Intel 945GM: 2.6.25-rc3 report (with a possible regression)

2008-02-26 Thread Romano Giannetti
Hi, this mail is to give feedback about the 2.6.25-rc3 kernel, on an Ubuntu 7.10 system, running on a Toshiba Satellite U305. Video is a Intel 845GM, and I run 915resolution at start to make X happy with the correct widescreen resolution. A lot of data is collected here (if more is needed,

Intel 945GM: 2.6.25-rc3 report (with a possible regression)

2008-02-26 Thread Romano Giannetti
Hi, this mail is to give feedback about the 2.6.25-rc3 kernel, on an Ubuntu 7.10 system, running on a Toshiba Satellite U305. Video is a Intel 845GM, and I run 915resolution at start to make X happy with the correct widescreen resolution. A lot of data is collected here (if more is needed,

Re: ndiswrapper tainting

2008-02-22 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Thu, 2008-02-21 at 20:02 -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote: > Hello! > > What are the chances that incorrect tainting of ndiswrapper will be > fixed in 2.6.25? > Please let's not turn it into another empty discussion. > > Seconded. Please. -- Sorry for the disclaimer --- ¡I cannot stop it!

Re: ndiswrapper tainting

2008-02-22 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Thu, 2008-02-21 at 20:02 -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote: Hello! What are the chances that incorrect tainting of ndiswrapper will be fixed in 2.6.25? Please let's not turn it into another empty discussion. Seconded. Please. -- Sorry for the disclaimer --- ¡I cannot stop it! -- La

Re: [Suspend-devel] 2.6.25-rc2 System no longer powers off aftersuspend-to-disk. Screen becomes green.

2008-02-21 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Thu, 2008-02-21 at 02:02 +0800, Jeff Chua wrote: > On Feb 21, 2008 1:52 AM, Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Ahh. You're using the BIOS to re-initialize your video, aren't you? > > I don't know. Just pure simple "s2ram" without any options. Well, as far as I know, s2ram could

Re: [Suspend-devel] 2.6.25-rc2 System no longer powers off aftersuspend-to-disk. Screen becomes green.

2008-02-21 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Thu, 2008-02-21 at 02:02 +0800, Jeff Chua wrote: On Feb 21, 2008 1:52 AM, Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ahh. You're using the BIOS to re-initialize your video, aren't you? I don't know. Just pure simple s2ram without any options. Well, as far as I know, s2ram could be doing

2.6.25-rc1/2 regression: first-time login into gnome fails

2008-02-18 Thread Romano Giannetti
Hi, I have a very strange, but fully reproducible, regression with 2.6.25-rc1 -rc2. I have an ubuntu 7.10 fully updated. The first time after boot, when I login to gnome (through gdm) the login half-fails with a Setting Daemon error: failed to connect to socket /tmp/dbus-:

2.6.25-rc1/2 regression: first-time login into gnome fails

2008-02-18 Thread Romano Giannetti
Hi, I have a very strange, but fully reproducible, regression with 2.6.25-rc1 -rc2. I have an ubuntu 7.10 fully updated. The first time after boot, when I login to gnome (through gdm) the login half-fails with a Setting Daemon error: failed to connect to socket /tmp/dbus-some

Re: [PATCH] Rationalise ACPI backlight implementation

2008-02-06 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Sat, 2008-02-02 at 09:30 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Fri, 01 Feb 2008, Len Brown wrote: > > You might check if CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO=m is set and you can load the "video" > > module. > > While the sony may be non-standard and not load, your thinkpad may work. [...] > > We

Re: [PATCH] Rationalise ACPI backlight implementation

2008-02-06 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Sat, 2008-02-02 at 09:30 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: On Fri, 01 Feb 2008, Len Brown wrote: You might check if CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO=m is set and you can load the video module. While the sony may be non-standard and not load, your thinkpad may work. [...] We really need to

Re: [RFT] Port 0x80 I/O speed

2007-12-12 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 00:31 +0100, Rene Herman wrote: > cc -W -Wall -O2 -o port80 port80.c On a laptop with a CoreDuo T2080/1.73GHz, but running on battery at 800 MHz (on-demand): (0)rukbat:~/tmp% for i in {1..10}; do sudo ./port80 done cycles: out 3575, in 2844 cycles: out 3589, in 2923

Re: [RFT] Port 0x80 I/O speed

2007-12-12 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 00:31 +0100, Rene Herman wrote: cc -W -Wall -O2 -o port80 port80.c On a laptop with a CoreDuo T2080/1.73GHz, but running on battery at 800 MHz (on-demand): (0)rukbat:~/tmp% for i in {1..10}; do sudo ./port80 done cycles: out 3575, in 2844 cycles: out 3589, in 2923

Re: namespace support requires network modules to say "GPL"

2007-12-03 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Sat, 2007-12-01 at 22:34 -0500, Mark Lord wrote: > Stephen Hemminger wrote:. > >> > > I spoke too soon earlier, ndiswrapper builds and loads against current > > 2.6.24-rc3. Vmware and proprietary VPN software probably do not. Once again > > I don't > > give a damn, but the enterprise distro

Re: namespace support requires network modules to say GPL

2007-12-03 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Sat, 2007-12-01 at 22:34 -0500, Mark Lord wrote: Stephen Hemminger wrote:. I spoke too soon earlier, ndiswrapper builds and loads against current 2.6.24-rc3. Vmware and proprietary VPN software probably do not. Once again I don't give a damn, but the enterprise distro vendors

Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs

2007-11-16 Thread Romano Giannetti
(Cc: trimmed a bit). On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 11:19 -0500, Daniel Barkalow wrote: > On Thu, 15 Nov 2007, Theodore Tso wrote: [...] > > A full kernel build with everything selected can take good 30 minutes or > > more, and that's on a fast dual-core machine with 4gigs of memory and > > 7200rpm

Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs

2007-11-16 Thread Romano Giannetti
(Cc: trimmed a bit). On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 11:19 -0500, Daniel Barkalow wrote: On Thu, 15 Nov 2007, Theodore Tso wrote: [...] A full kernel build with everything selected can take good 30 minutes or more, and that's on a fast dual-core machine with 4gigs of memory and 7200rpm disk

Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs

2007-11-13 Thread Romano Giannetti
I jump in this discussion hoping to have some more insight on git and to report my experience as a tester. I consider myself as half-literate in this (I am here since 1991, more or less, and I am able to compile a kernel and even hand-apply a patch, although I am in no way a kernel programmer).

Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs

2007-11-13 Thread Romano Giannetti
I jump in this discussion hoping to have some more insight on git and to report my experience as a tester. I consider myself as half-literate in this (I am here since 1991, more or less, and I am able to compile a kernel and even hand-apply a patch, although I am in no way a kernel programmer).

Re: 2.6.24-rc2 (esthetic?) regression: auto select interrupt spams my logs

2007-11-08 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 14:52 +0300, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote: > Please open new bug entry at bugzilla.kernel.org. > Your .config might be usefull. Done, http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9327 Romano -- Sorry for the disclaimer --- ¡I cannot stop it! -- La presente comunicación

2.6.24-rc2 (esthetic?) regression: auto select interrupt spams my logs

2007-11-08 Thread Romano Giannetti
Hi, After the ACPI changes between 2.6.24-rc1 and -rc2 I have my logs "spammed" (every 2-3 seconds) by: [ 423.112903] ACPI: EC: missing IBF_1 confirmations,switch off interrupt mode. [ 423.113020] ACPI: EC: non-query interrupt received, switching to interrupt mode [ 426.078972] ACPI: EC:

Re: *SPAM* Re: 2.6.34-rc1 eat my photo SD card :-(

2007-11-08 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 15:37 -0800, Roland Dreier wrote: > . > > Pierre, assuming Romano tests this patch successfully, please apply! > Hi, the patch below solves the problem with my SD card. Tested-by: Romano Giannetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thanks! Romano

Re: *SPAM* Re: 2.6.34-rc1 eat my photo SD card :-(

2007-11-08 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 15:37 -0800, Roland Dreier wrote: . Pierre, assuming Romano tests this patch successfully, please apply! Hi, the patch below solves the problem with my SD card. Tested-by: Romano Giannetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks! Romano -- patch below -- mmc: Fix sg

Re: 2.6.24-rc2 (esthetic?) regression: auto select interrupt spams my logs

2007-11-08 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 14:52 +0300, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote: Please open new bug entry at bugzilla.kernel.org. Your .config might be usefull. Done, http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9327 Romano -- Sorry for the disclaimer --- ¡I cannot stop it! -- La presente comunicación

2.6.24-rc2 (esthetic?) regression: auto select interrupt spams my logs

2007-11-08 Thread Romano Giannetti
Hi, After the ACPI changes between 2.6.24-rc1 and -rc2 I have my logs spammed (every 2-3 seconds) by: [ 423.112903] ACPI: EC: missing IBF_1 confirmations,switch off interrupt mode. [ 423.113020] ACPI: EC: non-query interrupt received, switching to interrupt mode [ 426.078972] ACPI: EC:

Re: 2.6.34-rc1 eat my photo SD card :-(

2007-11-07 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 23:17 +0100, Romano Giannetti wrote: > Well, I started bisecting it. It will be a long shot, I suspect... Well, I spent the last 36 hours (more or less) trying to bisect the SD problem. The method I used was to insert the card, umount it, and make 8 dd in a row; the ker

Re: 2.6.34-rc1 eat my photo SD card :-(

2007-11-07 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 23:17 +0100, Romano Giannetti wrote: Well, I started bisecting it. It will be a long shot, I suspect... Well, I spent the last 36 hours (more or less) trying to bisect the SD problem. The method I used was to insert the card, umount it, and make 8 dd in a row; the kernel

missing IBF_1 confirmations?

2007-11-06 Thread Romano Giannetti
Hi, latest git (v2.6.24-rc1-748-g2655e2c) spams my logs with a message like: SYS: Nov 6 23:55:21 rukbat kernel: [ 1479.474976] ACPI: EC: missing IBF_1 confirmations,switch off interrupt mode. SYS: Nov 6 23:55:21 rukbat kernel: [ 1479.475838] ACPI: EC: non-query interrupt received,

Re: 2.6.34-rc1 eat my photo SD card :-(

2007-11-06 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 22:48 +0100, Romano Giannetti wrote: > I do really suspect a software bug. > Well, I started bisecting it. It will be a long shot, I suspect... Romano BTW: I noticed that if I change EXTRAVERSION, doing a make rebuild almost all the kernel. Is it

Re: 2.6.34-rc1 eat my photo SD card :-(

2007-11-06 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 20:51 +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: > On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 10:58:41AM +0100, Romano Giannetti wrote: > (first time) > > 000 31e4 c363 d908 cb2e > > (fourth time) > > 000 71e4 c36f d908 cb2e > >

Re: 2.6.34-rc1 eat my photo SD card :-(

2007-11-06 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 20:51 +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: > It looks like a hardware problem to me. Maybe one version is more > optimized and puts more stress on the device ? I remember having > had comparable problems in the past with a CF connected to a > home-made IDE adapter on which the +5V

Re: 2.6.34-rc1 eat my photo SD card :-(

2007-11-06 Thread Romano Giannetti
(Nick re-added to the Cc: list; sorry, I dropped you without noticing) On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 10:58 +0100, Romano Giannetti wrote: > Hi, > > I have some more data. I really start to think that the mmc layer is > busted. I repeated a dd of the device, unmounted, five or six time

Re: 2.6.34-rc1 eat my photo SD card :-(

2007-11-06 Thread Romano Giannetti
Hi, I have some more data. I really start to think that the mmc layer is busted. I repeated a dd of the device, unmounted, five or six times in a row, and look: (0)rukbat:~/software/toshiba/lk2624-rc1-mmc2% sudo dd if=/dev/mmcblk0 bs=1c count=128 | od -h 128+0 records in 128+0 records out

Re: 2.6.34-rc1 eat my photo SD card :-(

2007-11-06 Thread Romano Giannetti
Hi, I have some more data. I really start to think that the mmc layer is busted. I repeated a dd of the device, unmounted, five or six times in a row, and look: (0)rukbat:~/software/toshiba/lk2624-rc1-mmc2% sudo dd if=/dev/mmcblk0 bs=1c count=128 | od -h 128+0 records in 128+0 records out

Re: 2.6.34-rc1 eat my photo SD card :-(

2007-11-06 Thread Romano Giannetti
(Nick re-added to the Cc: list; sorry, I dropped you without noticing) On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 10:58 +0100, Romano Giannetti wrote: Hi, I have some more data. I really start to think that the mmc layer is busted. I repeated a dd of the device, unmounted, five or six times in a row

Re: 2.6.34-rc1 eat my photo SD card :-(

2007-11-06 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 20:51 +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 10:58:41AM +0100, Romano Giannetti wrote: (first time) 000 31e4 c363 d908 cb2e (fourth time) 000 71e4 c36f d908 cb2e (fifth time) 000 f1e4

Re: 2.6.34-rc1 eat my photo SD card :-(

2007-11-06 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 22:48 +0100, Romano Giannetti wrote: I do really suspect a software bug. Well, I started bisecting it. It will be a long shot, I suspect... Romano BTW: I noticed that if I change EXTRAVERSION, doing a make rebuild almost all the kernel. Is it normal

Re: 2.6.34-rc1 eat my photo SD card :-(

2007-11-06 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 20:51 +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: It looks like a hardware problem to me. Maybe one version is more optimized and puts more stress on the device ? I remember having had comparable problems in the past with a CF connected to a home-made IDE adapter on which the +5V wire

missing IBF_1 confirmations?

2007-11-06 Thread Romano Giannetti
Hi, latest git (v2.6.24-rc1-748-g2655e2c) spams my logs with a message like: SYS: Nov 6 23:55:21 rukbat kernel: [ 1479.474976] ACPI: EC: missing IBF_1 confirmations,switch off interrupt mode. SYS: Nov 6 23:55:21 rukbat kernel: [ 1479.475838] ACPI: EC: non-query interrupt received,

Re: 2.6.34-rc1 eat my photo SD card :-(

2007-11-05 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 16:26 +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote: > On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 14:46:33 +0100 > Romano Giannetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 13:22 +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote: > > > Did you partition and format

Re: 2.6.34-rc1 eat my photo SD card :-(

2007-11-05 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 13:22 +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote: > On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 11:51:26 +0100 > Romano Giannetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ah, I forgot: I have a dump of the card (made with dd). If you'd happen to need it, simply tell me. dd gave no errors. And to double chec

Re: 2.6.34-rc1 eat my photo SD card :-(

2007-11-05 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 13:22 +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote: > On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 11:51:26 +0100 > > > > Ok, now this is a bit more telling. The filesystem is indeed corrupt > somehow as it references sectors wy outside the device (at roughly > 280 MB). Yes. The problem is, when I firstly

Re: 2.6.34-rc1 eat my photo SD card :-(

2007-11-05 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Sun, 2007-11-04 at 08:11 -0800, Roland Dreier wrote: > I had something similar recently, trying to access an SD card in the > internal drive of my thinkpad X60. Fortunately, the data wasn't > actually corrupted, but when I tried to copy the picture files off the > card, I saw garbage

Re: 2.6.34-rc1 eat my photo SD card :-(

2007-11-05 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Sun, 2007-11-04 at 08:11 -0800, Roland Dreier wrote: I had something similar recently, trying to access an SD card in the internal drive of my thinkpad X60. Fortunately, the data wasn't actually corrupted, but when I tried to copy the picture files off the card, I saw garbage filenames in

Re: 2.6.34-rc1 eat my photo SD card :-(

2007-11-05 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 13:22 +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote: On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 11:51:26 +0100 Ok, now this is a bit more telling. The filesystem is indeed corrupt somehow as it references sectors wy outside the device (at roughly 280 MB). Yes. The problem is, when I firstly mounted it

Re: 2.6.34-rc1 eat my photo SD card :-(

2007-11-05 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 13:22 +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote: On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 11:51:26 +0100 Romano Giannetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ah, I forgot: I have a dump of the card (made with dd). If you'd happen to need it, simply tell me. dd gave no errors. And to double check, I mounted a VFAT

Re: 2.6.34-rc1 eat my photo SD card :-(

2007-11-05 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 16:26 +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote: On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 14:46:33 +0100 Romano Giannetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 13:22 +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote: Did you partition and format this card in the camera or in Linux? In the camera

Re: *SPAM* Re: 2.6.24-rc1: OOPS at acpi_battery_update

2007-11-04 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 17:08 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Friday, 2 November 2007 00:14, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 11:11:04 +0100 [OOPS removed] > > > > Did any earlier kernels do this? In other words, do you believe that this > > is a bug which we added after 2.6.23

Re: 2.6.34-rc1 eat my photo SD card :-(

2007-11-04 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 18:28 +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote: > On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 12:56:42 +0100 > Romano Giannetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Data loss is never fun. I hope you didn't have anything important on the card. > Well. A cousin-in-law marriage, would have

Re: 2.6.34-rc1 eat my photo SD card :-(

2007-11-04 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 18:28 +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote: On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 12:56:42 +0100 Romano Giannetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Data loss is never fun. I hope you didn't have anything important on the card. Well. A cousin-in-law marriage, would have been best not to lose it, but I'll

Re: *SPAM* Re: 2.6.24-rc1: OOPS at acpi_battery_update

2007-11-04 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 17:08 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Friday, 2 November 2007 00:14, Andrew Morton wrote: On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 11:11:04 +0100 [OOPS removed] Did any earlier kernels do this? In other words, do you believe that this is a bug which we added after 2.6.23 was

2.6.34-rc1 eat my photo SD card :-(

2007-11-01 Thread Romano Giannetti
Hi, I have a very possible regression to signal. This morning 2.6.24-rc1 eat and destroyed my SD card. I have a toshiba laptop with a card slot and I have used it with 2.6.23-rcX and 2.6.23 without problems so far. This morning I put the card in, nothing happened, removed it. When I put

2.6.34-rc1 eat my photo SD card :-(

2007-11-01 Thread Romano Giannetti
Hi, I have a very possible regression to signal. This morning 2.6.24-rc1 eat and destroyed my SD card. I have a toshiba laptop with a card slot and I have used it with 2.6.23-rcX and 2.6.23 without problems so far. This morning I put the card in, nothing happened, removed it. When I put

2.6.24-rc1: OOPS at acpi_battery_update

2007-10-29 Thread Romano Giannetti
Hi, sometime on resuming from s2ram my laptop spew the following oops. Config, dmesg etc are at: http://www.dea.icai.upcomillas.es/romano/linux/info/2624rc1_6/ [3.475386] Oops: [#1] SMP [3.475602] Process kacpi_notify (pid: 50, ti=c2122000 task=c210c030

Re: [PATCH] r8169: don't call napi_disable if not doing NAPI

2007-10-29 Thread Romano Giannetti
or me (at least, after 8 suspend/resume cycles). Thanks. Tested-by: Romano Giannetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- Sorry for the disclaimer --- ¡I cannot stop it! -- La presente comunicación tiene carácter confidencial y es para el exclusivo uso del destinatario indicado en la misma. Si Ud.

Re: [PATCH] r8169: don't call napi_disable if not doing NAPI

2007-10-29 Thread Romano Giannetti
/resume cycles). Thanks. Tested-by: Romano Giannetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Sorry for the disclaimer --- ¡I cannot stop it! -- La presente comunicación tiene carácter confidencial y es para el exclusivo uso del destinatario indicado en la misma. Si Ud. no es el destinatario indicado, le

2.6.24-rc1: OOPS at acpi_battery_update

2007-10-29 Thread Romano Giannetti
Hi, sometime on resuming from s2ram my laptop spew the following oops. Config, dmesg etc are at: http://www.dea.icai.upcomillas.es/romano/linux/info/2624rc1_6/ [3.475386] Oops: [#1] SMP [3.475602] Process kacpi_notify (pid: 50, ti=c2122000 task=c210c030

Re: [PATCH] r8169: don't call napi_disable if not doing NAPI

2007-10-28 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 11:33 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > Don't call napi_disable if not configured. > And make sure that any misuse of napi_xxx in future fails > with a compile error. Will test as soon as possible (been without internet in the week end). Thanks. As a bonus, I tried more

Re: [PATCH] r8169: don't call napi_disable if not doing NAPI

2007-10-28 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 11:33 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: Don't call napi_disable if not configured. And make sure that any misuse of napi_xxx in future fails with a compile error. Will test as soon as possible (been without internet in the week end). Thanks. As a bonus, I tried more

Re: 2.6.24-rc1 fails with lockup and BUG:

2007-10-26 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 12:44 -0400, Joseph Fannin wrote: > On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 03:25:44PM +0200, Romano Giannetti wrote: > > > > > Denis V. Lunev wrote a patch for the NetworkManager thing a day or two > ago (which DaveM has queued). > > Since netlink is invo

Re: 2.6.24-rc1 fails with lockup and BUG:

2007-10-26 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 12:44 -0400, Joseph Fannin wrote: On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 03:25:44PM +0200, Romano Giannetti wrote: Denis V. Lunev wrote a patch for the NetworkManager thing a day or two ago (which DaveM has queued). Since netlink is involved in the traces you sent, this might do

Re: 2.6.24-rc1 fails with lockup and BUG:

2007-10-25 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 18:11 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 17:55 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > hm, this lockdep warning caused lockdep to turn itself off - hence we > > wont get to the really interesting warnings. We'll try to come up with a > > solution for this. >

Re: 2.6.24-rc1 fails with lockup and BUG:

2007-10-25 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 18:11 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 17:55 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: hm, this lockdep warning caused lockdep to turn itself off - hence we wont get to the really interesting warnings. We'll try to come up with a solution for this. Does this

Re: 2.6.24-rc1 fails with lockup and BUG:

2007-10-24 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 16:27 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y > CONFIG_DEBUG_LIST=y > CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=y > CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB=y > > and please post the resulting dmesg output - does lockdep notice any > lockup reason? (your backtrace suggests some mutex stuff so

2.6.24-rc1 fails with lockup and BUG:

2007-10-24 Thread Romano Giannetti
Hi, 2.6.23-rc1 fails for me. I have the sensation it is network-related, but I am not sure, so I send this message just to the list. This same failure was present in git-5734-gd85714d, I sent a message to the list but it seems it never arrived. I hope this will pass through. My system is a

2.6.24-rc1 fails with lockup and BUG:

2007-10-24 Thread Romano Giannetti
Hi, 2.6.23-rc1 fails for me. I have the sensation it is network-related, but I am not sure, so I send this message just to the list. This same failure was present in git-5734-gd85714d, I sent a message to the list but it seems it never arrived. I hope this will pass through. My system is a

Re: 2.6.24-rc1 fails with lockup and BUG:

2007-10-24 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 16:27 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y CONFIG_DEBUG_LIST=y CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=y CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB=y and please post the resulting dmesg output - does lockdep notice any lockup reason? (your backtrace suggests some mutex stuff so it might

[REGRESSION] locks with v2.6.23-5734-gd85714d (suspend- or bio- related?)

2007-10-19 Thread Romano Giannetti
Hi, I was testing yesterday release of kernel, and I have had a lot of problem with the new kernel. It boots ok, the first time it suspend/resume ok, and then at the second or third attempt to suspend, the suspend process will not go though (I suspend using s2ram -f -p -m); it will just

[REGRESSION] locks with v2.6.23-5734-gd85714d (suspend- or bio- related?)

2007-10-19 Thread Romano Giannetti
Hi, I was testing yesterday release of kernel, and I have had a lot of problem with the new kernel. It boots ok, the first time it suspend/resume ok, and then at the second or third attempt to suspend, the suspend process will not go though (I suspend using s2ram -f -p -m); it will just

Re: 2.6.23-rc6: S4 and S5 no longer listed as supported on ToshibaSatellite A40

2007-09-20 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 18:01 +0200, Maciek Rutecki wrote: > Frans Pop pisze: > >> Unexpected, and potentially pretty serious. Something went wrong with > >> ACPI. Can you try to narrow down when it started happening? > > > > rc1 still had all 4 levels. I'll run a bisect between rc1 and rc6. > >

Re: 2.6.23-rc6: S4 and S5 no longer listed as supported on ToshibaSatellite A40

2007-09-20 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 18:01 +0200, Maciek Rutecki wrote: Frans Pop pisze: Unexpected, and potentially pretty serious. Something went wrong with ACPI. Can you try to narrow down when it started happening? rc1 still had all 4 levels. I'll run a bisect between rc1 and rc6. I have the

Toshiba A305 hda-intel (Was: Re: easy alsa patches for the stablekernel?)

2007-09-10 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Sat, 2007-09-08 at 01:42 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > At Fri, 07 Sep 2007 22:59:07 +0200, > Romano Giannetti wrote: > > > > It's on git.kernel.org, perex/alsa.git tree mm branch. > You can find the information in the download wiki page of > alsa-project.org. >

Toshiba A305 hda-intel (Was: Re: easy alsa patches for the stablekernel?)

2007-09-10 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Sat, 2007-09-08 at 01:42 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: At Fri, 07 Sep 2007 22:59:07 +0200, Romano Giannetti wrote: It's on git.kernel.org, perex/alsa.git tree mm branch. You can find the information in the download wiki page of alsa-project.org. Ah thanks, found. Now, I'd

Re: easy alsa patches for the stable kernel?

2007-09-07 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Fri, 2007-09-07 at 21:42 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > On 07.09.2007 14:58, Takashi Iwai wrote: > >>> Ah good. I added it to ALSA HG tree now. Thanks. BTW, is anywhere visible the current hg tree? It seems that http://hg-mirror.alsa-project.org/alsa-kernel/ lags a bit behind... > It's

Re: hda_intel : Patch + Regression in 2.6.18 -> 2.6.22

2007-09-07 Thread Romano Giannetti
Takashi: good news! On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 23:48 +0200, Romano Giannetti wrote: > On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 17:25 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > At Thu, 06 Sep 2007 17:09:50 +0200, > > Romano Giannetti wrote: > > > > > > > > > Just one hand up: I hav

Re: hda_intel : Patch + Regression in 2.6.18 - 2.6.22

2007-09-07 Thread Romano Giannetti
Takashi: good news! On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 23:48 +0200, Romano Giannetti wrote: On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 17:25 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: At Thu, 06 Sep 2007 17:09:50 +0200, Romano Giannetti wrote: Just one hand up: I haven't tested the patch pointed to by Andrew, will do asap

Re: easy alsa patches for the stable kernel?

2007-09-07 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Fri, 2007-09-07 at 21:42 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: On 07.09.2007 14:58, Takashi Iwai wrote: Ah good. I added it to ALSA HG tree now. Thanks. BTW, is anywhere visible the current hg tree? It seems that http://hg-mirror.alsa-project.org/alsa-kernel/ lags a bit behind... It's just

Re: hda_intel : Patch + Regression in 2.6.18 -> 2.6.22

2007-09-06 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 17:25 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > At Thu, 06 Sep 2007 17:09:50 +0200, > Romano Giannetti wrote: > > > > > > Just one hand up: I haven't tested the patch pointed to by Andrew, will > > do asap, but it seems that contains the changes from

Re: hda_intel : Patch + Regression in 2.6.18 -> 2.6.22

2007-09-06 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Wed, 2007-09-05 at 18:44 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > At Wed, 5 Sep 2007 09:16:33 -0700, > Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 05 Sep 2007 18:05:44 +0200 Takashi Iwai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Roger, could you try git-alsa patch in the latest mm together with > > > model=acer-aspiore

Re: hda_intel : Patch + Regression in 2.6.18 - 2.6.22

2007-09-06 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Wed, 2007-09-05 at 18:44 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: At Wed, 5 Sep 2007 09:16:33 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: On Wed, 05 Sep 2007 18:05:44 +0200 Takashi Iwai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Roger, could you try git-alsa patch in the latest mm together with model=acer-aspiore option? If it

Re: hda_intel : Patch + Regression in 2.6.18 - 2.6.22

2007-09-06 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 17:25 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: At Thu, 06 Sep 2007 17:09:50 +0200, Romano Giannetti wrote: Just one hand up: I haven't tested the patch pointed to by Andrew, will do asap, but it seems that contains the changes from https://bugtrack.alsa-project.org/alsa-bug

Re: Hang in 2.6.23-rc5

2007-09-04 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Mon, 2007-09-03 at 08:39 +0200, Patrick Mau wrote: > In addition I totally agree with Satyam's comment above: either > anybody is testing rc's these days, or people simply stopped reporting. > Hi, I had network-related locks with rc5, but refrained to post here because I am using

Re: Hang in 2.6.23-rc5

2007-09-04 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Mon, 2007-09-03 at 08:39 +0200, Patrick Mau wrote: In addition I totally agree with Satyam's comment above: either anybody is testing rc's these days, or people simply stopped reporting. Hi, I had network-related locks with rc5, but refrained to post here because I am using

Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway

2007-07-03 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Tue, 2007-07-03 at 05:29 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > or alternatively we could do what we do for suspend to RAM on other > platforms (PPC and APM) and just not use the freezer. As a data point, I am running with this patch on top of 2.6.21.2 the last 3+ weeks, with an average of 5/6 STR

Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway

2007-07-03 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Tue, 2007-07-03 at 05:29 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: or alternatively we could do what we do for suspend to RAM on other platforms (PPC and APM) and just not use the freezer. As a data point, I am running with this patch on top of 2.6.21.2 the last 3+ weeks, with an average of 5/6 STR

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review

2007-05-30 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 07:55 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Tue, 29 May 2007, Romano Giannetti wrote: > > > > - The good (?) news. I have made 7 suspend/resume cycle (to ram, I > > haven't tested hibernation) with a 2.6.21.2 with that patch, applied > > ma

Re: Regression: USB is nfg after suspend/resume(RAM) cycle onIntel chipset

2007-05-30 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 10:07 -0700, Nish Aravamudan wrote: > Click on "raw"? e.g.: > > summary | shortlog | log | commit | commitdiff | tree > raw (parent: 1ea0975) > > Neare the top. Hmmm...yes, but if you click raw, you ave "500 internal error", and a raw html source (that is, content: header

Re: Regression: USB is nfg after suspend/resume(RAM) cycle onIntel chipset

2007-05-30 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 10:07 -0700, Nish Aravamudan wrote: Click on raw? e.g.: summary | shortlog | log | commit | commitdiff | tree raw (parent: 1ea0975) Neare the top. Hmmm...yes, but if you click raw, you ave 500 internal error, and a raw html source (that is, content: header is right

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review

2007-05-30 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 07:55 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: On Tue, 29 May 2007, Romano Giannetti wrote: - The good (?) news. I have made 7 suspend/resume cycle (to ram, I haven't tested hibernation) with a 2.6.21.2 with that patch, applied manually. The system did suspend and resume

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review

2007-05-29 Thread Romano Giannetti
as /class/input/input9 [ 371.297000] ACPI: Power Button (FF) [PWRF] [ 371.359000] input: Sleep Button (CM) as /class/input/input10 [ 371.359000] ACPI: Sleep Button (CM) [SBTN] [ 371.402000] input: Lid Switch as /class/input/input11 [ 371.403000] ACPI: Lid Switch [LID] [ 371.607000] ACPI: Therm

Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review

2007-05-29 Thread Romano Giannetti
] [ 371.607000] ACPI: Thermal Zone [THRM] (54 C) [ 371.661000] ACPI: AC Adapter [ACAD] (on-line) [ 372.01] ACPI: Battery Slot [BAT1] (battery present) [ 372.02] ACPI: Battery Slot [BAT2] (battery absent) -- Romano Giannetti --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sorry for the following disclaimer, it's attached

Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69]-stablereview)

2007-05-25 Thread Romano Giannetti
verfirewalling, you know...) Romano -- Romano Giannetti --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sorry for the following disclaimer, it's attached by our otugoing server and I cannot shut it up. -- La presente comunicación tiene carácter confidencial y es para el exclusivo uso del destinatario indicado en la mis

Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69]-stablereview)

2007-05-25 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 15:49 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Fri, 25 May 2007, Romano Giannetti wrote: > > > > Another naive doubt I have is: in 2.6.17.13, with additional patches > > http://zeus2.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linu

Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69]-stablereview)

2007-05-25 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 15:49 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: On Fri, 25 May 2007, Romano Giannetti wrote: Another naive doubt I have is: in 2.6.17.13, with additional patches http://zeus2.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h

Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69]-stablereview)

2007-05-25 Thread Romano Giannetti
...) Romano -- Romano Giannetti --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sorry for the following disclaimer, it's attached by our otugoing server and I cannot shut it up. -- La presente comunicación tiene carácter confidencial y es para el exclusivo uso del destinatario indicado en la misma. Si Ud. no es el

Re: 2.6.21.1 fails to suspend/resume to disk (sort of)

2007-05-24 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 21:27 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thursday, 24 May 2007 07:20, Romano Giannetti wrote: > > On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 18:57 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Wednesday, 23 May 2007 11:57, Romano Giannetti wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2007-

Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69]-stablereview)

2007-05-24 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 08:28 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Can you compile those two modules with PCMCIA_DEBUG=4? > > Something like > > make EXTRA_CFLAGS=-DPCMCIA_DEBUG=4 > Well, I have to give up for tonight... that make do not works (see the problem explained in other messages, some

Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -stablereview)

2007-05-24 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 23:12 +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > I really cannot see why it makes a difference. > If you use += (and :=) make will resolve EXTRA_CFLAGS when it see it. > Whereas with = make will resolve it only when actually referenced. > > But the way we use EXTRA_CFLAGS it should

Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -stablereview)

2007-05-24 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 13:35 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Thu, 24 May 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > Occasional lockups on resume is probably a separate issue, and it might > > well be a race, or even just firmware timing bugs. > > Btw, to solve the 60-second timeout problem, do you

Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -stablereview)

2007-05-24 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 14:01 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 24 May 2007 22:14:08 +0200 > Romano Giannetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ntfs is being naughty. > > hm, lots of Makefiles commit the same sin. Sam, is this as busted as > I think it is? Hmmm..

Re: Long delay in resume from RAM (Was Re: [patch 00/69] -stablereview)

2007-05-24 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 08:52 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Thu, 24 May 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > Ok. That was probably true even before you added the suspend ordering > > patch. > > Oh, no it apparently wasn't. I missed your other email that said > >"So, I tried to suspend

  1   2   3   >