RE: 2.6.25-current-git hangs on boot

2008-02-25 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: Rafael J. Wysocki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2008 3:18 AM >To: Soeren Sonnenburg >Cc: Oliver Pinter; Linux Kernel; Pallipadi, Venkatesh >Subject: Re: 2.6.25-current-git hangs on boot > >On Sunday, 24

RE: 100% C0 with 2.6.25-rc

2008-02-22 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: Jan Willies [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Friday, February 22, 2008 9:50 AM >To: Pallipadi, Venkatesh >Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Ingo >Molnar; LKML; Thomas Gleixner >Subject: Re: 100% C0 with 2.6.25-rc > >Pallipa

RE: 100% C0 with 2.6.25-rc

2008-02-22 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: Jan Willies [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Friday, February 22, 2008 7:56 AM >To: Rafael J. Wysocki >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Ingo Molnar; LKML; Thomas >Gleixner; Pallipadi, Venkatesh >Subject: Re: 100% C0 with 2.6.25-rc > >Raf

RE: 100% C0 with 2.6.25-rc

2008-02-22 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: Jan Willies [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Friday, February 22, 2008 7:56 AM >To: Rafael J. Wysocki >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Ingo Molnar; LKML; Thomas >Gleixner; Pallipadi, Venkatesh >Subject: Re: 100% C0 with 2.6.25-rc > >Raf

RE: kernel-2.6.25-rc2, CPU C state "active state" always remain C0 unchangeable by cat 'proc/'

2008-02-21 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 11:01 PM >To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >Cc: Song, Youquan >Subject: kernel-2.6.25-rc2, CPU C state "active state" always >remain C0 unchangeabl

RE: [2.6.25-rc1 regression] Suspend to RAM (bisected)

2008-02-11 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: Calvin Walton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2008 9:48 PM >To: Carlos R. Mafra >Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Pallipadi, Venkatesh >Subject: Re: [2.6.25-rc1 regression] Suspend to RAM (bisected) > >On Mon, 2

RE: (ondemand) CPU governor regression between 2.6.23 and 2.6.24

2008-02-04 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew Morton >Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2008 4:33 PM >To: Toralf Förster >Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: (ondemand) CPU governor regression between 2.6.23 >and 2.6.

RE: [PATCH] Force enable HPET on (some?) ICH9 boards

2008-01-28 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
gt;Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2008 6:33 AM >To: Pallipadi, Venkatesh >Cc: Ingo Molnar; Linux Kernel Mailing List; Alistair John Strachan >Subject: [PATCH] Force enable HPET on (some?) ICH9 boards > >Some consumer ICH9 boards (such as the Abit IP35 Pro) do not >provide a BIOS >op

RE: [PATCH] X86: fix typo PAT to X86_PAT

2008-01-22 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: Dave Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 7:29 PM >To: Ingo Molnar >Cc: Yinghai Lu; Pallipadi, Venkatesh; LKML >Subject: Re: [PATCH] X86: fix typo PAT to X86_PAT > >On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 10:02:10PM

RE: [PATCH] X86: fix typo PAT to X86_PAT

2008-01-18 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: Dave Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 10:25 AM >To: Ingo Molnar >Cc: Yinghai Lu; Pallipadi, Venkatesh; LKML >Subject: Re: [PATCH] X86: fix typo PAT to X86_PAT > >On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 01:31:40PM

RE: [patch 0/4] x86: PAT followup - Incremental changes and bug fixes

2008-01-18 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: Andreas Herrmann3 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 8:11 AM >To: Pallipadi, Venkatesh >Cc: Ingo Molnar; Siddha, Suresh B; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; >[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; >[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL

RE: [patch 0/4] x86: PAT followup - Incremental changes and bug fixes

2008-01-17 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: Andreas Herrmann3 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 3:25 PM >To: Pallipadi, Venkatesh >Cc: Ingo Molnar; Siddha, Suresh B; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; >[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; >[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL

RE: [-mm Patch] uml: fix a building error

2008-01-17 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: Jeff Dike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 3:08 PM >To: Pallipadi, Venkatesh >Cc: Andrew Morton; Mariusz Kozlowski; WANG Cong; >linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; >[EMAIL PROTECTED]; David Miller; >[EMAIL

RE: [-mm Patch] uml: fix a building error

2008-01-17 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
lnar; Thomas Gleixner; >Pallipadi, Venkatesh >Subject: Re: [-mm Patch] uml: fix a building error > >On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 19:11:13 +0100 Mariusz Kozlowski ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> > This patch fixes this building error: >> > ... &

RE: 2.6.24-rc8-mm1

2008-01-17 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: Andrew Morton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 10:40 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Linux ACPI mailing list; >Intel E/100 mailing list; Ingo Molnar; Thomas Gleixner; >Pallipadi, V

RE: [patch 0/4] x86: PAT followup - Incremental changes and bug fixes

2008-01-16 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: Andi Kleen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 2:02 PM >To: Pallipadi, Venkatesh >Cc: Andreas Herrmann; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; >[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; >[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL

RE: [patch 0/4] x86: PAT followup - Incremental changes and bug fixes

2008-01-16 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
Sorry. Never mind about e820 map. Somehow I did not notice the boot.log you had attached earlier. Thanks, Venki >-Original Message- >From: Pallipadi, Venkatesh >Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 11:06 AM >To: 'Andreas Herrmann' >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED];

RE: [patch 0/4] x86: PAT followup - Incremental changes and bug fixes

2008-01-16 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
Can you attach the e820 map from the top of your dmesg. Thanks, Venki >-Original Message- >From: Andreas Herrmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 10:58 AM >To: Pallipadi, Venkatesh >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTE

RE: [patch 2/4] x86: PAT followup - Remove KERNPG_TABLE from pte entry

2008-01-16 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: Mika Penttilä [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 12:14 AM >To: Pallipadi, Venkatesh >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; >[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; >[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMA

RE: [PATCH -mm 0/3] i386 boot: replace boot_ioremap with enhancedbt_ioremap

2008-01-15 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: Huang, Ying >Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 1:49 AM >To: Ingo Molnar; Pallipadi, Venkatesh >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; H. Peter Anvin; Thomas >Gleixner; Ingo Molnar; Andi Kleen; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 0/

RE: [patch 02/11] PAT x86: Map only usable memory in x86_64 identity map and kernel text

2008-01-10 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: Linus Torvalds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 2:15 PM >To: Pallipadi, Venkatesh >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; >[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; >[EMA

RE: [patch 02/11] PAT x86: Map only usable memory in x86_64 identity map and kernel text

2008-01-10 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andi Kleen >Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 1:17 PM >To: Pallipadi, Venkatesh >Cc: Andi Kleen; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; >[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; >[

RE: [patch 02/11] PAT x86: Map only usable memory in x86_64 identity map and kernel text

2008-01-10 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: Linus Torvalds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 1:05 PM >To: Pallipadi, Venkatesh >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; >[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; >[EMA

RE: [patch 11/11] PAT x86: Expose uc and wc interfaces in /sysfsvor pci_mmap_resource

2008-01-10 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: Greg KH [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 11:43 AM >To: Pallipadi, Venkatesh >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; >[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; >[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMA

RE: [patch 02/11] PAT x86: Map only usable memory in x86_64 identity map and kernel text

2008-01-10 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: Andi Kleen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 11:28 AM >To: Pallipadi, Venkatesh >Cc: Andi Kleen; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; >[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; >[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECT

RE: [patch 07/11] PAT x86: pat-conflict resolution using linear list

2008-01-10 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: Andi Kleen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 11:13 AM >To: Pallipadi, Venkatesh >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; >[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; >[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL

RE: [patch 09/11] PAT x86: Add ioremap_wc support

2008-01-10 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: Andi Kleen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 11:09 AM >To: Pallipadi, Venkatesh >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; >[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; >[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL

RE: [patch 02/11] PAT x86: Map only usable memory in x86_64 identity map and kernel text

2008-01-10 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andi Kleen >Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 11:07 AM >To: Pallipadi, Venkatesh >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; >[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; >[EMAIL PROT

RE: [PATCH] Kick CPUS that might be sleeping in cpus_idle_wait

2008-01-10 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steven Rostedt >Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 6:44 AM >To: Ingo Molnar >Cc: LKML; Linus Torvalds; Andrew Morton; Thomas Gleixner; >Brown, Len; Pallipadi, Venkatesh; Adam

RE: [PATCH] Kick CPUS that might be sleeping in cpus_idle_wait

2008-01-09 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: Steven Rostedt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 12:42 PM >To: LKML >Cc: Linus Torvalds; Andrew Morton; Ingo Molnar; Thomas >Gleixner; Brown, Len; Pallipadi, Venkatesh; Adam Belay; Peter >Zijlstra; Andi K

RE: + restore-missing-sysfs-max_cstate-attr.patch added to -mm tree

2008-01-07 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: Andrew Morton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2008 11:19 PM >To: Mark Lord >Cc: Pallipadi, Venkatesh; Arjan van de Ven; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; >[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Ingo Molnar; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; >[EMA

RE: + restore-missing-sysfs-max_cstate-attr.patch added to -mm tree

2008-01-04 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: Mark Lord [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Friday, January 04, 2008 1:53 PM >To: Pallipadi, Venkatesh >Cc: Arjan van de Ven; Andrew Morton; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; >[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Ingo Molnar; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; >[EMAIL PROTECT

RE: + restore-missing-sysfs-max_cstate-attr.patch added to -mm tree

2008-01-02 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: Andrew Morton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 4:52 PM >To: Pallipadi, Venkatesh >Cc: Mark Lord; Arjan van de Ven; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; >[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Ingo Molnar; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; >[EMAIL PR

RE: + restore-missing-sysfs-max_cstate-attr.patch added to -mm tree

2008-01-02 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: Mark Lord [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 3:42 PM >To: Arjan van de Ven >Cc: Pallipadi, Venkatesh; Andrew Morton; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; >[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Ingo Molnar; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; >[EMAIL PR

RE: [PATCH] x86: export 'leave_mm' symbol

2007-12-28 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
Acked-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >-Original Message- >From: Miguel Botón [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 7:58 AM >To: Linux Kernel Mailing List >Cc: Ingo Molnar; Thomas Gleixner; Pallipadi, Venkatesh >Subject: [PATC

RE: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 15s! [swapper:0]

2007-12-07 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: Parag Warudkar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Friday, December 07, 2007 2:54 PM >To: LKML >Cc: Andrew Morton; Pallipadi, Venkatesh; Linus Torvalds >Subject: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 15s! [swapper:0] > >Got this on today&

RE: + restore-missing-sysfs-max_cstate-attr.patch added to -mm tree

2007-12-07 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: Pavel Machek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 3:17 AM >To: Pallipadi, Venkatesh >Cc: Andrew Morton; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; >[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; >linux-k

RE: constant_tsc and TSC unstable

2007-12-05 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul >Rolland (???・???) >Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 10:53 PM >To: Pallipadi, Venkatesh >Cc: Linux Kernel; Siddha, Suresh B; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: const

RE: WARNING: smp_call_function_single() and smp_call_function_mask()

2007-12-03 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tomas Carnecky >Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 12:14 PM >To: Arjan van de Ven >Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: WARNING: smp_call_function_single() and >smp_call_funct

RE: + restore-missing-sysfs-max_cstate-attr.patch added to -mm tree

2007-11-30 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 14:06:55 -0800 >"Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Please dont go off-list like this. I put Mark's original >mailing list cc's >back. Sorry for missing some cc's earlier. I blindly did a reply-all to t

RE: constant_tsc and TSC unstable

2007-11-29 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul >Rolland (???・???) >Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 8:12 AM >To: Linux Kernel >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: constant_tsc and TSC unstable > >Hello, > >I've a machine with a Core2Duo CPU. /pro

RE: kondemand: kernel BUG at kernel/workqueue.c:258!

2007-11-29 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: Jiri Slaby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 1:43 PM >To: Pallipadi, Venkatesh; Nakajima, Jun >Cc: Linux kernel mailing list >Subject: kondemand: kernel BUG at kernel/workqueue.c:258! > >Hi, > >while

RE: ACPI related Warning in 2.6.24-rc3-git2

2007-11-27 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
Yakui, Can you look at this. Seems to be coming from commit f79f06ab9f86 FixedHW support tries to read MSR with interrupts disabled. Thanks, Venki >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of >Rafael J. Wysocki >Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007

RE: [PATCH] x86: disable hpet legacy replacement for kexec

2007-11-27 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
Ack. Thanks, Venki >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of OGAWA Hirofumi >Sent: Monday, November 26, 2007 1:43 PM >To: Ingo Molnar >Cc: Linus Torvalds; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Thomas >Gleixner; H. Peter Anvin >Subject: [PATCH] x86: d

RE: 2.6.23.8, ondemand scaling governor: "BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0!"

2007-11-20 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: Harald Dunkel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2007 12:17 AM >To: Pallipadi, Venkatesh >Cc: Linux Kernel list >Subject: Re: 2.6.23.8, ondemand scaling governor: "BUG: soft >lockup detected on CPU#0!"

RE: 2.6.23.8, ondemand scaling governor: "BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0!"

2007-11-19 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harald Dunkel >Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 4:19 PM >To: Linux Kernel list >Subject: 2.6.23.8, ondemand scaling governor: "BUG: soft >lockup detected on CPU#0!" > >Hi folks, > >using the ondemand sc

RE: 2.6.24-rc1 and 2.6.24.rc2 hangs while running udev on my laptop

2007-11-09 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: Andrew Morton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 2:03 AM >To: SANGOI DINO LEONARDO >Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Rafael J. Wysocki; Brown, >Len; Pallipadi, Venkatesh; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: 2.6.

RE: [2.6 patch] unexport tick_nohz_get_sleep_length

2007-10-25 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: Thomas Gleixner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 2:28 AM >To: Adrian Bunk >Cc: Brown, Len; LKML; Pallipadi, Venkatesh >Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] unexport tick_nohz_get_sleep_length > >On Wed, 24 Oct 2007, Adri

RE: nmi_watchdog fix for x86_64 to be more like i386

2007-10-05 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of >Thomas Gleixner >Sent: Monday, October 01, 2007 11:19 PM >To: Andi Kleen >Cc: Arjan van de Ven; David Bahi; LKML; >[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Andrew Morton; Ingo Molnar; >Gregory Haskins >Subject: Re: nmi_w

RE: cpu hotplug support broken in 2.6.23-rc3

2007-09-14 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of >Thomas Gleixner >Sent: Friday, September 14, 2007 5:51 AM >To: Pavel Machek >Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki; Jeff Chua; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; >[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; kernel list; Len Brown >Subjec

RE: [patch] enable userspace cpu core voltage control withacpi-cpufreq

2007-09-10 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Jones >Sent: Monday, September 03, 2007 8:25 AM >To: Andi Kleen >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >Subject: Re: [patch] enable userspace cpu core voltage control >withacpi-cpufr

RE: [PATCH] Track accurate idle time with tick_sched.idle_sleeptime

2007-09-10 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: Ingo Molnar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2007 3:02 AM >To: Andi Kleen >Cc: Pallipadi, Venkatesh; Thomas Gleixner; Andrew Morton; linux-kernel >Subject: Re: [PATCH] Track accurate idle time with >tick_sched.idle_

RE: [PATCH] Track accurate idle time with tick_sched.idle_sleeptime

2007-08-31 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: Ingo Molnar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Friday, August 31, 2007 11:24 AM >To: Pallipadi, Venkatesh >Cc: Thomas Gleixner; Andrew Morton; linux-kernel >Subject: Re: [PATCH] Track accurate idle time with >tick_sched.idle_sleepti

RE: [PATCH] kexec: reenable HPET before kexec

2007-08-27 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
> >I think we should dive little deeper to find out the root >cause of the problem >instead of putting the intermediate patch. These timer issues >are tricky >ones and we have already solved few of these. > >Going back to your original mail where you specify root cause. > >- You mentioned that f

RE: 2.6.23-rc3-mm1

2007-08-24 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of >Pallipadi, Venkatesh >Sent: Friday, August 24, 2007 5:14 PM >To: Andrew Morton; Tilman Schmidt >Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Thomas Gleixner; john >stultz; Andi

RE: 2.6.23-rc3-mm1

2007-08-24 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>> - in /var/log/warn: >> >> Aug 25 00:44:00 xenon powersaved[5356]: WARNING >(CpufreqManagement:51) No capability cpufreq_control >> Aug 25 00:44:00 xenon powersaved[5356]: WARNING >(CpufreqManagement:51) No capability cpufreq_control > >Dunno, there're some significant-looking cpufreq change

RE: Time Problems with 2.6.23-rc1-gf695baf2

2007-07-31 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
olnierkiewicz; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Ingo >Molnar; Thomas Gleixner; Pallipadi, Venkatesh >Subject: Re: Time Problems with 2.6.23-rc1-gf695baf2 > >* Michal Piotrowski ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >> Hi Eric, >> >> On 26/07/07, Eric Sesterhenn / Snakebyte <[EMAIL PROTECT

RE: Cpuidle task list

2007-06-22 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
Sorry about the noise. Below mail came here by mistake.. Thanks, Venki >-Original Message- >From: Pallipadi, Venkatesh >Sent: Friday, June 22, 2007 2:45 PM >To: LKML >Subject: RE: Cpuidle task list > > >I sent a mail to Adam to look at these... >Max_cstate

RE: Cpuidle task list

2007-06-22 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 12:30 AM To: Pallipadi, Venkatesh Subject: RE: Cpuidle task list I didn't follow cpuidle issue closely recently, are there links for below issues? >-Original Message- >From: Pallipadi, Venkatesh >Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 9:12 AM >To: Li, Sha

RE: [patch-mm 00/25] High resolution timer updates and x86_64 support - V2

2007-06-18 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 2:50 PM >To: Pallipadi, Venkatesh >Cc: Thomas Gleixner; LKML; Andrew Morton; Ingo Molnar; Andi >Kleen; Chris Wright; Arjan van de Ven >Subject: Re: [patch-mm 0

RE: [patch-mm 00/25] High resolution timer updates and x86_64 support - V2

2007-06-18 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 1:07 PM >To: Thomas Gleixner >Cc: LKML; Andrew Morton; Ingo Molnar; Andi Kleen; Chris >Wright; Arjan van de Ven; Pallipadi, Venkatesh >Subject: Re: [patch-mm 0

RE: v2.6.21.4-rt11

2007-06-12 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: Ingo Molnar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 12:32 AM >To: Eric St-Laurent >Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; >[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thomas Gleixner; Dinakar >Guniguntala; Pallipadi, Venkatesh >Subject: Re: v2.

RE: [stable] [PATCH] ACPI: Move timer broadcast and pmtimer accessbefore C3 arbiter shutdown

2007-06-12 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: Thomas Gleixner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 1:26 AM >To: Chris Wright >Cc: Andrew Morton; LKML; Andi Kleen; Udo A. Steinberg; >Pallipadi, Venkatesh; Dave Jones; Ingo Molnar; Arjan van de >Ven; Stable Team; L

RE: [patch-mm 21/23] x86-64 block irq balancing for timer

2007-06-11 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
make i386 and x86_64 same. So, we need to change either one. Thanks, Venki >-Original Message- >From: Arjan van de Ven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2007 9:29 AM >To: Thomas Gleixner >Cc: LKML; Andrew Morton; Ingo Molnar; Andi Kleen; Pallipadi, >Venka

RE: [PATCH] ACPI: Move timer broadcast and pmtimer access before C3 arbiter shutdown

2007-06-06 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: Andrew Morton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2007 6:39 PM >To: Thomas Gleixner >Cc: Pallipadi, Venkatesh; Stable Team; LKML; Len Brown; Ingo >Molnar; Arjan van de Ven; Andi Kleen; Udo A. Steinberg; Dave Jones >Subj

RE: [PATCH] ACPI: Move timer broadcast and pmtimer access before C3arbiter shutdown

2007-06-06 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
Ack. Thanks, Venki >-Original Message- >From: Thomas Gleixner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2007 2:38 AM >To: Andrew Morton >Cc: Pallipadi, Venkatesh; Stable Team; LKML; Len Brown; Ingo >Molnar; Arjan van de Ven; Andi Kleen; Udo A. Ste

RE: Dependent CPU core speed reporting not updated withCPUFREQ_SHARED_TYPE_HW?

2007-06-02 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: Dave Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Friday, June 01, 2007 11:43 PM >To: Pallipadi, Venkatesh >Cc: Darrick J. Wong; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >Subject: Re: Dependent CPU core speed reporting not updated >withCPUFREQ_SHARED_TY

RE: Dependent CPU core speed reporting not updated with CPUFREQ_SHARED_TYPE_HW?

2007-06-01 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: Darrick J. Wong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Friday, June 01, 2007 11:44 AM >To: Pallipadi, Venkatesh >Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >Subject: Re: Dependent CPU core speed reporting not updated >with CPUFREQ_SHARED_TYPE_HW? >

RE: [PATCH] Display Intel Dynamic Acceleration feature in /proc/cpuinfo

2007-05-24 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: H. Peter Anvin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 4:23 PM >To: Pallipadi, Venkatesh >Cc: Andi Kleen; Dave Jones; Andrew Morton; Brown, Len; linux-kernel >Subject: Re: [PATCH] Display Intel Dynamic Acceleration >fea

RE: [PATCH] Display Intel Dynamic Acceleration feature in /proc/cpuinfo

2007-05-24 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: H. Peter Anvin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 4:04 PM >To: Pallipadi, Venkatesh >Cc: Andi Kleen; Dave Jones; Andrew Morton; Brown, Len; linux-kernel >Subject: Re: [PATCH] Display Intel Dynamic Acceleration >fea

RE: Increased ipw2200 power usage with dynticks

2007-05-22 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: Andi Kleen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 2:24 AM >To: Pallipadi, Venkatesh >Cc: Björn Steinbrink; Andi Kleen; Brown, Len; >[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Zhu, Yi; >linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; [EMA

RE: Increased ipw2200 power usage with dynticks

2007-05-21 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: Björn Steinbrink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 12:50 AM >To: Andi Kleen >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Zhu, Yi; >linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Pallipadi, >Venkatesh; [EMAIL PR

RE: [PATCH 4/8] Force detect and enable HPET on ICH

2007-05-21 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: Jesse Barnes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 8:46 AM >To: Udo A. Steinberg >Cc: Pallipadi, Venkatesh; linux-kernel; Andrew Morton; Thomas >Gleixner; Andi Kleen; Ingo Molnar; Chris Wright >Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] Fo

RE: [PATCH -mm] timer: parenthesis fix in tbase_get_deferrable() etc.

2007-05-09 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: Satyam Sharma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 11:30 AM >To: Pallipadi, Venkatesh >Cc: Jarek Poplawski; Andrew Morton; >linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Oleg Nesterov >Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] time

RE: [PATCH -mm] timer: parenthesis fix in tbase_get_deferrable() etc.

2007-05-09 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: Jarek Poplawski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 10:32 PM >To: Andrew Morton >Cc: Pallipadi, Venkatesh; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Oleg Nesterov >Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] timer: parenthesis fix in >tbase_get_deferr

RE: [PATCH 1/8] Restructuring hpet timer generic clock interfaces

2007-05-08 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: S.Çağlar Onur [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 2:08 PM >To: Pallipadi, Venkatesh >Cc: linux-kernel; Andrew Morton; Thomas Gleixner; Andi Kleen; >Ingo Molnar; Chris Wright >Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] Restructuri

RE: [PATCH] x86-64 highres/dyntick support

2007-05-08 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: Chris Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 2:52 AM >To: Thomas Gleixner >Cc: Chris Wright; LKML; Pallipadi, Venkatesh; john stultz; >Ingo Molnar; Arjan van de Ven; Steven Rostedt; Andi Kleen; >Andrew Morton >

RE: [PATCH 1/8] Restructuring hpet timer generic clock interfaces

2007-05-07 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: S.Çağlar Onur [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 4:48 PM >To: Pallipadi, Venkatesh >Cc: linux-kernel; Andrew Morton; Thomas Gleixner; Andi Kleen; >Ingo Molnar; Chris Wright >Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] Restructuring hpet

RE: vmstat: use our own timer events

2007-05-02 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of >Christoph Lameter >Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2007 10:09 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Arjan van de Ven >Subject: vmstat: use our own timer events > > >We could implement

RE: 2.6.21-rc6-mm1

2007-04-09 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: Rafael J. Wysocki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Monday, April 09, 2007 9:08 AM >To: Andrew Morton >Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; >[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Pallipadi, Venkatesh >Subject: Re: 2.6.21-rc6-mm1 > >On

RE: [PATCH 1/5] RT kernel: force detect HPET from PCI space

2007-03-30 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: Ingo Molnar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Friday, March 30, 2007 2:47 AM >To: Pallipadi, Venkatesh >Cc: linux-kernel; Thomas Gleixner >Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] RT kernel: force detect HPET from PCI space > >On Thu, 2007-02-22 a

RE: Dependent CPU core speed reporting not updated with CPUFREQ_SHARED_TYPE_HW?

2007-03-29 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: Darrick J. Wong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 5:43 PM >To: Pallipadi, Venkatesh >Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >Subject: Dependent CPU core speed reporting not updated with >CPUFREQ_SHARED_TYPE_HW? > >

RE: 2.6.21-rc5-mm2

2007-03-28 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
Patch attached here should fix the issue. Thanks, Venki >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christian >Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 10:42 AM >To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >Subject: Re: 2.6.21-rc5-mm2 > >Hello lkml! > >I have a p

RE: [PATCH 2/2] Export not_critical_when_idle feature in workqueue and use it in ondemand

2007-03-20 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: Dave Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 7:58 AM >To: Pallipadi, Venkatesh >Cc: Andrew Morton; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; linux-kernel >Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Export not_critical_when_idle feature >in workqueue a

RE: [PATCH 1/2] Add not_critical_when_idle timer

2007-03-18 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: Andrew Morton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2007 1:10 AM >To: Pallipadi, Venkatesh >Cc: Dave Jones; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; linux-kernel >Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add not_critical_when_idle timer > >On Fri, 16 Mar 2007

RE: [PATCH 1/3]cpuidle take2: Core cpuidle infrastructure

2007-02-27 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: Dave Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 8:44 AM >To: Pallipadi, Venkatesh >Cc: linux-kernel; Andrew Morton; linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org; >Adam Belay; Li, Shaohua; Brown, Len >Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3]cpuidl

RE: [2.6 patch] the overdue removal of X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_ACPI

2007-02-24 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
Ack. Dave: Can you add this patch to cpufreq.git -> mm. Thanks, Venki >-Original Message- >From: Adrian Bunk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 4:07 PM >To: Pallipadi, Venkatesh >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; >linux-kernel@vge

RE: NO_HZ: timer interrupt stuck [Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1]

2007-02-22 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of >Thomas Gleixner >Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 8:00 AM >To: Pierre Ossman >Cc: Arjan van de Ven; Jan Engelhardt; Luca Tettamanti; >linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >Subject: Re: NO_HZ: timer interrup

RE: ACPI C and P states on Conroe

2007-01-30 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
C0 is the state when processor is executing instruction. C1-C3 is the state that kernel puts the CPU into when there is nothing to run (idle loop). C1 is supported by all processors and it is entered either by using "hlt" or "mwait" instructions. You don't have to do anything to enable this. It sh

RE: [BUG] NMI watchdog lockups caused by mwait_idle

2007-01-12 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: Darrick J. Wong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 1:01 PM >To: Pallipadi, Venkatesh >Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List >Subject: [BUG] NMI watchdog lockups caused by mwait_idle > >Hi Venkatesh, > >I have an IBM IntelliSta

RE: [PATCH] fix-flush_workqueue-vs-cpu_dead-race-update

2007-01-08 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Oleg Nesterov >Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 9:07 AM >To: Srivatsa Vaddagiri >Cc: Andrew Morton; David Howells; Christoph Hellwig; Ingo >Molnar; Linus Torvalds; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Gautham s

RE: kref refcnt and false positives

2006-12-14 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: Eric Dumazet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 11:57 PM >To: Andrew Morton >Cc: Greg KH; Pallipadi, Venkatesh; Arjan; linux-kernel; Eric >W. Biederman >Subject: Re: kref refcnt and false positives > >

RE: [PATCH] i386 add idle notifier (take 2)

2006-12-11 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
Stephane, This patch has the same race as in 64 bit patch, that was fixed here http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0611.3/1264.html With that race, idle callbacks does not work correctly. Even on a totally idle system, I can see exit_idle called before enter_idle once every few second

RE: CPUFREQ-CPUHOTPLUG: Possible circular locking dependency

2006-12-07 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of >Gautham R Shenoy >Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 11:07 PM >To: Pallipadi, Venkatesh >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Ingo Molnar; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; >linux-kernel@vger.kern

RE: CPUFREQ-CPUHOTPLUG: Possible circular locking dependency

2006-12-06 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of >Gautham R Shenoy >Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 3:44 AM >To: Ingo Molnar >Cc: Gautham R Shenoy; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; >linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; >[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PRO

RE: [BUG][acpi-cpufreq/userspace-governor]Frequency does not change

2006-11-17 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: Dhaval Giani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 1:22 PM >To: Pallipadi, Venkatesh; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; >Diefenbaugh, Paul S; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sadykov, Denis M >Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >Subject: [BUG][a

RE: cpufreq userspace governor does not reflect changes

2006-11-17 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: Dhaval Giani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 11:48 AM >To: Pallipadi, Venkatesh >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >Subject: Re: cpufreq userspace governor does not reflect changes > >Hey, &

RE: cpufreq userspace governor does not reflect changes

2006-11-17 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
programs each core individually based on CPU utilization and hardware will pick the highest frequency among the two and run both cores at that frequency. -Venki >-Original Message- >From: Dhaval Giani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 11:17 AM >T

RE: [PATCH 2.6.19-rc5-mm2] cpufreq: set policy->curfreq on initialization

2006-11-17 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
Acked. Andrew: Please include this patch in mm. Thanks, Venki >-Original Message- >From: Mattia Dongili [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 11:05 AM >To: Pallipadi, Venkatesh; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Reuben Farrelly; >Andrew Morton; [EMAIL PR

RE: [PATCH] fix hpet drift and url

2005-08-30 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
Ack. Andrew: Please apply. Thanks, Venki >-Original Message- >From: Alex Williamson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 10:40 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Cc: Robert W. Picco; Pallipadi, Venkatesh; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >Subject: [PATCH]

  1   2   >