On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 02:44:42PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> No, it was unintentional, the 'if ACPI' can be dropped when we add
> 'depends on ACPI'.
So I have one fix already which takes care of non-sensical configs. If
you or Tony wanna make it prettier, feel free to test it thoroughly and
se
On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 12:42 AM Borislav Petkov wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 10:39:59AM -0700, Luck, Tony wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 05:10:13PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 04:32:06PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > > We cannot currently select ACPI_A
On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 10:39:59AM -0700, Luck, Tony wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 05:10:13PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 04:32:06PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > We cannot currently select ACPI_ADXL without also enabling the top-level
> > > ACPI option:
> > >
On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 05:10:13PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 04:32:06PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > We cannot currently select ACPI_ADXL without also enabling the top-level
> > ACPI option:
> >
> > WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for ACPI_ADXL
> > De
On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 04:32:06PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> We cannot currently select ACPI_ADXL without also enabling the top-level
> ACPI option:
>
> WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for ACPI_ADXL
> Depends on [n]: ACPI [=n]
> Selected by [y]:
> - EDAC_SKX [=y] && EDAC [=y]
We cannot currently select ACPI_ADXL without also enabling the top-level
ACPI option:
WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for ACPI_ADXL
Depends on [n]: ACPI [=n]
Selected by [y]:
- EDAC_SKX [=y] && EDAC [=y] && PCI [=y] && X86_64 [=y] && X86_MCE_INTEL [=y]
&& PCI_MMCONFIG [=y] && (A
6 matches
Mail list logo