Re: [Intel-gfx] [GIT pull] x86 APIC updates for 4.15

2017-12-11 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Op 11-12-17 om 12:06 schreef Thomas Gleixner: > On Mon, 11 Dec 2017, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > >> On Mon, 11 Dec 2017, Daniel Vetter wrote: >>> Anything else we can do to move this? I just had to resolve a small >>> conflict when moving forward to -rc3. Carrying a revert for the entire >>> apic

Re: [Intel-gfx] [GIT pull] x86 APIC updates for 4.15

2017-12-11 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Op 11-12-17 om 12:06 schreef Thomas Gleixner: > On Mon, 11 Dec 2017, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > >> On Mon, 11 Dec 2017, Daniel Vetter wrote: >>> Anything else we can do to move this? I just had to resolve a small >>> conflict when moving forward to -rc3. Carrying a revert for the entire >>> apic

Re: [Intel-gfx] [GIT pull] x86 APIC updates for 4.15

2017-12-11 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Mon, 11 Dec 2017, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Mon, 11 Dec 2017, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > Anything else we can do to move this? I just had to resolve a small > > conflict when moving forward to -rc3. Carrying a revert for the entire > > apic pull (too many deps to just revert the bisected

Re: [Intel-gfx] [GIT pull] x86 APIC updates for 4.15

2017-12-11 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Mon, 11 Dec 2017, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Mon, 11 Dec 2017, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > Anything else we can do to move this? I just had to resolve a small > > conflict when moving forward to -rc3. Carrying a revert for the entire > > apic pull (too many deps to just revert the bisected

Re: [Intel-gfx] [GIT pull] x86 APIC updates for 4.15

2017-12-11 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Mon, 11 Dec 2017, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Anything else we can do to move this? I just had to resolve a small > conflict when moving forward to -rc3. Carrying a revert for the entire > apic pull (too many deps to just revert the bisected patch) is a bit > annoying.

Re: [Intel-gfx] [GIT pull] x86 APIC updates for 4.15

2017-12-11 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Mon, 11 Dec 2017, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Anything else we can do to move this? I just had to resolve a small > conflict when moving forward to -rc3. Carrying a revert for the entire > apic pull (too many deps to just revert the bisected patch) is a bit > annoying.

Re: [Intel-gfx] [GIT pull] x86 APIC updates for 4.15

2017-12-11 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 12:13:27PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > Hey, > > Op 30-11-17 om 23:47 schreef Thomas Gleixner: > > On Thu, 30 Nov 2017, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > >> Op 30-11-17 om 10:18 schreef Thomas Gleixner: > >> # cat /sys/kernel/debug/irq/irqs/28 > >> handler: handle_edge_irq

Re: [Intel-gfx] [GIT pull] x86 APIC updates for 4.15

2017-12-11 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 12:13:27PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > Hey, > > Op 30-11-17 om 23:47 schreef Thomas Gleixner: > > On Thu, 30 Nov 2017, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > >> Op 30-11-17 om 10:18 schreef Thomas Gleixner: > >> # cat /sys/kernel/debug/irq/irqs/28 > >> handler: handle_edge_irq