Hi,
End user type here. This seems to be a sort of old issue that
others have seen but it's never shown up here at home as far as I
know.
I typically run long-term kernels and have recently been running
the 3.12 series until a few days ago when I got around to building
3.14.14. The kernel
Hi,
End user type here. This seems to be a sort of old issue that
others have seen but it's never shown up here at home as far as I
know.
I typically run long-term kernels and have recently been running
the 3.12 series until a few days ago when I got around to building
3.14.14. The kernel
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 7:27 AM, Mahmood Naderan wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Sunday, March 23, 2014 6:35 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
>>In terms of changing the scheduler I think that you possibly missed
>>reading Documentation/block/switching-sched.txt in the kernel's
>>
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 4:01 AM, Mahmood Naderan wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>On Thursday, March 20, 2014 6:53 AM, Mike Galbraith
>> wrote:
>>
>>marge:~ # man -k setscheduler getscheduler
>>sched_setscheduler (2) - set and get scheduling policy/parameters
>>sched_setscheduler (3p) - set scheduling
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 4:01 AM, Mahmood Naderan nt_mahm...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Thursday, March 20, 2014 6:53 AM, Mike Galbraith
umgwanakikb...@gmail.com wrote:
marge:~ # man -k setscheduler getscheduler
sched_setscheduler (2) - set and get scheduling policy/parameters
sched_setscheduler
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 7:27 AM, Mahmood Naderan nt_mahm...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Sunday, March 23, 2014 6:35 PM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
In terms of changing the scheduler I think that you possibly missed
reading Documentation/block/switching-sched.txt in the kernel's
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 1:40 PM, markus wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 10:21:07AM -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Markus wrote:
>>
>>
>> > The hdparm result looks like there is somethink not right . There were no
>> > fea
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 1:40 PM, markus mar...@kola.li wrote:
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 10:21:07AM -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Markus mar...@kola.li wrote:
SNIP
The hdparm result looks like there is somethink not right . There were no
features supported but why
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Markus wrote:
> The hdparm result looks like there is somethink not right . There were no
> features supported but why ?
Does the HDD have S.M.A.R.T. features? Possibly
smartctl -a /dev/sda
would provide some additional visibility?
- Mark
--
To unsubscribe
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Markus mar...@kola.li wrote:
SNIP
The hdparm result looks like there is somethink not right . There were no
features supported but why ?
Does the HDD have S.M.A.R.T. features? Possibly
smartctl -a /dev/sda
would provide some additional visibility?
- Mark
--
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 7:47 AM, Madhusudhan Rao Sripalle
wrote:
> I have attached the boot directory contents, /boot/grub/grub.cfg and
> /etc/default/grub contents. Also attached the mount points on the
> system.
>
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 8:39 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
>>
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 7:05 AM, Madhusudhan Rao Sripalle
wrote:
> The grub file is /boot/grub/grub.cfg. The newly built kernel is
> reflected in grub.cfg. But, the grub doesn't display this new kernel
> at the boot time. I tried few tips from the web. It is no help. That
> is why I sought help
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 6:34 AM, Madhusudhan Rao Sripalle
wrote:
> Thanks to Randy and Ryan for the responses. The pointers are really
> helpful. Currently I am facing an issue with Ubuntu's grub not
> displaying the newly built kernel.
>
> Existing kernel on the ubuntu system is
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 6:34 AM, Madhusudhan Rao Sripalle
madhu.sripa...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks to Randy and Ryan for the responses. The pointers are really
helpful. Currently I am facing an issue with Ubuntu's grub not
displaying the newly built kernel.
Existing kernel on the ubuntu system
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 7:05 AM, Madhusudhan Rao Sripalle
madhu.sripa...@gmail.com wrote:
The grub file is /boot/grub/grub.cfg. The newly built kernel is
reflected in grub.cfg. But, the grub doesn't display this new kernel
at the boot time. I tried few tips from the web. It is no help. That
is
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 7:47 AM, Madhusudhan Rao Sripalle
madhu.sripa...@gmail.com wrote:
I have attached the boot directory contents, /boot/grub/grub.cfg and
/etc/default/grub contents. Also attached the mount points on the
system.
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 8:39 PM, Mark Knecht markkne
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 2:07 PM, wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> Somewhere between 3.11.0-rc7-gfa8218d and 3.12.0-rc4-g8b5ede6 this
> broke.
>
> The machine is an x61s thinkpad, with the headphone output unmuted and
> headphones partially inserted sound is audible. If the output is muted,
> the output
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 2:07 PM, l...@pengaru.com wrote:
Hello list,
Somewhere between 3.11.0-rc7-gfa8218d and 3.12.0-rc4-g8b5ede6 this
broke.
The machine is an x61s thinkpad, with the headphone output unmuted and
headphones partially inserted sound is audible. If the output is muted,
the
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> what's the status of union-mount?
> Where does the development happen - in [1]?
>
> Regards,
> - Sedat -
>
> [1]
> http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/dhowells/linux-fs.git/log/?h=unionmount
Sedat,
Did you look here for
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
what's the status of union-mount?
Where does the development happen - in [1]?
Regards,
- Sedat -
[1]
http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/dhowells/linux-fs.git/log/?h=unionmount
Sedat,
Did you look
On Jan 16, 2008 8:27 PM, Steven Rostedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We are pleased to announce the 2.6.24-rc8-rt1 tree, which can be
> downloaded from the location:
>
> http://rt.et.redhat.com/download/
>
Up and running fine here:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ uname -a
Linux lightning 2.6.24-rc8-rt1
On Jan 16, 2008 11:55 AM, Steven Rostedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, Mark Knecht wrote:
> >
> > Jan 16 11:12:55 lightning sshd[5915]: Server listening on :: port 22.
> > Jan 16 11:12:55 lightning sshd[5915]: error: Bind to port 22 on
>
On Jan 15, 2008 8:12 PM, Steven Rostedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We are pleased to announce the 2.6.24-rc7-rt3 tree
Up and running here:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ uname -a
Linux lightning 2.6.24-rc7-rt3 #1 PREEMPT RT Wed Jan 16 11:06:11 PST
2008 x86_64 AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3000+
On Jan 15, 2008 8:12 PM, Steven Rostedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are pleased to announce the 2.6.24-rc7-rt3 tree
Up and running here:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ uname -a
Linux lightning 2.6.24-rc7-rt3 #1 PREEMPT RT Wed Jan 16 11:06:11 PST
2008 x86_64 AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3000+ AuthenticAMD
On Jan 16, 2008 11:55 AM, Steven Rostedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, Mark Knecht wrote:
Jan 16 11:12:55 lightning sshd[5915]: Server listening on :: port 22.
Jan 16 11:12:55 lightning sshd[5915]: error: Bind to port 22 on
0.0.0.0 failed: Address already in use
On Jan 16, 2008 8:27 PM, Steven Rostedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are pleased to announce the 2.6.24-rc8-rt1 tree, which can be
downloaded from the location:
http://rt.et.redhat.com/download/
Up and running fine here:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ uname -a
Linux lightning 2.6.24-rc8-rt1 #1
On Jan 14, 2008 10:41 AM, Steven Rostedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We are pleased to announce the 2.6.24-rc7-rt2 tree, which can be
> downloaded from the location:
>
Up and running here:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ uname -a
Linux lightning 2.6.24-rc7-rt2 #1 PREEMPT RT Mon Jan 14 11:18:04 PST
2008
On Jan 14, 2008 10:41 AM, Steven Rostedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are pleased to announce the 2.6.24-rc7-rt2 tree, which can be
downloaded from the location:
Up and running here:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ uname -a
Linux lightning 2.6.24-rc7-rt2 #1 PREEMPT RT Mon Jan 14 11:18:04 PST
2008 x86_64
On Jan 13, 2008 11:00 AM, Steven Rostedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We are pleased to announce the 2.6.24-rc7-rt1 tree, which can be
> downloaded from the location:
>
> http://rt.et.redhat.com/download/
>
Up and running here. No significant testing but no problems building
it and no obvious
On Jan 13, 2008 11:00 AM, Steven Rostedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are pleased to announce the 2.6.24-rc7-rt1 tree, which can be
downloaded from the location:
http://rt.et.redhat.com/download/
Up and running here. No significant testing but no problems building
it and no obvious
On Nov 15, 2007 7:39 PM, Steven Rostedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 15 Nov 2007, Mark Knecht wrote:
>
>
> > On Nov 15, 2007 10:40 AM, Steven Rostedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Finally!
> > >
> > > We are please
Sent.
On Nov 15, 2007 12:54 PM, Steven Rostedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 15 Nov 2007, Mark Knecht wrote:
>
> > On Nov 15, 2007 10:40 AM, Steven Rostedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Finally!
> > >
> > > We are please
On Nov 15, 2007 10:40 AM, Steven Rostedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Finally!
>
> We are pleased to announce 2.6.24-rc2-rt1.
>
Hi Steve,
Not sure I've ever posted on this list. Always looking to help out
at my low level.
Anyway, I tried building the kernel. My 1st two attempts, done
On Nov 15, 2007 10:40 AM, Steven Rostedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Finally!
We are pleased to announce 2.6.24-rc2-rt1.
SNIP
Hi Steve,
Not sure I've ever posted on this list. Always looking to help out
at my low level.
Anyway, I tried building the kernel. My 1st two attempts, done
Sent.
On Nov 15, 2007 12:54 PM, Steven Rostedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007, Mark Knecht wrote:
On Nov 15, 2007 10:40 AM, Steven Rostedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Finally!
We are pleased to announce 2.6.24-rc2-rt1.
SNIP
Hi Steve,
snip!
As always
On Nov 15, 2007 7:39 PM, Steven Rostedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007, Mark Knecht wrote:
On Nov 15, 2007 10:40 AM, Steven Rostedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Finally!
We are pleased to announce 2.6.24-rc2-rt1.
SNIP
Hi Steve,
Not sure I've ever posted
On 6/11/07, Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Mark Knecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Ingo,
> Yep, that solved it on my machine. I did have to patch using 'patch
> -p1 -R' I think that's because the paths in your patch file are maybe
> based on your work
On 6/11/07, Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Mark Knecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Ingo,
Yep, that solved it on my machine. I did have to patch using 'patch
-p1 -R' I think that's because the paths in your patch file are maybe
based on your work setup? I don't know. I'm amazed
On 6/10/07, Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Mark Knecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> GMail is being kranky. Can you please send the patch as a zipped
> attachment?
you can pick it up from:
http://people.redhat.com/mingo/realtime-preempt/testing/forced
On 6/10/07, Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Mark Knecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 23:1739277 IO-APIC-fasteoi ohci_hcd:usb2, eth0
> 00:0a.0 Bridge: nVidia Corporation CK804 Ethernet Controller (rev a3)
ok, that's forcedeth. Does that behavior go
Hi,
I've been running 2.6.21.3-rt9 and a couple of -rc predecessors for
a few weeks and this minor problem has been consistent on all versions
I've run. On this AMD64 machine I still have 2.6.17-rt8 and 2.6.18-rt7
and neither of those versions cause the problem. I am currently
building the
Hi,
I've been running 2.6.21.3-rt9 and a couple of -rc predecessors for
a few weeks and this minor problem has been consistent on all versions
I've run. On this AMD64 machine I still have 2.6.17-rt8 and 2.6.18-rt7
and neither of those versions cause the problem. I am currently
building the
On 6/10/07, Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Mark Knecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
23:1739277 IO-APIC-fasteoi ohci_hcd:usb2, eth0
00:0a.0 Bridge: nVidia Corporation CK804 Ethernet Controller (rev a3)
ok, that's forcedeth. Does that behavior go away if you revert the
change
On 6/10/07, Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Mark Knecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
GMail is being kranky. Can you please send the patch as a zipped
attachment?
you can pick it up from:
http://people.redhat.com/mingo/realtime-preempt/testing/forcedeth-rt-tweak.patch
Just checking in after a few months of lurking. I have been running
2.6.18-rt7 for at least 4-5 months, possibly longer, without updates
and without problems.
Last weekend I updated my kernel for the first time in months. I must
say that while I cannot measure any differences the whole Gnome
Just checking in after a few months of lurking. I have been running
2.6.18-rt7 for at least 4-5 months, possibly longer, without updates
and without problems.
Last weekend I updated my kernel for the first time in months. I must
say that while I cannot measure any differences the whole Gnome
Hi Ingo,
I attempted to get 2.6.19-rt1 going this afternoon but no luck.
First, thanks for the realtime-lsm patch in the kernel. Nice to have
it there.
OK, so 2.6.19-rt1 starts booting, gets to the point where it see
the keyboard and mouse, and then apparently starts looking for a
remote NFS
Hi Ingo,
I attempted to get 2.6.19-rt1 going this afternoon but no luck.
First, thanks for the realtime-lsm patch in the kernel. Nice to have
it there.
OK, so 2.6.19-rt1 starts booting, gets to the point where it see
the keyboard and mouse, and then apparently starts looking for a
remote NFS
Forwarding it off list.
Thanks Ingo. I'm very interested if it works for you to do this.
Cheers,
Mark
On 11/28/06, Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Lee Revell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I know there were some comments awhile back about being required
> > to switch to PAM. Has
On 11/28/06, Lee Revell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 06:06 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
> Ingo,
>I started building the new kernels a few days ago with your
> 2.6.19-rc6-rt0 announcement. The kernels have built fine but so far I
> am unable to build the re
On 11/28/06, Lee Revell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 06:06 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
Ingo,
I started building the new kernels a few days ago with your
2.6.19-rc6-rt0 announcement. The kernels have built fine but so far I
am unable to build the realtime-lsm package
Forwarding it off list.
Thanks Ingo. I'm very interested if it works for you to do this.
Cheers,
Mark
On 11/28/06, Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Lee Revell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know there were some comments awhile back about being required
to switch to PAM. Has that
52 matches
Mail list logo
