Re: [BUG] linux-2.6.11-rc3 probably in ACPI battery procfs ...

2005-02-09 Thread Stefan Seyfried
aurelien francillon wrote: > CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG=y This one is also bad for you. If you unset this, it will even run fast even without the object cache (i'm recompiling right now with object cache _and_ unset debug to see what i can gain from this :-) Maybe a patch like the attached one for the Kco

Re: [BUG] linux-2.6.11-rc3 probably in ACPI battery procfs ...

2005-02-08 Thread Aurélien Francillon
Stefan Seyfried wrote: aurelien francillon wrote: hi, since just before linux-2.6.11-rc3 ( i think it's rc2-bk10 ) there seems to have a bug in the acpi part of the proc file system : reading /proc/acpi/battery/BAT0/info takes a very long time and locks up the computer, time gives: cat /proc/acpi

Re: [BUG] linux-2.6.11-rc3 probably in ACPI battery procfs ...

2005-02-08 Thread Stefan Seyfried
aurelien francillon wrote: > hi, > since just before linux-2.6.11-rc3 ( i think it's rc2-bk10 ) there > seems to have a bug in the acpi part of the proc file system : > reading /proc/acpi/battery/BAT0/info takes a very long time and locks > up the computer, time gives: > cat /proc/acpi/battery/BA

[BUG] linux-2.6.11-rc3 probably in ACPI battery procfs ...

2005-02-07 Thread aurelien francillon
hi, since just before linux-2.6.11-rc3 ( i think it's rc2-bk10 ) there seems to have a bug in the acpi part of the proc file system : reading /proc/acpi/battery/BAT0/info takes a very long time and locks up the computer, time gives: cat /proc/acpi/battery/BAT0/info 0.00s user 6.76s system 12030%