On the day of Saturday 09 February 2008 Gene Heskett hast written:
> On Saturday 09 February 2008, Prakash Punnoor wrote:
> >On the day of Saturday 09 February 2008 Gene Heskett hast written:
> >> This has killed me both at boot time twice, once before NASH was
> >> running, and several times when
On Saturday 09 February 2008, Prakash Punnoor wrote:
>On the day of Saturday 09 February 2008 Gene Heskett hast written:
>> This has killed me both at boot time twice, once before NASH was running,
>> and several times when uptimes were a day plus, but has never reappeared
>> since the first time I
On the day of Saturday 09 February 2008 Gene Heskett hast written:
> This has killed me both at boot time twice, once before NASH was running,
> and several times when uptimes were a day plus, but has never reappeared
> since the first time I used the acpi_user_timer_override argument, and this
> i
On Saturday 09 February 2008, Andi Kleen wrote:
>> Sort of coming in in the middle of this because I just realized this may
>> have something to do with the "exception Emask" errors. I have an NF2, and
>> the
>
>exception Emask is a SATA problem. Shouldn't be caused by timer troubles.
The error st
Am Samstag 09 Februar 2008 schrieben Sie:
> On Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 04:51:05PM +0100, Prakash Punnoor wrote:
> > On the day of Saturday 09 February 2008 Andi Kleen hast written:
> > > We discussed this back then with Nvidia engineers and they stated
> > > that only NF5 would need timer overrides.
>
On Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 04:51:05PM +0100, Prakash Punnoor wrote:
> On the day of Saturday 09 February 2008 Andi Kleen hast written:
> > We discussed this back then with Nvidia engineers and they stated
> > that only NF5 would need timer overrides.
>
> Can I get a link which verifies your statement
On the day of Saturday 09 February 2008 Andi Kleen hast written:
> We discussed this back then with Nvidia engineers and they stated
> that only NF5 would need timer overrides.
Can I get a link which verifies your statement? I provided one which kind of
contradicts yours.
--
(°=
On Sat, 9 Feb 2008 15:18:52 +0100
Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sort of coming in in the middle of this because I just realized this may
> > have
> > something to do with the "exception Emask" errors. I have an NF2, and the
>
> exception Emask is a SATA problem. Shouldn't be caused
On Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 12:53:11PM +0100, Prakash Punnoor wrote:
> On the day of Saturday 09 February 2008 Andi Kleen hast written:
> > > Grr, I don't know why I am discussing with stubborn and/or arrogant devs
> > > like you seem to be. But I actually did what you wanted and as *expected*
> > > -
> Sort of coming in in the middle of this because I just realized this may have
> something to do with the "exception Emask" errors. I have an NF2, and the
exception Emask is a SATA problem. Shouldn't be caused by timer troubles.
This means in theory it could be that your sata driver if compiled
On Friday 08 February 2008, Prakash Punnoor wrote:
>On the day of Friday 08 February 2008 Andi Kleen hast written:
>> On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 04:13:35PM +0100, Prakash Punnoor wrote:
>> > Sorry, I meant the opposite. I needed the acpi_skip_timer_override
>> > kernel parameter for nforce2, thus no o
On the day of Saturday 09 February 2008 Thomas Gleixner hast written:
> On Sat, 9 Feb 2008, Prakash Punnoor wrote:
> > On the day of Friday 08 February 2008 Andi Kleen hast written:
> > > On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 08:00:39PM +0100, Prakash Punnoor wrote:
> > > > On the day of Friday 08 February 2008
On the day of Saturday 09 February 2008 Andi Kleen hast written:
> > Grr, I don't know why I am discussing with stubborn and/or arrogant devs
> > like you seem to be. But I actually did what you wanted and as *expected*
> > - as I
>
> Thanks.
>
> > said I understand that trivial piece of code you p
Also just to make sure you tested v3 of the patch when
you saw the failure, right?
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ
> Grr, I don't know why I am discussing with stubborn and/or arrogant devs like
> you seem to be. But I actually did what you wanted and as *expected* - as I
Thanks.
> said I understand that trivial piece of code you posted - your patch fails
> here for my nforce2:
That is 2.6.24 + my patch?
On Sat, 9 Feb 2008, Prakash Punnoor wrote:
> On the day of Friday 08 February 2008 Andi Kleen hast written:
> > On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 08:00:39PM +0100, Prakash Punnoor wrote:
> > > On the day of Friday 08 February 2008 Andi Kleen hast written:
> > > > On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 06:39:17PM +0100, Pr
On the day of Friday 08 February 2008 Andi Kleen hast written:
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 08:00:39PM +0100, Prakash Punnoor wrote:
> > On the day of Friday 08 February 2008 Andi Kleen hast written:
> > > On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 06:39:17PM +0100, Prakash Punnoor wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Yes, confirmed.
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 08:00:39PM +0100, Prakash Punnoor wrote:
> On the day of Friday 08 February 2008 Andi Kleen hast written:
> > On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 06:39:17PM +0100, Prakash Punnoor wrote:
> > > On the day of Friday 08 February 2008 Andi Kleen hast written:
> > > > On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at
On the day of Friday 08 February 2008 Andi Kleen hast written:
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 06:39:17PM +0100, Prakash Punnoor wrote:
> > On the day of Friday 08 February 2008 Andi Kleen hast written:
> > > On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 04:13:35PM +0100, Prakash Punnoor wrote:
> > > > Sorry, I meant the oppo
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 06:39:17PM +0100, Prakash Punnoor wrote:
> On the day of Friday 08 February 2008 Andi Kleen hast written:
> > On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 04:13:35PM +0100, Prakash Punnoor wrote:
>
> > > Sorry, I meant the opposite. I needed the acpi_skip_timer_override kernel
> > > parameter f
On the day of Friday 08 February 2008 Andi Kleen hast written:
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 04:13:35PM +0100, Prakash Punnoor wrote:
> > Sorry, I meant the opposite. I needed the acpi_skip_timer_override kernel
> > parameter for nforce2, thus no override. So this chipset is missing here.
> > At least
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 04:13:35PM +0100, Prakash Punnoor wrote:
> On the day of Friday 08 February 2008 Andi Kleen hast written:
> > On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 10:21:18PM +0100, Prakash Punnoor wrote:
> > > On the day of Thursday 07 February 2008 Andi Kleen hast written:
> > > > Replace the old "for
On the day of Friday 08 February 2008 Prakash Punnoor hast written:
> On the day of Friday 08 February 2008 Andi Kleen hast written:
> > On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 10:21:18PM +0100, Prakash Punnoor wrote:
> > > On the day of Thursday 07 February 2008 Andi Kleen hast written:
> > > > Replace the old "f
On the day of Friday 08 February 2008 Andi Kleen hast written:
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 10:21:18PM +0100, Prakash Punnoor wrote:
> > On the day of Thursday 07 February 2008 Andi Kleen hast written:
> > > Replace the old "for all of nvidia" quirk with a quirk containing pci
> > > device ID. I goobl
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 10:21:18PM +0100, Prakash Punnoor wrote:
> On the day of Thursday 07 February 2008 Andi Kleen hast written:
>
> > Replace the old "for all of nvidia" quirk with a quirk containing pci
> > device ID. I goobled this list together from pci.ids and googling and it
> > may be in
On the day of Thursday 07 February 2008 Andi Kleen hast written:
> Replace the old "for all of nvidia" quirk with a quirk containing pci
> device ID. I goobled this list together from pci.ids and googling and it
> may be incomplete, but so far I haven't had complaints.
> + QBRIDGE(PCI_VENDOR_
[This patch was originally in the old ff tree and was intended for .24; but
somehow got lost in the arch merge. Has also shipped with OpenSUSE 10.3.
I think it should go into .25]
This replaces the old NF3/NF4 reference BIOS timer override quirk with a device
ID list. We need to ignore the timer
27 matches
Mail list logo
