2014-05-22 19:27 GMT+08:00 Russell King - ARM Linux :
> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 07:04:14PM +0800, Barry Song wrote:
>> 2014-05-22 17:33 GMT+08:00 Russell King - ARM Linux :
>> > On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:40:33PM +0800, Barry Song wrote:
>> >> 2014-04-29 23:14 GMT+08:00 Russell King - ARM Linux
>>
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 07:04:14PM +0800, Barry Song wrote:
> 2014-05-22 17:33 GMT+08:00 Russell King - ARM Linux :
> > On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:40:33PM +0800, Barry Song wrote:
> >> 2014-04-29 23:14 GMT+08:00 Russell King - ARM Linux
> >> :
> >> > On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:05:06PM +0800, Barry
2014-05-22 17:33 GMT+08:00 Russell King - ARM Linux :
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:40:33PM +0800, Barry Song wrote:
>> 2014-04-29 23:14 GMT+08:00 Russell King - ARM Linux :
>> > On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:05:06PM +0800, Barry Song wrote:
>> >> 2014-04-28 22:52 GMT+08:00 Russell King - ARM Linux
>>
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:40:33PM +0800, Barry Song wrote:
> 2014-04-29 23:14 GMT+08:00 Russell King - ARM Linux :
> > On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:05:06PM +0800, Barry Song wrote:
> >> 2014-04-28 22:52 GMT+08:00 Russell King - ARM Linux
> >> :
> >> > On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:37:09AM -0400, Matt
2014-04-29 23:14 GMT+08:00 Russell King - ARM Linux :
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:05:06PM +0800, Barry Song wrote:
>> 2014-04-28 22:52 GMT+08:00 Russell King - ARM Linux :
>> > On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:37:09AM -0400, Matt Porter wrote:
>> >> The "fix" is tested against bcm281xx and bcm21664 as t
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:05:06PM +0800, Barry Song wrote:
> 2014-04-28 22:52 GMT+08:00 Russell King - ARM Linux :
> > On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:37:09AM -0400, Matt Porter wrote:
> >> The "fix" is tested against bcm281xx and bcm21664 as that is what the
> >> l2c cleanup breaks in -next. As mentio
2014-04-28 21:40 GMT+08:00 Matt Porter :
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:15:33AM +0100, Russell King wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 08:27:40PM -0400, Matt Porter wrote:
>> > l2x0_of_init() is executed unconditionally within the sirfsoc_l2x0_init()
>> > early initcall. In a multi v7 kernel this caus
2014-04-28 22:52 GMT+08:00 Russell King - ARM Linux :
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:37:09AM -0400, Matt Porter wrote:
>> The "fix" is tested against bcm281xx and bcm21664 as that is what the
>> l2c cleanup breaks in -next. As mentioned, I don't have the sirfsoc h/w
>> so this first attempt at a fix
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:37:09AM -0400, Matt Porter wrote:
> The "fix" is tested against bcm281xx and bcm21664 as that is what the
> l2c cleanup breaks in -next. As mentioned, I don't have the sirfsoc h/w
> so this first attempt at a fix also breaks their platform. It can be
> addressed by adding
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 09:29:51AM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 08:27:40PM -0400, Matt Porter wrote:
> > l2x0_of_init() is executed unconditionally within the sirfsoc_l2x0_init()
> > early initcall. In a multi v7 kernel this causes bcm281xx and bcm21664
> > platform to fail
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 08:27:40PM -0400, Matt Porter wrote:
> l2x0_of_init() is executed unconditionally within the sirfsoc_l2x0_init()
> early initcall. In a multi v7 kernel this causes bcm281xx and bcm21664
> platform to fail boot since they have their own pre l2x0 init sequence
> that is requir
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:15:33AM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 08:27:40PM -0400, Matt Porter wrote:
> > l2x0_of_init() is executed unconditionally within the sirfsoc_l2x0_init()
> > early initcall. In a multi v7 kernel this causes bcm281xx and bcm21664
> > platform to fail
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 08:27:40PM -0400, Matt Porter wrote:
> l2x0_of_init() is executed unconditionally within the sirfsoc_l2x0_init()
> early initcall. In a multi v7 kernel this causes bcm281xx and bcm21664
> platform to fail boot since they have their own pre l2x0 init sequence
> that is requir
l2x0_of_init() is executed unconditionally within the sirfsoc_l2x0_init()
early initcall. In a multi v7 kernel this causes bcm281xx and bcm21664
platform to fail boot since they have their own pre l2x0 init sequence
that is required. Fix this by checking that a matching OF ID is present
before call
14 matches
Mail list logo