On Sun, 18 Mar 2007, Lee Revell wrote:
On 3/17/07, Mike Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
P.S. "utter failure" was too harsh. What sticks in my craw is that the
world has to adjust to fit this new scheduler.
I have never seen X run nearly as smooth as our favorite proprietary
OS on
On Sun, 18 Mar 2007, Lee Revell wrote:
On 3/17/07, Mike Galbraith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
P.S. utter failure was too harsh. What sticks in my craw is that the
world has to adjust to fit this new scheduler.
I have never seen X run nearly as smooth as our favorite proprietary
OS on similar
On Mon, 12 Mar 2007, Con Kolivas wrote:
There are updated patches for 2.6.20, 2.6.20.2, 2.6.21-rc3 and 2.6.21-rc3-mm2
to bring RSDL up to version 0.30 for download here:
Full patches:
http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/staircase-deadline/2.6.20-sched-rsdl-0.30.patch
On Mon, 12 Mar 2007, Con Kolivas wrote:
There are updated patches for 2.6.20, 2.6.20.2, 2.6.21-rc3 and 2.6.21-rc3-mm2
to bring RSDL up to version 0.30 for download here:
Full patches:
http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/staircase-deadline/2.6.20-sched-rsdl-0.30.patch
--- Con Kolivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> Interbench - The Linux Interactivity Benchmark v0.20
>
> http://interbench.kolivas.org
>
> direct download link:
> http://ck.kolivas.org/apps/interbench/interbench-0.20.tar.bz2
>
>
[snip]
> Audio:
> Audio is simulated as a thread that
--- Con Kolivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Interbench - The Linux Interactivity Benchmark v0.20
http://interbench.kolivas.org
direct download link:
http://ck.kolivas.org/apps/interbench/interbench-0.20.tar.bz2
[snip]
Audio:
Audio is simulated as a thread that tries to run
--- Lee Revell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 00:25 +0100, szonyi calin wrote:
> > --- Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> > Taking into account that nobody responded on lkml nor
> > on alsa (the message was awaiting modderator apr
--- Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
>
> Tangent: I would like to see requests-for-testing for FC
> kernels on LKML.
>
> If people announce -ac/-as/-aa/-ck/etc. kernels on LKML, why
> not distro
> kernels?
>
>
Because some people switched to other distribution also
because of
--- Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Tangent: I would like to see requests-for-testing for FC
kernels on LKML.
If people announce -ac/-as/-aa/-ck/etc. kernels on LKML, why
not distro
kernels?
Because some people switched to other distribution also
because of the
--- Lee Revell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 00:25 +0100, szonyi calin wrote:
--- Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Taking into account that nobody responded on lkml nor
on alsa (the message was awaiting modderator aprouval
on alsa-devel) i don't think i
--- Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 05:15:36PM -0800, Linus Torvalds
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > But when pressed about the issue of speed of development,
> rate of
> > change, feature increase, driver updates, and so on, no one
> else has any
> >
--- Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> > Grump. Have all these regressions received the appropriate
> level of
> > visibility on this mailing list?
>
> For the most part these things are usually known about by
> their upstream
> authors. To give an example: ALSA update in 2.6.10
--- Zwane Mwaikambo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Certainly -mm can be the feature tree, but i've noticed that
> not that many
> people run -mm aside from developers. Meaning that a fair
> number of bugs
> seep into Linus' tree before they get attended to. It would
> even be more
> effective
--- "Randy.Dunlap" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
>
> Maybe I don't understand? Is someone expecting distro
> quality/stability from kernel.org kernels?
> I don't, but maybe I'm one of those minorities.
>
yes. Some people (like me) would like to use from time to time
some _new_ stable
--- Randy.Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Maybe I don't understand? Is someone expecting distro
quality/stability from kernel.org kernels?
I don't, but maybe I'm one of those minorities.
yes. Some people (like me) would like to use from time to time
some _new_ stable kernel. It's
--- Zwane Mwaikambo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Certainly -mm can be the feature tree, but i've noticed that
not that many
people run -mm aside from developers. Meaning that a fair
number of bugs
seep into Linus' tree before they get attended to. It would
even be more
effective if we
--- Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Grump. Have all these regressions received the appropriate
level of
visibility on this mailing list?
For the most part these things are usually known about by
their upstream
authors. To give an example: ALSA update in 2.6.10 broke
sound
--- Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 05:15:36PM -0800, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
But when pressed about the issue of speed of development,
rate of
change, feature increase, driver updates, and so on, no one
else has any
clue of what to do.
--- David Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> back when I was doing PC repair (1.x kernel days) I
> started useing linux
> becouse the boot messages gave me so much info about
> the system (I started
> to keep a Slackware boot/root disk set on hand so
> when faced with a
> customer machine I could
--- David Lang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
back when I was doing PC repair (1.x kernel days) I
started useing linux
becouse the boot messages gave me so much info about
the system (I started
to keep a Slackware boot/root disk set on hand so
when faced with a
customer machine I could boot and
--- Jesse Pollard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >
> >
> > "This is almost always the result of flakiness in
> your hardware - either
> > RAM (most likely), or motherboard (less likely).
> "
> >
> > I cannot understand
> this. There are
--- Jesse Pollard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
This is almost always the result of flakiness in
your hardware - either
RAM (most likely), or motherboard (less likely).
I cannot understand
this. There are many other
stuffs
Hello
My name is Calin
I have a Cx 486/66 with 12 Megs of ram AST computer
gcc 2.95.3, glibc 2.1.3, make 3.79.1 binutils 2.11 ??
Problems:
1. When I try to run multiple (2) compilations on a
2.4.4 kernel usually one
of them dies -- if it's gcc - signal 11 , if it's sh
or rarely make -
Hello
My name is Calin
I have a Cx 486/66 with 12 Megs of ram AST computer
gcc 2.95.3, glibc 2.1.3, make 3.79.1 binutils 2.11 ??
Problems:
1. When I try to run multiple (2) compilations on a
2.4.4 kernel usually one
of them dies -- if it's gcc - signal 11 , if it's sh
or rarely make -
24 matches
Mail list logo
