On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, J Sloan wrote:
> Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > Bzzt, wrong. Red Hat 7 compiles the 2.4 tree beautifully with gcc 2.96 as well.
> > Please grow up.
>
> Yes indeed - on my quad CPU Red Hat 7 server, I accidentally
> forgot to say CC=kgcc during the last kernel build, and ended
> up with
On Mon, 4 Dec 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> Ok, this contains one of the fixes for the dirty inode buffer list (the
> other fix is pending, simply because I still want to understand why it
> would be needed at all). Al?
>
> Also, it has the final installment of the PageDirty handling, and now
>
On Thu, 12 Oct 2000, Keith Owens wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Oct 2000 12:56:09 +0100 (BST),
> Tigran Aivazian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >one correction -- it was "down and up the interface" that did the trick
> >and not deleting the 64M mtrr entry. I.e. the eepro100 problem is better
> >formulated as
3 matches
Mail list logo