hey linus, you made news again, all blown up and pointless again.
you're doing great: you're being honest. remember the offer i made to
put you in touch with my friend.
anecdotal story: andrew tridgell worked on the fujitsu sparc
supercomputer a couple decades ago: it had a really weird DMA ring
b
On Friday, January 18, 2019, Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > This is going to be a mammoth task. The alternatives are to continue
> > as things are, which is a mess that cannot be cleaned up by either of
> > (mutually exclusive) hardware or software alone.
> >
> > Thoughts and feedback appreciated.
>
> You
Hi all, please cc me on replies. Hardware discussion may be found here:
https://groups.google.com/forum/?nomobile=true#!topic/comp.arch/mzXXTU2GUSo
I am designing a new processor, based on RISCV, that is intended as a
hybrid GPU VPU and CPU. For various reasons, it needs to be a
multi-issue Out of
On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> l...@lkcl.net - 30.09.18, 14:09:
>> the third is how UNICEF trains teachers to treat children as human
>> beings.
>
> During releasing a lot of limiting "stuff" I found that probably nothing
> written or said can hurt my feelings unles
https://linux.slashdot.org/story/18/09/27/1529236/linus-torvalds-on-linuxs-code-of-conduct#comments
linus: ah... um... okay so this is beginning to remind me of dr who
films, the comedy film "the world's end", and various other b-movie
horror shows where people were taken over through mind-control
linus, hi,
i haven't been able to get hold of a copy of "invisible dynamics" yet
however my partner did track down a... "translation" of the six
systemic laws from family to organisational principles (from where
they were originally derived). the book puts the systemic laws in a
clearer way and e
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=8a104f8b5867c682d994ffa7a74093c54469c11f
ahh, guys? ah... i'm going to try *really* hard to follow the advice
that's listed here ok?
http://www.pndc.com/documents/_PDF%20Text-PNDC%20WORKS.pdf it's a
little challenging
hi linus,
just saw the note on slashdot. i just wanted to say how amazed,
relieved and delighted i was to see what you wrote. that you
recognised that you needed to reflect, *sought feedback*, and, most
importantly, were willing and able to discuss that and ask publicly.
as the longest-serving c
[apologies for breaking the reply-thread]
David wrote:
> I think we've covered the technical part of this now, not that you like
> it รข not that any of us *like* it. But since the peanut gallery is
> paying lots of attention it's probably worth explaining it a little
> more for their benefit.
i'
https://forum.manjaro.org/t/acpi-error-on-boot-after-updating-to-4-9/12894/3
weell, this is the oddest regression "fixed" with a workaround
recommended from the archlinux link on ACPI DSDT:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/DSDT
by setting acpi_os_name="Windows 2009" which, after disassembling
hi just a heads-up on trying out debian's 4.9 kernel on an awesomely
powerful recent laptop, it's unable to run /sbin/init. full report is
here:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=88
screenshot is here:
http://hands.com/~lkcl/IMG_20170220_1127225_rewind.jpg
this error appears
hi pantelis, don't freak out, but the best introduction i can think of
to what occurred to me is, "arg fek that is an ecumenical matter!
[1]".
*deep breath* - i can forsee a need for parameterisation to be added
to the proposed connector objects in some fashion. justification /
explanation follow
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 8:30 PM, Pantelis Antoniou
wrote:
>
>> On Nov 7, 2015, at 19:36 , Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
>> wrote:
>>
>> hi folks,
>>
>
> Hi Luke,
>
> This is a quite lengthy treatise you wrote here.
apologies, i've been working
hi folks,
i raised the issue of dynamic reconfigureable hardware back in 2012,
and thank you (once again) to alan for kindly answering:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/3/10/71
since then, yaay! beaglebone with "capes" has driven some
modifications to the linux kernel:
http://events.linuxfoundation.or
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 5:08 AM, David Lang wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Mar 2015, Luke Leighton wrote:
>> whilst the majority of people view management to be "hierarchical"
>> (so there is a top dog or God process and everything trickles down
>> from that), this is viewed as such an anathema in the securi
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/4/5/535
ok found one: i'll read up and see if there's evidence that the idea
mentioned a couple of days ago has occurred to the cgroups devs
(tejun) - i think it has, but i'll need to check to be sure.
l.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linu
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 1:45 AM, David Lang wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Mar 2015, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 12:13 AM, David Lang wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, 1 Mar 2015, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
>>>
>>>> in re
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 12:13 AM, David Lang wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Mar 2015, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
>
>> in recent discussions about PID-1 alternatives (sysvinit, openrc,
>> systemd, depinit) i was alerted to the idea that PID1 is to become the
>> sole exlcus
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 12:13 AM, David Lang wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Mar 2015, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
>
>> in recent discussions about PID-1 alternatives (sysvinit, openrc,
>> systemd, depinit) i was alerted to the idea that PID1 is to become the
>> sole exlcus
(i am subscribed nomail to lkml, please cc thx)
in recent discussions about PID-1 alternatives (sysvinit, openrc,
systemd, depinit) i was alerted to the idea that PID1 is to become the
sole exlcusive process permitted to manage cgroups. given that, just
as one specific example, depinit is only ar
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
wrote:
> second issue: compared to 3.13, detection of microsd cards has
> disappeared to the extent that there isn't even an entry in dmesg
> indicating that the insertion ever occurred.
scratch sd card from the
hi folks, i thought with the focus on "not breaking userspace" a
general report of two occurrences of exactly that occurring may be
appreciated. firstly: as a long-standing linux user (and minor
contributor) i fully appreciate that this is not the "latest version"
however this is a live-running st
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 3:35 AM, Yuhong Bao wrote:
> I read this: http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3102545&cid=41270883
> Makes me wonder what would happen if something similar was tried with EFI or
> ACPI?
the EOMA68 project is unique in that it is a mass-volume *modular*
architect
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 08:18:14PM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
>> wrote:
>> > Luke Leighton on the other hand is demanding that w
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
wrote:
> Luke Leighton on the other hand is demanding that we
no demands have been made, russell: i've informed you of an immovable
deadline which will pass beyond which the opportunity being presented
is lost.
> (Linux kernel
> developer
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 12:27 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>> their sheer overwhelming success provides us with mass-volume
>> ultra-low cost hardware. to not make an effort to accommodate them
>> would in this specific instance be a huge missed opportunity,
> OK, this is a large volume of hardware t
[removing debian-release again - at their request]
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 11:11 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Allwinner has just reinvented a wheel, without even considering the fact
> that it has been already invented.
apologies, tomasz, but i believe i covered this issue in, again, my
reply to rus
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 10:52 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Hi Luke,
allo tomasz :)
ok - much of what you say is duplicated by what russell said, so in
effect the same reply is relevant, but there's been some cross-over.
i'll summarise below and cut all but the key question below:
> I tend to disag
[ please do try to remove debian-release from replies - my mistake
please try not to propagage it, even though it may be too late!]
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 10:16 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
wrote:
eyy, allo russell, long time since we last spoke, which was eek around
2004 for that cirrus logic 9
[ please remove debian-release from future replies! my mistake -
please don't propagate it, thanks ]
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 06/05/2013 02:46 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
>>
[i've just received word, please remove debian-release from discussions!]
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 9:46 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
> Why don't you try converting the sunxi code over to device tree?
ok. perhaps i wasn't clear. whatever is proposed has to be be
acceptable to allwinner, and i'm
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 3:52 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> The 3.8.y branch is over, so I think we have to move to 3.9, ready or
> not. I merged the work in progress from trunk to sid and am going
> through the config changes at the moment.
>
> I'm rather disappointed that nothing at all has been c
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 4:44 AM, Rob Landley wrote:
>> whereas the EOMA initiative is at the complete opposite end of the
>> spectrum. and products based around the EOMA standards, although
>> there is a cost overhead of e.g. around $6 in parts for EOMA-68, there
>> is a whopping great saving of
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 9:31 PM, Lennart Sorensen
wrote:
>> And neither is the same as the quality or sustainability of the
>> resulting software. But if the product line will be be discontinued
>> three months after its introduction, who cares about being able to
>> maintain anything?
>
> Sounds
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 9:01 PM, Rob Landley wrote:
> On 05/06/2013 07:08:44 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
>>
>> > I suppose that ARM multi-platform will never cover all ARM CPUs, but
>> > the more it covers, the easier and cheaper it will be to work wit
mark, thank for this. i'm bringing lkml back in [my decision] but
just this once as i believe the point's now been made. i'm also
leaving it below [top-post style] as it's background, as well as
standing on its own merit.
i was under the impression that device tree had been declared
successful o
james, hi - top-posting or not you make some valid points, and i don't
believe you're subscribed to arm-netbooks so i'm going to take a
liberty and reply briefly inline but keep most of what you've written
intact, apologies to debian-arm and lkml.
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 10:04 AM, James Courtier-Du
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 5:09 AM, Robert Hancock wrote:
>> and that's just within *one* of the fabless semiconductor companies,
>> and you have to bear in mind that there are *several hundred* ARM
>> licensees. when this topic was last raised, someone mentioned that
>> ARM attempted to standardise
11:14 AM, David Goodenough
wrote:
> On Sunday 05 May 2013, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
>> > And I have a question: as the Debian installer takes the arch armhf in
>> > charge, do you think a standard install' from a netboot image will work
>> > ?
>
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 05:38:47PM +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Dec 2006, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
>
> > I Have A Great Idea(tm) and would like to describe it concisely to see
> > if anyone likes it and hopefully hasn't thought of it before so i'm
hello darlings,
well i actually followed the FAQ http://www.tux.org/lkml/#s3-17
on this one, and got to try 'do a search' bit, and when searches
for 'parallel boot initialisation' came up with discussions about
parallel ports, and articles on ibm developerworks about sysvinit,
i made the decision
On Sat, Nov 25, 2006 at 11:08:26PM +, Alan wrote:
> > userspace, which would be a hell of a lot easier, but would make
> > applications a pain, because they would need to use a library instead of
> > just opening /dev/ttySN just like any other phone app, to transfer AT
> > commands.
>
> Like g
happening???
i know - HACK TIME!!!
muhahahahah.
l.
On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 07:28:45PM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> in order to be able to debug what is going on, i have enabled
> a dummy/virtual serial console, all is well so far.
>
> in order to test the screen,
same time?
should it be expected to work?
any assistance / guidance greatly appreciated.
l.
- Forwarded message from Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-----
From: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [2.4
hi, please reply cc to me as well because i am not on these lists
(well i am but the receive post options are switched off), thank you.
i have a "noddy" question where what used to work under 2.4.27
(echo 'hello world' > /dev/vc/0) now doesn't work on 2.6.7.11,
even though echo 'garbage' > /dev/fb
On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 01:35:15PM +0200, Erik Mouw wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 12:30:52AM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> > ... aaand it flopped. i'm not even getting data out of the
> > serial console - not a squeak. HELP!
>
> [...]
>
> >
... aaand it flopped. i'm not even getting data out of the
serial console - not a squeak. HELP!
the patch is quite large - and contains [working in 2.4.27] a
lot of untested stuff - naturally, if i don't get a squeak out
of the serial console. features include support for CPU_FREQ
which is a bi
hi, please respond cc to me because i am not on the lkml.
for a new arm linux embedded device called a skyminder, i'm responsible
for getting all the drivers working. ha ha.
the success of this device presents the linux community with
an opportunity to own a linux-based mobile phone (even if it'
On Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 01:40:35PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > the kernel-part of fuse tells any kernel-level callers to
> > "go away, come back later".
> >
> > obviously this gives time for the kernel-part to "wake up" the
> > userspace daemon, obtain an answer, such that when the kerne
On Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 12:13:04PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > > *) Last time I looked at FUSE the security model was: If the current uid
> > > equals the owner of the mountpoint then forward the request to the
> > > userland daemon, without any authentication information like for example
> >
On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 03:45:08PM +0100, Alexander Bostr?m wrote:
> fre 2005-01-21 klockan 12:22 -0500 skrev Derrick J Brashear:
> > On Fri, 21 Jan 2005, Matthew Miller wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 09:00:59AM -0500, Derrick J Brashear wrote:
>
> > >> It seems like Arla would probabl
51 matches
Mail list logo
