Hi Jeffrey,
On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 02:31:18PM -0600, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 5:15 PM Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 04:36:23PM -0600, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 3:33 PM Matthias Kaehlcke
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri,
Hi Jeffrey,
> On the msm8998 mtp, the response to the baudrate change command is
> never
> received. On the Lenovo Miix 630, the response to the baudrate change
> command is corrupted - "Frame reassembly failed (-84)".
>
> Adding a 50ms delay befo
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 5:15 PM Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 04:36:23PM -0600, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 3:33 PM Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 01:51:39PM -0600, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 1:40 PM
Hi Matthias,
>> On the msm8998 mtp, the response to the baudrate change command is never
>> received. On the Lenovo Miix 630, the response to the baudrate change
>> command is corrupted - "Frame reassembly failed (-84)".
>>
>> Adding a 50ms delay before re-enabling flow to re
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 04:36:23PM -0600, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 3:33 PM Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 01:51:39PM -0600, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 1:40 PM Matthias Kaehlcke
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Oct 18, 2019
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 3:33 PM Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 01:51:39PM -0600, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 1:40 PM Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 12:30:09PM -0600, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 12:03 P
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 01:51:39PM -0600, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 1:40 PM Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 12:30:09PM -0600, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 12:03 PM Matthias Kaehlcke
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Oct 17, 201
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 1:40 PM Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 12:30:09PM -0600, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 12:03 PM Matthias Kaehlcke
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 02:29:55PM -0700, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
> > > > On the msm8998 mtp, the r
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 12:30:09PM -0600, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 12:03 PM Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 02:29:55PM -0700, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
> > > On the msm8998 mtp, the response to the baudrate change command is never
> > > received. On the Len
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 12:03 PM Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 02:29:55PM -0700, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
> > On the msm8998 mtp, the response to the baudrate change command is never
> > received. On the Lenovo Miix 630, the response to the baudrate change
> > command is corrupt
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 02:29:55PM -0700, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
> On the msm8998 mtp, the response to the baudrate change command is never
> received. On the Lenovo Miix 630, the response to the baudrate change
> command is corrupted - "Frame reassembly failed (-84)".
>
> Adding a 50ms delay before
Hi Jeffrey,
> On the msm8998 mtp, the response to the baudrate change command is never
> received. On the Lenovo Miix 630, the response to the baudrate change
> command is corrupted - "Frame reassembly failed (-84)".
>
> Adding a 50ms delay before re-enabling flow to receive the baudrate change
On the msm8998 mtp, the response to the baudrate change command is never
received. On the Lenovo Miix 630, the response to the baudrate change
command is corrupted - "Frame reassembly failed (-84)".
Adding a 50ms delay before re-enabling flow to receive the baudrate change
command response from t
13 matches
Mail list logo