Hi Andrew,
On Mon, 14 May 2007 23:34:01 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sun, 13 May 2007 01:43:42 -0600 Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > ---
> >
> > Here is the 3rd iteration with the following changes:
> > - Modified to be an
On 5/15/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, 13 May 2007 01:43:42 -0600 Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
>
> Here is the 3rd iteration with the following changes:
> - Modified to be an i2c "new style" driver based on
On Sun, 13 May 2007 01:43:42 -0600 Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
>
> Here is the 3rd iteration with the following changes:
> - Modified to be an i2c "new style" driver based on David Brownell's work
> - uses the new prototype for
On Sun, 13 May 2007 01:43:42 -0600 Grant Likely [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Signed-off-by: Grant Likely [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Here is the 3rd iteration with the following changes:
- Modified to be an i2c new style driver based on David Brownell's work
- uses the new prototype for
On 5/15/07, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 13 May 2007 01:43:42 -0600 Grant Likely [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Signed-off-by: Grant Likely [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Here is the 3rd iteration with the following changes:
- Modified to be an i2c new style driver based on David
Hi Andrew,
On Mon, 14 May 2007 23:34:01 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sun, 13 May 2007 01:43:42 -0600 Grant Likely [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Signed-off-by: Grant Likely [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Here is the 3rd iteration with the following changes:
- Modified to be an i2c new style
On Sun, 13 May 2007 01:43:42 -0600
Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Here is the 3rd iteration with the following changes:
> - Modified to be an i2c "new style" driver based on David Brownell's work
> - uses the new prototype for i2c_smbus_read_i2c_block_data() for block data
> reads
On Mon, 14 May 2007 11:29:04 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> BTW, I've just left the driver in drivers/i2c/chips. It seems
> sufficiently different from an rtc (and the interface is totally
> difference) that putting it in drivers/rtc seems wrong. If you
> disagree, I can change this.
That's fine
Ugh. Well that was a rather sloppy patch on my part. I'll fix up and resubmit.
On 5/14/07, Jean Delvare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Grant,
On Sun, 13 May 2007 01:43:42 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
>
> Here is the 3rd iteration with the
Hi Grant,
On Sun, 13 May 2007 01:43:42 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
>
> Here is the 3rd iteration with the following changes:
> - Modified to be an i2c "new style" driver based on David Brownell's work
Can we see the corresponding
Hi Grant,
On Sun, 13 May 2007 01:43:42 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
Signed-off-by: Grant Likely [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Here is the 3rd iteration with the following changes:
- Modified to be an i2c new style driver based on David Brownell's work
Can we see the corresponding architecture patch
Ugh. Well that was a rather sloppy patch on my part. I'll fix up and resubmit.
On 5/14/07, Jean Delvare [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Grant,
On Sun, 13 May 2007 01:43:42 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
Signed-off-by: Grant Likely [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Here is the 3rd iteration with the
On Mon, 14 May 2007 11:29:04 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
BTW, I've just left the driver in drivers/i2c/chips. It seems
sufficiently different from an rtc (and the interface is totally
difference) that putting it in drivers/rtc seems wrong. If you
disagree, I can change this.
That's fine with
On Sun, 13 May 2007 01:43:42 -0600
Grant Likely [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is the 3rd iteration with the following changes:
- Modified to be an i2c new style driver based on David Brownell's work
- uses the new prototype for i2c_smbus_read_i2c_block_data() for block data
reads instead
Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Here is the 3rd iteration with the following changes:
- Modified to be an i2c "new style" driver based on David Brownell's work
- uses the new prototype for i2c_smbus_read_i2c_block_data() for block data
reads instead of a single byte at a
Signed-off-by: Grant Likely [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Here is the 3rd iteration with the following changes:
- Modified to be an i2c new style driver based on David Brownell's work
- uses the new prototype for i2c_smbus_read_i2c_block_data() for block data
reads instead of a single byte at a time.
Hi Grant,
On Thu, 10 May 2007 14:37:54 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> Thanks for the comments Jean. I've got some questions/comments below.
>
> On 5/10/07, Jean Delvare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi Grant,
> >
> > On Mon, 7 May 2007 14:45:42 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by:
Hi Grant,
On Thu, 10 May 2007 14:37:54 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
Thanks for the comments Jean. I've got some questions/comments below.
On 5/10/07, Jean Delvare [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Grant,
On Mon, 7 May 2007 14:45:42 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
Signed-off-by: Grant Likely
Thanks for the comments Jean. I've got some questions/comments below.
On 5/10/07, Jean Delvare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Grant,
On Mon, 7 May 2007 14:45:42 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> drivers/i2c/chips/Kconfig | 10 ++
>
On Thu, 10 May 2007 13:48:50 +0200
Jean Delvare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know this isn't exactly a RTC chip, but this is still related with
> timekeeping, so wouldn't it be better placed under drivers/rtc?
> Alessandro, what do you think?
Hi,
I don't know if the rtc subsystem can
Hi Grant,
On Mon, 7 May 2007 14:45:42 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> drivers/i2c/chips/Kconfig | 10 ++
> drivers/i2c/chips/Makefile |1 +
> drivers/i2c/chips/ds1682.c | 363
>
> 3 files
Hi Grant,
On Mon, 7 May 2007 14:45:42 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
Signed-off-by: Grant Likely [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/i2c/chips/Kconfig | 10 ++
drivers/i2c/chips/Makefile |1 +
drivers/i2c/chips/ds1682.c | 363
3 files changed,
On Thu, 10 May 2007 13:48:50 +0200
Jean Delvare [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know this isn't exactly a RTC chip, but this is still related with
timekeeping, so wouldn't it be better placed under drivers/rtc?
Alessandro, what do you think?
Hi,
I don't know if the rtc subsystem can offer
Thanks for the comments Jean. I've got some questions/comments below.
On 5/10/07, Jean Delvare [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Grant,
On Mon, 7 May 2007 14:45:42 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
Signed-off-by: Grant Likely [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/i2c/chips/Kconfig | 10 ++
Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/i2c/chips/Kconfig | 10 ++
drivers/i2c/chips/Makefile |1 +
drivers/i2c/chips/ds1682.c | 363
3 files changed, 374 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644
Signed-off-by: Grant Likely [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/i2c/chips/Kconfig | 10 ++
drivers/i2c/chips/Makefile |1 +
drivers/i2c/chips/ds1682.c | 363
3 files changed, 374 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644
26 matches
Mail list logo