On 1/16/07, Oliver Neukum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Am Dienstag, 16. Januar 2007 10:10 schrieb Jerome Lacoste:
> Hi,
>
> I unplugged my (second) webcam, forgotting to stop ekiga, and khubd is
> now taking 100% CPU.
>
> - lsusb doesn't return
> - /etc/init.d/
Hi,
I unplugged my (second) webcam, forgotting to stop ekiga, and khubd is
now taking 100% CPU.
- lsusb doesn't return
- /etc/init.d/udev restart didn't resolve the problem.
Is that a problem one may want to investigate or should I just forget
about it (problem being cause by a user error)?
Hi,
I unplugged my (second) webcam, forgotting to stop ekiga, and khubd is
now taking 100% CPU.
- lsusb doesn't return
- /etc/init.d/udev restart didn't resolve the problem.
Is that a problem one may want to investigate or should I just forget
about it (problem being cause by a user error)?
On 1/16/07, Oliver Neukum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Dienstag, 16. Januar 2007 10:10 schrieb Jerome Lacoste:
Hi,
I unplugged my (second) webcam, forgotting to stop ekiga, and khubd is
now taking 100% CPU.
- lsusb doesn't return
- /etc/init.d/udev restart didn't resolve the problem
On 8/23/05, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> jerome lacoste <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I am on a Dell Inspiron 8100 laptop with 512 M and 1G disk cache. I
> > usually have at least 4 big applications running simultaneously: a
> > Java IDE,
On 8/23/05, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jerome lacoste [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am on a Dell Inspiron 8100 laptop with 512 M and 1G disk cache. I
usually have at least 4 big applications running simultaneously: a
Java IDE, firefox, firefox and X. All that under the Gnome
On 8/23/05, Tomasz Chmielewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We are running almost 20 Fujitsu-Siemens Scenic machines, 2.6.8.1
> kernel, equipped with a onboard card that uses a tulip module:
>
> 02:01.0 Ethernet controller: Linksys NC100 Network Everywhere Fast
> Ethernet 10/100 (rev 11)
>
> No
On 8/23/05, Tomasz Chmielewski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are running almost 20 Fujitsu-Siemens Scenic machines, 2.6.8.1
kernel, equipped with a onboard card that uses a tulip module:
02:01.0 Ethernet controller: Linksys NC100 Network Everywhere Fast
Ethernet 10/100 (rev 11)
No problem
Hi,
I am on a Dell Inspiron 8100 laptop with 512 M and 1G disk cache. I
usually have at least 4 big applications running simultaneously: a
Java IDE, firefox, firefox and X. All that under the Gnome desktop.
I've sometimes seen periods where my laptop goes kind of nuts. While
the cpu is still at
Using kernel 2.6.11 on Mandriva LE 2005, I am seeing a lot of tulip
errors in my logs:
:02:09.0: tulip_stop_rxtx() failed
It doesn't seem to impact the performance, although it fills up my logs.
The card is connected to the ADSL modem. Any idea as to what could be
causing this?
Bad
Using kernel 2.6.11 on Mandriva LE 2005, I am seeing a lot of tulip
errors in my logs:
:02:09.0: tulip_stop_rxtx() failed
It doesn't seem to impact the performance, although it fills up my logs.
The card is connected to the ADSL modem. Any idea as to what could be
causing this?
Bad
Hi,
I am on a Dell Inspiron 8100 laptop with 512 M and 1G disk cache. I
usually have at least 4 big applications running simultaneously: a
Java IDE, firefox, firefox and X. All that under the Gnome desktop.
I've sometimes seen periods where my laptop goes kind of nuts. While
the cpu is still at
[I doubt this is the right list to ask this question.]
On 8/18/05, Guillermo López Alejos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a piece of code which uses environment variables. I have been
> told that it is not going to work in kernel space because the concept
> of environment is not
[I doubt this is the right list to ask this question.]
On 8/18/05, Guillermo López Alejos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have a piece of code which uses environment variables. I have been
told that it is not going to work in kernel space because the concept
of environment is not applicable
On 8/16/05, john stultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-08-16 at 12:10 +0200, jerome lacoste wrote:
> > Installed stock 2.6.12.3 on a brand new amd64 box with an Asus extreme
> > AX 300 SE/t mainboard.
> >
> > I remember seeing a message i
On 8/16/05, Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Aug 2005, jerome lacoste wrote:
>
> > Installed stock 2.6.12.3 on a brand new amd64 box with an Asus extreme
> > AX 300 SE/t mainboard.
Ooops the main board is a Sapphire Axion XP200PA-A58SL.
Installed stock 2.6.12.3 on a brand new amd64 box with an Asus extreme
AX 300 SE/t mainboard.
I remember seeing a message in the boot saying something along:
"cannot connect to hardware clock."
And now I see that the time is changing too fast (about 2 seconds each second).
I don't have
Installed stock 2.6.12.3 on a brand new amd64 box with an Asus extreme
AX 300 SE/t mainboard.
I remember seeing a message in the boot saying something along:
cannot connect to hardware clock.
And now I see that the time is changing too fast (about 2 seconds each second).
I don't have visual
On 8/16/05, Christoph Lameter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 16 Aug 2005, jerome lacoste wrote:
Installed stock 2.6.12.3 on a brand new amd64 box with an Asus extreme
AX 300 SE/t mainboard.
Ooops the main board is a Sapphire Axion XP200PA-A58SL. The
aforementionned name is the video
On 8/16/05, john stultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2005-08-16 at 12:10 +0200, jerome lacoste wrote:
Installed stock 2.6.12.3 on a brand new amd64 box with an Asus extreme
AX 300 SE/t mainboard.
I remember seeing a message in the boot saying something along:
cannot connect
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 17:50:02 -0800, Junio C Hamano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "PJ" == Paul Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> PJ> There is not a concensus (nor a King Penguin dictate) between the
> PJ> "while(1)" and "for(;;)" style to document.
>
> FWIW, linux-0.01 has four uses of
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 15:48:21 -0500, Lee Revell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 16:11 +0100, jerome lacoste wrote:
> > On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 15:22:36 -0500, Lee Revell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 13:09 +0100, jerome lacos
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 15:48:21 -0500, Lee Revell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 16:11 +0100, jerome lacoste wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 15:22:36 -0500, Lee Revell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 13:09 +0100, jerome lacoste wrote:
I have a VIA Epia M1 board
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 17:50:02 -0800, Junio C Hamano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PJ == Paul Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
PJ There is not a concensus (nor a King Penguin dictate) between the
PJ while(1) and for(;;) style to document.
FWIW, linux-0.01 has four uses of while (1) and two uses
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 15:22:36 -0500, Lee Revell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 13:09 +0100, jerome lacoste wrote:
> > I have a VIA Epia M1 board that crashes very badly (and pretty
> > often, especially when using DMA). I want to fix that.
> >
>
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 15:22:36 -0500, Lee Revell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 13:09 +0100, jerome lacoste wrote:
I have a VIA Epia M1 board that crashes very badly (and pretty
often, especially when using DMA). I want to fix that.
Are the crashes associated with any
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 13:34:55 +0100, Mikael Pettersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> jerome lacoste writes:
> > I have a VIA Epia M1 board that crashes very badly (and pretty
> > often, especially when using DMA). I want to fix that.
> >
> > Serial console
I have a VIA Epia M1 board that crashes very badly (and pretty
often, especially when using DMA). I want to fix that.
Serial console + magic SysRQ didn't help so I am going the nmi
watchdog way. But in order to have nmi watchdog I need APIC, right?
The C3 processor seems to support IOAPIC.
I have a VIA Epia M1 board that crashes very badly (and pretty
often, especially when using DMA). I want to fix that.
Serial console + magic SysRQ didn't help so I am going the nmi
watchdog way. But in order to have nmi watchdog I need APIC, right?
The C3 processor seems to support IOAPIC.
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 13:34:55 +0100, Mikael Pettersson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jerome lacoste writes:
I have a VIA Epia M1 board that crashes very badly (and pretty
often, especially when using DMA). I want to fix that.
Serial console + magic SysRQ didn't help so I am going
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 20:59:43 -0800, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> jerome lacoste <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On an VIA EPIA board, I got this single oops at boot. Wasn't stored on
> > file so I had to take a screenshot with a digital camera
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 20:59:43 -0800, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jerome lacoste [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On an VIA EPIA board, I got this single oops at boot. Wasn't stored on
file so I had to take a screenshot with a digital camera. Basicallly
goes along those lines
On an VIA EPIA board, I got this single oops at boot. Wasn't stored on
file so I had to take a screenshot with a digital camera. Basicallly
goes along those lines:
Process: S36mountvirtfs
Call trace:
run_timer_softirq+0x16f/0x200
__do_softirq
do_softirq
irq_exit
do_IRQ
On an VIA EPIA board, I got this single oops at boot. Wasn't stored on
file so I had to take a screenshot with a digital camera. Basicallly
goes along those lines:
Process: S36mountvirtfs
Call trace:
run_timer_softirq+0x16f/0x200
__do_softirq
do_softirq
irq_exit
do_IRQ
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 12:43:33 +0100, Udo van den Heuvel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On my firewall (VIA EPIA CL-6000 with VIA Rhine network chips running FC3
> and custom kernels) I see messages like:
>
> Jan 13 19:35:46 epia kernel: eth1: Oversized Ethernet frame spanned multiple
>
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 12:43:33 +0100, Udo van den Heuvel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello,
On my firewall (VIA EPIA CL-6000 with VIA Rhine network chips running FC3
and custom kernels) I see messages like:
Jan 13 19:35:46 epia kernel: eth1: Oversized Ethernet frame spanned multiple
buffers,
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005 11:55:31 -0500 (EST), linux-os <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Feb 2005, Chris Friesen wrote:
>
> > Lee Revell wrote:
> >> On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 21:50 -0500, Kyle Moffett wrote:
> >>
> >>> It's not like somebody will have
> >>> some innate commercial advantage over you
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005 11:55:31 -0500 (EST), linux-os [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005, Chris Friesen wrote:
Lee Revell wrote:
On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 21:50 -0500, Kyle Moffett wrote:
It's not like somebody will have
some innate commercial advantage over you because they have
Took
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 07:18:17 -0500, Wakko Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please keep me CCd
>
> jerome lacoste wrote:
> > particular hardware (Dell Inspiron 8100)? I run Linux on 3 other
>
> I have this exact same laptop. It works perfectly for me with
Took
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 07:18:17 -0500, Wakko Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please keep me CCd
jerome lacoste wrote:
particular hardware (Dell Inspiron 8100)? I run Linux on 3 other
I have this exact same laptop. It works perfectly for me with linux.
Originally started with a 2.4
>> Could a hardware failure look like bad sectors to fsck?
>
> A failure of the bus or a former sporadic error can cause defective fs, but
> normally you have a read error in fsck no structure error.
>
> Are you using hdparm? is the system perhaps overheating or overclocked?
no overclock
hdparm
[Sorry for the sensational title]
I have had this laptop for three years. It ran Linux (Debian unstable)
from the start and its hardware has been very unreliable: I changed
hard disks twice and the motherboard thrice. My DVD drive started
failing some days ago (this one is 'original', 3 years
[Sorry for the sensational title]
I have had this laptop for three years. It ran Linux (Debian unstable)
from the start and its hardware has been very unreliable: I changed
hard disks twice and the motherboard thrice. My DVD drive started
failing some days ago (this one is 'original', 3 years
Could a hardware failure look like bad sectors to fsck?
A failure of the bus or a former sporadic error can cause defective fs, but
normally you have a read error in fsck no structure error.
Are you using hdparm? is the system perhaps overheating or overclocked?
no overclock
hdparm is
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 18:00:22 +0100, Arnd Bergmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sünnavend 29 Januar 2005 02:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > From: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Cc: David Howells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > The errno values which are visible for
45 matches
Mail list logo
