Gisle S{lensminde wrote:
>
> Predictable data in
> the last DES subkey would probably open up for certain attacks.
>
meet-in-the-middle with complexity at most 2*2**54 if the last key is
known. The right way to do this would be to create a random key and use
that for encryption. However,
On Fri, 22 Sep 2000, Sandy Harris wrote:
> Gisle S{lensminde wrote:
>
> No. Adding data the attacker knows cannot make the attack harder to any
> significant extent. At best, it might increase attack overheads by some
> small factor. What you need for security are things that cost little or
>
Gisle S{lensminde wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Sep 2000, Alexander S A Kjeldaas wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Sep 22, 2000 at 11:46:02AM +0200, Gisle Sælensminde wrote:
> > >
> > > Since des_ede3(3des) now is added to the international kernel, it will
> > > probably be a good idea to add support for it in
On Fri, 22 Sep 2000, Alexander S A Kjeldaas wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 22, 2000 at 11:46:02AM +0200, Gisle Sælensminde wrote:
> >
> > Since des_ede3(3des) now is added to the international kernel, it will
> > probably be a good idea to add support for it in losetup, so here is
> > a patch to the
On Fri, Sep 22, 2000 at 11:46:02AM +0200, Gisle Sælensminde wrote:
>
> Since des_ede3(3des) now is added to the international kernel, it will
> probably be a good idea to add support for it in losetup, so here is
> a patch to the kerneli version of util-linux-2.10m / kerneli 2.2.17.3
>
> Since
Since des_ede3(3des) now is added to the international kernel, it will
probably be a good idea to add support for it in losetup, so here is
a patch to the kerneli version of util-linux-2.10m / kerneli 2.2.17.3
Since this is crypto-related the patch is found at the URL:
Since des_ede3(3des) now is added to the international kernel, it will
probably be a good idea to add support for it in losetup, so here is
a patch to the kerneli version of util-linux-2.10m / kerneli 2.2.17.3
Since this is crypto-related the patch is found at the URL:
On Fri, Sep 22, 2000 at 11:46:02AM +0200, Gisle Sælensminde wrote:
Since des_ede3(3des) now is added to the international kernel, it will
probably be a good idea to add support for it in losetup, so here is
a patch to the kerneli version of util-linux-2.10m / kerneli 2.2.17.3
Since this
On Fri, 22 Sep 2000, Alexander S A Kjeldaas wrote:
On Fri, Sep 22, 2000 at 11:46:02AM +0200, Gisle Sælensminde wrote:
Since des_ede3(3des) now is added to the international kernel, it will
probably be a good idea to add support for it in losetup, so here is
a patch to the kerneli
Gisle S{lensminde wrote:
On Fri, 22 Sep 2000, Alexander S A Kjeldaas wrote:
On Fri, Sep 22, 2000 at 11:46:02AM +0200, Gisle Sælensminde wrote:
Since des_ede3(3des) now is added to the international kernel, it will
probably be a good idea to add support for it in losetup, so here
On Fri, 22 Sep 2000, Sandy Harris wrote:
Gisle S{lensminde wrote:
No. Adding data the attacker knows cannot make the attack harder to any
significant extent. At best, it might increase attack overheads by some
small factor. What you need for security are things that cost little or
nothing
Gisle S{lensminde wrote:
snip
Predictable data in
the last DES subkey would probably open up for certain attacks.
snip
meet-in-the-middle with complexity at most 2*2**54 if the last key is
known. The right way to do this would be to create a random key and use
that for encryption.
12 matches
Mail list logo
