Re: [v3,2/2] arm64: Add software workaround for Falkor erratum 1041

2017-11-15 Thread Manoj Iyer
.13 kernel and ran the stress-ng and VM create/stop/restart testing like I did on the previous version of this patch series. Tests successfully ran on qdf2400 platform, I did not observe any regressions on the Artful 4.13 kernel. Tested-by: Manoj Iyer <manoj.i...@canonical.com> -- ==

Re: [v3,2/2] arm64: Add software workaround for Falkor erratum 1041

2017-11-15 Thread Manoj Iyer
tress-ng and VM create/stop/restart testing like I did on the previous version of this patch series. Tests successfully ran on qdf2400 platform, I did not observe any regressions on the Artful 4.13 kernel. Tested-by: Manoj Iyer -- Manoj Iyer Ubuntu/Canonical ARM Servers - Cloud

Re: [3/3] arm64: Add software workaround for Falkor erratum 1041

2017-11-15 Thread Manoj Iyer
On Fri, 10 Nov 2017, Manoj Iyer wrote: On Thu, 9 Nov 2017, Manoj Iyer wrote: James, Looks like my VM test raised a false alarm. I retested stock Artful 4.13 kernel (No erratum 1041 patches applied). James, an update on the crash (false alarm). We suspect this is a firmware crash due

Re: [3/3] arm64: Add software workaround for Falkor erratum 1041

2017-11-15 Thread Manoj Iyer
On Fri, 10 Nov 2017, Manoj Iyer wrote: On Thu, 9 Nov 2017, Manoj Iyer wrote: James, Looks like my VM test raised a false alarm. I retested stock Artful 4.13 kernel (No erratum 1041 patches applied). James, an update on the crash (false alarm). We suspect this is a firmware crash due

Re: [3/3] arm64: Add software workaround for Falkor erratum 1041

2017-11-10 Thread Manoj Iyer
On Thu, 9 Nov 2017, Manoj Iyer wrote: James, Looks like my VM test raised a false alarm. I retested stock Artful 4.13 kernel (No erratum 1041 patches applied). James, an update on the crash (false alarm). We suspect this is a firmware crash due to a possible fw bug. Once

Re: [3/3] arm64: Add software workaround for Falkor erratum 1041

2017-11-10 Thread Manoj Iyer
On Thu, 9 Nov 2017, Manoj Iyer wrote: James, Looks like my VM test raised a false alarm. I retested stock Artful 4.13 kernel (No erratum 1041 patches applied). James, an update on the crash (false alarm). We suspect this is a firmware crash due to a possible fw bug. Once

Re: [3/3] arm64: Add software workaround for Falkor erratum 1041

2017-11-09 Thread Manoj Iyer
failed. Status=0 [ 464.258973] ACPI CPPC: PCC check channel failed. Status=0 [ 465.283028] ACPI CPPC: PCC check channel failed. Status=0 SYS_DBG: Running SDI image (immediate mode) SYS_DBG: Ram Dump Init SYS_DBG: Failed to init SD card SYS_DBG: Resetting system! On Thu, 9 Nov 2017, Manoj Iyer

Re: [3/3] arm64: Add software workaround for Falkor erratum 1041

2017-11-09 Thread Manoj Iyer
failed. Status=0 [ 464.258973] ACPI CPPC: PCC check channel failed. Status=0 [ 465.283028] ACPI CPPC: PCC check channel failed. Status=0 SYS_DBG: Running SDI image (immediate mode) SYS_DBG: Ram Dump Init SYS_DBG: Failed to init SD card SYS_DBG: Resetting system! On Thu, 9 Nov 2017, Manoj Iyer

Re: [3/3] arm64: Add software workaround for Falkor erratum 1041

2017-11-09 Thread Manoj Iyer
On Thu, 9 Nov 2017, Manoj Iyer wrote: James, (sorry for top-posting) Applied patch 3 patches to Ubuntu Artful Kernel ( 4.13.0-16-generic ) - Start 20 VMs one at a time In a loop: - Stop (virsh destroy) 20 VMs one at a time - Start (virsh start) 20 VMs one at a time. Fixing some

Re: [3/3] arm64: Add software workaround for Falkor erratum 1041

2017-11-09 Thread Manoj Iyer
On Thu, 9 Nov 2017, Manoj Iyer wrote: James, (sorry for top-posting) Applied patch 3 patches to Ubuntu Artful Kernel ( 4.13.0-16-generic ) - Start 20 VMs one at a time In a loop: - Stop (virsh destroy) 20 VMs one at a time - Start (virsh start) 20 VMs one at a time. Fixing some

Re: [3/3] arm64: Add software workaround for Falkor erratum 1041

2017-11-09 Thread Manoj Iyer
] [Hardware Error]: 0030: On Thu, 9 Nov 2017, James Morse wrote: Hi Manoj, On 08/11/17 19:05, Manoj Iyer wrote: On Thu, 2 Nov 2017, Shanker Donthineni wrote: The ARM architecture defines the memory locations that are permitted to be accessed

Re: [3/3] arm64: Add software workaround for Falkor erratum 1041

2017-11-09 Thread Manoj Iyer
] [Hardware Error]: 0030: On Thu, 9 Nov 2017, James Morse wrote: Hi Manoj, On 08/11/17 19:05, Manoj Iyer wrote: On Thu, 2 Nov 2017, Shanker Donthineni wrote: The ARM architecture defines the memory locations that are permitted to be accessed

Re: [3/3] arm64: Add software workaround for Falkor erratum 1041

2017-11-08 Thread Manoj Iyer
ssions either. I ran the stress-ng tests for over 8hrs found the system to be stable. Tested-by: Manoj Iyer <manoj.i...@canonical.com> Regards -- Manoj Iyer Ubuntu/Canonical ARM Servers - Cloud

Re: [3/3] arm64: Add software workaround for Falkor erratum 1041

2017-11-08 Thread Manoj Iyer
s-ng tests for over 8hrs found the system to be stable. Tested-by: Manoj Iyer Regards -- Manoj Iyer Ubuntu/Canonical ARM Servers - Cloud

Re: mm/migrate: Fix ref-count handling when !hugepage_migration_supported()

2017-05-24 Thread Manoj Iyer
grate: correct failure handling if !hugepage_migration_support()") Reported-by: Manoj Iyer <manoj.i...@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Punit Agrawal <punit.agra...@arm.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo@lge.com> Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horigu...@ah.jp.nec.com> Cc: Wanpeng

Re: mm/migrate: Fix ref-count handling when !hugepage_migration_supported()

2017-05-24 Thread Manoj Iyer
grate: correct failure handling if !hugepage_migration_support()") Reported-by: Manoj Iyer Signed-off-by: Punit Agrawal Cc: Joonsoo Kim Cc: Naoya Horiguchi Cc: Wanpeng Li Cc: Christoph Lameter --- Hi Andrew, We ran into this bug when working towards enabling memory corruption on arm64.

iommu: Fix incompatible arg type in iommu_put/get_resv_regions

2017-05-05 Thread Manoj Iyer
In linux-next struct device dev; was added to struct iommu_device this breaks calls to iommu_put/get_resv_regions function because these functions expect struct device * instead. Please review and consider this patch to fix this. Thanks Manoj Iyer

iommu: Fix incompatible arg type in iommu_put/get_resv_regions

2017-05-05 Thread Manoj Iyer
In linux-next struct device dev; was added to struct iommu_device this breaks calls to iommu_put/get_resv_regions function because these functions expect struct device * instead. Please review and consider this patch to fix this. Thanks Manoj Iyer

[PATCH] iommu: Fix incompatible arg type passed to iommu_get/put_resv_regions

2017-05-05 Thread Manoj Iyer
to struct iommu_device instead of struct device * but the code in drivers/iommu/iommu.c was not refactored to take this change into account. Signed-off-by: Manoj Iyer <manoj.i...@canonical.com> --- drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers

[PATCH] iommu: Fix incompatible arg type passed to iommu_get/put_resv_regions

2017-05-05 Thread Manoj Iyer
to struct iommu_device instead of struct device * but the code in drivers/iommu/iommu.c was not refactored to take this change into account. Signed-off-by: Manoj Iyer --- drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iom

Re: arm64: Fix the kernel panic() on QDF2400 platform

2017-02-23 Thread Manoj Iyer
Tested on Ubuntu 17.04 (Linux 4.10). I am able to boot the kernel on QDF2400 platform without any panics. Tested-by: Manoj Iyer <manoj.i...@canonical.com> -- ==== Manoj Iyer Ubuntu/Canonical ARM Servers - Cloud On Wed, 22 Fe

Re: arm64: Fix the kernel panic() on QDF2400 platform

2017-02-23 Thread Manoj Iyer
Tested on Ubuntu 17.04 (Linux 4.10). I am able to boot the kernel on QDF2400 platform without any panics. Tested-by: Manoj Iyer -- Manoj Iyer Ubuntu/Canonical ARM Servers - Cloud On Wed, 22 Feb 2017, Shanker Donthineni wrote

[PATCH 1/1] USB: Added quirk to recognize GE0301 3G modem as an interface.

2013-03-13 Thread manoj . iyer
From: Manoj Iyer Signed-off-by: Manoj Iyer Reported-by: Timo Aaltonen Original-author: Timo Aaltonen BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348861 --- drivers/usb/storage/unusual_devs.h |7 +++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/usb/storage/unusual_devs.h b

[PATCH 0/1] USB: Added quirk to recognize GE0301 3G modem as an interface.

2013-03-13 Thread manoj . iyer
From: Manoj Iyer This patch enables GE0301 3G modem as an interface, the patch has been part of the Ubuntu kernel for a while but I forgot to upstream. Test details can be found in the bug http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348861 Please consider this patch for upstream. Manoj Iyer (1): USB

[PATCH 0/1] USB: Added quirk to recognize GE0301 3G modem as an interface.

2013-03-13 Thread manoj . iyer
From: Manoj Iyer manoj.i...@canonical.com This patch enables GE0301 3G modem as an interface, the patch has been part of the Ubuntu kernel for a while but I forgot to upstream. Test details can be found in the bug http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348861 Please consider this patch for upstream

[PATCH 1/1] USB: Added quirk to recognize GE0301 3G modem as an interface.

2013-03-13 Thread manoj . iyer
From: Manoj Iyer manoj.i...@canonical.com Signed-off-by: Manoj Iyer manoj.i...@canonical.com Reported-by: Timo Aaltonen tjaal...@ubuntu.com Original-author: Timo Aaltonen tjaal...@ubuntu.com BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348861 --- drivers/usb/storage/unusual_devs.h |7 +++ 1

Re: [PATCH] mmc: Added quirks for Ricoh 1180:e823 lower base clock frequency

2012-11-26 Thread Manoj Iyer
Chris, Do you know what systems produce these errors? I can look and see if we have those for testing your patch. Cheers Manoj On Wed, 21 Nov 2012, Chris Ball wrote: Hi Manoj, Matsumuro-san, On Mon, Jul 18 2011, Manoj Iyer wrote: Right, without the patch I get.. [ 52.526665] mmc0

Re: [PATCH] mmc: Added quirks for Ricoh 1180:e823 lower base clock frequency

2012-11-26 Thread Manoj Iyer
Chris, Do you know what systems produce these errors? I can look and see if we have those for testing your patch. Cheers Manoj On Wed, 21 Nov 2012, Chris Ball wrote: Hi Manoj, Matsumuro-san, On Mon, Jul 18 2011, Manoj Iyer wrote: Right, without the patch I get.. [ 52.526665] mmc0

[PATCH 1/1] thinkpad-acpi: enable loading module with new B-series Lenovo BIOS

2012-09-24 Thread manoj . iyer
From: Manoj Iyer The new B series BIOS has version string 43CN46WW. The driver requires that 2nd and 3rd characters be 'E' and 'T' respectively, where as the newer BIOS has 'C' and 'N' respectively. Failing to load the module causes some of the hotkeys to not work. Before the patch

[PATCH 0/1] thinkpad-acpi: enable loading module with new B-series Lenovo BIOS

2012-09-24 Thread manoj . iyer
From: Manoj Iyer The new B series BIOS has version string 43CN46WW. The driver requires that 2nd and 3rd characters be 'E' and 'T' respectively, where as the newer BIOS has 'C' and 'N' respectively. Failing to load the module causes some of the hotkeys to not work. This was tested by me

[PATCH 0/1] thinkpad-acpi: enable loading module with new B-series Lenovo BIOS

2012-09-24 Thread manoj . iyer
From: Manoj Iyer manoj.i...@canonical.com The new B series BIOS has version string 43CN46WW. The driver requires that 2nd and 3rd characters be 'E' and 'T' respectively, where as the newer BIOS has 'C' and 'N' respectively. Failing to load the module causes some of the hotkeys to not work

[PATCH 1/1] thinkpad-acpi: enable loading module with new B-series Lenovo BIOS

2012-09-24 Thread manoj . iyer
From: Manoj Iyer manoj.i...@canonical.com The new B series BIOS has version string 43CN46WW. The driver requires that 2nd and 3rd characters be 'E' and 'T' respectively, where as the newer BIOS has 'C' and 'N' respectively. Failing to load the module causes some of the hotkeys to not work

[PATCH 1/1] xhci: Recognize USB 3.0 devices as superspeed at powerup

2012-08-22 Thread manoj . iyer
From: Manoj Iyer On Intel Panther Point chipset USB 3.0 devices show up as high-speed devices on powerup, but after an s3 cycle they are correctly recognized as SuperSpeed. At powerup switch the port to xHCI so that USB 3.0 devices are correctly recognized. BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net

[PATCH 0/1] xhci: Recognize USB 3.0 devices as superspeed at powerup

2012-08-22 Thread manoj . iyer
From: Manoj Iyer On Intel Panther Point chipset USB 3.0 devices show up as high-speed devices on powerup, but after an s3 cycle they are correctly recognized as SuperSpeed. At powerup switch the port to xHCI so that USB 3.0 devices are correctly recognized. This is a second attempt at fixing

Re: [PATCH 1/1] xhci: Unconditionally switch ports to xHCI on powerup

2012-08-22 Thread Manoj Iyer
will send out a new seperate patch with the fix. Thanks Manoj Thanks, Andiry On Tue, 21 Aug 2012, Andiry Xu wrote: On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:06 PM, wrote: From: Manoj Iyer USB 3.0 devices show up as high-speed devices on powerup, after an s3 cycle they are correctly recognized

Re: [PATCH 1/1] xhci: Unconditionally switch ports to xHCI on powerup

2012-08-22 Thread Manoj Iyer
will send out a new seperate patch with the fix. Thanks Manoj Thanks, Andiry On Tue, 21 Aug 2012, Andiry Xu wrote: On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:06 PM, manoj.i...@canonical.com wrote: From: Manoj Iyer manoj.i...@canonical.com USB 3.0 devices show up as high-speed devices on powerup

[PATCH 0/1] xhci: Recognize USB 3.0 devices as superspeed at powerup

2012-08-22 Thread manoj . iyer
From: Manoj Iyer manoj.i...@canonical.com On Intel Panther Point chipset USB 3.0 devices show up as high-speed devices on powerup, but after an s3 cycle they are correctly recognized as SuperSpeed. At powerup switch the port to xHCI so that USB 3.0 devices are correctly recognized

[PATCH 1/1] xhci: Recognize USB 3.0 devices as superspeed at powerup

2012-08-22 Thread manoj . iyer
From: Manoj Iyer manoj.i...@canonical.com On Intel Panther Point chipset USB 3.0 devices show up as high-speed devices on powerup, but after an s3 cycle they are correctly recognized as SuperSpeed. At powerup switch the port to xHCI so that USB 3.0 devices are correctly recognized. BugLink: http

Re: [PATCH 1/1] xhci: Unconditionally switch ports to xHCI on powerup

2012-08-21 Thread Manoj Iyer
as well. On Tue, 21 Aug 2012, Andiry Xu wrote: On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:06 PM, wrote: From: Manoj Iyer USB 3.0 devices show up as high-speed devices on powerup, after an s3 cycle they are correctly recognized as SuperSpeed. At powerup unconditionally switch the port to xHCI like we do when

Re: [PATCH 1/1] xhci: Unconditionally switch ports to xHCI on powerup

2012-08-21 Thread Manoj Iyer
as well. On Tue, 21 Aug 2012, Andiry Xu wrote: On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:06 PM, manoj.i...@canonical.com wrote: From: Manoj Iyer manoj.i...@canonical.com USB 3.0 devices show up as high-speed devices on powerup, after an s3 cycle they are correctly recognized as SuperSpeed. At powerup

[PATCH 1/1] xhci: Unconditionally switch ports to xHCI on powerup

2012-08-20 Thread manoj . iyer
From: Manoj Iyer USB 3.0 devices show up as high-speed devices on powerup, after an s3 cycle they are correctly recognized as SuperSpeed. At powerup unconditionally switch the port to xHCI like we do when we resume from suspend. BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1000424 Signed-off

[PATCH 0/1] xhci: Unconditionally switch ports to xHCI on powerup

2012-08-20 Thread manoj . iyer
From: Manoj Iyer USB 3.0 devices show up as high-speed devices on powerup, after an s3 cycle they are correctly recognized as SuperSpeed. At powerup unconditionally switch the port to xHCI like we do when we resume from suspend. BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1000424 Test results

[PATCH 0/1] xhci: Unconditionally switch ports to xHCI on powerup

2012-08-20 Thread manoj . iyer
From: Manoj Iyer manoj.i...@canonical.com USB 3.0 devices show up as high-speed devices on powerup, after an s3 cycle they are correctly recognized as SuperSpeed. At powerup unconditionally switch the port to xHCI like we do when we resume from suspend. BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs

[PATCH 1/1] xhci: Unconditionally switch ports to xHCI on powerup

2012-08-20 Thread manoj . iyer
From: Manoj Iyer manoj.i...@canonical.com USB 3.0 devices show up as high-speed devices on powerup, after an s3 cycle they are correctly recognized as SuperSpeed. At powerup unconditionally switch the port to xHCI like we do when we resume from suspend. BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs

[PATCH] thinkpad-acpi: recognize latest V-Series using DMI_BIOS_VENDOR

2012-08-06 Thread manoj . iyer
From: Manoj Iyer In the latest V-series bios DMI_PRODUCT_VERSION does not contain the string Lenovo or Thinkpad, but is set to the model number, this causes the thinkpad_acpi module to fail to load. Recognize laptop as Lenovo using DMI_BIOS_VENDOR instead, which is set to Lenovo. Test on V490u

[PATCH] thinkpad-acpi: recognize latest V-Series using DMI_BIOS_VENDOR

2012-08-06 Thread manoj . iyer
From: Manoj Iyer In the latest V-series bios DMI_PRODUCT_VERSION does not contain the string Lenovo or Thinkpad, but is set to the model number, this causes the thinkpad_acpi module to fail to load. Recognize laptop as Lenovo using DMI_BIOS_VENDOR instead, which is set to Lenovo. Signed-off

[PATCH] thinkpad-acpi: recognize latest V-Series using DMI_BIOS_VENDOR

2012-08-06 Thread manoj . iyer
From: Manoj Iyer In the latest V-series bios DMI_PRODUCT_VERSION does not contain the string Lenovo or Thinkpad, but is set to the model number, this causes the thinkpad_acpi module to fail to load. Recognize laptop as Lenovo using DMI_BIOS_VENDOR instead, which is set to Lenovo. Signed-off

[PATCH] thinkpad-acpi: recognize latest V-Series using

2012-08-06 Thread manoj . iyer
From: Manoj Iyer Please consider this patch to thinkapd_acpi, it loads the module on V-series systems that do not report with "Lenovo" or "ThinkPad" prefix to DMI_PRODUCT_VERSION query, but only returns model name. ==

[PATCH] thinkpad-acpi: recognize latest V-Series using

2012-08-06 Thread manoj . iyer
From: Manoj Iyer manoj.i...@canonical.com Please consider this patch to thinkapd_acpi, it loads the module on V-series systems that do not report with Lenovo or ThinkPad prefix to DMI_PRODUCT_VERSION query, but only returns model name

[PATCH] thinkpad-acpi: recognize latest V-Series using DMI_BIOS_VENDOR

2012-08-06 Thread manoj . iyer
From: Manoj Iyer manoj.i...@canonical.com In the latest V-series bios DMI_PRODUCT_VERSION does not contain the string Lenovo or Thinkpad, but is set to the model number, this causes the thinkpad_acpi module to fail to load. Recognize laptop as Lenovo using DMI_BIOS_VENDOR instead, which is set

[PATCH] thinkpad-acpi: recognize latest V-Series using DMI_BIOS_VENDOR

2012-08-06 Thread manoj . iyer
From: Manoj Iyer manoj.i...@canonical.com In the latest V-series bios DMI_PRODUCT_VERSION does not contain the string Lenovo or Thinkpad, but is set to the model number, this causes the thinkpad_acpi module to fail to load. Recognize laptop as Lenovo using DMI_BIOS_VENDOR instead, which is set

[PATCH] thinkpad-acpi: recognize latest V-Series using DMI_BIOS_VENDOR

2012-08-06 Thread manoj . iyer
From: Manoj Iyer manoj.i...@canonical.com In the latest V-series bios DMI_PRODUCT_VERSION does not contain the string Lenovo or Thinkpad, but is set to the model number, this causes the thinkpad_acpi module to fail to load. Recognize laptop as Lenovo using DMI_BIOS_VENDOR instead, which is set

Re: [PATCH] thinkpad-acpi: recognize latest V-Series using DMI_BIOS_VENDOR

2012-08-02 Thread Manoj Iyer
Oops! This is embarrassing! my logic is flawed. Please ignore this patch, I will resend it NACK On Thu, 2 Aug 2012, manoj.i...@canonical.com wrote: From: Manoj Iyer In the latest V-series bios DMI_PRODUCT_VERSION does not contain the string Lenovo or Thinkpad, but is set to the model

[PATCH] thinkpad-acpi: recognize latest V-Series using DMI_BIOS_VENDOR

2012-08-02 Thread manoj . iyer
From: Manoj Iyer In the latest V-series bios DMI_PRODUCT_VERSION does not contain the string Lenovo or Thinkpad, but is set to the model number, this causes the thinkpad_acpi module to fail to load. Recognize laptop as Lenovo using DMI_BIOS_VENDOR instead, which is set to Lenovo. Signed-off

[PATCH] thinkpad-acpi: recognize latest V-Series using DMI_BIOS_VENDOR

2012-08-02 Thread manoj . iyer
From: Manoj Iyer In the latest V-series bios DMI_PRODUCT_VERSION does not contain the string Lenovo or Thinkpad, but is set to the model number, this causes the thinkpad_acpi module to fail to load. Recognize laptop as Lenovo using DMI_BIOS_VENDOR instead, which is set to Lenovo. BIOS

[PATCH] thinkpad-acpi: recognize latest V-Series using DMI_BIOS_VENDOR

2012-08-02 Thread manoj . iyer
From: Manoj Iyer manoj.i...@canonical.com In the latest V-series bios DMI_PRODUCT_VERSION does not contain the string Lenovo or Thinkpad, but is set to the model number, this causes the thinkpad_acpi module to fail to load. Recognize laptop as Lenovo using DMI_BIOS_VENDOR instead, which is set

[PATCH] thinkpad-acpi: recognize latest V-Series using DMI_BIOS_VENDOR

2012-08-02 Thread manoj . iyer
From: Manoj Iyer manoj.i...@canonical.com In the latest V-series bios DMI_PRODUCT_VERSION does not contain the string Lenovo or Thinkpad, but is set to the model number, this causes the thinkpad_acpi module to fail to load. Recognize laptop as Lenovo using DMI_BIOS_VENDOR instead, which is set

Re: [PATCH] thinkpad-acpi: recognize latest V-Series using DMI_BIOS_VENDOR

2012-08-02 Thread Manoj Iyer
Oops! This is embarrassing! my logic is flawed. Please ignore this patch, I will resend it NACK On Thu, 2 Aug 2012, manoj.i...@canonical.com wrote: From: Manoj Iyer manoj.i...@canonical.com In the latest V-series bios DMI_PRODUCT_VERSION does not contain the string Lenovo or Thinkpad

[PATCH] Bluetooth: btusb: Add vendor specific ID (0a5c:21f4) BCM20702A0

2012-07-10 Thread manoj . iyer
From: Manoj Iyer Patch adds support for BCM20702A0 device id (0a5c:21f4). usb-devices after patch was applied: T: Bus=03 Lev=01 Prnt=01 Port=01 Cnt=01 Dev#= 2 Spd=12 MxCh= 0 D: Ver= 2.00 Cls=ff(vend.) Sub=01 Prot=01 MxPS=64 #Cfgs= 1 P: Vendor=0a5c ProdID=21f4 Rev=01.12 S: Manufacturer=Broadcom

[PATCH] Bluetooth: btusb: Add vendor specific ID (0a5c:21f4) BCM20702A0

2012-07-10 Thread manoj . iyer
From: Manoj Iyer manoj.i...@canonical.com Patch adds support for BCM20702A0 device id (0a5c:21f4). usb-devices after patch was applied: T: Bus=03 Lev=01 Prnt=01 Port=01 Cnt=01 Dev#= 2 Spd=12 MxCh= 0 D: Ver= 2.00 Cls=ff(vend.) Sub=01 Prot=01 MxPS=64 #Cfgs= 1 P: Vendor=0a5c ProdID=21f4 Rev=01.12 S

Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: btusb: Add vendor specific ID (0a5c:21f4) BCM20702A0

2012-07-06 Thread Manoj Iyer
Cls=ff(vend.) Sub=01 Prot=01 Driver=btusb I: If#= 2 Alt= 0 #EPs= 2 Cls=ff(vend.) Sub=ff Prot=ff Driver=(none) I: If#= 3 Alt= 0 #EPs= 0 Cls=fe(app. ) Sub=01 Prot=01 Driver=(none) Hi Manoj, * Manoj Iyer [2012-04-11 13:39:23 -0500]: usb-devices: T: Bus=01 Lev=02 Prnt=02 Port=03 Cnt=02 Dev#= 4

Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: btusb: Add vendor specific ID (0a5c:21f4) BCM20702A0

2012-07-06 Thread Manoj Iyer
Cls=ff(vend.) Sub=01 Prot=01 Driver=btusb I: If#= 2 Alt= 0 #EPs= 2 Cls=ff(vend.) Sub=ff Prot=ff Driver=(none) I: If#= 3 Alt= 0 #EPs= 0 Cls=fe(app. ) Sub=01 Prot=01 Driver=(none) Hi Manoj, * Manoj Iyer manoj.i...@canonical.com [2012-04-11 13:39:23 -0500]: usb-devices: T: Bus=01 Lev=02 Prnt=02