rsdl 0.32 backport to 2.6.18.8 available & pre-built DebianEtch and Fedora 6 kernels

Hi all, A backported version of the RSDL 0.32 patch is now available at http://linux-dev.qc.ec.gc.ca for a 2.6.18.8 kernel. There are also a few 2.6.18/2.6.20 pre-built kernels available for both Debian Etch (x86_64) and Fedora 6 (x86_64). - vin - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

rsdl 0.32 backport to 2.6.18.8 available pre-built DebianEtch and Fedora 6 kernels

Hi all, A backported version of the RSDL 0.32 patch is now available at http://linux-dev.qc.ec.gc.ca for a 2.6.18.8 kernel. There are also a few 2.6.18/2.6.20 pre-built kernels available for both Debian Etch (x86_64) and Fedora 6 (x86_64). - vin - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Fwd: Backport RSDL v0.31: Updated RSDL 0.31 backport for 2.6.18.8 & Debian etch x86_64 RSDL 0.31 kernels availability

Hi all, Here is are the backported RSDL scheduler for a 2.6.18.8 kernel and now also for 2.6.19.7 kernel. This release includes the original backported 2.6.20.x RSDL 0.31 patch and also has few cleanups to remove unecessary debian make-kpkg files. This update also includes a small patch to

Fwd: Backport RSDL v0.31: Updated RSDL 0.31 backport for 2.6.18.8 Debian etch x86_64 RSDL 0.31 kernels availability

Hi all, Here is are the backported RSDL scheduler for a 2.6.18.8 kernel and now also for 2.6.19.7 kernel. This release includes the original backported 2.6.20.x RSDL 0.31 patch and also has few cleanups to remove unecessary debian make-kpkg files. This update also includes a small patch to

RSDL v0.29 backport to 2.6.18.8

Hello, again, I just saw that my 0.28 patch file was wrongly named 0.26 and that there is a new version 0.29 of RSDL that just came out... so here is the backported RSDL 0.29 to a 2.6.18.8 kernel. This does compile but I did not got the time to fully test it yet. > > Here is an update for

RSDL v0.28 for 2.6.20 -> backport to 2.6.18.8

Hi all, > > Here is an update for RSDL to version 0.28 > > Full patch: > http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/staircase-deadline/2.6.20-sched- > rsdl-0.28.patch > > Series: > http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/staircase-deadline/2.6.20/ > > The patch to get you from 0.26 to 0.28: >

RSDL v0.28 for 2.6.20 - backport to 2.6.18.8

Hi all, Here is an update for RSDL to version 0.28 Full patch: http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/staircase-deadline/2.6.20-sched- rsdl-0.28.patch Series: http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/staircase-deadline/2.6.20/ The patch to get you from 0.26 to 0.28:

RSDL v0.29 backport to 2.6.18.8

Hello, again, I just saw that my 0.28 patch file was wrongly named 0.26 and that there is a new version 0.29 of RSDL that just came out... so here is the backported RSDL 0.29 to a 2.6.18.8 kernel. This does compile but I did not got the time to fully test it yet. Here is an update for RSDL

Re: Sound 2.6.19: Soundcard driver often fail to load?

Le vendredi 23 février 2007, vous avez écrit : > At Wed, 21 Feb 2007 05:50:48 -0500, > Veronique & Vincent wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I'm currently running a 2.6.19 kernel and 2 times out of 3 the sound driver > > fails to load hence probi

Re: Sound 2.6.19: Soundcard driver often fail to load?

Le vendredi 23 février 2007, vous avez écrit : At Wed, 21 Feb 2007 05:50:48 -0500, Veronique Vincent wrote: Hi, I'm currently running a 2.6.19 kernel and 2 times out of 3 the sound driver fails to load hence probing me a no sound device available in KDE. Could the snd-usb

Re: Boot time Bluetooth BUG: warning: (value > m) at hid-core.c:793

> > > > I've set up the hid-core.c to DEBUG mode... and it literally got pretty verbose... > > > thanks for the output. Is this really the full output? The important part > > - report descriptor dump - seems to be missing in the output (it should > > read something like "hid-core.c: report

Re: Boot time Bluetooth BUG: warning: (value m) at hid-core.c:793

I've set up the hid-core.c to DEBUG mode... and it literally got pretty verbose... thanks for the output. Is this really the full output? The important part - report descriptor dump - seems to be missing in the output (it should read something like hid-core.c: report descriptor

Fwd: RE: Boot time Bluetooth BUG: warning: (value > m) at hid-core.c:793

Hi again Marcel and Jiri, I've set up the hid-core.c to DEBUG mode... and it literally got pretty verbose... At line 2114 we finally get the BUG message (I've attached the full dmesg also...) : 2104 drivers/usb/input/hid-core.c: report (size 8) (unnumbered) 2105 drivers/usb/input/hid-core.c:

Fwd: RE: Boot time Bluetooth BUG: warning: (value m) at hid-core.c:793

Hi again Marcel and Jiri, I've set up the hid-core.c to DEBUG mode... and it literally got pretty verbose... At line 2114 we finally get the BUG message (I've attached the full dmesg also...) : 2104 drivers/usb/input/hid-core.c: report (size 8) (unnumbered) 2105 drivers/usb/input/hid-core.c: