("KVM: selftests: Add basic selftest for guest_memfd()")
Signed-off-by: Patrick Roy
---
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/guest_memfd_test.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/guest_memfd_test.c
b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/guest_me
On Fri, 2024-10-18 at 08:50 +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 18.10.24 09:15, Patrick Roy wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 2024-10-17 at 20:18 +0100, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 03:11:10PM -0400, Peter Xu wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Oct 17,
On Thu, 2024-10-17 at 20:18 +0100, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 03:11:10PM -0400, Peter Xu wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 02:10:10PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
If so, maybe that's a non-issue for non-CoCo, where the VM object /
gmemfd object (when created) can
On Fri, 2024-10-18 at 00:16 +0100, Ackerley Tng wrote:
> Patrick Roy writes:
>
>> On Tue, 2024-10-08 at 20:56 +0100, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 08, 2024, Ackerley Tng wrote:
>>>> Patrick Roy writes:
>>>>> For the "non-CoC
On Tue, 2024-10-08 at 20:56 +0100, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 08, 2024, Ackerley Tng wrote:
>> Patrick Roy writes:
>>> For the "non-CoCo with direct map entries removed" VMs that we at AWS
>>> are going for, we'd like a VM type with host
Hi Ackerley,
On Thu, 2024-10-03 at 22:32 +0100, Ackerley Tng wrote:
> Elliot Berman writes:
>
>> On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 11:44:01PM +, Ackerley Tng wrote:
>>> Since guest_memfd now supports mmap(), folios have to be prepared
>>> before they are faulted into userspace.
>>>
>>> When memory att
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 1:25 PM Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 10:15 PM Arjun Roy wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 10:35 AM Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 7:15 PM Arjun Roy wrote:
> > > >
>
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 10:35 AM Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 7:15 PM Arjun Roy wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 9:10 AM Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 6:08 PM David Laight
> > > wrote:
> >
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 9:10 AM Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 6:08 PM David Laight wrote:
> >
> > From: Eric Dumazet
> > > Sent: 14 April 2021 17:00
> > ...
> > > > Repeated unsafe_get_user() calls are crying out for an optimisation.
> > > > You get something like:
> > > >
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 2:19 PM David Laight wrote:
>
> > If we're special-casing 64-bit architectures anyways - unrolling the
> > 32B copy_from_user() for struct rseq_cs appears to be roughly 5-10%
> > savings on x86-64 when I measured it (well, in a microbenchmark, not
> > in rseq_get_rseq_cs()
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 11:22 AM Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 8:00 PM Mathieu Desnoyers
> wrote:
> >
>
> > As long as the ifdefs are localized within clearly identified wrappers in
> > the
> > rseq code I don't mind doing the special-casing there.
> >
> > The point which remai
Op 13-04-2021 om 10:48 schreef Karol Herbst:
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 10:24 AM Roy Spliet wrote:
Op 13-04-2021 om 01:10 schreef Karol Herbst:
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 9:36 PM Roy Spliet wrote:
Hello Aaron,
Thanks for your insights. A follow-up query and some observations in-line.
Op 12-04
Op 13-04-2021 om 01:10 schreef Karol Herbst:
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 9:36 PM Roy Spliet wrote:
Hello Aaron,
Thanks for your insights. A follow-up query and some observations in-line.
Op 12-04-2021 om 20:06 schreef Aaron Plattner:
On 4/10/21 1:48 PM, Roy Spliet wrote:
Op 10-04-2021 om 20
Hello Aaron,
Thanks for your insights. A follow-up query and some observations in-line.
Op 12-04-2021 om 20:06 schreef Aaron Plattner:
On 4/10/21 1:48 PM, Roy Spliet wrote:
Op 10-04-2021 om 20:23 schreef Lukas Wunner:
On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 04:51:27PM +0100, Roy Spliet wrote:
Can I ask
Op 10-04-2021 om 20:23 schreef Lukas Wunner:
On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 04:51:27PM +0100, Roy Spliet wrote:
Can I ask someone with more
technical knowledge of snd_hda_intel and vgaswitcheroo to brainstorm about
the possible challenges of nouveau taking matters into its own hand rather
than keeping
wn hand rather than
keeping this PCI quirk around?
Roy
Op 04-01-2021 om 13:20 schreef Karol Herbst:
On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 3:50 AM Kai-Heng Feng
wrote:
On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 1:56 AM Ilia Mirkin wrote:
On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 11:33 AM Kai-Heng Feng
wrote:
[+Cc nouveau]
On Fri,
st recently by the consumer (opposed to what was
> actually implemented in hardware in reply to the last request).
> To make this semantic obvious rename the function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König
> ---
> drivers/input/misc/da7280.c | 2 +-
Acked-by: Roy Im
what I can do to correct this to avoid
confusion.
- Roy
On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 1:13 PM Theodore Ts'o wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 07:48:30PM +, Al Viro wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 12:17:44PM -0700, Roy Yang wrote:
> > > Both Android and Chrome OS rea
Both Android and Chrome OS really want this feature; For Container-Optimized
OS, we have customers
interested in the defense too.
Thank you very much.
Change-Id: I1eb1b726007aa8f9c374b934cc1c690fb4924aa3
--
2.31.0.208.g409f899ff0-goog
On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 2:24 PM Johannes Weiner wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 10:12:46AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Tue 23-03-21 11:47:54, Arjun Roy wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 7:34 AM Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On
On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 11:26 AM Shakeel Butt wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 11:42 AM Arjun Roy wrote:
> >
> [...]
> >
> > To summarize then, it seems to me that we're on the same page now.
> > I'll put together a tentative v3 such that:
> >
On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 2:12 AM Michal Hocko wrote:
>
> On Tue 23-03-21 11:47:54, Arjun Roy wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 7:34 AM Michal Hocko wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed 17-03-21 18:12:55, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > > Here is a
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 7:34 AM Michal Hocko wrote:
>
> On Wed 17-03-21 18:12:55, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> [...]
> > Here is an idea of how it could work:
> >
> > struct page already has
> >
> > struct {/* page_pool used by netstack */
> > /**
> >
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 10:01 AM Johannes Weiner wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 02:35:11PM -0700, Arjun Roy wrote:
> > To make sure we're on the same page, then, here's a tentative
> > mechanism - I'd rather get buy in before spending too much time on
> &
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 3:12 PM Johannes Weiner wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 11:05:11PM -0700, Arjun Roy wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 3:27 AM Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 09:16:45PM
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 8:21 PM Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 18:30:03 -0700 Arjun Roy wrote:
>
> > From: Arjun Roy
> >
> > TCP zerocopy receive is used by high performance network applications
> > to further scale. For RX zerocopy, the memor
> From: Lorenzo Pieralisi
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 01:40:16PM +0000, Roy Zang wrote:
> > Yes. It is maintained.
>
> To be maintained you should review its code please.
Sure.
>
> > I will send out a patch.
>
> Krzysztof already posted one for you, you just n
Yes. It is maintained.
I will send out a patch.
Thanks.
Roy
-Original Message-
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi
On Sun, Mar 07, 2021 at 07:36:57PM +0100, Krzysztof Wilczyński wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [...]
> > I would request NXP maintainers to take this patch, rewrite it as
> >
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 3:27 AM Johannes Weiner wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 09:16:45PM -0700, Arjun Roy wrote:
> > From: Arjun Roy
> >
> > TCP zerocopy receive is used by high performance network applications
> > to further scale. For RX
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 11:22 PM Arjun Roy wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 9:29 PM Shakeel Butt wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 9:20 PM Arjun Roy wrote:
> > >
> > [...]
> > > >
> > >
> > > Apologies for the spam - loo
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 9:29 PM Shakeel Butt wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 9:20 PM Arjun Roy wrote:
> >
> [...]
> > >
> >
> > Apologies for the spam - looks like I forgot to rebase the first time
> > I sent this out.
> >
> > Actually
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 9:16 PM Arjun Roy wrote:
>
> From: Arjun Roy
>
> TCP zerocopy receive is used by high performance network applications
> to further scale. For RX zerocopy, the memory containing the network
> data filled by the network driver is directly mapped into the
From: Arjun Roy
TCP zerocopy receive is used by high performance network applications
to further scale. For RX zerocopy, the memory containing the network
data filled by the network driver is directly mapped into the address
space of high performance applications. To keep the TLB cost low,
these
From: Arjun Roy
TCP zerocopy receive is used by high performance network applications
to further scale. For RX zerocopy, the memory containing the network
data filled by the network driver is directly mapped into the address
space of high performance applications. To keep the TLB cost low,
these
On Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 1:13 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> On Mon, 25 Jan 2021 11:12:23 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the bpf-next tree got a conflict in:
> >
> > net/ipv4/tcp.c
> >
> > between commit:
> >
> > 7eeba1706eba ("tcp: Add receive
On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 4:12 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the bpf-next tree got a conflict in:
>
> net/ipv4/tcp.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 7eeba1706eba ("tcp: Add receive timestamp support for receive zerocopy.")
>
> from the net-next tree and commit:
>
> > > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 04:18:44PM -0800, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 4:12 PM Arjun Roy wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 3:48 PM Roman Gushchin wrote:
> > > > &
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 10:48 AM Roman Gushchin wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 04:12:08PM -0800, Arjun Roy wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 3:48 PM Roman Gushchin wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 03:36:18PM -0800, Arjun Roy wrote:
> > >
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 3:48 PM Roman Gushchin wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 03:36:18PM -0800, Arjun Roy wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 3:31 PM Roman Gushchin wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 01:41:05PM -0800, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> > >
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 3:31 PM Roman Gushchin wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 01:41:05PM -0800, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> > From: Arjun Roy
> >
> > TCP zerocopy receive is used by high performance network applications to
> > further scale. For RX zerocopy, the memo
_TABLE(of, da7280_of_match);
> +#endif
>
> static const struct i2c_device_id da7280_i2c_id[] = {
> { "da7280", },
> --
> 2.29.2.729.g45daf8777d-goog
>
>
> --
> Dmitry
Thanks!
Acked-by: Roy Im
y: Dmitry Torokhov
> ---
Many thanks for your help.
Reviewed-by: Roy Im
"Failed to update GPI sequence: %d\n", error);
You are right.
Reviewed-by: Roy Im
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 4:55 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 01:07:39AM +0900, Roy Im wrote:
> > Adds support for the Dialog DA7280 LRA/ERM Haptic Driver with multiple
> > mode and integrated waveform memory and wideband support.
> > It communicates via
This patch adds the da7280 bindings doc and driver to the Dialog
Semiconductor support list.
Signed-off-by: Roy Im
---
v20: No changes.
v19: No changes.
v18: No changes.
v17: No changes.
v16: No changes.
v15: No changes.
v14: No changes.
v13: No changes.
v12: Corrected file list order.
v11: No
Adds support for the Dialog DA7280 LRA/ERM Haptic Driver with
multiple mode and integrated waveform memory and wideband support.
It communicates via an I2C bus to the device.
Reviewed-by: Jes Sorensen .
Signed-off-by: Roy Im
---
v20:
- Simplified the code with dev_err_probe
Add device tree binding information for DA7280 haptic driver.
Example bindings for DA7280 are added.
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring .
Signed-off-by: Roy Im
---
v20: No changes.
v19: No changes.
v18: No changes.
v17: No changes.
v16: No changes.
v15: No changes.
v14: No changes.
v13: No changes.
v12
This patch adds support for the Dialog DA7280 Haptic driver IC.
In this patch set the following is provided:
[PATCH v20 1/3] MAINTAINERS file update for DA7280
[PATCH v20 2/3] DA7280 DT Binding
[PATCH v20 3/3] DA7280 Driver
This patch applies against linux-mainline and v5.10-rc5
Thank you,
Roy
This patch adds the da7280 bindings doc and driver to the Dialog
Semiconductor support list.
Signed-off-by: Roy Im
---
v20: No changes.
v19: No changes.
v18: No changes.
v17: No changes.
v16: No changes.
v15: No changes.
v14: No changes.
v13: No changes.
v12: Corrected file list order.
v11: No
This patch adds support for the Dialog DA7280 Haptic driver IC.
In this patch set the following is provided:
[PATCH v20 1/3] MAINTAINERS file update for DA7280
[PATCH v20 2/3] DA7280 DT Binding
[PATCH v20 3/3] DA7280 Driver
This patch applies against linux-mainline and v5.10-rc2
Thank you,
Roy
Adds support for the Dialog DA7280 LRA/ERM Haptic Driver with
multiple mode and integrated waveform memory and wideband support.
It communicates via an I2C bus to the device.
Reviewed-by: Jes Sorensen .
Signed-off-by: Roy Im
---
v20:
- Simplified the code with dev_err_probe
Add device tree binding information for DA7280 haptic driver.
Example bindings for DA7280 are added.
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring .
Signed-off-by: Roy Im
---
v20: No changes.
v19: No changes.
v18: No changes.
v17: No changes.
v16: No changes.
v15: No changes.
v14: No changes.
v13: No changes.
v12
This patch adds support for the Dialog DA7280 Haptic driver IC.
In this patch set the following is provided:
[PATCH v20 1/3] MAINTAINERS file update for DA7280
[PATCH v20 2/3] DA7280 DT Binding
[PATCH v20 3/3] DA7280 Driver
This patch applies against linux-mainline and v5.9
Thank you,
Roy Im
Add device tree binding information for DA7280 haptic driver.
Example bindings for DA7280 are added.
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring .
Signed-off-by: Roy Im
---
v20: No changes.
v19: No changes.
v18: No changes.
v17: No changes.
v16: No changes.
v15: No changes.
v14: No changes.
v13: No changes.
v12
Adds support for the Dialog DA7280 LRA/ERM Haptic Driver with
multiple mode and integrated waveform memory and wideband support.
It communicates via an I2C bus to the device.
Reviewed-by: Jes Sorensen .
Signed-off-by: Roy Im
---
v20:
- Simplified the code with dev_err_probe
This patch adds the da7280 bindings doc and driver to the Dialog
Semiconductor support list.
Signed-off-by: Roy Im
---
v20: No changes.
v19: No changes.
v18: No changes.
v17: No changes.
v16: No changes.
v15: No changes.
v14: No changes.
v13: No changes.
v12: Corrected file list order.
v11: No
Adds support for the Dialog DA7280 LRA/ERM Haptic Driver with
multiple mode and integrated waveform memory and wideband support.
It communicates via an I2C bus to the device.
Reviewed-by: Jes Sorensen .
Signed-off-by: Roy Im
---
v20:
- Simplified the code with dev_err_probe
This patch adds the da7280 bindings doc and driver to the Dialog
Semiconductor support list.
Signed-off-by: Roy Im
---
v20: No changes.
v19: No changes.
v18: No changes.
v17: No changes.
v16: No changes.
v15: No changes.
v14: No changes.
v13: No changes.
v12: Corrected file list order.
v11: No
This patch adds support for the Dialog DA7280 Haptic driver IC.
In this patch set the following is provided:
[PATCH v20 1/3] MAINTAINERS file update for DA7280
[PATCH v20 2/3] DA7280 DT Binding
[PATCH v20 3/3] DA7280 Driver
This patch applies against linux-mainline and v5.9-rc6
Thank you,
Roy
Add device tree binding information for DA7280 haptic driver.
Example bindings for DA7280 are added.
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring .
Signed-off-by: Roy Im
---
v20: No changes.
v19: No changes.
v18: No changes.
v17: No changes.
v16: No changes.
v15: No changes.
v14: No changes.
v13: No changes.
v12
Adds support for the Dialog DA7280 LRA/ERM Haptic Driver with
multiple mode and integrated waveform memory and wideband support.
It communicates via an I2C bus to the device.
Reviewed-by: Jes Sorensen .
Signed-off-by: Roy Im
---
v19:
- Corrected some errors and replaced some code to
This patch adds support for the Dialog DA7280 Haptic driver IC.
In this patch set the following is provided:
[PATCH v19 1/3] MAINTAINERS file update for DA7280
[PATCH v19 2/3] DA7280 DT Binding
[PATCH v19 3/3] DA7280 Driver
This patch applies against linux-next and v5.8
Thank you,
Roy Im
Add device tree binding information for DA7280 haptic driver.
Example bindings for DA7280 are added.
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring .
Signed-off-by: Roy Im
---
v19: No changes.
v18: No changes.
v17: No changes.
v16: No changes.
v15: No changes.
v14: No changes.
v13: No changes.
v12: No changes.
v11
This patch adds the da7280 bindings doc and driver to the Dialog
Semiconductor support list.
Signed-off-by: Roy Im
---
v19: No changes.
v18: No changes.
v17: No changes.
v16: No changes.
v15: No changes.
v14: No changes.
v13: No changes.
v12: Corrected file list order.
v11: No changes.
v10: No
Adds support for the Dialog DA7280 LRA/ERM Haptic Driver with
multiple mode and integrated waveform memory and wideband support.
It communicates via an I2C bus to the device.
Reviewed-by: Jes Sorensen .
Signed-off-by: Roy Im
---
v19:
- Corrected some errors and replaced some code to
This patch adds support for the Dialog DA7280 Haptic driver IC.
In this patch set the following is provided:
[PATCH v19 1/3] MAINTAINERS file update for DA7280
[PATCH v19 2/3] DA7280 DT Binding
[PATCH v19 3/3] DA7280 Driver
This patch applies against linux-next and v5.8
Thank you,
Roy Im
This patch adds the da7280 bindings doc and driver to the Dialog
Semiconductor support list.
Signed-off-by: Roy Im
---
v19: No changes.
v18: No changes.
v17: No changes.
v16: No changes.
v15: No changes.
v14: No changes.
v13: No changes.
v12: Corrected file list order.
v11: No changes.
v10: No
Add device tree binding information for DA7280 haptic driver.
Example bindings for DA7280 are added.
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring .
Signed-off-by: Roy Im
---
v19: No changes.
v18: No changes.
v17: No changes.
v16: No changes.
v15: No changes.
v14: No changes.
v13: No changes.
v12: No changes.
v11
Adds support for the Dialog DA7280 LRA/ERM Haptic Driver with
multiple mode and integrated waveform memory and wideband support.
It communicates via an I2C bus to the device.
Reviewed-by: Jes Sorensen .
Signed-off-by: Roy Im
---
v19:
- Corrected some errors and replaced some code to
Add device tree binding information for DA7280 haptic driver.
Example bindings for DA7280 are added.
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring .
Signed-off-by: Roy Im
---
v19: No changes.
v18: No changes.
v17: No changes.
v16: No changes.
v15: No changes.
v14: No changes.
v13: No changes.
v12: No changes.
v11
This patch adds support for the Dialog DA7280 Haptic driver IC.
In this patch set the following is provided:
[PATCH v19 1/3] MAINTAINERS file update for DA7280
[PATCH v19 2/3] DA7280 DT Binding
[PATCH v19 3/3] DA7280 Driver
This patch applies against linux-next and v5.8
Thank you,
Roy Im
This patch adds the da7280 bindings doc and driver to the Dialog
Semiconductor support list.
Signed-off-by: Roy Im
---
v19: No changes.
v18: No changes.
v17: No changes.
v16: No changes.
v15: No changes.
v14: No changes.
v13: No changes.
v12: Corrected file list order.
v11: No changes.
v10: No
a little bit more in the upload effect function
in the next patch.
Thanks for your comments.
>
> --
> (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
> (cesky, pictures)
> http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Kind regards
Roy
On Thu, July 30, 2020 2:10 PM, Dmitry Torokhov
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 02:09:48PM +0000, Roy Im wrote:
> > Wednesday, July 29, 2020 3:37 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 11:59:40AM +0900, Roy Im wrote:
> > > > v11:
> > > &
Hello Dmitry and Uwe,
Wednesday, July 29, 2020 3:37 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 11:59:40AM +0900, Roy Im wrote:
> > Adds support for the Dialog DA7280 LRA/ERM Haptic Driver with multiple
> > mode and integrated waveform memory and wideband support.
>
This patch adds the da7280 bindings doc and driver to the Dialog
Semiconductor support list.
Signed-off-by: Roy Im
---
v18: No changes.
v17: No changes.
v16: No changes.
v15: No changes.
v14: No changes.
v13: No changes.
v12: Corrected file list order.
v11: No changes.
v10: No changes.
v9: No
Adds support for the Dialog DA7280 LRA/ERM Haptic Driver with
multiple mode and integrated waveform memory and wideband support.
It communicates via an I2C bus to the device.
Reviewed-by: Jes Sorensen .
Signed-off-by: Roy Im
---
v18:
- Corrected comments in Kconfig
- Updated to
Add device tree binding information for DA7280 haptic driver.
Example bindings for DA7280 are added.
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring .
Signed-off-by: Roy Im
---
v18: No changes.
v17: No changes.
v16: No changes.
v15: No changes.
v14: No changes.
v13: No changes.
v12: No changes.
v11: No changes.
v10
This patch adds support for the Dialog DA7280 Haptic driver IC.
In this patch set the following is provided:
[PATCH v18 1/3] MAINTAINERS file update for DA7280
[PATCH v18 2/3] DA7280 DT Binding
[PATCH v18 3/3] DA7280 Driver
This patch applies against linux-next and v5.8-rc7
Thank you,
Roy Im
configuration register
based on the configuration mode and the external reference voltage.
The advanced configuration register is then written to the device,
if it is different from the default register value (0x0).
Signed-off-by: Roy van Doormaal
---
drivers/hwmon/adc128d818.c | 24
Friday, July 24, 2020 11:57 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote
> On 7/23/20 6:54 PM, Roy Im wrote:
> > On Fri, July 24, 2020 5:51 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote
> >> On 7/23/20 8:01 AM, Roy Im wrote:
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/Kconfig b/drivers/input/misc/Kconfig
>
On Fri July 24, 2020 5:55 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 7/23/20 8:01 AM, Roy Im wrote:
> > Adds support for the Dialog DA7280 LRA/ERM Haptic Driver with multiple
> > mode and integrated waveform memory and wideband support.
> > It communicates via an I2C bus to the device.
>
On Fri, July 24, 2020 5:51 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote
> On 7/23/20 8:01 AM, Roy Im wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/Kconfig b/drivers/input/misc/Kconfig
> > index 362e8a0..06dc5a3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/input/misc/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/input/misc/Kconfig
>
Add device tree binding information for DA7280 haptic driver.
Example bindings for DA7280 are added.
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring .
Signed-off-by: Roy Im
---
v17: No changes.
v16: No changes.
v15: No changes.
v14: No changes.
v13: No changes.
v12: No changes.
v11: No changes.
v10: No changes.
v9
Adds support for the Dialog DA7280 LRA/ERM Haptic Driver with
multiple mode and integrated waveform memory and wideband support.
It communicates via an I2C bus to the device.
Reviewed-by: Jes Sorensen .
Signed-off-by: Roy Im
---
v17:
- fixed an issue.
v16:
- Corrected some code
This patch adds support for the Dialog DA7280 Haptic driver IC.
In this patch set the following is provided:
[PATCH v17 1/3] MAINTAINERS file update for DA7280
[PATCH v17 2/3] DA7280 DT Binding
[PATCH v17 3/3] DA7280 Driver
This patch applies against linux-next and v5.8-rc6
Thank you,
Roy Im
This patch adds the da7280 bindings doc and driver to the Dialog
Semiconductor support list.
Signed-off-by: Roy Im
---
v17: No changes.
v16: No changes.
v15: No changes.
v14: No changes.
v13: No changes.
v12: Corrected file list order.
v11: No changes.
v10: No changes.
v9: No changes.
v8: No
On Thursday, July 23, 2020 12:24 AM, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> On 7/9/20 3:27 AM, Roy Im wrote:
> > Adds support for the Dialog DA7280 LRA/ERM Haptic Driver with multiple
> > mode and integrated waveform memory and wideband support.
> > It communicates via an I2C bus to the devic
This patch adds support for the Dialog DA7280 Haptic driver IC.
In this patch set the following is provided:
[PATCH v16 1/3] MAINTAINERS file update for DA7280
[PATCH v16 2/3] DA7280 DT Binding
[PATCH v16 3/3] DA7280 Driver
This patch applies against linux-next and v5.8-rc4
Thank you,
Roy Im
Adds support for the Dialog DA7280 LRA/ERM Haptic Driver with
multiple mode and integrated waveform memory and wideband support.
It communicates via an I2C bus to the device.
Signed-off-by: Roy Im
---
v16:
- Corrected some code and updated description in Kconfig.
v15:
- Removed
This patch adds the da7280 bindings doc and driver to the Dialog
Semiconductor support list.
Signed-off-by: Roy Im
---
v16: No changes.
v15: No changes.
v14: No changes.
v13: No changes.
v12: Corrected file list order.
v11: No changes.
v10: No changes.
v9: No changes.
v8: No changes.
v7: No
Add device tree binding information for DA7280 haptic driver.
Example bindings for DA7280 are added.
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring .
Signed-off-by: Roy Im
---
v16: No changes.
v15: No changes.
v14: No changes.
v13: No changes.
v12: No changes.
v11: No changes.
v10: No changes.
v9: No changes.
v8
On Fri, July 3, 2020 3:02 AM, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> On 6/29/20 9:01 AM, Roy Im wrote:
> > Adds support for the Dialog DA7280 LRA/ERM Haptic Driver with multiple
> > mode and integrated waveform memory and wideband support.
> > It communicates via an I2C bus to the device.
On Tue, June 30, 2020 12:14 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 6/29/20 6:01 AM, Roy Im wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/Kconfig b/drivers/input/misc/Kconfig
> > index 362e8a0..79fbddb 100644
> > --- a/drivers/input/misc/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/input/misc/Kc
Adds support for the Dialog DA7280 LRA/ERM Haptic Driver with
multiple mode and integrated waveform memory and wideband support.
It communicates via an I2C bus to the device.
Signed-off-by: Roy Im
---
v15:
- Removed some defines and updated some comments.
v14:
- Updated pwm
Add device tree binding information for DA7280 haptic driver.
Example bindings for DA7280 are added.
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring .
Signed-off-by: Roy Im
---
v15: No changes.
v14: No changes.
v13: No changes.
v12: No changes.
v11: No changes.
v10: No changes.
v9: No changes.
v8: Updated
This patch adds support for the Dialog DA7280 Haptic driver IC.
In this patch set the following is provided:
[PATCH v15 1/3] MAINTAINERS file update for DA7280
[PATCH v15 2/3] DA7280 DT Binding
[PATCH v15 3/3] DA7280 Driver
This patch applies against linux-next and v5.8-rc3
Thank you,
Roy Im
This patch adds the da7280 bindings doc and driver to the Dialog
Semiconductor support list.
Signed-off-by: Roy Im
---
v15: No changes.
v14: No changes.
v13: No changes.
v12: Corrected file list order.
v11: No changes.
v10: No changes.
v9: No changes.
v8: No changes.
v7: No changes.
v6: No
On Sat, June 27, 2020 12:56 AM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 01:17:29PM +0000, Roy Im wrote:
> > > On Fri, June 26, 2020 3:19 PM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > > from the PWM POV I'm happy now. Just a few minor comments that I no
> On Fri, June 26, 2020 3:19 PM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello,
> from the PWM POV I'm happy now. Just a few minor comments that I noticed
> while checking the PWM details.
Many thanks for your comments.
>
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 01:59:29AM +0900, Roy Im wro
1 - 100 of 618 matches
Mail list logo
