On 2020-11-12 13:39:02 [+0100], Daniel Wagner wrote:
> With the current version signaltest + your test patch and 'taskset -c1'
> the results looks good again, around 230us (running since 2 hours). I've
> tested first without taskset and it took about an half hour to hit
> 350us. So pinning the thre
On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 07:05:18PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2020-11-09 15:37:03 [+0100], Daniel Wagner wrote:
> > > I've been staring at the code of signaltest on Friday and I might need
> > > to stare longer to figure out what it does.
> >
> > I hear you. Anyway, I gave the cu
Sorry for the late response, I had to reinstall my system after a FS
corruption...
On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 05:31:43PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > These test run only very short with hackbench as worlkload (5 minutes).
> > Though I running these tests now for more than year with v4.
On 2020-11-09 15:37:03 [+0100], Daniel Wagner wrote:
> > I've been staring at the code of signaltest on Friday and I might need
> > to stare longer to figure out what it does.
>
> I hear you. Anyway, I gave the current head a run with lazy preemption
> disabled as you asked for.
I just sent a few
On 2020-11-09 15:37:03 [+0100], Daniel Wagner wrote:
> > this looks odd. So rt1 has 415, rt2 has 399 and rt3 has 420 so lets say
> > it is the same. And then rt4 should reduce it to 340. The only part that
> > could have some influence is the are the highmem/kmap patches. But for
> > ARM64 these ar
On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 01:47:18PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> So it is the new migrate-disable code? If you have stable 100us you
> should be able bisect it within the few commits between rt13 and rt14.
Okay, I'll start a bissect in this range.
> this looks odd. So rt1 has 415, rt2
On 2020-11-06 17:14:13 [+0100], Daniel Wagner wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 11:54:47AM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > > rpi3signaltest 5.9.0-rc8-rt12
> > > 813 0_signaltest t0-max-latency : fail 214.00
> > > rpi3signaltest 5.9.0-rc8-rt12
> > >
On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 11:54:47AM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > rpi3signaltest 5.9.0-rc8-rt12
> > 813 0_signaltest t0-max-latency : fail 214.00
> > rpi3signaltest 5.9.0-rc8-rt12
> > 874 0_signaltest t0-max-latency : fail 217
On 2020-11-04 17:06:50 [+0100], Daniel Wagner wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 02:09:30PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > Could you figure out if the arm64 thingy started with -rt4 or was
> > already in rt3?
>
> I wrote a quick and dirty script to extract the data from my logs to see
>
On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 02:09:30PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> Could you figure out if the arm64 thingy started with -rt4 or was
> already in rt3?
I wrote a quick and dirty script to extract the data from my logs to see
if the regression might be older then I remembered. I filtered o
On 2020-11-04 13:47:46 [+0100], Daniel Wagner wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 12:19:48PM +0100, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> > Yes, Just fired up signaltest 5 times for arm64 and x86_64 with the
> > latest release. Keep you posted.
>
> arm64
> 1184 0_signaltest t0-max-latency : fail
On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 12:19:48PM +0100, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> Yes, Just fired up signaltest 5 times for arm64 and x86_64 with the
> latest release. Keep you posted.
arm64
1184 0_signaltest t0-max-latency : fail 386.00
1185 0_signaltest t0-max-latency : fail
On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 11:46:17AM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> How reproducible are these numbers? If these numbers increase between
> rt3 and rt4 then we have a hand full patches to look at.
Usually signaltest generated reproducible results.
I did see those higher numbers also for
On 2020-11-04 11:38:09 [+0100], Daniel Wagner wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 08:57:31PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > I'm pleased to announce the v5.10-rc2-rt4 patch set.
>
> All tests on passed in my lab. On arm64 and arm I saw slightly higher
> max latency values for signaltest a
On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 08:57:31PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> I'm pleased to announce the v5.10-rc2-rt4 patch set.
All tests on passed in my lab. On arm64 and arm I saw slightly higher
max latency values for signaltest and sigwaittest. Usually they are
below 200us but currently I se
Dear RT folks!
I'm pleased to announce the v5.10-rc2-rt4 patch set.
Changes since v5.10-rc2-rt3:
- Update Thomas Gleixner's "mm/highmem: Preemptible variant of
kmap_atomic & friends" series from v2 to v3.
- Compile fix PREEMPT_COUNT=n.
- Luis Claudio R. Goncalve reported a ptrace re
16 matches
Mail list logo
