Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants

s have named forks (or streams, or whatever you wish to call them) associated with them. Read the archives on this issue :) Mo. - -- Mo McKinlay [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ekto.org Read http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc18

Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants

named forks (or streams, or whatever you wish to call them) associated with them. Read the archives on this issue :) Mo. - -- Mo McKinlay [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ekto.org Read http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1855.txt

Re: Version 2.4.1 cannot be built.

le to ftp but > (sometimes) show with their `ls`, and never with nlist. > Maybe you can still download stuff if you are running from a > Web Crawler, but it doesn't work with `ftp` anymore. We've had no problem reports, and it works fine for me. Mo. - -- Mo McKinlay -- GNU Webmaste

Re: named streams, extended attributes, and posix

EA > vop_eattr_serialize - export all the EAs as a stream of entries. > > Thoughts? You mught want to refer back to the paper to get the whole EAs > proposal... I shall, and get back to you this evening (workworkworkwork... :) Mo. - -- Mo McKinlay [EMAIL PROTECTED] - -

Re: named streams, extended attributes, and posix

ughts? You mught want to refer back to the paper to get the whole EAs proposal... I shall, and get back to you this evening (workworkworkwork... :) Mo. - -- Mo McKinlay [EMAIL PROTECTED] - - GnuPG/PGP Key: pub 1024D/76A

Re: Renaming lost+found

lways uses the same inode number > (11), but I don't know if that is anywhere enforced. I seem to recall e2fsck complaining when I renamed lost+found, but that may well be a consistency check. Don't quote me on this, though. Mo. - -- Mo McK

Re: Renaming lost+found

same inode number (11), but I don't know if that is anywhere enforced. I seem to recall e2fsck complaining when I renamed lost+found, but that may well be a consistency check. Don't quote me on this, though. Mo. - -- Mo McKinlay [EMAIL

Re: [OT?] Coding Style

ng thy next line .. > now I know why I never read the bible. ..or Monty Python... - -- Mo McKinlay [EMAIL PROTECTED] - - GnuPG/PGP Key: pub 1024D/76A275F9 2000-07-22 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: Gn

Re: [OT?] Coding Style

read the bible. ..or Monty Python... - -- Mo McKinlay [EMAIL PROTECTED] - - GnuPG/PGP Key: pub 1024D/76A275F9 2000-07-22 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see

Re: Is sendfile all that sexy?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Today, Linus Torvalds ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Just wait. My crystal ball is infallible. One of these days, that line will be your downfall :-) *grins* Mo. - -- Mo McKinlay [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: Is sendfile all that sexy?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Today, Linus Torvalds ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Just wait. My crystal ball is infallible. One of these days, that line will be your downfall :-) *grins* Mo. - -- Mo McKinlay [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: named streams, extended attributes, and posix

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Today, Michael Rothwell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Mo McKinlay wrote: > > > Nono, that's not what I mean - each of the filesystems fails if it > > doesn't support what you're trying to do, that's given - but having

Re: named streams, extended attributes, and posix

nd of inconsistency. Mo. - -- Mo McKinlay [EMAIL PROTECTED] - - GnuPG/PGP Key: pub 1024D/76A275F9 2000-07-22 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see h

Re: named streams, extended attributes, and posix

ame you to high heaven for that last suggestion if he was paying much attention to this thread :-) - -- Mo McKinlay [EMAIL PROTECTED] - - GnuPG/PGP Key: pub 1024D/76A275F9 2000-07-22 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: G

Re: named streams, extended attributes, and posix

as it stands would break in that situation (assuming I've not missed something :) Mo. - -- Mo McKinlay [EMAIL PROTECTED] - - GnuPG/PGP Key: pub 1024D/76A275F9 2000-07-22 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU

Re: named streams, extended attributes, and posix

eam() then returns an fd which can be read/written/sendfiled/closed as the programmer wishes. How daft does this sound? Apart from the additional of a new open()-type call, your paper seems to be fairly solid. Mo. - -- Mo McKinlay [EMAIL PROTECTED] - -

Re: named streams, extended attributes, and posix

ally there? (Pretty much why I'm more in favour of a specific API for reading streams, extended attributes and whatnot, over any of the other solutions thus suggested). Mo. - -- Mo McKinlay [EMAIL PROTECTED] - - GnuPG/PGP Key

Re: named streams, extended attributes, and posix

(Pretty much why I'm more in favour of a specific API for reading streams, extended attributes and whatnot, over any of the other solutions thus suggested). Mo. - -- Mo McKinlay [EMAIL PROTECTED] - - GnuPG/PGP Key: pub 1024D

Re: named streams, extended attributes, and posix

an be read/written/sendfiled/closed as the programmer wishes. How daft does this sound? Apart from the additional of a new open()-type call, your paper seems to be fairly solid. Mo. - -- Mo McKinlay [EMAIL PROTECTED] - - Gnu

Re: named streams, extended attributes, and posix

ould break in that situation (assuming I've not missed something :) Mo. - -- Mo McKinlay [EMAIL PROTECTED] - - GnuPG/PGP Key: pub 1024D/76A275F9 2000-07-22 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Fo

Re: named streams, extended attributes, and posix

igh heaven for that last suggestion if he was paying much attention to this thread :-) - -- Mo McKinlay [EMAIL PROTECTED] - - GnuPG/PGP Key: pub 1024D/76A275F9 2000-07-22 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4

Re: named streams, extended attributes, and posix

onsistency. Mo. - -- Mo McKinlay [EMAIL PROTECTED] - - GnuPG/PGP Key: pub 1024D/76A275F9 2000-07-22 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www

Re: named streams, extended attributes, and posix

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Today, Michael Rothwell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Mo McKinlay wrote: Nono, that's not what I mean - each of the filesystems fails if it doesn't support what you're trying to do, that's given - but having a different delimeter

Re: named streams, extended attributes, and posix

concise portable API for accessing streams (even if it *started out* Linux-specific) - without imposing silly semantics on existing applications which currently ignore streams anyway. Mo. - -- Mo McKinlay [EMAIL PROTECTED] - ---

Re: named streams, extended attributes, and posix

for accessing streams (even if it *started out* Linux-specific) - without imposing silly semantics on existing applications which currently ignore streams anyway. Mo. - -- Mo McKinlay [EMAIL PROTECTED] - - GnuPG/PGP Key: pub 1024D

Re: named streams, extended attributes, and posix

s it is already used for this purpose -- apart from the fact that POSIX already allows applications to use it in filenames). - -- Mo McKinlay [EMAIL PROTECTED] - - GnuPG/PGP Key: pub 1024D/76A275F9 2000-07-22

Re: named streams, extended attributes, and posix

already allows applications to use it in filenames). - -- Mo McKinlay [EMAIL PROTECTED] - - GnuPG/PGP Key: pub 1024D/76A275F9 2000-07-22 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU

Re: Journaling: Surviving or allowing unclean shutdown?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Today, David Lang ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Mo McKinlay wrote: > > > > The off button need not and _does not_ remove power instantly (if at > > > all) on many appliances. > > &g

Re: Journaling: Surviving or allowing unclean shutdown?

it so that it's acceptable? - -- Mo McKinlay [EMAIL PROTECTED] - - GnuPG/PGP Key: pub 1024D/76A275F9 2000-07-22 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnu

Re: Journaling: Surviving or allowing unclean shutdown?

> > > > > it's essential for embedded devices. Answer your question? - -- Mo McKinlay [EMAIL PROTECTED] - - GnuPG/PGP Key: pub 1024D/76A275F9 2000-07-22 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GN

Re: Journaling: Surviving or allowing unclean shutdown?

for embedded devices. Answer your question? - -- Mo McKinlay [EMAIL PROTECTED] - - GnuPG/PGP Key: pub 1024D/76A275F9 2000-07-22 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http

Re: Journaling: Surviving or allowing unclean shutdown?

acceptable? - -- Mo McKinlay [EMAIL PROTECTED] - - GnuPG/PGP Key: pub 1024D/76A275F9 2000-07-22 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

Re: Journaling: Surviving or allowing unclean shutdown?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Today, David Lang ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Mo McKinlay wrote: The off button need not and _does not_ remove power instantly (if at all) on many appliances. Indeed - but unplugging your VCR from

Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > does anyone other than me think that the pm code is *way* too agressive about > spinning down the hard drive? my 256mb laptop (2.2.16) will only spin down the > disk for about 30 seconds before it decides it's got something else it feels >

Re: innd mmap bug in 2.4.0-test12

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 does anyone other than me think that the pm code is *way* too agressive about spinning down the hard drive? my 256mb laptop (2.2.16) will only spin down the disk for about 30 seconds before it decides it's got something else it feels

Re: ESS device "1998"

get the current maestro open driver to recognize the chip > at least the mixer will start to work. Aha - Many thanks! I shall go and experiment, then :) -- Mo McKinlay [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GnuPG/PGP Key: pub 1024D/7

ESS device "1998"

miserably :/] Any hints/clues/etc welcome. Many thanks, Mo. -- Mo McKinlay [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GnuPG/PGP Key: pub 1024D/76A275F9 2000-07-22 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-k

ESS device 1998

miserably :/] Any hints/clues/etc welcome. Many thanks, Mo. -- Mo McKinlay [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GnuPG/PGP Key: pub 1024D/76A275F9 2000-07-22 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-k

Re: ESS device 1998

open driver to recognize the chip at least the mixer will start to work. Aha - Many thanks! I shall go and experiment, then :) -- Mo McKinlay [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GnuPG/PGP Key: pub 1024D/76A275F9 2000-07-22

Re: Posting to this list without 500 bounces?

ir mail servers properly and close those damned open relays. THAT is who MAPS should be putting pressure on, not the innocent end-users. My serveral cents, Mo [who is now praying that his ISP's mail server has decided to work today :P] -- Mo McKinlay Chief Sof

Re: Posting to this list without 500 bounces?

amned open relays. THAT is who MAPS should be putting pressure on, not the innocent end-users. My serveral cents, Mo [who is now praying that his ISP's mail server has decided to work today :P] -- Mo McKinlay Chief Software Architect inter

Re: routing kernel

nd 500mb HDs as routers/NAT boxes - I've had no downtime in about 18 months on any of the machines. Each one runs 2.0.36 as RedHat patched it for their 5.2 release (I've never had to recompile the kernel for any of them, so I don't know who much this may vary from stock 2.0.36). HTH, Mo. --

Re: [bug] test8-preX crashes X on APM resume >>>Re: [Fwd: Returnedmail: see transcript for details]

t; perfectly legitimate, tested clean as a whistle, and fully anti-spam compliant etc. We > shouldn't have to pay because someone else has decided our city has a con artist > somewhere. If you're on a fixed IP, I can relay for you, if that helps. Mo. -- Mo McKinlay Chief

Re: [bug] test8-preX crashes X on APM resume Re: [Fwd: Returnedmail: see transcript for details]

, tested clean as a whistle, and fully anti-spam compliant etc. We shouldn't have to pay because someone else has decided our city has a con artist somewhere. If you're on a fixed IP, I can relay for you, if that helps. Mo. -- Mo McKinlay Chief Software Architect inter