Fixes warnings regarding redundant parantheses thrown by the checkpatch tool in
bpctl_mod.c
Signed-off-by: Will Tange
---
drivers/staging/silicom/bpctl_mod.c | 122 ++--
1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/silicom
Fixes warnings regarding redundant parantheses thrown by the checkpatch tool in
bpctl_mod.c
Signed-off-by: Will Tange bh3...@gmail.com
---
drivers/staging/silicom/bpctl_mod.c | 122 ++--
1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers
One of my disks had a slight hiccup. This caused mpt2sas to remove the
handle to the disk. In my kernel log I get:
mpt2sas1: removing handle(0x0021), sas_addr(0x500304800182694c)
By reseating the disk physically I can get mpt2sas to pick up the disk
again, but can I somehow through software ask
One of my disks had a slight hiccup. This caused mpt2sas to remove the
handle to the disk. In my kernel log I get:
mpt2sas1: removing handle(0x0021), sas_addr(0x500304800182694c)
By reseating the disk physically I can get mpt2sas to pick up the disk
again, but can I somehow through software ask
[1.] One line summary of the problem:
RTL8029 based card stops receiving data after being flood pinged
[2.] Full description of the problem/report:
I tried flood pinging a host with a RTL8029. After approximately
20 packets the host stops responding to the network. The
[1.] One line summary of the problem:
RTL8029 based card stops receiving data after being flood pinged
[2.] Full description of the problem/report:
I tried flood pinging a host with a RTL8029. After approximately
20 packets the host stops responding to the network. The
On Sat, 10 Feb 2001, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > [1.] One line summary of the problem:
> > Running badblocks on a ramdisk larger than 778000 KB halts
> > system
>
> Is it really bug?
That is simply a matter of definition. If the system does as you expect,
then you will probably not regard it
On Sat, 10 Feb 2001, Pavel Machek wrote:
[1.] One line summary of the problem:
Running badblocks on a ramdisk larger than 778000 KB halts
system
Is it really bug?
That is simply a matter of definition. If the system does as you expect,
then you will probably not regard it as a
[1.] One line summary of the problem:
Running badblocks on a ramdisk larger than 778000 KB halts system
[2.] Full description of the problem/report:
I have setup a ramdisk of 1 GB. When I run badblocks on the
RAMdisk, it halts the total system when reaching app. 778000 KB
I
[1.] One line summary of the problem:
Running badblocks on a ramdisk larger than 778000 KB halts system
[2.] Full description of the problem/report:
I have setup a ramdisk of 1 GB. When I run badblocks on the
RAMdisk, it halts the total system when reaching app. 778000 KB
I
10 matches
Mail list logo