On 2021-01-31 14:18, Måns Rullgård wrote:
What userspace visable change will be caused by this?
There won't be /dev/ttyS devices for ports that don't exist.
Oh yes, please!
That would mean I can create ttyS2 and upward while keeping ttyPS0 and
ttyPS1 (which invaded the serial alias namespac
On 2020-12-10 19:59, Mychaela Falconia wrote:
Maarten Brock wrote:
I agree. And an application not configuring the required handshakes,
but
still relying on them is an equal bug.
This comment can be interpreted in at least two different ways. Are
you referring to:
1) Mainstream existing
On 2020-12-10 11:50, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 11:41:24AM +0100, Maarten Brock wrote:
Hello Mychaela,
On 2020-12-09 23:49, Mychaela Falconia wrote:
> Greg K-H wrote:
>
> > I think we need more review for the rest of the series. This does
> > change th
Hello Mychaela,
On 2020-12-09 23:49, Mychaela Falconia wrote:
Greg K-H wrote:
I think we need more review for the rest of the series. This does
change the way serial ports work in a non-traditional way (i.e. using
sysfs instead of terminal settings).
But the problem is that the current stat
On 2020-11-04 20:35, Lee Jones wrote:
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/tty/serial/xilinx_uartps.c:205: warning: Function parameter
or member 'cts_override' not described in 'cdns_uart'
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Jiri Slaby
Cc: Michal Simek
Cc: linux-ser...@vger.kerne
On 2020-05-18 18:35, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 06:13:16PM +0200, Maarten Brock wrote:
On 2020-05-18 17:22, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 06:12:41PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Sun, May 17, 2020 at 11:56:08PM +0200, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
&
On 2020-05-18 17:22, Lukas Wunner wrote:
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 06:12:41PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Sun, May 17, 2020 at 11:56:08PM +0200, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> From: Heiko Stuebner
>
> The RE signal is used to control the duplex mode of transmissions,
> aka receiving data while send
On 2020-05-02 15:49, Lukas Wunner wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 12:14:19AM +0100, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
Some 8250 ports have a TEMT interrupt but it's not a part of the 8250
standard, instead only available on some implementations.
The current em485 implementation does not work on ports withou
On 2018-12-20 07:52, Michal Simek wrote:
Hi,
On 19. 12. 18 19:40, Maarten Brock wrote:
Hello Michal,
On 2018-12-18 13:18, Michal Simek wrote:
Hi,
I am sending 4 patches in series to fix some issues we found.
Patches were sent separately but I have been asked to send them in
serial that&#
Hello Michal,
On 2018-12-18 13:18, Michal Simek wrote:
Hi,
I am sending 4 patches in series to fix some issues we found.
Patches were sent separately but I have been asked to send them in
serial that's why I am also adding cover letter to explain this v2
version.
Thanks,
Michal
I'm wondering
On 2018-04-26 16:08, Michal Simek wrote:
Hi,
this series is trying to address discussion I had with Alan in past
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9738445/.
It is moving uart_register_driver() to probe function like it is done
in
pl011 driver.
And also introducing new function for alias comp
On 2017-05-24 18:09, Michal Simek wrote:
On 24.5.2017 15:31, Alan Cox wrote:
I am not saying that config option is perfect solution. It is at
least
aligned with 5 others serial drivers in the tree.
And the fact people keep doing hacks jutifies continuing to make a
mess.
Especialy as in this
Hello Greg,
Does that also mean that this isn't possible in the sc16is7xx.c driver
in
sc16is7xx_spi_probe() line 1358 and sc16is7xx_i2c_probe() line 1419 ?
If so, should these checks be removed?
Kind regards,
Maarten
On 2017-01-30 20:37, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 04:
the device using indirect access through an I2C
or SPI driver with separate interrupts from the UART. There is also more info on
the linux-serial mailing list.
Kind regards,
Maarten Brock
- Original Message -
From: Pascal JEAN [mailto:epsilo...@gmail.com]
To: Greg KH [
- Original Message -
From: Andy Shevchenko [mailto:andy.shevche...@gmail.com]
To: Maarten Brock [mailto:m.br...@vanmierlo.com]
Cc: Andy Shevchenko [mailto:andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com], Bryan
O'Donoghue [mailto:pure.lo...@nexus-software.ie], Peter Hurley
[mail
- Original Message -
From: Andy Shevchenko [mailto:andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com]
To: Bryan O'Donoghue [mailto:pure.lo...@nexus-software.ie], Peter Hurley
[mailto:pe...@hurleysoftware.com], linux-ser...@vger.kernel.org, Vinod Koul
[mailto:vinod.k...@intel.com], linux-kernel@vger.kerne
- Original Message -
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman [mailto:gre...@linuxfoundation.org]
To: Maarten Brock [mailto:m.br...@vanmierlo.com]
Cc: Arnd Bergmann [mailto:a...@arndb.de], Peter Korsgaard
[mailto:jac...@sunsite.dk], Jiri Slaby [mailto:jsl...@suse.com], Rich Felker
[mailto:dal
- Original Message -
From: Geert Uytterhoeven [mailto:ge...@linux-m68k.org]
To: Sudip Mukherjee [mailto:sudipm.mukher...@gmail.com]
Cc: Peter Korsgaard [mailto:jac...@sunsite.dk], Greg Kroah-Hartman
[mailto:gre...@linuxfoundation.org], Jiri Slaby [mailto:jsl...@suse.com],
linux-kernel@vge
I've created a version 2 of this patch immediately which fixes the warning,
but somehow this stays ignored.
Please apply my second patch!
Maarten
> We were getting build warnings about:
> drivers/tty/serial/uartlite.c: In function ‘ulite_request_port’:
> drivers/tty/serial/uartlite.c:348:21:
I've created a version 2 of this patch immediately which fixes the warning,
but somehow this stays ignored.
Please apply my second patch!
Maarten
> The patch to make uartlite_be/uartlite_le const was well-intended but
> caused a new build warning:
>
> tty/serial/uartlite.c: In function 'ulite_re
20 matches
Mail list logo
