On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 10:37:37PM +, Adrian McMenamin wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 08:14 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 08:27:55AM +, Adrian McMenamin wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sun, 2008-02-03 at 21:29 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 08:00:47PM
On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 22:37 +, Adrian McMenamin wrote:
>
> The hardware is very flaky. If I add in delays to the bus start, it will
> detect the devices, but it's not brilliant. Registering an empty device
> got round that problem, at the price of testing for the earlier
> registration.
>
On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 08:14 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 08:27:55AM +, Adrian McMenamin wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 2008-02-03 at 21:29 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 08:00:47PM +, Adrian McMenamin wrote:
> > > > From: Adrian McMenamin
> > > >
> > > >
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 08:27:55AM +, Adrian McMenamin wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2008-02-03 at 21:29 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 08:00:47PM +, Adrian McMenamin wrote:
> > > From: Adrian McMenamin
> > >
> > > This patch fixes the regression noted here:
> > >
On Mon, February 4, 2008 9:59 am, Paul Mundt wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 09:35:11AM -, Adrian McMenamin wrote:
>> On Mon, February 4, 2008 9:02 am, Paul Mundt wrote:
>> > My previous commit was directly from _your_ patch, given that your
>> > patches have a history of whitespace damage,
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 09:35:11AM -, Adrian McMenamin wrote:
> On Mon, February 4, 2008 9:02 am, Paul Mundt wrote:
> > My previous commit was directly from _your_ patch, given that your
> > patches have a history of whitespace damage, this doesn't seem like much
> > of a stretch. It's true I
On Mon, February 4, 2008 9:02 am, Paul Mundt wrote:
> My previous commit was directly from _your_ patch, given that your
> patches have a history of whitespace damage, this doesn't seem like much
> of a stretch. It's true I neglected to run it through checkpatch, I'll be
> more careful with that
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 08:23:44AM +, Adrian McMenamin wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 10:10 +0900, Paul Mundt wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 08:00:47PM +, Adrian McMenamin wrote:
> > > From: Adrian McMenamin
> > >
> > This is useless if you are submitting the patch, especially if
On Sun, 2008-02-03 at 21:29 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 08:00:47PM +, Adrian McMenamin wrote:
> > From: Adrian McMenamin
> >
> > This patch fixes the regression noted here:
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/1/26/189 as well as whitespace issues in the
> > previous commit of
On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 10:10 +0900, Paul Mundt wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 08:00:47PM +, Adrian McMenamin wrote:
> > From: Adrian McMenamin
> >
> This is useless if you are submitting the patch, especially if you're
> missing a mail address.
>
>From Documentation/SubmittingPatches
The
On Sun, 2008-02-03 at 21:29 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 08:00:47PM +, Adrian McMenamin wrote:
From: Adrian McMenamin
This patch fixes the regression noted here:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/1/26/189 as well as whitespace issues in the
previous commit of this driver
On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 10:10 +0900, Paul Mundt wrote:
On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 08:00:47PM +, Adrian McMenamin wrote:
From: Adrian McMenamin
This is useless if you are submitting the patch, especially if you're
missing a mail address.
From Documentation/SubmittingPatches
The
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 08:23:44AM +, Adrian McMenamin wrote:
On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 10:10 +0900, Paul Mundt wrote:
On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 08:00:47PM +, Adrian McMenamin wrote:
From: Adrian McMenamin
This is useless if you are submitting the patch, especially if you're
On Mon, February 4, 2008 9:02 am, Paul Mundt wrote:
My previous commit was directly from _your_ patch, given that your
patches have a history of whitespace damage, this doesn't seem like much
of a stretch. It's true I neglected to run it through checkpatch, I'll be
more careful with that in
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 09:35:11AM -, Adrian McMenamin wrote:
On Mon, February 4, 2008 9:02 am, Paul Mundt wrote:
My previous commit was directly from _your_ patch, given that your
patches have a history of whitespace damage, this doesn't seem like much
of a stretch. It's true I
On Mon, February 4, 2008 9:59 am, Paul Mundt wrote:
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 09:35:11AM -, Adrian McMenamin wrote:
On Mon, February 4, 2008 9:02 am, Paul Mundt wrote:
My previous commit was directly from _your_ patch, given that your
patches have a history of whitespace damage, this
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 08:27:55AM +, Adrian McMenamin wrote:
On Sun, 2008-02-03 at 21:29 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 08:00:47PM +, Adrian McMenamin wrote:
From: Adrian McMenamin
This patch fixes the regression noted here:
On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 22:37 +, Adrian McMenamin wrote:
The hardware is very flaky. If I add in delays to the bus start, it will
detect the devices, but it's not brilliant. Registering an empty device
got round that problem, at the price of testing for the earlier
registration.
I
On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 08:14 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 08:27:55AM +, Adrian McMenamin wrote:
On Sun, 2008-02-03 at 21:29 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 08:00:47PM +, Adrian McMenamin wrote:
From: Adrian McMenamin
This patch fixes the
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 10:37:37PM +, Adrian McMenamin wrote:
On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 08:14 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 08:27:55AM +, Adrian McMenamin wrote:
On Sun, 2008-02-03 at 21:29 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 08:00:47PM +, Adrian
On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 08:00:47PM +, Adrian McMenamin wrote:
> From: Adrian McMenamin
>
> This patch fixes the regression noted here:
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/1/26/189 as well as whitespace issues in the
> previous commit of this driver and the memory leaks noted here:
>
On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 08:00:47PM +, Adrian McMenamin wrote:
> From: Adrian McMenamin
>
This is useless if you are submitting the patch, especially if you're
missing a mail address.
> This patch fixes the regression noted here:
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/1/26/189 as well as whitespace
From: Adrian McMenamin
This patch fixes the regression noted here:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/1/26/189 as well as whitespace issues in the
previous commit of this driver and the memory leaks noted here:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/2/143 (as well as one or two other minor
cleanups).
Signed off by:
From: Adrian McMenamin
This patch fixes the regression noted here:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/1/26/189 as well as whitespace issues in the
previous commit of this driver and the memory leaks noted here:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/2/143 (as well as one or two other minor
cleanups).
Signed off by:
On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 08:00:47PM +, Adrian McMenamin wrote:
From: Adrian McMenamin
This is useless if you are submitting the patch, especially if you're
missing a mail address.
This patch fixes the regression noted here:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/1/26/189 as well as whitespace issues
On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 08:00:47PM +, Adrian McMenamin wrote:
From: Adrian McMenamin
This patch fixes the regression noted here:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/1/26/189 as well as whitespace issues in the
previous commit of this driver and the memory leaks noted here:
26 matches
Mail list logo
