RE: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] x86/boot/KASLR: Restrict kernel to be randomized in mirror regions if existed

2017-06-15 Thread Izumi, Taku
But, if mirrored regions are existed, bootmem allocator tries to allocate from mirrored region independently of "kerenelcore=mirror" option. So, IMHO, kernel text is important, so putting it to mirrored (more reliable) region is reasonable whether or not "kernelcore=

RE: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] x86/boot/KASLR: Restrict kernel to be randomized in mirror regions if existed

2017-06-15 Thread Izumi, Taku
But, if mirrored regions are existed, bootmem allocator tries to allocate from mirrored region independently of "kerenelcore=mirror" option. So, IMHO, kernel text is important, so putting it to mirrored (more reliable) region is reasonable whether or not "kernelcore=

RE: [bug discuss] fjes driver call trace warning, "PNP0C02" used in fjes seems like a bug,

2016-06-09 Thread Izumi, Taku
e motherboard resources through system.c > driver. > > @David Miller, what is your opinion about this? > I think this driver should be reverted... I'm willing to revise my driver if it's something wrong. I can't reproduce this problem. Could you please show me how to reproduce problem ? Sincerely, Taku Izumi

RE: [bug discuss] fjes driver call trace warning, "PNP0C02" used in fjes seems like a bug,

2016-06-09 Thread Izumi, Taku
e motherboard resources through system.c > driver. > > @David Miller, what is your opinion about this? > I think this driver should be reverted... I'm willing to revise my driver if it's something wrong. I can't reproduce this problem. Could you please show me how to reproduce problem ? Sincerely, Taku Izumi

RE: [PATCH] net: fjes: fjes_main: Remove create_workqueue

2016-06-02 Thread Izumi, Taku
Dear Bhaktipriya, Thanks. Looks good to me. Sincerely, Taku Izumi > -Original Message- > From: Bhaktipriya Shridhar [mailto:bhaktipriy...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2016 6:31 PM > To: David S. Miller; Izumi, Taku/泉 拓; Florian Westphal; Bhaktipriya Shridhar >

RE: [PATCH] net: fjes: fjes_main: Remove create_workqueue

2016-06-02 Thread Izumi, Taku
Dear Bhaktipriya, Thanks. Looks good to me. Sincerely, Taku Izumi > -Original Message- > From: Bhaktipriya Shridhar [mailto:bhaktipriy...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2016 6:31 PM > To: David S. Miller; Izumi, Taku/泉 拓; Florian Westphal; Bhaktipriya Shridhar >

RE: [PATCH v3 2/2] mm: Introduce kernelcore=mirror option

2015-12-16 Thread Izumi, Taku
Dear Xishi, Sorry for late. > -Original Message- > From: Xishi Qiu [mailto:qiuxi...@huawei.com] > Sent: Friday, December 11, 2015 6:44 PM > To: Izumi, Taku/泉 拓 > Cc: Luck, Tony; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux...@kvack.org; > a...@linux-foundation.org; Kamezawa,

RE: [PATCH v3 2/2] mm: Introduce kernelcore=mirror option

2015-12-16 Thread Izumi, Taku
Dear Xishi, Sorry for late. > -Original Message- > From: Xishi Qiu [mailto:qiuxi...@huawei.com] > Sent: Friday, December 11, 2015 6:44 PM > To: Izumi, Taku/泉 拓 > Cc: Luck, Tony; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux...@kvack.org; > a...@linux-foundation.org; Kamezawa,

RE: [PATCH v3 2/2] mm: Introduce kernelcore=mirror option

2015-12-10 Thread Izumi, Taku
ust provides a new way to create ZONE_MOVABLE. Sincerely, Taku Izumi > > It seems something like that we add a new zone but the name is zone_movable, > not zone_mirror. And the prerequisite is that we won't enable these two > features(movable memory and mirrored memory) at the same

RE: [PATCH v3 2/2] mm: Introduce kernelcore=mirror option

2015-12-10 Thread Izumi, Taku
ust provides a new way to create ZONE_MOVABLE. Sincerely, Taku Izumi > > It seems something like that we add a new zone but the name is zone_movable, > not zone_mirror. And the prerequisite is that we won't enable these two > features(movable memory and mirrored memory) at the same

RE: [PATCH v3 2/2] mm: Introduce kernelcore=mirror option

2015-12-09 Thread Izumi, Taku
cated from ZONE_MOVABLE. In this case administrator must review and reconfigure the mirror ratio via "MirrorRequest" EFI variable. Sincerely, Taku Izumi > > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > > the body of

RE: [PATCH v3 2/2] mm: Introduce kernelcore=mirror option

2015-12-09 Thread Izumi, Taku
cated from ZONE_MOVABLE. In this case administrator must review and reconfigure the mirror ratio via "MirrorRequest" EFI variable. Sincerely, Taku Izumi > > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > > the body of

RE: [PATCH v2 2/2] mm: Introduce kernelcore=reliable option

2015-12-08 Thread Izumi, Taku
Dear Xishi, Thanks for reviewing. > -Original Message- > From: Xishi Qiu [mailto:qiuxi...@huawei.com] > Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2015 11:26 AM > To: Izumi, Taku/泉 拓 > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux...@kvack.org; tony.l...@intel.com; > Kamezawa,

[PATCH v3 2/2] mm: Introduce kernelcore=mirror option

2015-12-08 Thread Taku Izumi
|ooxx| ZONE_MOVABLE (legend) o: present x: absent v2 -> v3: - change the option name from kernelcore=reliable into kernelcore=mirror - documentation fix so that users can understand nn[KMS] and mirror are exclusive Signed-off-by: Taku Izumi --- Documentation/kernel-par

[PATCH v3 1/2] mm: Calculate zone_start_pfn at zone_spanned_pages_in_node()

2015-12-08 Thread Taku Izumi
Currently each zone's zone_start_pfn is calculated at free_area_init_core(). However zone's range is fixed at the time when invoking zone_spanned_pages_in_node(). This patch changes each zone->zone_start_pfn is calculated at zone_spanned_pages_in_node(). Signed-off-by: Taku Izumi ---

[PATCH v3 0/2] mm: Introduce kernelcore=mirror option

2015-12-08 Thread Taku Izumi
ages, and vice versa. v1 -> v2: Refine so that the above example case also can be handled properly: v2 -> v3: Change the option name from kernelcore=reliable into kernelcore=mirror and some documentation fix according to Andrew Morton's point Taku Izumi (2): mm

RE: [PATCH v2 0/2] mm: Introduce kernelcore=reliable option

2015-12-08 Thread Izumi, Taku
mirror. > Okay, I'll change the option name into kernelcore=mirror. Sincerely, Taku Izumi

RE: [PATCH v2 0/2] mm: Introduce kernelcore=reliable option

2015-12-08 Thread Izumi, Taku
); } Which do you think is beter ? - change into kernelcore="mirrored" - keep kernelcore="reliable" and minmal printk fix > > Secondly, does this patchset mean that kernelcore=reliable and > kernelcore=100M are exclusive? Or can the user specify > &qu

RE: [PATCH v2 0/2] mm: Introduce kernelcore=reliable option

2015-12-08 Thread Izumi, Taku
); } Which do you think is beter ? - change into kernelcore="mirrored" - keep kernelcore="reliable" and minmal printk fix > > Secondly, does this patchset mean that kernelcore=reliable and > kernelcore=100M are exclusive? Or can the user specify > &qu

RE: [PATCH v2 0/2] mm: Introduce kernelcore=reliable option

2015-12-08 Thread Izumi, Taku
mirror. > Okay, I'll change the option name into kernelcore=mirror. Sincerely, Taku Izumi

RE: [PATCH v2 2/2] mm: Introduce kernelcore=reliable option

2015-12-08 Thread Izumi, Taku
Dear Xishi, Thanks for reviewing. > -Original Message- > From: Xishi Qiu [mailto:qiuxi...@huawei.com] > Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2015 11:26 AM > To: Izumi, Taku/泉 拓 > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux...@kvack.org; tony.l...@intel.com; > Kamezawa,

[PATCH v3 2/2] mm: Introduce kernelcore=mirror option

2015-12-08 Thread Taku Izumi
|ooxx| ZONE_MOVABLE (legend) o: present x: absent v2 -> v3: - change the option name from kernelcore=reliable into kernelcore=mirror - documentation fix so that users can understand nn[KMS] and mirror are exclusive Signed-off-by: Taku Izumi <izumi.t...@jp.fujitsu.c

[PATCH v3 0/2] mm: Introduce kernelcore=mirror option

2015-12-08 Thread Taku Izumi
ages, and vice versa. v1 -> v2: Refine so that the above example case also can be handled properly: v2 -> v3: Change the option name from kernelcore=reliable into kernelcore=mirror and some documentation fix according to Andrew Morton's point Taku Izumi (2): mm

[PATCH v3 1/2] mm: Calculate zone_start_pfn at zone_spanned_pages_in_node()

2015-12-08 Thread Taku Izumi
Currently each zone's zone_start_pfn is calculated at free_area_init_core(). However zone's range is fixed at the time when invoking zone_spanned_pages_in_node(). This patch changes each zone->zone_start_pfn is calculated at zone_spanned_pages_in_node(). Signed-off-by: Taku Izumi <i

[PATCH v2 0/2] mm: Introduce kernelcore=reliable option

2015-11-26 Thread Taku Izumi
the above example case also can be handled properly: Taku Izumi (2): mm: Calculate zone_start_pfn at zone_spanned_pages_in_node() mm: Introduce kernelcore=reliable option Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt | 9 ++- mm/page_alloc.c | 140 ++

[PATCH v2 1/2] mm: Calculate zone_start_pfn at zone_spanned_pages_in_node()

2015-11-26 Thread Taku Izumi
Currently each zone's zone_start_pfn is calculated at free_area_init_core(). However zone's range is fixed at the time when invoking zone_spanned_pages_in_node(). This patch changes each zone->zone_start_pfn is calculated at zone_spanned_pages_in_node(). Signed-off-by: Taku Izumi ---

[PATCH v2 2/2] mm: Introduce kernelcore=reliable option

2015-11-26 Thread Taku Izumi
x| ZONE_MOVABLE (legend) o: present x: absent Signed-off-by: Taku Izumi --- Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt | 9 ++- mm/page_alloc.c | 110 ++-- 2 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/k

[PATCH v2 0/2] mm: Introduce kernelcore=reliable option

2015-11-26 Thread Taku Izumi
the above example case also can be handled properly: Taku Izumi (2): mm: Calculate zone_start_pfn at zone_spanned_pages_in_node() mm: Introduce kernelcore=reliable option Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt | 9 ++- mm/page_alloc.c | 140 ++

[PATCH v2 1/2] mm: Calculate zone_start_pfn at zone_spanned_pages_in_node()

2015-11-26 Thread Taku Izumi
Currently each zone's zone_start_pfn is calculated at free_area_init_core(). However zone's range is fixed at the time when invoking zone_spanned_pages_in_node(). This patch changes each zone->zone_start_pfn is calculated at zone_spanned_pages_in_node(). Signed-off-by: Taku Izumi <i

[PATCH v2 2/2] mm: Introduce kernelcore=reliable option

2015-11-26 Thread Taku Izumi
x| ZONE_MOVABLE (legend) o: present x: absent Signed-off-by: Taku Izumi <izumi.t...@jp.fujitsu.com> --- Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt | 9 ++- mm/page_alloc.c | 110 ++-- 2 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-

RE: [PATCH] fjes: fix inconsistent indenting

2015-11-11 Thread Izumi, Taku
Thanks, Colin. Signed-off-by: Taku Izumi > -Original Message- > From: Colin King [mailto:colin.k...@canonical.com] > Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2015 12:23 AM > To: David S. Miller; Izumi, Taku/泉 拓; Markus Elfring; net...@vger.kernel.org > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kerne

RE: [PATCH] fjes: fix inconsistent indenting

2015-11-11 Thread Izumi, Taku
Thanks, Colin. Signed-off-by: Taku Izumi <izumi.t...@jp.fujitsu.com> > -Original Message- > From: Colin King [mailto:colin.k...@canonical.com] > Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2015 12:23 AM > To: David S. Miller; Izumi, Taku/泉 拓; Markus Elfring; net...@vger.kernel.org

[tip:core/efi] efi: Fix warning of int-to-pointer-cast on x86 32-bit builds

2015-10-28 Thread tip-bot for Taku Izumi
Commit-ID: 78b9bc947b18ed16b6c2c573d774e6d54ad9452d Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/78b9bc947b18ed16b6c2c573d774e6d54ad9452d Author: Taku Izumi AuthorDate: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 11:48:17 +0200 Committer: Ingo Molnar CommitDate: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 12:28:06 +0100 efi: Fix warning of int

[tip:core/efi] efi: Fix warning of int-to-pointer-cast on x86 32-bit builds

2015-10-28 Thread tip-bot for Taku Izumi
Commit-ID: 78b9bc947b18ed16b6c2c573d774e6d54ad9452d Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/78b9bc947b18ed16b6c2c573d774e6d54ad9452d Author: Taku Izumi <izumi.t...@jp.fujitsu.com> AuthorDate: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 11:48:17 +0200 Committer: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org> CommitDate: Wed,

RE: [PATCH] mm: Introduce kernelcore=reliable option

2015-10-22 Thread Izumi, Taku
Dear Tony, > -Original Message- > From: Luck, Tony [mailto:tony.l...@intel.com] > Sent: Friday, October 23, 2015 8:27 AM > To: Kamezawa, Hiroyuki/亀澤 寛之; Izumi, Taku/泉 拓; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; > linux...@kvack.org > Cc: qiuxi...@huawei.com; m...@csn

[PATCH v2] efi: Fix warning of int-to-pointer-cast on x86 32-bit builds

2015-10-22 Thread Taku Izumi
32-bit environment. This patch changes the type of "new_memmap_phy" variable from "u64" into "ulong" to avoid it. v1 -> v2: - change the type of "new_memmap_phy" from phys_addr_t into ulong according to Ard's comment Reported-by: Ingo Molnar Signe

RE: [PATCH] efi: Fix warning of int-to-pointer-cast on x86 32-bit builds

2015-10-22 Thread Izumi, Taku
of(void*) == sizeof(phys_addr_t), which is not always true, > e.g., on 32-bit ARM (whose UEFI support is > in development but not yet merged) with LPAE enabled. > > Could we use unsigned long instead? Okay. I'll update my patch. Sincerely, Taku Izumi -- To unsubscribe from this list:

[PATCH] efi: Fix warning of int-to-pointer-cast on x86 32-bit builds

2015-10-22 Thread Taku Izumi
32-bit environment. This patch changes the type of "new_memmap_phy" variable from "u64" into "phys_addr_t" to avoid it. Reported-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Taku Izumi --- drivers/firmware/efi/fake_mem.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) dif

[PATCH] efi: Fix warning of int-to-pointer-cast on x86 32-bit builds

2015-10-22 Thread Taku Izumi
32-bit environment. This patch changes the type of "new_memmap_phy" variable from "u64" into "phys_addr_t" to avoid it. Reported-by: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Taku Izumi <izumi.t...@jp.fujitsu.com> --- drivers/firmware/efi/fake_mem.c

RE: [PATCH] efi: Fix warning of int-to-pointer-cast on x86 32-bit builds

2015-10-22 Thread Izumi, Taku
of(void*) == sizeof(phys_addr_t), which is not always true, > e.g., on 32-bit ARM (whose UEFI support is > in development but not yet merged) with LPAE enabled. > > Could we use unsigned long instead? Okay. I'll update my patch. Sincerely, Taku Izumi -- To unsubscribe from this list:

[PATCH v2] efi: Fix warning of int-to-pointer-cast on x86 32-bit builds

2015-10-22 Thread Taku Izumi
32-bit environment. This patch changes the type of "new_memmap_phy" variable from "u64" into "ulong" to avoid it. v1 -> v2: - change the type of "new_memmap_phy" from phys_addr_t into ulong according to Ard's comment Reported-by: Ingo Molnar &

RE: [PATCH] mm: Introduce kernelcore=reliable option

2015-10-22 Thread Izumi, Taku
Dear Tony, > -Original Message- > From: Luck, Tony [mailto:tony.l...@intel.com] > Sent: Friday, October 23, 2015 8:27 AM > To: Kamezawa, Hiroyuki/亀澤 寛之; Izumi, Taku/泉 拓; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; > linux...@kvack.org > Cc: qiuxi...@huawei.com; m...@csn

RE: [PATCH] mm: Introduce kernelcore=reliable option

2015-10-19 Thread Izumi, Taku
Hi Xishi, > On 2015/10/15 21:32, Taku Izumi wrote: > > > Xeon E7 v3 based systems supports Address Range Mirroring > > and UEFI BIOS complied with UEFI spec 2.5 can notify which > > ranges are reliable (mirrored) via EFI memory map. > > Now Linux kernel utilize

RE: [PATCH] mm: Introduce kernelcore=reliable option

2015-10-19 Thread Izumi, Taku
Hi Xishi, > On 2015/10/15 21:32, Taku Izumi wrote: > > > Xeon E7 v3 based systems supports Address Range Mirroring > > and UEFI BIOS complied with UEFI spec 2.5 can notify which > > ranges are reliable (mirrored) via EFI memory map. > > Now Linux kernel utilize

[PATCH] mm: Introduce kernelcore=reliable option

2015-10-14 Thread Taku Izumi
,2G@0x10a000:0x1,2G@4G:0x1 efi_fake_mem is found at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mfleming/efi.git tags/efi-next Signed-off-by: Taku Izumi --- Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt | 9 - mm/page_alloc.c | 26 +++

[PATCH] mm: Introduce kernelcore=reliable option

2015-10-14 Thread Taku Izumi
,2G@0x10a000:0x1,2G@4G:0x1 efi_fake_mem is found at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mfleming/efi.git tags/efi-next Signed-off-by: Taku Izumi <izumi.t...@jp.fujitsu.com> --- Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt | 9 - mm/page_alloc.

RE: [PATCH][RFC] mm: Introduce kernelcore=reliable option

2015-10-13 Thread Izumi, Taku
m solution. But this looks like a very clever was to try out the > feature with a minimally invasive patch. Yes. I agree creating a new zone is the right solution for long term. I believe this approach using MOVABLE_ZONE is good and reasonable for short-term solution. Sincerely, Tak

RE: [PATCH][RFC] mm: Introduce kernelcore=reliable option

2015-10-13 Thread Izumi, Taku
m solution. But this looks like a very clever was to try out the > feature with a minimally invasive patch. Yes. I agree creating a new zone is the right solution for long term. I believe this approach using MOVABLE_ZONE is good and reasonable for short-term solution. Sincerely, Tak

[PATCH][RFC] mm: Introduce kernelcore=reliable option

2015-10-08 Thread Taku Izumi
ot; option and introduces kernelcore=reliable option. By specifying "reliable" instead of specifying the amount of memory, non-reliable region will be arranged into ZONE_MOVABLE. Signed-off-by: Taku Izumi --- Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt | 9 - mm/page_alloc.c

[PATCH][RFC] mm: Introduce kernelcore=reliable option

2015-10-08 Thread Taku Izumi
ot; option and introduces kernelcore=reliable option. By specifying "reliable" instead of specifying the amount of memory, non-reliable region will be arranged into ZONE_MOVABLE. Signed-off-by: Taku Izumi <izumi.t...@jp.fujitsu.com> --- Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt | 9

[tip:perf/core] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Fix multi-segment problem of perf_event_intel_uncore

2015-10-06 Thread tip-bot for Taku Izumi
Commit-ID: 712df65ccb63da08a484bf57c40b250dfd4103a7 Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/712df65ccb63da08a484bf57c40b250dfd4103a7 Author: Taku Izumi AuthorDate: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 21:10:21 +0900 Committer: Ingo Molnar CommitDate: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 17:31:51 +0200 perf/x86/intel/uncore: Fix

[tip:perf/core] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Fix multi-segment problem of perf_event_intel_uncore

2015-10-06 Thread tip-bot for Taku Izumi
Commit-ID: 712df65ccb63da08a484bf57c40b250dfd4103a7 Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/712df65ccb63da08a484bf57c40b250dfd4103a7 Author: Taku Izumi <izumi.t...@jp.fujitsu.com> AuthorDate: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 21:10:21 +0900 Committer: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org> CommitDate: Tue

[PATCH 2/2] x86, efi: Add "efi_fake_mem" boot option

2015-09-29 Thread Taku Izumi
d memory Signed-off-by: Taku Izumi --- Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt | 15 +++ arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 4 +- drivers/firmware/efi/Kconfig| 22 drivers/firmware/efi/Makefile | 1 + drivers/firmware/efi/fake_mem.c | 238

RE: [PATCH 2/2] x86, efi: Add "efi_fake_mem" boot option

2015-09-29 Thread Izumi, Taku
I've missed git-format-patch after rebasing. I'll resend right one.. > -Original Message- > From: kbuild test robot [mailto:l...@intel.com] > Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 10:37 AM > To: Izumi, Taku/泉 拓 > Cc: kbuild-...@01.org; linux-kernel@vger.kerne

[PATCH 2/2] x86, efi: Add "efi_fake_mem" boot option

2015-09-29 Thread Taku Izumi
d memory Signed-off-by: Taku Izumi --- Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt | 15 +++ arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 4 +- drivers/firmware/efi/Kconfig| 22 drivers/firmware/efi/Makefile | 1 + drivers/firmware/efi/fake_mem.c | 238

[PATCH 0/2] Introduce "efi_fake_mem" boot option

2015-09-29 Thread Taku Izumi
_MAX_FAKE_MEM - and some fix pointed by Matt Flemming Taku Izumi (2): x86, efi: rename print_efi_memmap() to efi_print_memmap() x86, efi: Add "efi_fake_mem" boot option Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt | 15 +++ arch/x86/include/asm/efi.h | 1 + arch/x86/kernel/se

[PATCH 1/2] x86, efi: rename print_efi_memmap() to efi_print_memmap()

2015-09-29 Thread Taku Izumi
This patch renames print_efi_memmap() to efi_print_memmap() and make it global function so that we can invoke it outside of arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c Signed-off-by: Taku Izumi --- arch/x86/include/asm/efi.h | 1 + arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2

[PATCH 2/2] x86, efi: Add "efi_fake_mem" boot option

2015-09-29 Thread Taku Izumi
d memory Signed-off-by: Taku Izumi <izumi.t...@jp.fujitsu.com> --- Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt | 15 +++ arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 4 +- drivers/firmware/efi/Kconfig| 22 drivers/firmware/efi/Makefile | 1 + drivers/firmwar

[PATCH 0/2] Introduce "efi_fake_mem" boot option

2015-09-29 Thread Taku Izumi
_MAX_FAKE_MEM - and some fix pointed by Matt Flemming Taku Izumi (2): x86, efi: rename print_efi_memmap() to efi_print_memmap() x86, efi: Add "efi_fake_mem" boot option Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt | 15 +++ arch/x86/include/asm/efi.h | 1 + arch/x86/kernel/se

[PATCH 2/2] x86, efi: Add "efi_fake_mem" boot option

2015-09-29 Thread Taku Izumi
d memory Signed-off-by: Taku Izumi <izumi.t...@jp.fujitsu.com> --- Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt | 15 +++ arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 4 +- drivers/firmware/efi/Kconfig| 22 drivers/firmware/efi/Makefile | 1 + drivers/firmwar

RE: [PATCH 2/2] x86, efi: Add "efi_fake_mem" boot option

2015-09-29 Thread Izumi, Taku
I've missed git-format-patch after rebasing. I'll resend right one.. > -Original Message- > From: kbuild test robot [mailto:l...@intel.com] > Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 10:37 AM > To: Izumi, Taku/泉 拓 > Cc: kbuild-...@01.org; linux-kernel@vger.kerne

[PATCH 1/2] x86, efi: rename print_efi_memmap() to efi_print_memmap()

2015-09-29 Thread Taku Izumi
This patch renames print_efi_memmap() to efi_print_memmap() and make it global function so that we can invoke it outside of arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c Signed-off-by: Taku Izumi <izumi.t...@jp.fujitsu.com> --- arch/x86/include/asm/efi.h | 1 + arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c | 4 ++-- 2

[PATCH v5][RESEND] perf, x86: Fix multi-segment problem of perf_event_intel_uncore

2015-09-23 Thread Taku Izumi
ck at snbep_pci2phy_map_init() Signed-off-by: Taku Izumi --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c | 61 -- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.h | 12 - arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore_snb.c | 16 -- .../x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel

[PATCH v5][RESEND] perf, x86: Fix multi-segment problem of perf_event_intel_uncore

2015-09-23 Thread Taku Izumi
ck at snbep_pci2phy_map_init() Signed-off-by: Taku Izumi <izumi.t...@jp.fujitsu.com> --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c | 61 -- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.h | 12 - arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore_snb.c | 16 -- ..

[PATCH v4] perf, x86: Fix multi-segment problem of perf_event_intel_uncore

2015-09-16 Thread Taku Izumi
ng segment-aware pci2phy_map instead. v3 -> v4: - avoid GFP_ATOMIC allocation at __find_pci2phy_map() - Add missing pci_dev_put at snb_pci2phy_map_init() - Add missing raw_spin_unlock at snbep_pci2phy_map_init() Signed-off-by: Taku Izumi --- arch/x86/kernel/

[PATCH v4] perf, x86: Fix multi-segment problem of perf_event_intel_uncore

2015-09-16 Thread Taku Izumi
ng segment-aware pci2phy_map instead. v3 -> v4: - avoid GFP_ATOMIC allocation at __find_pci2phy_map() - Add missing pci_dev_put at snb_pci2phy_map_init() - Add missing raw_spin_unlock at snbep_pci2phy_map_init() Signed-off-by: Taku Izumi <izumi.t...@jp.fujitsu.com> --- arch/x86/k

[PATCH v3] perf, x86: Fix multi-segment problem of perf_event_intel_uncore

2015-09-03 Thread Taku Izumi
ng segment-aware pci2phy_map instead. v2 -> v3: - fix up according to Peter's comment - introduce __find_pci2phy_map() to avert repetition Signed-off-by: Taku Izumi --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c | 45 -- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_unc

[PATCH v3] perf, x86: Fix multi-segment problem of perf_event_intel_uncore

2015-09-03 Thread Taku Izumi
ng segment-aware pci2phy_map instead. v2 -> v3: - fix up according to Peter's comment - introduce __find_pci2phy_map() to avert repetition Signed-off-by: Taku Izumi <izumi.t...@jp.fujitsu.com> --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c | 45 --

[PATCH v2][RESEND] perf, x86: Fix multi-segment problem of perf_event_intel_uncore

2015-08-26 Thread Taku Izumi
ng segment-aware pci2phy_map instead. v1 -> v2: - Extract method named uncore_pcibus_to_physid to avoid repetetion of retrieving phys_id code Signed-off-by: Taku Izumi --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c | 25 -- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore

RE: [PATCH 2/2] x86, efi: Add "efi_fake_mem_mirror" boot option

2015-08-26 Thread Izumi, Taku
Dear Matt, Thank you for reviewing. I updated my patchset. I'm happy if you review new one. Sincerely, Taku Izumi > -Original Message- > From: Matt Fleming [mailto:m...@codeblueprint.co.uk] > Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2015 8:46 AM > To: Izumi, Taku/泉 拓 > C

[PATCH v2 1/3] efi: Add EFI_MEMORY_MORE_RELIABLE support to efi_md_typeattr_format()

2015-08-26 Thread Taku Izumi
UEFI spec 2.5 introduces new Memory Attribute Definition named EFI_MEMORY_MORE_RELIABLE. This patch adds this new attribute support to efi_md_typeattr_format(). Signed-off-by: Taku Izumi --- drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c | 6 -- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git

[PATCH v2 0/3] Introduce "efi_fake_mem_mirror" boot option

2015-08-26 Thread Taku Izumi
abbreviation of EFI_MEMORY_MORE_RELIABLE from "RELY" to "MR" - add patch (2/3) for changing abbreviation of EFI_MEMORY_RUNTIME - migrate some code from arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks to drivers/firmware/efi/fake_mem.c and create config EFI_FAKE_MEMMAP Taku Izumi (3): efi: Add

[PATCH v2 2/3] efi: Change abbreviation of EFI_MEMORY_RUNTIME from "RUN" to "RT"

2015-08-26 Thread Taku Izumi
Now efi_md_typeattr_format() outputs "RUN" if passed EFI memory descriptor has EFI_MEMORY_RUNTIME attribute. But "RT" is preferer because it is shorter and clearer. This patch changes abbreviation of EFI_MEMORY_RUNTIME from "RUN" to "RT". Suggested-by: A

[PATCH v2 3/3] x86, efi: Add "efi_fake_mem_mirror" boot option

2015-08-26 Thread Taku Izumi
ng message is output: efi: Memory: 4096M/131455M mirrored memory Signed-off-by: Taku Izumi --- Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt | 8 ++ arch/x86/include/asm/efi.h | 1 + arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 4 +- arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c | 2 +- drivers/

RE: [PATCH 2/2] x86, efi: Add efi_fake_mem_mirror boot option

2015-08-26 Thread Izumi, Taku
Dear Matt, Thank you for reviewing. I updated my patchset. I'm happy if you review new one. Sincerely, Taku Izumi -Original Message- From: Matt Fleming [mailto:m...@codeblueprint.co.uk] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2015 8:46 AM To: Izumi, Taku/泉 拓 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

[PATCH v2 3/3] x86, efi: Add efi_fake_mem_mirror boot option

2015-08-26 Thread Taku Izumi
that the following message is output: efi: Memory: 4096M/131455M mirrored memory Signed-off-by: Taku Izumi izumi.t...@jp.fujitsu.com --- Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt | 8 ++ arch/x86/include/asm/efi.h | 1 + arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 4 +- arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c

[PATCH v2 2/3] efi: Change abbreviation of EFI_MEMORY_RUNTIME from RUN to RT

2015-08-26 Thread Taku Izumi
-by: Taku Izumi izumi.t...@jp.fujitsu.com --- drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c index 8124078..25b6477 100644 --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c

[PATCH v2 1/3] efi: Add EFI_MEMORY_MORE_RELIABLE support to efi_md_typeattr_format()

2015-08-26 Thread Taku Izumi
UEFI spec 2.5 introduces new Memory Attribute Definition named EFI_MEMORY_MORE_RELIABLE. This patch adds this new attribute support to efi_md_typeattr_format(). Signed-off-by: Taku Izumi izumi.t...@jp.fujitsu.com --- drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c | 6 -- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2

[PATCH v2 0/3] Introduce efi_fake_mem_mirror boot option

2015-08-26 Thread Taku Izumi
of EFI_MEMORY_MORE_RELIABLE from RELY to MR - add patch (2/3) for changing abbreviation of EFI_MEMORY_RUNTIME - migrate some code from arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks to drivers/firmware/efi/fake_mem.c and create config EFI_FAKE_MEMMAP Taku Izumi (3): efi: Add EFI_MEMORY_MORE_RELIABLE support

[PATCH v2][RESEND] perf, x86: Fix multi-segment problem of perf_event_intel_uncore

2015-08-26 Thread Taku Izumi
: - Extract method named uncore_pcibus_to_physid to avoid repetetion of retrieving phys_id code Signed-off-by: Taku Izumi izumi.t...@jp.fujitsu.com --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c | 25 -- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.h | 11 - arch/x86

[PATCH 0/2][RFC] Introduce "efi_fake_mem_mirror" boot option

2015-08-20 Thread Taku Izumi
with UEFI spec 2.5 complied firmware. This patchset introduces new boot option named "efi_fake_mem_mirror". By specifying this parameter, you can mark specific memory as mirrored memory. This is useful for debugging of Memory Address Range Mirroring feature. Taku Izumi (2):

[PATCH 1/2] efi: Add EFI_MEMORY_MORE_RELIABLE support to efi_md_typeattr_format()

2015-08-20 Thread Taku Izumi
UEFI spec 2.5 introduces new Memory Attribute Definition named EFI_MEMORY_MORE_RELIABLE. This patch adds this new attribute support to efi_md_typeattr_format(). Signed-off-by: Taku Izumi --- drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c | 6 -- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git

[PATCH 2/2] x86, efi: Add "efi_fake_mem_mirror" boot option

2015-08-20 Thread Taku Izumi
) And you will find that the following message is output: efi: Memory: 4096M/131455M mirrored memory Signed-off-by: Taku Izumi --- Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt | 8 ++ arch/x86/include/asm/efi.h | 2 + arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 4 +- arch/x86/platform/efi

[PATCH 1/2] efi: Add EFI_MEMORY_MORE_RELIABLE support to efi_md_typeattr_format()

2015-08-20 Thread Taku Izumi
UEFI spec 2.5 introduces new Memory Attribute Definition named EFI_MEMORY_MORE_RELIABLE. This patch adds this new attribute support to efi_md_typeattr_format(). Signed-off-by: Taku Izumi izumi.t...@jp.fujitsu.com --- drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c | 6 -- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2

[PATCH 2/2] x86, efi: Add efi_fake_mem_mirror boot option

2015-08-20 Thread Taku Izumi
-0x9000) (768MB) And you will find that the following message is output: efi: Memory: 4096M/131455M mirrored memory Signed-off-by: Taku Izumi izumi.t...@jp.fujitsu.com --- Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt | 8 ++ arch/x86/include/asm/efi.h | 2 + arch/x86/kernel/setup.c

[PATCH 0/2][RFC] Introduce efi_fake_mem_mirror boot option

2015-08-20 Thread Taku Izumi
with UEFI spec 2.5 complied firmware. This patchset introduces new boot option named efi_fake_mem_mirror. By specifying this parameter, you can mark specific memory as mirrored memory. This is useful for debugging of Memory Address Range Mirroring feature. Taku Izumi (2): efi: Add

[PATCH v2] perf: Fix multi-segment problem of perf_event_intel_uncore

2015-08-04 Thread Taku Izumi
ng segment-aware pci2phy_map instead. v1->v2: - Extract method named uncore_pcibus_to_physid to avoid repetetion of retrieving phys_id code Signed-off-by: Taku Izumi --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c | 25 -- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore

[PATCH v2] perf: Fix multi-segment problem of perf_event_intel_uncore

2015-08-04 Thread Taku Izumi
: - Extract method named uncore_pcibus_to_physid to avoid repetetion of retrieving phys_id code Signed-off-by: Taku Izumi izumi.t...@jp.fujitsu.com --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c | 25 -- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.h | 11 - arch/x86

[PATCH] perf: Fix multi-segment problem of perf_event_intel_uncore

2015-06-30 Thread Taku Izumi
ng segment-aware pci2phy_map instead. Signed-off-by: Taku Izumi --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c | 27 +++--- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.h | 9 - arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore_snb.c | 23 +++- .../x86/kernel/cpu/

[PATCH] perf: Fix multi-segment problem of perf_event_intel_uncore

2015-06-30 Thread Taku Izumi
-off-by: Taku Izumi izumi.t...@jp.fujitsu.com --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c | 27 +++--- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.h | 9 - arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore_snb.c | 23 +++- .../x86/kernel/cpu

RE: [RFC PATCH 0/2 shit_A shit_B] workqueue: fix wq_numa bug

2015-01-22 Thread Izumi, Taku
5 00 4d 39 c4 75 6c 4c 39 e3 [0.189000] RIP [] __list_add+0x16/0xc0 [0.189000] RSP [0.189000] CR2: 0008 [0.189000] ---[ end trace 58feee6875cf67cf ]--- [0.189000] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception [0.189000] ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncin

RE: [RFC PATCH 0/2 shit_A shit_B] workqueue: fix wq_numa bug

2015-01-22 Thread Izumi, Taku
: 0008 [0.189000] ---[ end trace 58feee6875cf67cf ]--- [0.189000] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception [0.189000] ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception Sincerely, Taku Izumi Both patch1 of the both solutions are: reset pool-node and unhash the pool

Re: [PATCH 2/3 v2] Do not use acpi_device to find pci root bridge in _init code.

2012-10-14 Thread Taku Izumi
ot depending on acpi_device > struct. How about squashing patch #2 into patch #1 ? The caller and callee should be the same place in my mind. Best regards, Taku Izumi > Signed-off-by: Tang Chen > Signed-off-by: Liu Jiang > --- > drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 19 +++

Re: [PATCH 2/3 v2] Do not use acpi_device to find pci root bridge in _init code.

2012-10-14 Thread Taku Izumi
on acpi_device struct. How about squashing patch #2 into patch #1 ? The caller and callee should be the same place in my mind. Best regards, Taku Izumi Signed-off-by: Tang Chen tangc...@cn.fujitsu.com Signed-off-by: Liu Jiang jiang@huawei.com --- drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 19

Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] ACPIHP: ACPI system device hotplug slot enumerator

2012-08-03 Thread Taku Izumi
num_get_slot_type(u32 dev_types) > +{ > + BUG_ON(dev_types > 15); > + > + switch (dev_types) { > + case 0: > + /* Generic CONTAINER */ > + return ACPIHP_SLOT_TYPE_COMMON; > + case 1: > + /* Physical processor

Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] ACPIHP: ACPI system device hotplug slot enumerator

2012-08-03 Thread Taku Izumi
ACPIHP_SLOT_TYPE_CPU? I think this case is ACPIHP_SLOT_TYPE_COMMON or else. By the way how about simplifying slot type category? Do we need to differentiate case7, 8, 9, 11 and 15? Best regards, Taku Izumi + case 8: + /* Generic CONTAINER */ + return

Re: [RFC PATCH 01/14] PCI: add pcie_flags into struct pci_dev to cache PCIe capabilities register

2012-07-11 Thread Taku Izumi
> struct pci_driver *driver; /* which driver has allocated this > device */ > u64 dma_mask; /* Mask of the bits of bus address this > -- > 1.7.9.5 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in > the body

Re: [RFC PATCH 01/14] PCI: add pcie_flags into struct pci_dev to cache PCIe capabilities register

2012-07-11 Thread Taku Izumi
; /* Mask of the bits of bus address this -- 1.7.9.5 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-pci in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- Taku Izumi izumi.t...@jp.fujitsu.com

Re: [PATCH][BUG] Fix the graphic corruption issue on IA64 machines

2007-06-28 Thread izumi
if "blank_state", which is intended to reflect the state of timer, was shuffled arround. This revised patch reflects his pointed out. I confirmed this also fixed the problem. Regards, Taku Izumi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fix the graphic corruption issue on IA64 machines. VGA co

Re: [PATCH][BUG] Fix the graphic corruption issue on IA64 machines

2007-06-28 Thread izumi
if blank_state, which is intended to reflect the state of timer, was shuffled arround. This revised patch reflects his pointed out. I confirmed this also fixed the problem. Regards, Taku Izumi [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fix the graphic corruption issue on IA64 machines. VGA console driver can

  1   2   >