:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 8:01 AM, Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote:
On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 14:01 -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
* Steven Rostedt (rost
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers
mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com wrote:
* Keun-O Park (kpark3...@gmail.com) wrote:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers
mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com wrote:
* Keun-O Park (kpark3...@gmail.com) wrote:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 8
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 23:24:21 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)"
>>
>> Update the README file in debugfs/tracing to something more useful.
>> What's currently in the file is very old and what it
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Namhyung Kim namhy...@kernel.org wrote:
Hi Steve,
On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 23:24:21 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
From: Steven Rostedt (Red Hat) rost...@goodmis.org
Update the README file in debugfs/tracing to something more useful.
What's currently in the file is
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 9:50 PM, Dave Martin wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:33:11AM +0900, Keun-O Park wrote:
>> Hello guys,
>>
>> Could you please review the patch of fixing bug first of returning
>> wrong address when using frame pointer?
>>
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 9:50 PM, Dave Martin dave.mar...@linaro.org wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:33:11AM +0900, Keun-O Park wrote:
Hello guys,
Could you please review the patch of fixing bug first of returning
wrong address when using frame pointer?
I am wondering if the first patch
Hello guys,
Could you please review the patch of fixing bug first of returning
wrong address when using frame pointer?
I am wondering if the first patch is not delivered to the mailing.
~snip~
>From 3a60b536d22a2043d735c890a9aac9e7cb72de8f Mon Sep 17
Hello guys,
Could you please review the patch of fixing bug first of returning
wrong address when using frame pointer?
I am wondering if the first patch is not delivered to the mailing.
~snip~
From 3a60b536d22a2043d735c890a9aac9e7cb72de8f Mon Sep 17
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2013-01-04 at 17:45 +0900, Keun-O Park wrote:
>
> > With "CFLAGS_REMOVE_unwind.o = -pg" and with CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
> > turned on, I confirmed that
> > there's no trace output like Steve
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote:
On Fri, 2013-01-04 at 17:45 +0900, Keun-O Park wrote:
With CFLAGS_REMOVE_unwind.o = -pg and with CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
turned on, I confirmed that
there's no trace output like Steve mentioned.
However, if I turn
From: sahara
This makes return_address return correct value for ftrace feature.
unwind_frame does not update frame->lr but frame->pc for backtrace.
And, the initialization for data.addr was missing so that wrong value
returned when unwind_frame failed.
Signed-off-by: sahara
---
From: sahara keun-o.p...@windriver.com
This makes return_address return correct value for ftrace feature.
unwind_frame does not update frame-lr but frame-pc for backtrace.
And, the initialization for data.addr was missing so that wrong value
returned when unwind_frame failed.
Signed-off-by:
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 1:58 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 16:23 +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 11:03:58AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> > On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 14:13 +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>> > > In summary, from what I can
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 1:58 AM, Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote:
On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 16:23 +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 11:03:58AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 14:13 +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
In summary, from
31 matches
Mail list logo