On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 10:37:37PM +, Adrian McMenamin wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 08:14 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 08:27:55AM +, Adrian McMenamin wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sun, 2008-02-03 at 21:29 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 08:00:47PM +0
On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 22:37 +, Adrian McMenamin wrote:
>
> The hardware is very flaky. If I add in delays to the bus start, it will
> detect the devices, but it's not brilliant. Registering an empty device
> got round that problem, at the price of testing for the earlier
> registration.
>
On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 08:14 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 08:27:55AM +, Adrian McMenamin wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 2008-02-03 at 21:29 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 08:00:47PM +, Adrian McMenamin wrote:
> > > > From: Adrian McMenamin
> > > >
> > > > T
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 08:27:55AM +, Adrian McMenamin wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2008-02-03 at 21:29 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 08:00:47PM +, Adrian McMenamin wrote:
> > > From: Adrian McMenamin
> > >
> > > This patch fixes the regression noted here:
> > > http://lkml.org/
On Mon, February 4, 2008 9:59 am, Paul Mundt wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 09:35:11AM -, Adrian McMenamin wrote:
>> On Mon, February 4, 2008 9:02 am, Paul Mundt wrote:
>> > My previous commit was directly from _your_ patch, given that your
>> > patches have a history of whitespace damage, th
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 09:35:11AM -, Adrian McMenamin wrote:
> On Mon, February 4, 2008 9:02 am, Paul Mundt wrote:
> > My previous commit was directly from _your_ patch, given that your
> > patches have a history of whitespace damage, this doesn't seem like much
> > of a stretch. It's true I n
On Mon, February 4, 2008 9:02 am, Paul Mundt wrote:
> My previous commit was directly from _your_ patch, given that your
> patches have a history of whitespace damage, this doesn't seem like much
> of a stretch. It's true I neglected to run it through checkpatch, I'll be
> more careful with that i
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 08:23:44AM +, Adrian McMenamin wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 10:10 +0900, Paul Mundt wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 08:00:47PM +, Adrian McMenamin wrote:
> > > From: Adrian McMenamin
> > >
> > This is useless if you are submitting the patch, especially if yo
On Sun, 2008-02-03 at 21:29 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 08:00:47PM +, Adrian McMenamin wrote:
> > From: Adrian McMenamin
> >
> > This patch fixes the regression noted here:
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/1/26/189 as well as whitespace issues in the
> > previous commit of th
On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 10:10 +0900, Paul Mundt wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 08:00:47PM +, Adrian McMenamin wrote:
> > From: Adrian McMenamin
> >
> This is useless if you are submitting the patch, especially if you're
> missing a mail address.
>
>From Documentation/SubmittingPatches
The
On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 08:00:47PM +, Adrian McMenamin wrote:
> From: Adrian McMenamin
>
> This patch fixes the regression noted here:
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/1/26/189 as well as whitespace issues in the
> previous commit of this driver and the memory leaks noted here:
> http://lkml.org/lk
On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 08:00:47PM +, Adrian McMenamin wrote:
> From: Adrian McMenamin
>
This is useless if you are submitting the patch, especially if you're
missing a mail address.
> This patch fixes the regression noted here:
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/1/26/189 as well as whitespace issue
From: Adrian McMenamin
This patch fixes the regression noted here:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/1/26/189 as well as whitespace issues in the
previous commit of this driver and the memory leaks noted here:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/2/143 (as well as one or two other minor
cleanups).
Signed off by:
13 matches
Mail list logo
