Re: [BUG][PATCH] audit: audit_log_start running on auditd should not stop

2013-10-28 Thread Toshiyuki Okajima
Hi. (2013/10/26 0:12), Eric Paris wrote: > On Fri, 2013-10-25 at 10:36 +0900, Toshiyuki Okajima wrote: > >> systemd|auditd >> ---+--- >> ...| >> -> a

Re: [BUG][PATCH] audit: audit_log_start running on auditd should not stop

2013-10-25 Thread Eric Paris
On Fri, 2013-10-25 at 10:36 +0900, Toshiyuki Okajima wrote: > systemd|auditd > ---+--- > ...| > -> audit_receive |... >-

Re: [BUG][PATCH] audit: audit_log_start running on auditd should not stop

2013-10-24 Thread Toshiyuki Okajima
Hi. Thanks for your interest. (2013/10/24 4:55), Richard Guy Briggs wrote: > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 02:30:34PM +0800, Gao feng wrote: >> Hi Toshiyuki-san, > > Toshiuki and Gao, > >> On 10/15/2013 12:43 PM, Toshiyuki Okajima wrote: >>> The backlog cannot be consumed when audit_log_start is runn

Re: [BUG][PATCH] audit: audit_log_start running on auditd should not stop

2013-10-24 Thread Richard Guy Briggs
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 01:55:37PM +0800, Gao feng wrote: > On 10/24/2013 03:55 AM, Richard Guy Briggs wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 02:30:34PM +0800, Gao feng wrote: > >> Hi Toshiyuki-san, > > > > Toshiuki and Gao, > > > >> On 10/15/2013 12:43 PM, Toshiyuki Okajima wrote: > >>> The backlog

Re: [BUG][PATCH] audit: audit_log_start running on auditd should not stop

2013-10-23 Thread Gao feng
On 10/24/2013 03:55 AM, Richard Guy Briggs wrote: > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 02:30:34PM +0800, Gao feng wrote: >> Hi Toshiyuki-san, > > Toshiuki and Gao, > >> On 10/15/2013 12:43 PM, Toshiyuki Okajima wrote: >>> The backlog cannot be consumed when audit_log_start is running on auditd >>> even if a

Re: [BUG][PATCH] audit: audit_log_start running on auditd should not stop

2013-10-23 Thread Richard Guy Briggs
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 02:30:34PM +0800, Gao feng wrote: > Hi Toshiyuki-san, Toshiuki and Gao, > On 10/15/2013 12:43 PM, Toshiyuki Okajima wrote: > > The backlog cannot be consumed when audit_log_start is running on auditd > > even if audit_log_start calls wait_for_auditd to consume it. > > The

Re: [BUG][PATCH] audit: audit_log_start running on auditd should not stop

2013-10-15 Thread Toshiyuki Okajima
Hi Gao-san, (2013/10/15 15:30), Gao feng wrote: > Hi Toshiyuki-san, > On 10/15/2013 12:43 PM, Toshiyuki Okajima wrote: >> The backlog cannot be consumed when audit_log_start is running on auditd >> even if audit_log_start calls wait_for_auditd to consume it. >> The situation is a deadlock because

Re: [BUG][PATCH] audit: audit_log_start running on auditd should not stop

2013-10-14 Thread Gao feng
Hi Toshiyuki-san, On 10/15/2013 12:43 PM, Toshiyuki Okajima wrote: > The backlog cannot be consumed when audit_log_start is running on auditd > even if audit_log_start calls wait_for_auditd to consume it. > The situation is a deadlock because only auditd can consume the backlog. > If the other proc

[BUG][PATCH] audit: audit_log_start running on auditd should not stop

2013-10-14 Thread Toshiyuki Okajima
The backlog cannot be consumed when audit_log_start is running on auditd even if audit_log_start calls wait_for_auditd to consume it. The situation is a deadlock because only auditd can consume the backlog. If the other process needs to send the backlog, it can be also stopped by the deadlock. So