Linus Torvalds wrote:
Ok,
-rc3 is pretty small, with the bulk of the diff being some defconfig
updates, and cleanup of xtensa (notably removal of another copy of zlib).
Greg Kroah-Hartman:
PCI: clean up dynamic pci id logic
PCI: Fix up PCI routing in parent bridge
Without
Linus Torvalds wrote:
Ok,
-rc3 is pretty small, with the bulk of the diff being some defconfig
updates, and cleanup of xtensa (notably removal of another copy of zlib).
Greg Kroah-Hartman:
PCI: clean up dynamic pci id logic
PCI: Fix up PCI routing in parent bridge
Without
Martin J. Bligh wrote:
drivers/scsi/aic7xxx/aic7xxx_osm.c: In function `ahc_linux_init':
drivers/scsi/aic7xxx/aic7xxx_osm.c:3608: parse error before `int'
drivers/scsi/aic7xxx/aic7xxx_osm.c:3609: `rc' undeclared (first use in this
function)
drivers/scsi/aic7xxx/aic7xxx_osm.c:3609: (Each
Martin J. Bligh wrote:
drivers/scsi/aic7xxx/aic7xxx_osm.c: In function `ahc_linux_init':
drivers/scsi/aic7xxx/aic7xxx_osm.c:3608: parse error before `int'
drivers/scsi/aic7xxx/aic7xxx_osm.c:3609: `rc' undeclared (first use in this
function)
drivers/scsi/aic7xxx/aic7xxx_osm.c:3609: (Each
On Tuesday 19 April 2005 05:38 pm, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, Steven Cole wrote:
> >
> > I wasn't complaining about the 4 minutes, just the lack of feedback
> > during the majority of that time. And most of it was after the last
> > patching
On Tuesday 19 April 2005 04:38 pm, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, Steven Cole wrote:
> >
> > But perhaps a progress bar right about here might be
> > a good thing for the terminally impatient.
> >
> > real3m54.909s
> > user
Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, Greg KH wrote:
Nice, it looks like the merge of this tree, and my usb tree worked just
fine.
Yup, it all seems to work out.
[many files patched]
patching file mm/mmap.c
patching file net/bridge/br_sysfs_if.c
patching file scripts/ver_linux
Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, Greg KH wrote:
Nice, it looks like the merge of this tree, and my usb tree worked just
fine.
Yup, it all seems to work out.
[many files patched]
patching file mm/mmap.c
patching file net/bridge/br_sysfs_if.c
patching file scripts/ver_linux
On Tuesday 19 April 2005 04:38 pm, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, Steven Cole wrote:
But perhaps a progress bar right about here might be
a good thing for the terminally impatient.
real3m54.909s
user0m14.835s
sys 0m10.587s
4 minutes might be long
On Tuesday 19 April 2005 05:38 pm, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, Steven Cole wrote:
I wasn't complaining about the 4 minutes, just the lack of feedback
during the majority of that time. And most of it was after the last
patching file message.
That should be exactly
I got around to booting 2.6.12-rc2 here at home last night, and got several
(12) oops.
Here is a typical one. They all have the same trace, but occured on differing
processes.
[18008.409586] <1>Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address
c2166000
[24538.187178] printing eip:
I got around to booting 2.6.12-rc2 here at home last night, and got several
(12) oops.
Here is a typical one. They all have the same trace, but occured on differing
processes.
[18008.409586] 1Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address
c2166000
[24538.187178] printing eip:
Andrew Morton wrote:
Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
arch/i386/kernel/setup.c: In function 'setup_arch':
arch/i386/kernel/setup.c:1571: warning: implicit declaration of function
'acpi_boot_table_init'
arch/i386/kernel/setup.c:1572: warning: implicit declaration of function
'acpi_boo
Andrew Morton wrote:
Steven Cole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
arch/i386/kernel/setup.c: In function 'setup_arch':
arch/i386/kernel/setup.c:1571: warning: implicit declaration of function
'acpi_boot_table_init'
arch/i386/kernel/setup.c:1572: warning: implicit declaration of function
'acpi_boot_init
Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 12:32:52AM +1200, Reuben Farrelly wrote:
Hi again
At 12:14 a.m. 6/04/2005, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 08:34:11PM +1200, Reuben Farrelly wrote:
Hi,
Hi Reuben,
...
Hrm. Something changed between the last -mm release which compiled
through,
Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 12:32:52AM +1200, Reuben Farrelly wrote:
Hi again
At 12:14 a.m. 6/04/2005, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 08:34:11PM +1200, Reuben Farrelly wrote:
Hi,
Hi Reuben,
...
Hrm. Something changed between the last -mm release which compiled
through,
Gentlehackers,
The day to clarify the real definition of "-rc" is finally here.
Steven
--- linux-2.6.12-rc1-mm4/Documentation/feature-list-2.6.txt.orig
2005-04-01 07:56:23.0 -0700
+++ linux-2.6.12-rc1-mm4/Documentation/feature-list-2.6.txt 2005-04-01
07:59:21.0 -0700
Gentlehackers,
The day to clarify the real definition of -rc is finally here.
Steven
--- linux-2.6.12-rc1-mm4/Documentation/feature-list-2.6.txt.orig
2005-04-01 07:56:23.0 -0700
+++ linux-2.6.12-rc1-mm4/Documentation/feature-list-2.6.txt 2005-04-01
07:59:21.0 -0700
@@
)
Signed-off-by: Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- linux-2.6.12-rc1-mm3/scripts/ver_linux.orig 2005-03-29 08:52:35.0
-0700
+++ linux-2.6.12-rc1-mm3/scripts/ver_linux 2005-03-29 09:04:37.0
-0700
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@
expr --v 2>&1 | awk 'NR==1{print "Sh-utils
)
Signed-off-by: Steven Cole [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- linux-2.6.12-rc1-mm3/scripts/ver_linux.orig 2005-03-29 08:52:35.0
-0700
+++ linux-2.6.12-rc1-mm3/scripts/ver_linux 2005-03-29 09:04:37.0
-0700
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@
expr --v 21 | awk 'NR==1{print Sh-utils , $NF
Andrew Morton wrote:
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's the new rock-ridge bounds checking.
Try this, please?
OK, you caught me just as I was headed out the door. ;)
The patch fixed it for me. Wheee.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] steven]# uname -r
2.6.12-rc1-mm3-GX110
[EMAIL PROTECTED] steven]#
Andrew Morton wrote:
Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I found a few more minutes to test two more kernels. The problem
first occured with 2.6.12-rc1-mm2:
2.6.12-rc1 reads the cd-rom OK as reported earlier
2.6.12-rc1-mm1 also reads the cd-rom OK
2.6.12-rc1-mm2 broken same a
Andrew Morton wrote:
Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [ 49.198779] EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
> [ 56.310394] PCI: Found IRQ 5 for device :01:0c.0
> [ 222.804956] rock: directory entry would overflow storage
> [ 222.804978] rock:
Steven Cole wrote:
I'm having trouble reading from the cd-rom with 2.6.12-rc1-mm3.
Kernel 2.6.12-rc1 behaves normally:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] steven]# mount /dev/hdc /mnt/cdrom
mount: block device /dev/hdc is write-protected, mounting read-only
[EMAIL PROTECTED] steven]# df -T
FilesystemType
I'm having trouble reading from the cd-rom with 2.6.12-rc1-mm3.
Kernel 2.6.12-rc1 behaves normally:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] steven]# mount /dev/hdc /mnt/cdrom
mount: block device /dev/hdc is write-protected, mounting read-only
[EMAIL PROTECTED] steven]# df -T
FilesystemTypeSize Used Avail Use%
I'm having trouble reading from the cd-rom with 2.6.12-rc1-mm3.
Kernel 2.6.12-rc1 behaves normally:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] steven]# mount /dev/hdc /mnt/cdrom
mount: block device /dev/hdc is write-protected, mounting read-only
[EMAIL PROTECTED] steven]# df -T
FilesystemTypeSize Used Avail Use%
Steven Cole wrote:
I'm having trouble reading from the cd-rom with 2.6.12-rc1-mm3.
Kernel 2.6.12-rc1 behaves normally:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] steven]# mount /dev/hdc /mnt/cdrom
mount: block device /dev/hdc is write-protected, mounting read-only
[EMAIL PROTECTED] steven]# df -T
FilesystemType
Andrew Morton wrote:
Steven Cole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ 49.198779] EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
[ 56.310394] PCI: Found IRQ 5 for device :01:0c.0
[ 222.804956] rock: directory entry would overflow storage
[ 222.804978] rock: sig=0x5245, size=8, remaining=0
Andrew Morton wrote:
Steven Cole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I found a few more minutes to test two more kernels. The problem
first occured with 2.6.12-rc1-mm2:
2.6.12-rc1 reads the cd-rom OK as reported earlier
2.6.12-rc1-mm1 also reads the cd-rom OK
2.6.12-rc1-mm2 broken same as -mm3 described
Andrew Morton wrote:
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's the new rock-ridge bounds checking.
Try this, please?
OK, you caught me just as I was headed out the door. ;)
The patch fixed it for me. Wheee.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] steven]# uname -r
2.6.12-rc1-mm3-GX110
[EMAIL PROTECTED] steven]#
Steven Cole wrote:
I'm getting the following build error with 2.6.12-rc1-mm2:
CC init/version.o
LD init/built-in.o
LD .tmp_vmlinux1
drivers/built-in.o(.init.text+0x4323): In function `zft_init':
: undefined reference to `class_device_creat'
make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1
I
I'm getting the following build error with 2.6.12-rc1-mm2:
CC init/version.o
LD init/built-in.o
LD .tmp_vmlinux1
drivers/built-in.o(.init.text+0x4323): In function `zft_init':
: undefined reference to `class_device_creat'
make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1
2.6.12-rc1-mm1 built
I'm getting the following build error with 2.6.12-rc1-mm2:
CC init/version.o
LD init/built-in.o
LD .tmp_vmlinux1
drivers/built-in.o(.init.text+0x4323): In function `zft_init':
: undefined reference to `class_device_creat'
make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1
2.6.12-rc1-mm1 built
Steven Cole wrote:
I'm getting the following build error with 2.6.12-rc1-mm2:
CC init/version.o
LD init/built-in.o
LD .tmp_vmlinux1
drivers/built-in.o(.init.text+0x4323): In function `zft_init':
: undefined reference to `class_device_creat'
make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1
I
On Friday 11 March 2005 01:13 pm, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> >>Stephen Hemminger also wrote: (Someting's busted with serial in 2.6.11
> >>latest)
> >>
> >>>Some checkin since 2.6.11 has caused the serial driver to
> >>>drop characters. Console output is chopped and
On Friday 11 March 2005 01:13 pm, Bill Davidsen wrote:
Stephen Hemminger wrote:
Stephen Hemminger also wrote: (Someting's busted with serial in 2.6.11
latest)
Some checkin since 2.6.11 has caused the serial driver to
drop characters. Console output is chopped and messages are garbled.
On Thursday 10 March 2005 03:59 pm, Russell King wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 03:40:11PM -0700, Steven Cole wrote:
> > I'll test current bk tonight, but I don't see any recent fix to
> > drivers/serial/8250.c when browsing linux.bkbits.net/linux-2.6.
>
> Ok, so Stephen's
On Thursday 10 March 2005 03:59 pm, Russell King wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 03:40:11PM -0700, Steven Cole wrote:
> > I'll test current bk tonight, but I don't see any recent fix to
> > drivers/serial/8250.c when browsing linux.bkbits.net/linux-2.6.
>
> Ok, so Stephen's
Russell King wrote:
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 03:50:49PM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
Some checkin since 2.6.11 has caused the serial driver to
drop characters. Console output is chopped and messages are garbled.
Even the shell prompt gets truncated.
There was a problem with 2.6.11-bk1 which
Russell King wrote:
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 03:50:49PM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
Some checkin since 2.6.11 has caused the serial driver to
drop characters. Console output is chopped and messages are garbled.
Even the shell prompt gets truncated.
There was a problem with 2.6.11-bk1 which
On Thursday 10 March 2005 03:59 pm, Russell King wrote:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 03:40:11PM -0700, Steven Cole wrote:
I'll test current bk tonight, but I don't see any recent fix to
drivers/serial/8250.c when browsing linux.bkbits.net/linux-2.6.
Ok, so Stephen's bug is already fixed. After
On Thursday 10 March 2005 03:59 pm, Russell King wrote:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 03:40:11PM -0700, Steven Cole wrote:
I'll test current bk tonight, but I don't see any recent fix to
drivers/serial/8250.c when browsing linux.bkbits.net/linux-2.6.
Ok, so Stephen's bug is already fixed. After
Today at 04:57:37 pm, I wrote:
>Earlier today, I reported "PPPD fails on recent 2.6.11-bk". I've narrowed
>the problem down to between 2.6.11 and 2.6.11-bk1.
>
>I get this with 2.6.11-bk1: (two attempts)
>
>Mar 9 16:34:32 spc pppd[1142]: pppd 2.4.1 started by steven, uid 501
>Mar 9 16:34:32 spc
Earlier today, I reported "PPPD fails on recent 2.6.11-bk". I've narrowed
the problem down to between 2.6.11 and 2.6.11-bk1.
I get this with 2.6.11-bk1: (two attempts)
Mar 9 16:34:32 spc pppd[1142]: pppd 2.4.1 started by steven, uid 501
Mar 9 16:34:32 spc pppd[1142]: Using interface ppp0
Mar
Jon Smirl wrote:
On Wed, 09 Mar 2005 12:16:44 -0500, Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jon Smirl wrote:
Something in the last 24hrs in linus bk broke my ability to mount root:
Creating root device
Mounting root filesystem
mount: error 6 mounting ext3
mount: error 2 mounting none
Switching to
Last night, I did a bk pull from linux.bkbits.net/linux-2.6,
built and rebooted, and the pppd (version 2.4.2) failed to start
after the modem at the ISP end answered.
I usually keep the kernel fairly up-to-date with bk, and I'm
certain that 2.6.11-vanilla ran pppd just fine a few days earlier.
I
Last night, I did a bk pull from linux.bkbits.net/linux-2.6,
built and rebooted, and the pppd (version 2.4.2) failed to start
after the modem at the ISP end answered.
I usually keep the kernel fairly up-to-date with bk, and I'm
certain that 2.6.11-vanilla ran pppd just fine a few days earlier.
I
Jon Smirl wrote:
On Wed, 09 Mar 2005 12:16:44 -0500, Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jon Smirl wrote:
Something in the last 24hrs in linus bk broke my ability to mount root:
Creating root device
Mounting root filesystem
mount: error 6 mounting ext3
mount: error 2 mounting none
Switching to
Earlier today, I reported PPPD fails on recent 2.6.11-bk. I've narrowed
the problem down to between 2.6.11 and 2.6.11-bk1.
I get this with 2.6.11-bk1: (two attempts)
Mar 9 16:34:32 spc pppd[1142]: pppd 2.4.1 started by steven, uid 501
Mar 9 16:34:32 spc pppd[1142]: Using interface ppp0
Mar 9
Today at 04:57:37 pm, I wrote:
Earlier today, I reported PPPD fails on recent 2.6.11-bk. I've narrowed
the problem down to between 2.6.11 and 2.6.11-bk1.
I get this with 2.6.11-bk1: (two attempts)
Mar 9 16:34:32 spc pppd[1142]: pppd 2.4.1 started by steven, uid 501
Mar 9 16:34:32 spc
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Linus Torvalds wrote:
I've long since decided that there's no point to making "-pre". What's
the difference between a "-pre" and a daily -bk snapshot? Really?
Several non-BK developers use the first -rc1 as a merge point.
Others simply trust that _Linus_ has a lot more smarts
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Linus Torvalds wrote:
I've long since decided that there's no point to making -pre. What's
the difference between a -pre and a daily -bk snapshot? Really?
Several non-BK developers use the first -rc1 as a merge point.
Others simply trust that _Linus_ has a lot more smarts than
Matt Mackall wrote:
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 03:10:38PM -0700, Steven Cole wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am having trouble getting recent -mm kernels to boot on my test box.
For 2.6.11-rc3-mm2 and 2.6.11-rc4-mm1 I get the following:
VFS: Cannot ope
Matt Mackall wrote:
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 03:10:38PM -0700, Steven Cole wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am having trouble getting recent -mm kernels to boot on my test box.
For 2.6.11-rc3-mm2 and 2.6.11-rc4-mm1 I get the following:
VFS: Cannot ope
Matt Mackall wrote:
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 03:10:38PM -0700, Steven Cole wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
Steven Cole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am having trouble getting recent -mm kernels to boot on my test box.
For 2.6.11-rc3-mm2 and 2.6.11-rc4-mm1 I get the following:
VFS: Cannot open root device
Matt Mackall wrote:
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 03:10:38PM -0700, Steven Cole wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
Steven Cole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am having trouble getting recent -mm kernels to boot on my test box.
For 2.6.11-rc3-mm2 and 2.6.11-rc4-mm1 I get the following:
VFS: Cannot open root device
Steven Cole wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am having trouble getting recent -mm kernels to boot on my test box.
For 2.6.11-rc3-mm2 and 2.6.11-rc4-mm1 I get the following:
VFS: Cannot open root device "301" or unknown-block(3,1)
Please append
Andrew Morton wrote:
Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am having trouble getting recent -mm kernels to boot on my test box.
For 2.6.11-rc3-mm2 and 2.6.11-rc4-mm1 I get the following:
VFS: Cannot open root device "301" or unknown-block(3,1)
Please append a correct "root
Andrew Morton wrote:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.11-rc4/2.6.11-rc4-mm1/
- Various fixes and updates all over the place. Things seem to have slowed
down a bit.
I am having trouble getting recent -mm kernels to boot on my test box.
For 2.6.11-rc3-mm2 and
Andrew Morton wrote:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.11-rc4/2.6.11-rc4-mm1/
- Various fixes and updates all over the place. Things seem to have slowed
down a bit.
I am having trouble getting recent -mm kernels to boot on my test box.
For 2.6.11-rc3-mm2 and
Andrew Morton wrote:
Steven Cole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am having trouble getting recent -mm kernels to boot on my test box.
For 2.6.11-rc3-mm2 and 2.6.11-rc4-mm1 I get the following:
VFS: Cannot open root device 301 or unknown-block(3,1)
Please append a correct root= boot option
Kernel panic
Steven Cole wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
Steven Cole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am having trouble getting recent -mm kernels to boot on my test box.
For 2.6.11-rc3-mm2 and 2.6.11-rc4-mm1 I get the following:
VFS: Cannot open root device 301 or unknown-block(3,1)
Please append a correct root= boot
On Friday 06 July 2001 16:35, Tom Diehl wrote:
> Hi all,
> This is my first bug report so please go easy on me if I screw it up.
> The kernel 2.4.6-ac1
> The build machine AMD k6-2-350 with 128Megs of memory
> I get the following errors when I try to build ac1. It builds ok when
> just building
On Friday 06 July 2001 16:35, Tom Diehl wrote:
Hi all,
This is my first bug report so please go easy on me if I screw it up.
The kernel 2.4.6-ac1
The build machine AMD k6-2-350 with 128Megs of memory
I get the following errors when I try to build ac1. It builds ok when
just building 2.4.6
I got this error building 2.4.6-ac1.
drivers/parport/driver.o: In function `parport_pc_find_ports':
drivers/parport/driver.o(.text.init+0x3f2): undefined reference to `init_pnp040x'
drivers/parport/driver.o(.text.init+0x400): undefined reference to
`pnpbios_find_device'
I got this error building 2.4.6-ac1.
drivers/parport/driver.o: In function `parport_pc_find_ports':
drivers/parport/driver.o(.text.init+0x3f2): undefined reference to `init_pnp040x'
drivers/parport/driver.o(.text.init+0x400): undefined reference to
`pnpbios_find_device'
On Thursday 28 June 2001 20:18, Keith Owens wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Jun 2001 10:05:58 -0600,
>
> Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >[root@spc linux]# make xconfig
> >./tkparse < ../arch/i386/config.in >> kconfig.tk
> >make[1]: *** [kconfig.tk] Error 1
On Thursday 28 June 2001 20:18, Keith Owens wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001 10:05:58 -0600,
Steven Cole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[root@spc linux]# make xconfig
./tkparse ../arch/i386/config.in kconfig.tk
make[1]: *** [kconfig.tk] Error 139
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.5-ac20
Hello all,
In addition to the 14 new CONFIG symbols without help texts which
2.4.6-pre6 introduced, 2.4.5-ac20 has 5 more, for a total of 19 in -ac20.
Here are the five new symbols in 2.4.5-ac20 which don't have
Configure.help texts and likely should have. If you're the owner
of these, please
I got this familiar error with make xconfig and 2.4.5-ac20 (same as 2.4.6-pre6)
drivers/net/Config.in: 149: can't handle dep_bool/dep_mbool/dep_tristate condition
make[1]: *** [kconfig.tk] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.5-ac20/scripts'
make: *** [xconfig] Error 2
I
On Thursday 28 June 2001 09:33, Alan Cox wrote:
> > With CONFIG_SOUND_FUSION=m, I get the following error for 2.4.6-pre6
> > during make modules:
> >
> > I've got a number of older 2.4.[3,4,5] kernels, so I'll go back and try
> > to figure out when the change occured, but this is the first time
With CONFIG_SOUND_FUSION=m, I get the following error for 2.4.6-pre6 during
make modules:
cs46xx.c:386: conflicting types for `cs46xx_suspend_tbl'
cs46xxpm-24.h:39: previous declaration of `cs46xx_suspend_tbl'
cs46xx.c:387: conflicting types for `cs46xx_resume_tbl'
cs46xxpm-24.h:40: previous
Hello all,
2.4.6-pre6 introduces 14 new undocumented symbols.
Would the owners please provide help texts for the following:
CONFIG_CPU_SUBTYPE_SH7751
CONFIG_CPU_SUBTYPE_ST40STB1
CONFIG_HD64465_IOBASE
CONFIG_MAPLE_KEYBOARD
CONFIG_MAPLE_MOUSE
CONFIG_SH_7751_SOLUTION_ENGINE
CONFIG_SH_BIGSUR
With CONFIG_SOUND_FUSION=m, I get the following error for 2.4.6-pre6 during
make modules:
cs46xx.c:386: conflicting types for `cs46xx_suspend_tbl'
cs46xxpm-24.h:39: previous declaration of `cs46xx_suspend_tbl'
cs46xx.c:387: conflicting types for `cs46xx_resume_tbl'
cs46xxpm-24.h:40: previous
Hello all,
In addition to the 14 new CONFIG symbols without help texts which
2.4.6-pre6 introduced, 2.4.5-ac20 has 5 more, for a total of 19 in -ac20.
Here are the five new symbols in 2.4.5-ac20 which don't have
Configure.help texts and likely should have. If you're the owner
of these, please
On Thursday 28 June 2001 09:33, Alan Cox wrote:
With CONFIG_SOUND_FUSION=m, I get the following error for 2.4.6-pre6
during make modules:
I've got a number of older 2.4.[3,4,5] kernels, so I'll go back and try
to figure out when the change occured, but this is the first time I've
seen
I got this familiar error with make xconfig and 2.4.5-ac20 (same as 2.4.6-pre6)
drivers/net/Config.in: 149: can't handle dep_bool/dep_mbool/dep_tristate condition
make[1]: *** [kconfig.tk] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.5-ac20/scripts'
make: *** [xconfig] Error 2
I
I got this error for 2.4.6-pre6 for make xconfig
drivers/net/Config.in: 145: can't handle dep_bool/dep_mbool/dep_tristate condition
make[1]: *** [kconfig.tk] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.6-pre6/scripts'
make: *** [xconfig] Error 2
This may be the proper fix.
Steven
I got this error for 2.4.6-pre6 for make xconfig
drivers/net/Config.in: 145: can't handle dep_bool/dep_mbool/dep_tristate condition
make[1]: *** [kconfig.tk] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.6-pre6/scripts'
make: *** [xconfig] Error 2
This may be the proper fix.
Steven
I got the following error from make xconfig:
drivers/net/wireless/Config.in: 5: can't handle dep_bool/dep_mbool/dep_tristate
condition
make[1]: *** [kconfig.tk] Error 1
Here is a little micro patch to change the dep_tristate into a plain vanilla tristate.
Steven
---
I got the following error from make xconfig:
drivers/net/wireless/Config.in: 5: can't handle dep_bool/dep_mbool/dep_tristate
condition
make[1]: *** [kconfig.tk] Error 1
Here is a little micro patch to change the dep_tristate into a plain vanilla tristate.
Steven
---
On Monday 21 May 2001 10:01, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 09:58:04AM -0600, Steven Cole wrote:
> > On Monday 21 May 2001 09:36, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > Which brings up another point, RedHat (7.1?) and Debian/woody both have
> > > the option of having python2
On Monday 21 May 2001 10:01, Tom Rini wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 09:58:04AM -0600, Steven Cole wrote:
On Monday 21 May 2001 09:36, Tom Rini wrote:
Which brings up another point, RedHat (7.1?) and Debian/woody both have
the option of having python2 around. Anyone know about mandrake
On Friday 18 May 2001 09:19, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> Replacing the code does not require changing the style of the config
> files. Thats a major problem with CML2, you introduce a new 'let me do
> everything for you' tool that relies on a programming language that is
> not being shipped by any
On Friday 18 May 2001 09:19, Jes Sorensen wrote:
Replacing the code does not require changing the style of the config
files. Thats a major problem with CML2, you introduce a new 'let me do
everything for you' tool that relies on a programming language that is
not being shipped by any major
With CONFIG_USB=y, I got the following error building 2.4.4-ac4:
drivers/usb/usbdrv.o: In function `uhci_alloc_td':
drivers/usb/usbdrv.o(.text+0x57b7): undefined reference to `pci_pool_alloc'
drivers/usb/usbdrv.o: In function `uhci_free_td':
drivers/usb/usbdrv.o(.text+0x5a41): undefined
With CONFIG_USB=y, I got the following error building 2.4.4-ac4:
drivers/usb/usbdrv.o: In function `uhci_alloc_td':
drivers/usb/usbdrv.o(.text+0x57b7): undefined reference to `pci_pool_alloc'
drivers/usb/usbdrv.o: In function `uhci_free_td':
drivers/usb/usbdrv.o(.text+0x5a41): undefined
As of kernel 2.4.3-ac11, there are 464 config options which have no help text in
Configure.help.
Here is the list of these items which have been introduced after 2.4.3-ac1.
Each group is incremental, versus 2.4.3-ac[n-1].
If you see one of your options here, please consider generating a patch
As of kernel 2.4.3-ac11, there are 464 config options which have no help text in
Configure.help.
Here is the list of these items which have been introduced after 2.4.3-ac1.
Each group is incremental, versus 2.4.3-ac[n-1].
If you see one of your options here, please consider generating a patch
Axel Boldt wrote:
>Eric has worked on Configure.help for some time now and I haven't,
>so he will take over official maintenance of that file.
I've also been fixing up Configure.help for a while now, and helped Eric
recently with his huge update patch for Configure.help.
I'd like to be listed
Axel Boldt wrote:
Eric has worked on Configure.help for some time now and I haven't,
so he will take over official maintenance of that file.
I've also been fixing up Configure.help for a while now, and helped Eric
recently with his huge update patch for Configure.help.
I'd like to be listed as
I got the following with CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL not set:
kernel/kernel.o(__ksymtab+0xc80): undefined reference to `handle_sysrq'
kernel/kernel.o(__ksymtab+0xc88): undefined reference to `__handle_sysrq_nolock'
kernel/kernel.o(__ksymtab+0xc90): undefined reference to `__sysrq_lock_table'
On Tuesday 17 April 2001 12:13, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> The latest version is always available at http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/cml2/
>
> Release 1.1.4: Tue Apr 17 14:02:17 EDT 2001
> * Tom Rini's patches for the ARM port tree.
> * Correct handling of booleans when trits are disabled.
>
I got the following with CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL not set:
kernel/kernel.o(__ksymtab+0xc80): undefined reference to `handle_sysrq'
kernel/kernel.o(__ksymtab+0xc88): undefined reference to `__handle_sysrq_nolock'
kernel/kernel.o(__ksymtab+0xc90): undefined reference to `__sysrq_lock_table'
On Tuesday 17 April 2001 12:13, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
The latest version is always available at http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/cml2/
Release 1.1.4: Tue Apr 17 14:02:17 EDT 2001
* Tom Rini's patches for the ARM port tree.
* Correct handling of booleans when trits are disabled.
On Monday 16 April 2001 16:06, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Whoops, I just tried out 1.1.3 using make xconfig, and now all the
> > option labels are dark green, not just the ones set to y.
>
> That's because they're set in your .con
On Monday 16 April 2001 15:42, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> CML2 NEWS
>
> The latest version is always available at http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/cml2/
>
> Release 1.1.3:
> * Freeze color changed from cyan to blue.
> * Tom Rini's network-configuration patches.
> * Better detection of
On Monday 16 April 2001 15:42, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
CML2 NEWS
The latest version is always available at http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/cml2/
Release 1.1.3:
* Freeze color changed from cyan to blue.
* Tom Rini's network-configuration patches.
* Better detection of set
On Monday 16 April 2001 16:06, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
Steven Cole [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Whoops, I just tried out 1.1.3 using make xconfig, and now all the
option labels are dark green, not just the ones set to y.
That's because they're set in your .config, dude!
Well, lets look at a snippet
On Sunday 15 April 2001 12:33, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> The latest version is always available at http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/cml2/
>
> Release 1.1.2: Sun Apr 15 14:26:07 EDT 2001
> * Synchronized with 2.4.4-pre3.
> * Screen flicker in menuconfig is gone.
> * KEY_HOME and KEY_END
1 - 100 of 255 matches
Mail list logo
