2014-05-22 19:27 GMT+08:00 Russell King - ARM Linux :
> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 07:04:14PM +0800, Barry Song wrote:
>> 2014-05-22 17:33 GMT+08:00 Russell King - ARM Linux :
>> > On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:40:33PM +0800, Barry Song wrote:
>> >> 2014-04-29 23:14 GMT+08:00 Russell King - ARM Linux
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 07:04:14PM +0800, Barry Song wrote:
> 2014-05-22 17:33 GMT+08:00 Russell King - ARM Linux :
> > On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:40:33PM +0800, Barry Song wrote:
> >> 2014-04-29 23:14 GMT+08:00 Russell King - ARM Linux
> >> :
> >> > On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:05:06PM +0800,
2014-05-22 17:33 GMT+08:00 Russell King - ARM Linux :
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:40:33PM +0800, Barry Song wrote:
>> 2014-04-29 23:14 GMT+08:00 Russell King - ARM Linux :
>> > On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:05:06PM +0800, Barry Song wrote:
>> >> 2014-04-28 22:52 GMT+08:00 Russell King - ARM Linux
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:40:33PM +0800, Barry Song wrote:
> 2014-04-29 23:14 GMT+08:00 Russell King - ARM Linux :
> > On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:05:06PM +0800, Barry Song wrote:
> >> 2014-04-28 22:52 GMT+08:00 Russell King - ARM Linux
> >> :
> >> > On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:37:09AM -0400, Matt
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:40:33PM +0800, Barry Song wrote:
2014-04-29 23:14 GMT+08:00 Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:05:06PM +0800, Barry Song wrote:
2014-04-28 22:52 GMT+08:00 Russell King - ARM Linux
li...@arm.linux.org.uk:
On Mon, Apr 28,
2014-05-22 17:33 GMT+08:00 Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:40:33PM +0800, Barry Song wrote:
2014-04-29 23:14 GMT+08:00 Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:05:06PM +0800, Barry Song wrote:
2014-04-28 22:52
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 07:04:14PM +0800, Barry Song wrote:
2014-05-22 17:33 GMT+08:00 Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:40:33PM +0800, Barry Song wrote:
2014-04-29 23:14 GMT+08:00 Russell King - ARM Linux
li...@arm.linux.org.uk:
On Tue, Apr 29,
2014-05-22 19:27 GMT+08:00 Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk:
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 07:04:14PM +0800, Barry Song wrote:
2014-05-22 17:33 GMT+08:00 Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:40:33PM +0800, Barry Song wrote:
2014-04-29 23:14
2014-04-29 23:14 GMT+08:00 Russell King - ARM Linux :
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:05:06PM +0800, Barry Song wrote:
>> 2014-04-28 22:52 GMT+08:00 Russell King - ARM Linux :
>> > On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:37:09AM -0400, Matt Porter wrote:
>> >> The "fix" is tested against bcm281xx and bcm21664 as
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:05:06PM +0800, Barry Song wrote:
> 2014-04-28 22:52 GMT+08:00 Russell King - ARM Linux :
> > On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:37:09AM -0400, Matt Porter wrote:
> >> The "fix" is tested against bcm281xx and bcm21664 as that is what the
> >> l2c cleanup breaks in -next. As
2014-04-28 21:40 GMT+08:00 Matt Porter :
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:15:33AM +0100, Russell King wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 08:27:40PM -0400, Matt Porter wrote:
>> > l2x0_of_init() is executed unconditionally within the sirfsoc_l2x0_init()
>> > early initcall. In a multi v7 kernel this
2014-04-28 22:52 GMT+08:00 Russell King - ARM Linux :
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:37:09AM -0400, Matt Porter wrote:
>> The "fix" is tested against bcm281xx and bcm21664 as that is what the
>> l2c cleanup breaks in -next. As mentioned, I don't have the sirfsoc h/w
>> so this first attempt at a fix
2014-04-28 22:52 GMT+08:00 Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:37:09AM -0400, Matt Porter wrote:
The fix is tested against bcm281xx and bcm21664 as that is what the
l2c cleanup breaks in -next. As mentioned, I don't have the sirfsoc h/w
so this first
2014-04-28 21:40 GMT+08:00 Matt Porter mpor...@linaro.org:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:15:33AM +0100, Russell King wrote:
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 08:27:40PM -0400, Matt Porter wrote:
l2x0_of_init() is executed unconditionally within the sirfsoc_l2x0_init()
early initcall. In a multi v7 kernel
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:05:06PM +0800, Barry Song wrote:
2014-04-28 22:52 GMT+08:00 Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:37:09AM -0400, Matt Porter wrote:
The fix is tested against bcm281xx and bcm21664 as that is what the
l2c cleanup breaks in
2014-04-29 23:14 GMT+08:00 Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:05:06PM +0800, Barry Song wrote:
2014-04-28 22:52 GMT+08:00 Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:37:09AM -0400, Matt Porter wrote:
The fix is tested
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:37:09AM -0400, Matt Porter wrote:
> The "fix" is tested against bcm281xx and bcm21664 as that is what the
> l2c cleanup breaks in -next. As mentioned, I don't have the sirfsoc h/w
> so this first attempt at a fix also breaks their platform. It can be
> addressed by
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 09:29:51AM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 08:27:40PM -0400, Matt Porter wrote:
> > l2x0_of_init() is executed unconditionally within the sirfsoc_l2x0_init()
> > early initcall. In a multi v7 kernel this causes bcm281xx and bcm21664
> > platform to fail
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 08:27:40PM -0400, Matt Porter wrote:
> l2x0_of_init() is executed unconditionally within the sirfsoc_l2x0_init()
> early initcall. In a multi v7 kernel this causes bcm281xx and bcm21664
> platform to fail boot since they have their own pre l2x0 init sequence
> that is
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:15:33AM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 08:27:40PM -0400, Matt Porter wrote:
> > l2x0_of_init() is executed unconditionally within the sirfsoc_l2x0_init()
> > early initcall. In a multi v7 kernel this causes bcm281xx and bcm21664
> > platform to fail
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 08:27:40PM -0400, Matt Porter wrote:
> l2x0_of_init() is executed unconditionally within the sirfsoc_l2x0_init()
> early initcall. In a multi v7 kernel this causes bcm281xx and bcm21664
> platform to fail boot since they have their own pre l2x0 init sequence
> that is
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 08:27:40PM -0400, Matt Porter wrote:
l2x0_of_init() is executed unconditionally within the sirfsoc_l2x0_init()
early initcall. In a multi v7 kernel this causes bcm281xx and bcm21664
platform to fail boot since they have their own pre l2x0 init sequence
that is required.
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:15:33AM +0100, Russell King wrote:
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 08:27:40PM -0400, Matt Porter wrote:
l2x0_of_init() is executed unconditionally within the sirfsoc_l2x0_init()
early initcall. In a multi v7 kernel this causes bcm281xx and bcm21664
platform to fail boot
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 08:27:40PM -0400, Matt Porter wrote:
l2x0_of_init() is executed unconditionally within the sirfsoc_l2x0_init()
early initcall. In a multi v7 kernel this causes bcm281xx and bcm21664
platform to fail boot since they have their own pre l2x0 init sequence
that is required.
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 09:29:51AM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 08:27:40PM -0400, Matt Porter wrote:
l2x0_of_init() is executed unconditionally within the sirfsoc_l2x0_init()
early initcall. In a multi v7 kernel this causes bcm281xx and bcm21664
platform to fail boot
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:37:09AM -0400, Matt Porter wrote:
The fix is tested against bcm281xx and bcm21664 as that is what the
l2c cleanup breaks in -next. As mentioned, I don't have the sirfsoc h/w
so this first attempt at a fix also breaks their platform. It can be
addressed by adding
l2x0_of_init() is executed unconditionally within the sirfsoc_l2x0_init()
early initcall. In a multi v7 kernel this causes bcm281xx and bcm21664
platform to fail boot since they have their own pre l2x0 init sequence
that is required. Fix this by checking that a matching OF ID is present
before
l2x0_of_init() is executed unconditionally within the sirfsoc_l2x0_init()
early initcall. In a multi v7 kernel this causes bcm281xx and bcm21664
platform to fail boot since they have their own pre l2x0 init sequence
that is required. Fix this by checking that a matching OF ID is present
before
28 matches
Mail list logo
