Hello Krzysztof,
On 02/15/2016 08:04 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 15.02.2016 22:38, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
In some of the DTSI this was under "soc" node, not at top-level.
Unfortunately we do not have consistency here - some DTSI have "soc",
Yes, I noticed this but as you said
On 15.02.2016 22:38, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>>
>> In some of the DTSI this was under "soc" node, not at top-level.
>> Unfortunately we do not have consistency here - some DTSI have "soc",
>
> Yes, I noticed this but as you said not all DTSI have a soc node
> and that's why I made it top l
Hello Krzysztof,
On 02/14/2016 03:44 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
W dniu 10.02.2016 o 03:30, Javier Martinez Canillas pisze:
All Exynos SoCs have the same syscon reboot and poweroff device nodes so
there is no need to duplicate the same on each SoC dtsi and can be moved
to a common dtsi that
W dniu 10.02.2016 o 03:30, Javier Martinez Canillas pisze:
> All Exynos SoCs have the same syscon reboot and poweroff device nodes so
> there is no need to duplicate the same on each SoC dtsi and can be moved
> to a common dtsi that can be included by all the SoCs dtsi files.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ja
Hi Javier,
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 12:00 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas
wrote:
> All Exynos SoCs have the same syscon reboot and poweroff device nodes so
> there is no need to duplicate the same on each SoC dtsi and can be moved
> to a common dtsi that can be included by all the SoCs dtsi files.
>
All Exynos SoCs have the same syscon reboot and poweroff device nodes so
there is no need to duplicate the same on each SoC dtsi and can be moved
to a common dtsi that can be included by all the SoCs dtsi files.
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas
---
Hello,
The patch was tested on an Exyno
6 matches
Mail list logo
